News & Politics  
comments_image Comments

The 5 Most Offensive Sexist and Homophobic Moves by Conservatives: This Month Alone!

From homophobic remarks to awful bills, here's a little roundup of a month of assault from the GOP.

A sign at NYC's 2011 rally for women's health.
Photo Credit: Sarah Seltzer


It seems like with every cultural step forward by the country on the whole, the right-wing has to take a few leaps backward--and women, gays and minorities are the victims.

This month has already brought some great moments: massive protests on May 1 and the historic cultural moment when a sitting US president endorsed marriage equality. But simultaneously the GOP and other conservative institutions have gone on what felt like a vengeful tear. Maybe these racist, sexist and homophobic statements and bills really just constitute business as usual, a continuation of the "war on women," but in contrast to progress, it most certainly brings the term "reactionary" into a new light.

It also shows that the war on women isn't just on women--it's on anyone who doesn't conform to rigid patriarchal gender roles.

Here are five of the worst offenses this month.

1. Watered-down VAWA act simulteanously slams LGBT people, immigrant women and native women. This is obviously the most egregious of the offenses, because it's happening nationally and until this year the VAWA act has not been politicized or used to hurt certain groups.

But this year is different.The GOP-led house, with what Debbie Wasserman-Schultz  assures is "a directive" from John Boehner, has politicized the issue by rolling back the bill's protections for LGBT Americans, immigrants whose status depends on marriage and the undocumented, and native women. Perhaps most shockingly, the new version initially required law enforcement to actually reveal the name of the accuser to the accused. This isn't happening in a vacuum.

Josh Glasseter wrote on Wednesday before the vote about the groups responsible for gutting these important protections: 

This time around, however, top Religious Right groups have rallied against the bill due to the protections it would extend to immigrant, Native American, and LGBT victims of domestic abuse. These groups, including the Family Research Council, Concerned Women for America, Eagle Forum, and the Southern Baptist Convention's  Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission, made noise on Capitol Hill and are most directly responsible for the events that will unfold in the House today.

It's petty, it's dangerous, and in this writer's opinion, it's pretty much anti-human decency. As Eleanor Smeal of the Feminist Majority Foundation said in her statement, "The House GOP VAWA reauthorization simply does not recognize that violence is violence and all victims deserve protection."

2. Hearing on abortion in DC excludes DC's female representative. Apparently the massive backlash--and viral photos--of Darrell Issa's all-male hearing about birth control didn't stop the same kind of shenanigans from happening at a hearing about Roe and abortion in Washington, DC:

Late this afternoon, a House subcommittee will  gather to hear testimony on a bill that would  prohibit abortions in D.C.—and only D.C.—after 20 weeks. Both the bill and hearing are the work of Rep. Trent Franks (R-Ariz.), who has said that he is constitutionally charged with imposing laws on D.C.

As we reported earlier this week, though,  one person won't be speaking at the hearing—D.C. Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton, who requested the opportunity to speak on behalf of D.C. constituents but was denied.  

Holmes Norton, never one to take things sitting down, has said that this is "bullying" behavior and vowed to fight back.

3. Rejecting Virginia judicial candidate because he's gay, then saying "Sodomy is not a civil right." In Virginia, members of the House of Delegates failed to confirm Tracy Thorne-Begland, an openly gay formal Navy officer raising children with his partner, as a judicial candidate.

His nomination had been seen as a given, with bipartisan support, until lobbying from "both the Family Foundation, a powerful conservative group that opposed his candidacy, and conservative lawmakers, who argued that his past indicated that he would press an activist agenda from the bench " according to the New York Times.

See more stories tagged with: