Save the Nukes (From Terrorists)

By J.A. Savage, AlterNet. Posted April 15, 2003.

It won't be as dramatic as the surge in the price of gasoline, but the cost of 20 percent of the nation's electricity source -- nuclear power -- is about to rise. The increase will be to help strengthen the plants against terrorist attacks.

Thanks to the influence of the nuclear industry, though, the price will apparently not rise enough to cause nuclear power plant shutdowns for economic reasons. Neither is it likely to rise enough to pay for proper terrorism resistance.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is poised to require major "design basis" changes this spring -- the nuclear equivalent of taking a scrawny, pathetic physique susceptible to any local bully's jabs to an expensive gym for bulking up. Initial estimates are that the cost of power from fission will rise about 15 percent.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has been roundly criticized by environmentalists, and by some in Congress, for not reacting fast enough and with enough magnitude to keep nuclear power plants from turning into weapons of massive domestic radioactive destruction if hit by a terrorist attack.

"No matter how you feel about the war, this community is at risk of retaliation," said Rochelle Becker, a spokesperson for Mothers for Peace in Luis Obispo, Calif. The source she refers to is the Diablo Canyon nuclear plant. "Duct tape and plastic will not prevent exposure" in the event of successful terrorism, Becker added. Communities in on the Northeastern Seaboard are also raising the terrorism issue, particularly the New England Coalition on Nuclear Pollution.

Environmentalists' focus on potential terrorist effects on nuclear plants is long-standing, but was renewed in the wake of 9/11. For at least two decades, environmentalists have been trying to insert the issue of potential terrorist threats into the formal federal process for licensing nukes and radioactive waste storage to no avail. Still, the NRC has been advised by congress members that it had better do more than the flimsy (and super hush-hush) procedures put in place post-9/11. Congressional pressure is the main reason the NRC is planning new basic requirements for strengthening nuclear power plants against terrorist attacks -- in the hope of keep radioactivity bottled up in the reactors in the worst-case scenarios.

Early estimates are that new federal requirements will cost each plant about $30 million initially, with an ongoing annual cost of $10 million a year.

But even a 10 to 20 percent increase in the cost of nuclear power has been damped down by industry into something more than wimpy but less than optimal, say observers.

There's been a "cozy collaboration between a weak regulatory agency and a strong special-interest lobby," said Rep. Ed Markey (D-MA), of at least one private meeting between NRC staff and nuclear industry representatives. Markey, a member of the House Energy & Commerce Committee, said that notes obtained from that meeting indicated the nuclear industry collaborated with the NRC to develop its own security regulations and attempted to dismiss some security projects -- at the same time the industry was attempting to block legislation to strengthen security at nuclear power plants. "We are talking about public safety, and the consequences of toeing the nuclear industry's line could be catastrophic."

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »