Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Cheney's 'Irresponsible' Speech

By Ray McGovern, AlterNet. Posted July 31, 2003.


With the administration taking the heat on 9/11, the vice president is once again making wildly unsubstantiated claims about Iraqi WMD.
Advertisement

When Vice President Dick Cheney comes out of seclusion to brand critics "irresponsible," you know the administration is running scared.

The last time Cheney was enlisted to do so was in the spring of 2002, amid reports that intelligence warnings given to President Bush prior to Sept. 11, 2001 should have prompted preventive action. Cheney branded such reporting "irresponsible," and critics in the press and elsewhere were successfully intimidated.

In the recently released congressional report on the 9/11 attacks, fresh attention is given to an item titled "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S." contained in the president's daily intelligence briefing on Aug. 6, 2001. Dana Priest of the Washington Post recently reported that this item stated that "bin Laden had wanted to conduct attacks in the United States for years and that (his) group apparently maintained a support base here." It went on to cite "FBI judgments about patterns of activity consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks." (The president has cited "executive privilege" in refusing to declassify this item.)

With the administration under fire once again, the vice president came off the bench on July 24 in an attempt to hit two birds with one speech: one, distract attention from the highly embarrassing 9/11 report released that day; and two, stem the erosion of the administration's credibility on Iraq. The absence of Iraqi WMD and the growing firestorm around the "16 words" in the SOTU speech, alleging Iraqi uranium purchases were becoming increasingly embarrassing for the White House. In the words of one Cheney aide, "We had to get out of the hole we were in."

But, alas, thanks to Cheney's speech, they have dug themselves in deeper. The centerpiece of the speech was his selection of quotes from the intelligence community's most authoritative assessment of the Iraqi threat: a National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) dated Oct. 1, 2002, and titled "Iraq's Continuing Programs for Weapons of Mass Destruction." The excerpts he cited were designed to demonstrate that Iraq posed such an urgent threat to the U.S. that it would have been "irresponsible" to shy away from using force to deal with it.

Inconveniently, experience on the ground in Iraq over the past four months has given the lie to the very NIE judgments that the vice-president chose to quote. Worse still, as Cheney knows better than anyone, it was largely the unrelenting pressure he put on intelligence analysts -- during his unprecedented "multiple visits" to CIA headquarters and in other ways -- that put them so wide of the mark.

In his unusual speech on July 24, Cheney cited four statements from the NIE:

  1. "Baghdad has chemical and biological weapons, as well as missiles with ranges in excess of UN restrictions. If left unchecked, it probably will have a nuclear weapon during this decade."

Digg!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Hospitals' Lessons From Hurricane Gustav
Health and Wellness: The pre-storm medical evacuation -- the largest in American history -- revealed some critical flaws in American hospitals.
By Sheri Fink, ProPublica. September 5, 2008.
Why McCain and the GOP Are So Afraid of Discussing the Economy
Election 2008: Whether rich, poor or somewhere in between, Americans always do better economically under Democrats.
By Frances Moore Lappe, Huffington Post. September 5, 2008.
Only in America Could a Two-Faced Creature Like McCain Attain Such Media Status
Media and Technology: Only in America could a man who has called the mainstream media his "base" run against that very same media.
By Rory O'Connor, AlterNet. September 5, 2008.

Advertisement