comments_image -

Judge Nixes 'National Prayer Day' But Obama Administration Will Fight to Protect Christian Right

A federal judge ruled that National Prayer Day's 'sole purpose is to encourage citizens to engage in prayer, an inherently religious exercise.'
 
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.

 
 
 
 

Editor's Note: This story has been updated to reflect breaking news.

On Tax Day last week, a federal judge in Wisconsin overturned a 58-year infringement on Americans' constitutional rights. In her ruling, Judge Barbara B. Crabb wrote that the National Day of Prayer Proclamation violates the First Amendment.

The case, Freedom From Religion Foundation v Barack Obama & Robert Gibbs, was originally filed against George W. Bush in 2008. In the judgment, Crabb wrote that the National Day of Prayer "goes beyond mere 'acknowledgment' of religion because its sole purpose is to encourage citizens to engage in prayer, an inherently religious exercise that serves no secular function in this context. In this instance, the government has taken sides on a matter that must be left to individual conscience." She continued by quoting a legal precedent: "When the government associates one set of religious beliefs with the state and identifies nonadherents as outsiders, it encroaches upon the individual's decision about whether and how to worship."

Annie Laurie Gaylor, co-president of the Freedom from Religion Foundation (FFRF), said she was very happy with the judge's decision. According to Gaylor, the FFRF -- a Madison-based organization that promotes the separation between church and state and educates on atheism, agnosticism and nontheism -- decided to file the suit because it was a "good way to show the entanglement between private religion and government."

The National Day of Prayer has been rather entangled with private religion since its official roots in 1952, when the Rev. Billy Graham suggested it as the only way to bring Americans back to God. Members of Congress introduced a joint resolution for an annual prayer day, with one senator calling it a measure against "the corrosive forces of communism which seek simultaneously to destroy our democratic way of life and the faith in Almighty God on which it is based."

Until 1988, each president picked a date for the National Day of Prayer, but that year, Ronald Reagan amended the law so that it would be held each year on the first Thursday in May. While Reagan's proclamation made the prayer day seem universal and inclusive, saying all could pray in "his or her own manner" and including meditation alongside prayer, it also included a quote from Leviticus in the Christian Bible and references "God," indicating monotheism.

Though the prayer day is touted by supporters as a way for all Americans of all faiths to come together, critics believe it is nothing more than a Christian National Day of Prayer. It started with Billy Graham, moved onto Reagan and the culture warriors, and today it is managed mostly by the National Day of Prayer Task Force, an organization whose name makes it sound governmental, but which is actually entirely housed within Focus on the Family, a major actor in the Christian right's efforts to influence public policy.

According to Gaylor, the FFRF's research showed that in 2008, 30 state governors used the exact wording, Scripture verse or some version of the press release provided by the Task Force in their official proclamations. That same year, President Bush used the Task Force's language as his own National Day of Prayer Proclamation.

Judge Crabb, in her ruling, referenced the National Day of Prayer Task Force's open exclusion of non-Christian groups, particularly Muslims, at its events. And, like the FFRF, the judge saw that the National Day of Prayer generally seemed to exclude non-Christian, non-Abrahamic, non-messianic religions -- not to mention all other belief systems and worldviews, including atheism.

This led Crabb to rule that the National Day of Prayer violates the First Amendment, which states that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."

submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Alternet Special Coverage - Occupy Wall Street
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
Running Out of Oxygen? Gingrich Loses Crucial Campaign Donor

By Ed Kilgore | Washington Monthly Political Animal

 
 
FBI File Chronicled Steve Jobs' LSD Use

By Hunter R. Slaton | The Fix

 
 
Will Millennials Back Obama in 2012?

By Bill Moyers | BillMoyers.com

 
 
Financial Services Committee Chair Rep. Bachus is Investigated for Insider Trading

By Staff | AlterNet

 
 
White House Announces Birth Control "Accommodations" for Religious Groups: Insurance Companies Will Pay, So Women Will Still be Covered

By Jodi Jacobson | RH Reality Check

 
 
Is the Catholic Church Just a Super PAC in Robes?

By Steve M. | No More Mister Nice Blog

 
 
Amid General Strike, 7,000 Protest Austerity in Greece, And Violence Erupts Between Demonstrators and Police

By AFP

 
 
Must-See Video: WA Republican Debates Gay Marriage with Profound, Personal Speech for Equality

By Kristen Gwynne | AlterNet

 
 
"Emotions": Santorum's Sexist Explanation for Why Women Shouldn't be on the Front Lines

By Kristen Gwynne | AlterNet

 
 
Taibbi: Mortgage Fraud Settlement is More Like a Bailout Than Justice

By Kristen Gwynne | AlterNet

 
 
 
Reverend Billy Talen
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 1 ]