News & Politics  
comments_image Comments

Verizon Wants The "Freedom" To Edit Your Internet

Verizon argues that it has the constitutionally protected right to decide which content you, as a customer, can access--that it is no different from a newspaper editor.

Last week, Verizon  filed a brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit laying out their various and sundry complaints against the Federal Communications Commission's Open Internet Order, which put net neutrality regulations in place for Internet service providers. The telecom giant is suing to have the FCC's order thrown out, and one of their legal arguments is raising  more than a few eyebrows. Verizon, per the court document, considers itself your Internet editor. Or your Internet editor-in-waiting.

It goes like this: the Open Internet Order says that Verizon, as a provider of broadband Internet, can't block or slow access to (legal) online content because they disagree with its message or are being paid by an outside party to do so. This is essentially how the internet has operated since its inception, and the Open Internet Order is intended to prevent ISPs like Verizon from becoming gatekeepers. Verizon, however, argues that it has the constitutionally protected right to decide which content you, as a Verizon customer, can access -- that it is no different from a newspaper editor:

Broadband providers transmit their own speech both by developing their own content and by partnering with other content providers and adopting that speech as their own.  For example, they develop video services, which draw information from, and are then made available over, the Internet.  Many also select or create content for their own over-the-top video services or offer applications that provide access to particular content.  They also transmit the speech of others:  each day millions of individuals use the Internet to promote their own opinions and ideas and to explore those of others, and broadband providers convey those communications.

In performing these functions, broadband providers possess "editorial discretion."  Just as a newspaper is entitled to decide which content to publish and where, broadband providers may feature some content over others.  Although broadband providers have generally exercised their discretion to allow all content in an undifferentiated manner, Order ¶ 14 (JA__), they nonetheless possess discretion that these rules preclude them from exercising.

This argument is  fraught with problems. Jeff Jarvis  observes that if Verizon is asserting editorial control over the content that passes over its pipes, then that implies  ownership of that content. "Does Verizon really want to be responsible for everything distributed on the net, including libel, theft, and other illegal behavior? I doubt it." Verizon cites as precedent  Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. FCC (1994), in which the Supreme Court ruled that cable companies enjoy First Amendment protection because they exercise editorial discretion in transmitting the speech of others, and are not merely neutral pathways over which speech is transmitted without restriction or interference. Internet service providers, per Verizon's reasoning, are no different.

But here's the hitch: it's tough for an ISP to argue that it isn't a neutral pathway when ISPs also benefit from laws that treat them as neutral pathways. For example, if you use your Verizon internet connection to commit copyright infringement, you might end up in a heap of trouble, but Verizon won't. The  Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998 says ISPs can not be held responsible if infringing material merely passes through their network. Indeed, when the Recording Industry Association of America sued Verizon to turn over the name of a subscriber thought to be engaging in copyright infringement, Verizon  successfully argued that they were "acting merely as a conduit for an individual using a P2P [person to person] file sharing program to exchange files," and were thus not legally obligated to release the name.

See more stories tagged with: