Tea Party and the Right  
comments_image Comments

Tentherism: The Bizarre Ideology Behind Tea Partiers' Plans to Kill Social Security and Child Labor Laws

Tentherism is an anachronistic Constitutional theory embraced by a slate of GOP candidates bent on dismantling 100 years of progress.
 
 
Share
 

More than seventy years ago, the Supreme Court abandoned a brief, disastrous experiment with " tentherism," a constitutional theory that early twentieth century justices wielded to  protect monopolies, strip workers of their  right to organize and knock down  child labor laws. This discredited constitutional theory is back -- with a vengeance -- endangering  MedicareSocial Security, the  minimum wage and even the national  highway system and America's membership in the United Nations. For the first time in three generations, the right is fielding a slate of candidates convinced that any attempt to better the lives of ordinary Americans violates the Constitution -- while a number of sitting lawmakers such as Reps.  John Shadegg (R-AZ) and Donald Manzullo (R-IL) are already actively pushing tentherism from within the Congress. Make no mistake, this agenda threatens all Americans, from the youngest schoolchild to the most venerable retirees.

SLAMMING SCHOOLHOUSE DOORS:  Tentherism's core tenet is that the 10th Amendment must be read  too narrowly to permit much of the progress of the last century. Thus, for example, because the Constitution doesn't actually use the word "education" -- it instead gives Congress broad authority to  spend money to advance the "common defense" and "general welfare" -- Senate candidates like  Ken Buck (R-CO) and  Sharron Angle (R-NV) claim that the federal Department of Education is unconstitutional. That means no federal  student loan assistance or Pell Grants for middle class students struggling to pay for college, and no education funds providing  opportunities to students desperately trying to break into the middle class. And that's hardly the worst news tenthers have in store for young Americans. Alaska GOP Senate candidate Joe Miller wants to  declare child labor laws unconstitutional -- returning America to the day when  ten-year-olds labored in coal mines.

THANKLESS LABOR:  Tenther candidates have even worse plans for working age Americans.  Miller and West Virginia GOP Senate candidate  John Raese both claim that the federal minimum wage is unconstitutional -- a position the Supreme Court  unanimously rejected in 1941. If you're a person of color or a woman or a person of faith than you are also out of luck, because Kentucky GOP Senate candidate  Rand Paulagrees with  Justice Clarence Thomas that the ban on employment and pay discrimination is unconstitutional (don't try to get a meal on your lunch break either, because both men feel the same way about the  ban on whites-only lunch counters). Significantly, the constitutional doctrine which supports the minimum wage is the  same one which supports child labor laws and bans on discrimination, so when a candidate comes out in opposition to any one of these laws, it is likely that they  oppose all of them. To top this all off, Alaska's Miller even claims that  unemployment benefits violate the Constitution, so Americans who are unable to find work in the new tenther regime will simply be cast out into the cold.

AN IMPOVERISHED RETIREMENT Social Security may be the most successful program in American history. Without it, nearly  half of all seniors would live below the poverty line. Yet, because words like "retirement" don't specifically appear in the Constitution, tenthers think that Social Security is forbidden. Indeed, Social Security has not just been  labeled unconstitutional by specific GOP candidates, the Republican Party's "Pledge To America" embraces a tenther understanding of the Constitution which  endangers both Social Security and Medicare. Tenthers respond to claims that they would abolish America's entire safety net for seniors by pointing out that state governments could still create their own retirement programs, but such a state takeover of retirement programs is  economically impossible unless America forbids its citizens from retiring in a different state than the one that they paid taxes in while working. Some tenther candidates have also suggested that Social Security can survive so long as it is privatized, but privatization would impose significant new risks on seniorscreate new administrative costs, force benefit reductions and cost more money than the present system. In other words, the right has a simple plan for American families: making sure that everyone at the dinner table is completely on their own.

 
See more stories tagged with: