Immigration Crisis: Is Michigan About to Become Another Arizona?

DETROIT--Information on newly proposed Michigan HB 6256 known as the "Immigration Law Enforcement Act" was gathered during a hearing administered by the Michigan Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights June 18 inside Wayne State University's (WSU) Spencer M. Partrich Auditorium. The bill is similar to Arizona SB 1070 that prevents illegal immigration.

Provisions of HB 6256 bill allow police officers to arrest and detain people with sufficient reasonable suspicion they are in the U.S. illegally.

Those in the U.S. unlawfully may be deported back to their country of origin.

Failing to provide proof of insurance, registration, operator license or alien registration documents while accused of an infraction can trigger reasonable suspicion.

The bill was introduced June 10 by Reps. Meltzer, Marleau, Lund, Walsh, Knollenberg, Haines, Rogers Kowall, Rick Jones, Proos, Ball, Calley, Kurtz, Crawford, Horn, Daley, Moore, Haveman and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.

Panel guests included Meltzer; Oakland County Commissioner Jim Runestad; Kenneth Grabowski, legislative director, Police Officers Association of Michigan; Kary Moss, executive director, ACLU of Michigan; Hassan Jaber, executive director, ACCESS; and Ethriam Brammer, Center for Chicano-Boricua Studies, WSU.

"I think not having their documents with them would be reasonable suspicion. It is within the discretion of the law enforcement officer to write them a ticket at that point for not having that and letting that person go, or proceeding to take them in and arrest them and verify whether they are here legally or not," Rep. Kim Meltzer (R-MI) said.

The bill turns illegal immigrants over to the federal agency, makes it a crime not to carry alien registration documents and is a reinforcement of the federal immigration law that exists today according to Meltzer.

"Nothing really is changing in this law. The federal law requires a person who is a legal alien to carry their legal documents, that's been the case since 1940," Runestad said.

According to Runestad, police officers are prohibited from approaching people and enforcing the law if no infraction was made.

The discussion was led by questions from Imad Hamad, Michigan regional director for the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee; Lawrence Almeda, chairperson, Michigan Advisory Committee; Donna Budnick; Joyce-Herron-Taylor; Jayashree Kommareddi and Arthur White.

Attendees raised concerns the bill promotes racial profiling.

Hamad said leaving the issue of illegal immigration to the discretion of police officers could have disastrous affects.

"They can't relay on police officers not to impose their own personal bias while enforcing the law. The bill opens the door for racial judgment. It's going to have a chilling effect not only on Arab Americans but the larger immigrant community. People of color will be severely affected," Hamad said.

Jaber thinks one's foreign accent and appearance could push police officers to ask more questions.

"It's a fact that profiling is a disease. This law, this legislation will only add to that disease," Jaber said.

"Just because one says there are weapons of mass destruction does not mean they actually exist, and just because one says there won't be any racial profiling does not mean there won't be in daily practice, Brammer said.

Runestad said the law doesn't enforce racial profiling.

"It is absolutely not racial profiling. In fact the provisions of the Arizona and Michigan law strictly prohibit racial profiling. It's actually part of the law that you can not racial profile. A police officer is not allowed to look at a person and make a judgment call about their race in determining and enforcing this law," Runestad said.