comments_image -

Tilting at Spin Mills

A new, rabbi-led, celebrity-backed group is attempting to do what is virtually impossible: stop gossip.
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.

 
 
 
 

As the world's axis tilts towards war, and as the spectre of terror looms most everywhere, some of Hollywood's biggest names have reassuringly banded together to fight ... gossip.

Never to be accused of self-absorption, the likes of Tom Cruise, Goldie Hawn, Susan Sarandon, Rene Russo and even Florence Henderson are the flag-bearers for a new group called Words Can Heal, founded and headed by a New York rabbi, Irwin Katsof.

Cruise, whose lawyer a year ago trumpeted a defamation judge's ruling that the actor was not gay, and whose earlier split with Nicole Kidman also set tongues wagging, has become the poster child of the group, which invites people to "take the pledge" on their website and leave gossip behind forever.

In New York's swish St Regis Hotel in late 2002, Rabbi Katsof gathered the faithful for a $1000-a-plate fundraising dinner, amid an American flag and banners declaring "no gossip" and "gossip-free zone."

"The first step is for people to acknowledge that gossip and verbal abuse cause real pain," says Katsof. "Once people admit they have a problem with gossip, they can take steps to improve their lives and the lives of the people they love."

Words Can Heal is a blend of patriotism, evangelicalism and Hollywood worship that has been likened to a Hollywood-influenced Army of God, erecting billboards, encouraging people to spread "nice" news (banners on its website show people whispering, "The new kid is nice, pass it on"), and distributing kits on how you and the whole family can change your gossiping habits.

This could all reassuringly be just an American phenomenon. While Cruise is prone to calling the lawyers, his Australian ex-wife is more circumspect in responding to rumors.

"They've said I'm gay, they've said everyone's gay," Nicole Kidman philosophizes in the December Vanity Fair. "I personally don't believe in doing huge lawsuits about that stuff. Tom does. That's what he wants to do, that's what he's going to do. You do not tell Tom what to do. That's it. Simple."

And if you're still in doubt, you can join an online "gay celebrity gossip club" in Cruise's name to discuss the matter, underscoring the good sense of Kidman's personal view: in the world of the Internet, gossip is unstoppable. It's a growth industry.

Do Katsof, Cruise et al. stand a chance of consigning gossip to the last millennium?

"No," confirms Illinois psychology professor Frank McAndrew. "You might as well ask people to stop breathing."

McAndrew and his team from Knox College, Illinois have studied the phenomenon of celebrity gossip. They gave more than 100 participants a series of articles about celebrities--ranging from Frank Sinatra (Mafia-ties gossip), Robert Downey, Jr (drug abuse gossip), and Courtney Cox (eating disorder gossip). The participants were asked to nominate which articles most interested them.

The conclusion? We're most interested in gossip about stars we perceive to be similar to ourselves, says McAndrew.

The professor says gossip serves a useful social purpose: it functions "in the evolutionary interest of individuals, as a means of enhancing individual status." He makes no distinction between gossip about people we know and people we watch on screen.

"The fact that we know so much about celebrities tricks us into being interested in them, because anyone we know so much about automatically qualifies as important people in our lives," McAndrew says. "Remember that our predisposition to be interested in gossip evolved in a world in which there were no celebrities.

"When I speak about 'enhancing individual status', I am referring specifically to acquiring social information that might ultimately improve our chances for social success in our group.

"Even though we know that, at some level the celebrity is not part of our social circle, our drive to acquire information about them is irresistible," he continues "Access to information about them is irresistible. Access to social information about others equals access to social power."

submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
Fox, Breitbart, and Ricketts Try to Bring Back D'Souza's Pseudo-Birtherism

By Steve M | No More Mister Nice Blog

 
 
Activists Speak Out Against Lack of Access to Bradley Manning

By Agence France Presse

 
 
NYPD Catches Sexual Assailant, Then Lets Him Go Free Because He Didn't Feel Like Being Questioned

By Jill F | Feministe

 
 
Gov. Scott Orders Purging of Florida’s Voter Rolls - Just in Time For Prez Election

By Adele Stan | Washington Monthly

 
 
Abortion Clinics Across Country Put On Alert In Wake of Georgia Clinic Arson Cases

By Robin Marty | RH Reality Check

 
 
Former GOP Congresswoman Blasts New GOP Women’s Caucus: ‘They’re Not Voting In Best Interest Of All Women’

By Josh Israel | ThinkProgress

 
 
Debbie Wasserman Schulz is Wrong on Wisconsin

By LaFeminista | DailyKos

 
 
Pro-Coal Group Pays People to Wear Its Shirts at EPA Hearing

By Heather Moyer | Sierra Club

 
 
Kids Inundate NY Governor With Concerns About Fracking

By Seth Gladstone | Food and Water Watch

 
 
Shareholders, Top Doctors Demand McDonald's Assess its Health Impacts

By Sara Deon | Civil Eats

 
 
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 1 ]