comments_image -

Wartime Luddite

My disgust with mass-mediated news about the war in Iraq drove me to consume fantastical versions of the same thing in "Children of Dune."
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.

 
 
 
 

Last week, when I knew the war was about to start, I stood at the edge of Cambridge Common watching the sun melt ice in a colonial graveyard. All around me students were swarming in and out of Harvard Square, their winter-pale arms finally showing because it was the first T-shirt day of the year. The brick buildings across the street were beautiful in the warm afternoon light, and I was having one of those melodramatic, world-is-about-to-end moments. I kept imagining what it would be like if my neighborhood were about to have the shit ripped out of it by cruise missiles.

But it isn't. All of the noises and explosions and dead people are going to be halfway across the globe. That frustrates me on a visceral, emotional level totally unrelated to policy-wonking and ideology and my intellectual grasp of what's going on in Iraq. From a purely psychological perspective -- and I think it's crucial to investigate our imaginations during wartime -- Baghdad is as real to me as Tatooine. But I want it to be real. Veins in my teeth real, as Arlo Guthrie might say.

Maybe that's why I spent most of last week obsessively watching the outrageously cheesy and bizarrely satisfying Sci Fi Channel miniseries Children of Dune, based on the eponymous book from Frank Herbert's epic series. The planet Arakis -- a.k.a. Dune -- is a war-torn desert planet ruled by despotic imperialists who have oppressed the local Fremen tribes in order to mine the planet for "spice," the most valuable substance in the galaxy. Spice is used, among other things, to facilitate faster-than-light space travel. Every planet needs it, and every ruler wants to control the galactic spice trade. Produced by giant, nifty worms who roam the sands of Dune, spice is integral to the planet's delicate ecosystem, which is constantly endangered by the imperialists who want to terraform the place and turn it into a big green park.

Of course, the show's writers had to leave out some details from the book. The Fremen leader Muad'dib, our hero, has inspired a galactic jihad, which sets the stage for the events in Children of Dune. Despite this omission, it's pretty clear the miniseries is supposed to be some sort of thousands-of-years-into-the-future vision of the Middle East.

My disgust with mass-mediated news about the war in Iraq drove me to consume fantastical versions of the same thing. I think it was because something about Dune prompted me to examine what disturbs me most about this war. Sometimes fiction is more helpful than what passes as fact.

In the Dune universe, an ancient jihad thousands of years before the books take place has cleansed the galaxy of "thinking machines," or computers, which were used in war to disastrous effect. As a result, war has become much more personal. Military leaders of the Fremen ride into battle on the backs of worms, and combat is often hand to hand. Souped-up human bodies have become the instruments of war, which means that each instance of violence is strongly felt. Human death means both emotional loss and a depletion in military force.

Children of Dune made me wish we had no thinking machines in our battles. If we have to make war, it would be better for us to fight like Luddites. It's too easy to unplug our ethics when machines target our enemies for us. Having to see the enemy, to realize that he or she is human, is profoundly important. It reminds us that every war is a battle against ourselves: a struggle against human horrors. Placing our bodies in combat reminds us -- soldiers and comrades of soldiers alike -- that war is a sacrifice.

Thinking machines are responsible for making Americans far more willing to endorse the Iraq war. Because technology promises an engagement with few U.S. casualties, there are none of the self-doubts the Vietnam War raised. Should we really be able to bomb Baghdad with no consequences to ourselves beyond the payments for our expensive weapons? Certainly it's true that smart weapons allow troops to hit very specific targets and minimize civilian Iraqi casualties. And that's great, if it works.

submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
Republican NLRB Member Accused of Leaks to Romney Campaign Resigns

By Laura Clawson | Daily Kos Labor

 
 
Record 45% of Iraq and Afghanistan Vets Have Filed for Disability

By Muriel Kane | Raw Story

 
 
President Obama's Memorial Day Address: "Honoring Those Who Made the Ultimate Sacrifice"

By Julianne Escobedo Shepherd | AlterNet

 
 
"Tubes": What the Internet is Made Of

By Laura Miller | Salon

 
 
Students at Stuyvesant Take Issue With Sexist Dress Code

By Jill F | Feministe

 
 
Chris Hayes on Memorial Day: Glamorizing and Justifying War with the Term "Hero"

By Julianne Escobedo Shepherd | AlterNet

 
 
Cory Booker vs. Philly Mayor Michael Nutter on Mitt Romney

By BooMan | Booman Tribune

 
 
How Florida Governor Rick Scott Could Steal The Election For Mitt Romney

By Judd Legum | ThinkProgress

 
 
Renowned Economist Simon Johnson Calls for a National Safety Board for Finance Ticking Time Bomb

By Lynn Parramore | AlterNet

 
 
Veterans' Gap

By Ed Kilgore | Washington Monthly

 
 
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 1 ]