Anywhere But Here

By Tim Wise, AlterNet. Posted July 2, 2003.

Imagine that in Germany, government officials and teachers decided to develop a special curriculum for schools that would seek to instill in their students an understanding of the horrors of racism and intolerance.

Now imagine that this curriculum never mentioned the Holocaust of European Jewry, or Germany's persecution of Romany, Slavs, homosexuals, persons with disabilities, or any of the other groups singled out by the Nazi regime. Instead, this curriculum focused on the legacy of racism and oppression in the United States. Slavery, Indian removal, Asian exclusion and Jim Crow laws, all of it presented in clear and convincing detail, but nary a mention of anything even remotely similar done by the German republic itself.

This, of course, would be absurd. How, after all, can a nation possibly instill an anti-racist consciousness in its citizens if it refuses to look at its own culpability and focuses only on the crimes of others?

How indeed?

Yet apparently studying racism in other nations, while resisting any mention of the same in your own country, is completely appropriate when the teachers and students are Americans. Here, it is acceptable to teach of the European Holocaust (and it alone) as evidence of man's inhumanity to man.

At least this appears to be the case in Tennessee, where the state has developed an adult education curriculum to foster "appreciation for diversity," to be taught to persons seeking their high school equivalency degree. The only example of intolerance mentioned is the Holocaust.

Please don't misunderstand. As a Jew, I can viscerally appreciate the importance of studying the European Holocaust, and I have no doubt about its ability to teach certain universal lessons about how low-level prejudice can develop over time into widespread persecution and even genocide.

But these lessons can also be taught by discussing any of a number of this nation's own crimes: crimes which go undiscussed in the new course, "Learning the Holocaust." So far as Tennessee is concerned -- and the U.S. Holocaust Museum which endorses the curriculum -- there is nothing to be learned from chattel slavery; nothing to be learned from the Trail of Tears, which began on the very territory where the Holocaust will be taught as if it were unique in human history. Indeed, the author of Indian removal, Andrew Jackson, made his home not fifteen minutes drive from the offices of Tennessee's Department of Labor and Workforce Development, which has promoted the new study of Nazi terror so as to, in their words, "foster an appreciation for diversity, as more and more immigrants and refugees move to Tennessee."

Which begs the obvious question. How can learning about the mistreatment of Jews and other European sub-groups have any effect on the attitudes that people in Tennessee have towards those new immigrants, almost none of whom are European, but who are mostly Latino or Asian?

After all, despite ongoing prejudice occasionally flung our way, Jews are, for all intent and purpose (at least in the U.S.) seen as whites, accepted as part of the grand schema of European civilization; viewed as intelligent, hard-working and successful. People of color, on the other hand, are still typified as lazy, unintelligent, and prone to crime. Making students acknowledge the humanity of a group of white people -- however much this group may differ from most of them in terms of religion and certain cultural traditions -- is a far cry from convincing them of the rights of non-white immigrants, who don't look like them, who might not speak the same language, and who are routinely viewed as taking white jobs and soaking up welfare dollars.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »