GOP and Tea Party Mobs Determined to Raise Taxes -- On the Poor
America’s Republican/Tea Party contingent, who are defined by their dogmatic devotion to lower taxes as a panacea for everything, have finally found a sector of society they can comfortably saddle with a higher tax burden: the poor.
That’s right. These antitax zealots have concluded that fairness cannot be achieved in the country’s tax code as long as there are disadvantaged freeloaders who are allegedly not paying into the system. While they fight tooth and nail to protect wealthy individuals and corporations from contributing even modest amounts to the nation’s recovery, the rightist brigade is marching lock-step in favor of soaking the poor in order to heal the malaise on Wall Street and the misery of long-suffering bankers. Their battle cry goes something like this: “Half of the Country Doesn’t Pay Any Taxes At All.” Fox News has been pushing that theme for quite a while. For the past two years they headlined it on Fox Nation right at tax time.
This movement is not some scruffy assemblage of disorganized trust-funders seeking to upgrade their yachts. It is a coordinated campaign that has pulled together high-profile proponents from politics and the press. Here is a sampling of the breadth and unity of the movement and the message:
- Rick Perry (R-TX): We’re dismayed at the injustice that nearly half of all Americans don’t even pay any income tax.
- Michele Bachmann (R-MN): A system in which 47 percent of Americans don’t pay any tax is ruinous for a democracy.
- Sarah Palin (R-AK): The problem is more than 40 percent pay no income taxes at all.
- Orrin Hatch (R-UT): 51 percent don’t pay anything.
- Jim DeMint (R-SC): Over half of Americans pay no federal income tax.
- Mitch McConnell (R-KY): In fact, about half of Americans don’t pay any income taxes at all.
- John Boehner (R-OH): Fifty-one percent — that is, a majority of American households — paid no income tax in 2009. Zero. Zip. Nada.
- Eric Cantor (R-MD): We also have a situation in this country where you’re nearing 50 percent of people who don’t even pay income taxes.
- Alan West (R-FL): Currently we have some 40-45 percent of Americans who are not paying any taxes.
We’re not through yet.
- Donald Trump (R-HisOwnEgo): You do have a problem because half of the people don’t pay any tax.
- Bill O’Reilly (Fox News): 50 percent of Americans don’t pay any federal income tax now.
- Stuart Varney (Fox News): About half the people who work in America, half the households, actually, pay any federal income tax at all.
- Dave Briggs (Fox News): [A]lmost half of this country pays no income tax whatsoever.
- Gretchen Carlson (Fox News): But what does that mean when you factor in that 50 percent of the nation doesn’t even pay federal income tax? Is that fair?
- [Idiot Award Winner] Steve Doocy (Fox News): With 47 percent of Americans not paying taxes – 47 percent – should those who don’t pay be allowed to vote?
- Sean Hannity (Fox News): 50 percent of Americans no longer pay taxes.
- Neil Cavuto (Fox News): I’ve discovered nearly half of this country’s households don’t pay any taxes at all.
Oh yes, there’s more.
- Dave Ramsey (Fox News): This idea that 42 percent of Americans don’t pay anything…that’s just morally wrong.
- Brian Kilmeade (Fox News): Fifty-one percent of the country isn’t paying any taxes at all.
- Eric Bolling (Fox News): 43 percent of households don’t pay any federal tax.
- Glenn Beck (Right-Wing Radio): There was like 48 percent say they pay their right amount of taxes and 49 percent don’t pay any tax.
- Rush Limbaugh (Right-Wing Radio): Meanwhile, 45 percent of Americans pay nothing.
- Gary Bauer (Right-Wing Evangelist): But the reality is that nearly half of Americans don’t pay any income tax.
- Rick Warren (Right-Wing Evangelist): HALF of America pays NO taxes. Zero.
- Ted Nugent (Right-Wing Douchebag): This, of course, will not apply to those 50 percent of Americans who pay no income taxes.
Is there anyone who could seriously argue that this is not a coordinated effort aimed at demonizing low-income and working-class citizens? The conformity and ubiquity of the identical messaging from such a broad spectrum of players is audacious and disturbing. And what’s worse, it is entirely misleading.
First of all, claims that half the population pay no taxes at all are factually wrong. There are about 46 percent who do not pay federal income taxes, but most of them do pay many other taxes including Social Security, state and local, sales, property, gas, etc. Second, it should come as no surprise that those with little or no tax liability have little or no income. The majority of this group is comprised of senior citizens, students, the disabled, and the unemployed. Those are the folks the right wants to tap for new revenue rather than the rich, who they have taken to calling “job creators” despite the fact that they haven’t created any jobs since they got the Bush tax cuts a decade ago.
To put this into perspective, federal income taxes account for just 20 percent of all taxes. When you add them all up, people making $20,000 a year pay approximately the same tax rate as people making $500,000, give or take 5 percent. However, those earning a half-million have seen their rate decline almost 50 percent since 1980, while the rate for the 20K earners edged slightly higher.
What’s more, corporate taxes as a percentage of federal revenue dropped from 27.3 percent in 1955, to 8.9 percent in 2010. During that same time period individual income/payrolls as a percentage of federal revenue skyrocketed from 58 percent to 81.5 percent. Thus the burden of paying for our government shifted broadly from corporations to ordinary people (notwithstanding the Supreme Court Ruling that corporations are people). These facts prove that whole faux controversy over the tax liability of low-income Americans is, in technical terms, a crazy zombie lie.
Also worthy of note is that one of the main reasons many Americans owe no federal income tax is due to the earned-income tax credit that was introduced by Republican President Gerald Ford and expanded by Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush. And now the GOP is threatening to impose a tax hike on working people by opposing the extension of President Obama’s Payroll Tax reduction. This relief was passed as a temporary measure and is set to expire at the end of this year. Obama has proposed extending it for another year, but House Republicans are balking, saying “not all tax relief is created equal” (Rep. Jeb Hensarling, R-TX), and that tax reductions, “no matter how well-intended,” will push the deficit higher (Rep. David Camp, R-MI). Camp is a member of the deficit reduction-seeking super-committee. A spokesman for House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA), says the legislator “has never believed that this type of temporary tax relief is the best way to grow the economy.”
Really? Is this the same Eric Cantor who fought so fiercely for Bush’s tax cuts for the rich? Cantor, and the rest of the Tea-publicans, are putting their deficit-cutting necks on the line to raise the $120 billion that would be restored to the treasury by letting the payroll tax relief expire, but they will take the fight to Hell and back before considering the recovery of $800 billion from the expiration of Bush’s gift to taxpayers earning more $250,000 a year. Apparently Republicans are opposed to temporary tax relief when it benefits the middle- and working-classes, but they are wildly in favor of it when it benefits the wealthy.
How can the GOP get away with portraying themselves as tax-cutters while advancing an agenda that would increase taxes for most Americans who happen not to be rich? How can the Tea Party assert through their acronym that they have been “Taxed Enough Already” when they view seniors, and other low-income Americans as not taxed enough? And when will the media expose this brazen hypocrisy?