comments_image -

Biopharm Roulette

ProdiGene's dramatic soybean contamination scandal has ripped the veil of secrecy off the pharmaculture industry, at least for the time being. Now the pressure must be put on the USDA to remove the veil forever.
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.

 
 
 
 

When people think of genetically modified crops, they usually think of plants that are meant to be eaten. However, to industry insiders, food is just the beginning. The real money is supposed to be biopharming: the engineering of plants to produce pharmaceutical and industrial substances.

It might sound futuristic, but a lot is being spent to stake a claim in what investors hope will be a multibillion dollar industry by the decade's end, and the people involved aren't about to bother with pesky details like regulations or public safety. Hundreds of fields of experimental drug-producing crops have already been planted throughout the nation. Because these plants contain "confidential business information," they are planted secretly -- and because the best-kept secrets are hidden in plain sight, they are planted in the open, unidentified and unsecured.

This mass experiment has been conducted with the cooperation of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The USDA rarely visits trial sites more than once, and sometimes not at all. So far, they've relied primarily on the "voluntary compliance" of biopharm companies. Voluntary compliance, we all know, is a business term for virtually unregulated.

Luckily, perhaps, the biopharm industry's veil of secrecy was ripped spectacularly off last week when newspapers across the U.S. reported that the Food and Drug Administration had ordered the destruction of half a million bushels of Nebraska soybeans. The crop had been contaminated by biopharmaceutical corn which was planted last year in the same field and unexpectedly sprouted again.

Ever the masters of "the dog ate my press release" school of public service, the USDA announced the next day that they had burned 155 acres of similarly contaminated Iowa soybean fields back in September, only they hadn't told anyone. It was, technically, a surprising admission. Just weeks ago, USDA officials informed activist groups concerned about the open planting of biopharmaceuticals that contamination testing hadn't even happened.

Clearly, the USDA decided to reveal what happened in Iowa only after it became obvious that it could no longer be hidden. As it happens, the rogue corn in both states was developed by ProdiGene, a Texas-based corporation whose cavalier attitude towards their technology has long drawn the ire of environmentalists. Joe Jilka, ProdiGene's vice president of product development, once described the planting methods used in their 85 USDA-approved crop trials as this:

"The best way to secure it is to grow it just like any other corn. In other words, the anonymity of it just completely hides it. You know, our TGEV [pig vaccine] corn was up here by Story City right by the interstate, and no one could have ever seen it."

Both ProdiGene and the government refuse to identify what drugs or chemicals so very nearly ended up on dinner tables across the nation. However, based on ProdiGene's history, it was likely one of four things: an AIDS vaccine which some researchers think may actually suppress immune response, a blood clotting agent which causes pancreatic disease in lab animals, an asthma-inducing digestive enzyme used in pharmaceutical processing, or an industrial adhesive.

Of course, it could have been something else entirely. All we know is that, according to the FDA's own press release, the "genetically modified material" is being studied under an Investigational New Drug application. In other words, they're still don't know whether it's safe to test on people.

The USDA's response was insultingly tepid. "The department may consider revising its rules to lessen the chance of similar problems in the future," said Cindy Smith, a senior administrator. "May consider"? "Lessen the chance"? Exactly what would make the USDA take seriously the fact that millions of people were nearly fed experimental drugs and chemicals? A few spectacular deaths, perhaps, or a steady increase in debilitating disorders that is only noticed decades later, when it is too late? Or, in starkly economic terms, the loss of even more export markets?

submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Alternet Special Coverage - Occupy Wall Street
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
Occupy Protesters Mic-Check Palin During CPAC Speech

By Adele M. Stan | AlterNet

 
 
Apple, Accustomed to Profits and Praise, Faces Outcry for Labor Practices at Chinese Factories

By Amy Goodman, Juan Gonzalez | Democracy Now!

 
 
Could Santorum Actually Beat Romney? And Would the Obama Campaign be Ready?

By Steve M. | Booman Tribune

 
 
Bill Moyers: The Economy Has Been Engineered to Screw Over Millennials (With an AlterNet Shoutout!)

By Staff | AlterNet

 
 
Maher: Conservatives Are the Ones Dividing the Country

By Sarah Seltzer | AlterNet

 
 
In Kansas, Is Catholic Church Trying to Destroy A Victim's Advocates Organization?

By Julie Cain | Ms. Magazine Blog

 
 
Obama vs. the Concern Trolls on Nonsense "Religious Liberty" Issue

By Digby | Hullabaloo

 
 
At CPAC, Santorum Surges Despite Idiotic Claims; Romney Poses as 'Severe' Conservative; Gingrich Makes War on GOP

By Adele M. Stan | AlterNet

 
 
Wisconsin's Gov. Walker Appeals to CPAC Crowd for Help Fending Off Recall

By Adele M. Stan | AlterNet

 
 
In Birth Control Debate, Cable News Disproportionately Asked Men What They Thought of Women's Health

By Faiz Shakir and Adam Peck | Think Progress

 
 
 
Reverend Billy Talen
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 2 ]