Human Rights

Isn't Free Speech Important Enough to Tolerate Fred Phelps Screaming 'F*ggot' at the Funerals of Dead Soldiers?

More, rather than less speech remains the best way to combat the kind of bile peddled by Phelps and his ilk.

Last week, Arizona passed an ordinance barring protests within sight of funerals. It's the latest in a slew of popular laws that criminalize the very unpopular political expression of Fred Phelps and his clan from the Westboro Baptist Church – the “God Hates Fags” freakshow. They're very popular but very un-American, because our Constitutional protections don't exist to protect popular speech.

People like these laws because they represent basic common sense. Of course one shouldn't be able to wave signs at military funerals declaring God's distaste for “fags” and rejoicing in those soldiers' deaths. But the freedom of speech and expression is a core liberty, and as such, it shouldn't be subject to the sensitivities of the community. It should never be subjected to a popular referendum, nor limited in response to some current outrage – to the “passions of the day.”

Of course, we tolerate other restrictions on our right to speak, assemble, and yes, offend others. You can't yell fire in a crowded theater (unless it's on fire, of course), and “fighting words” aren't protected. Neither is slanderous or obscene speech.

But what distinguishes those exceptions from efforts to limit political speech near funerals is that every other limit on our right to speak and assemble is based on an argument – whether valid or not – that it's necessary to prevent some harm from coming to others. Not discomfort or emotional distress, but some demonstrable harm. These laws are only meant to shield mourners' sensitivities – and those of the larger community – from political views, or at least tactics, that most of us find repellent.

These laws are as likely to pass Constitutional muster as the “free speech” zones that have become increasingly common at political conventions – the courts have held that the government can regulate the time, place and manner of speech – and they're just as wrong. Despite their popularity, these laws affect all of our liberties – Fred Phelps' right to express views in a way that is decidedly outside the mainstream is inextricably connected to my own ability to express unpopular views without being subject to arrest by the police.

It's hard for people to grasp that connection because the Westboro Baptist clan is generally thought to occupy a space far out on the fringe of America's political culture. Decent Americans don't want the right to slur gays at funerals, but the question is: who gets to determine what speech is so offensive that we have to throw out the First Amendment to ban it? Where is that line, and how do we know we may not one day end up on the wrong side of it?

Having spent a day talking to Phelps and his followers as I followed them from protest to protest in Topeka, Kansas a few years back, I can report that their views are in fact fairly common among right-wing Christians.

Of course, only a tiny minority of religious conservatives would agree that “God hates fags,” and the number who would put that message on placards and wave them at funerals for troops killed in Iraq or Afghanistan is, thankfully, more or less limited to Fred Phelps and the numerous offspring who make up his “congregation.”

But it is only their shtick that's way out there. Their patently offensive rhetoric – and choices of venue – explain why nobody ever mentions how pedestrian their religious, social and political views actually are.

Like millions of religious conservatives, they believe that America is a Christian nation that is currently in decline because of the moral degradation of its culture. Homosexuality, abortion and other deviations from (their interpretation of) Biblical scripture are ultimately to blame for our nation's problems, including the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Their crazy displays are simply an out-there but entirely logical extension of a belief held by many Christian conservatives that the National Review's Peter Wehner once described as being as “neat as a mathematical equation.”

God grants blessings and curses on nations and people based on their allegiance and obedience to Him. If things are going well, you're living right; if things are going badly, you're living wrong.

Wehner wrote that last year, after Pat Robertson blamed the earthquake that rocked Haiti on a “pact with the Devil.” Robertson also agreed with Jerry Falwell when the latter blamed the 9/11 attacks on “the pagans, and the abortionists, and the feminists, and the gays and the lesbians who are actively trying to make that an alternative lifestyle, the ACLU [and] People For the American Way.” Robertson also blamed Hurricane Katrina on legalized abortion, which other more-or-less mainstream conservative religious leaders like Chuck Colson and Hal Lindsey also saw as God's punishment for our sinful lifestyles. John Hagee said it clearly: "I believe that New Orleans had a level of sin that was offensive to God, and they were recipients of the judgment of God for that."  

The main difference between these more acceptable preachers and Fred Phelps is simply a matter of tactics – Phelps shows the courage of his convictions, while Robertson, Falwell and those others who believe that homosexuality causes devastating natural disasters were content to whine about it on the Christian Broadcasting Network, maybe raise a few dollars from the gullible, and leave it at that.

It's worth noting that the alternative to these laws – citizens exercising their own rights to assemble and speak out in order to confront the bile of hate-mongers like Phelps – works quite well. After the Westboro Baptist Church protested the funeral of hate-crime victim Matthew Shepard, a group called Angels Action was formed. The angels are volunteers who don long angels' wings and physically block the Phelps clan's execrable message from the eyes of people mourning for their lost loved ones.

Absent the imminent likelihood of violence or criminality resulting from some form of speech, that's the way it's supposed to work in a free society. More, rather than less speech remains the best way to combat the kind of bile peddled by Phelps and his ilk.  

Sign Up!
Get AlterNet's Daily Newsletter in Your Inbox
+ sign up for additional lists
[x]
Select additional lists by selecting the checkboxes below before clicking Subscribe:
Activism
Drugs
Economy
Education
Environment
Food
Media
World