Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.
Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.
New Colossus Consumes Public Interest
Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Why McCain and the GOP Are So Afraid of Discussing the Economy
Frances Moore Lappe
Democracy and Elections:
Seven Ways Your Vote Might Not Count This November
Steven Rosenfeld
DrugReporter:
Obama's Biden Pick Signals 'More of the Same' Stupid Drug Policies
Paul Armentano
Election 2008:
The GOP Has Turned a Major Election into an Episode of the Mommy Wars
Judith Warner
Environment:
Boatloads of Trouble: How We Are Importing Our Way to Destruction
Stan Cox
ForeignPolicy:
The Bush Administration Checkmated in Georgia
Michael T. Klare
Health and Wellness:
Hospitals' Lessons From Hurricane Gustav
Sheri Fink
Hurricane Katrina:
From the Bayou to Baghdad: Mission Not Accomplished
Amy Goodman
Immigration:
Leader of Anti-Immigration Movement Calls Issue a "Skirmish in a Wider War"
Eric Ward
Media and Technology:
Only in America Could a Two-Faced Creature Like McCain Attain Such Media Status
Rory O'Connor
Movie Mix:
Does "Working Girls" Still Work?
Ariel Dougherty
Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Rutgers Center Helps Women Enter Politics
Alison Bowen
Rights and Liberties:
On Top of Jail Time, Prisoners Now Face Fees and Surcharges
Emily Jane Goodman
Sex and Relationships:
What Republicans Can Learn from "Gossip Girl"
Sarah Seltzer
War on Iraq:
One Fifth of Iraq Funding Goes to Private Contractors
Willam Fisher
Water:
Is California on the Brink of Environmental Collapse?
Rachel Olivieri
The Federal Communications Commission has struck another blow against the public interest with its approval of the largest cable TV merger in United States history.
The $47.5 billion buyout of AT&T by Comcast, which links the nation's largest and third-largest cable companies, respectively, will spawn a new industry giant that will be able to exert unprecedented control of both the cable TV and broadband Internet sectors, with a virtual monopoly on costs, content and service options for millions of Americans.
With more than 30 percent of the domestic cable TV marketplace, and a stranglehold on an equally large portion of the broadband Internet, the new media conglomerate will have the clout to shape the emerging multi-channel, digital TV and broadband marketplace -- because, under the FCC-approved deal, there is little recourse for consumers to get their cable or Internet service from competing providers.
The failure of both the Bush administration-controlled FCC and the Department of Justice to impose any safeguards on the merger illustrates that the agenda of big business remains unrivaled in Washington, despite the recent media and telecom financial scandals.
Under FCC Chairman Michael Powells "leadership," the guiding principles of the Communications Act ordering the FCC enforce the "public interest, convenience and necessity" have become not merely irrelevant, but meaningless.
The AT&T-Comcast deal is the latest case in point. There should have been safeguards to ensure competition and diversity in the cable programming market, such as real choices for Comcast broadband users, including choosing the Internet service provider of their preference. There also should have been public policies enabling local communities to share some of the benefits of digital cable. None of this is in the offing.
Above and beyond the FCCs rubber-stamping of the AT&T-Comcast deal, there are bigger questions about whether the board has any intention of analyzing or recognizing the cultural and political implications of the new media landscape it is sanctioning.
During the past year, the Center for Digital Democracy has joined many other public interest and industry groups in urging the FCC to carefully consider the threats that the AT&T-Comcast merger would pose to competition in the cable TV and broadband marketplaces, as well as its implications for our democracy as a whole -- as a result of more consolidated editorial content and shrinking public interest programming.
No dearth of evidence of these potential threats exists. Yet in approving this merger without any public interest safeguards, the FCC has chosen to ignore those facts. Also on the FCC agenda is a worrisome Internet service provider agreement with AOL Time Warner that has implications for the future character of the net for exactly the same reasons -- the public will have face fewer choices in selecting media sources.
Behind these complex cases and seemingly obscure FCC rulings is the fact that the countrys largest communications firms are enlarging and consolidating their monopoly in their industry.
Jeff Chester is executive director of the Center for Digital Democracy.
Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »
| More News and Analysis: | ||
|
Rutgers Center Helps Women Enter Politics Reproductive Justice and Gender: The Center for American Women in Politics at Rutgers trains and encourages women to run for office. By Alison Bowen, Women's eNews. September 7, 2008. |
Five Women Buried Alive -- and the Media Ignore It Reproductive Justice and Gender: Why is it that we get so outraged over war but look the other way when women and girls are beaten and murdered in the name of tradition? By Riane Eisler, AlterNet. September 6, 2008. |
On Top of Jail Time, Prisoners Now Face Fees and Surcharges Rights and Liberties: Prisoners across the country are facing court fees, arrest fees and booking fees in addition to their sentences -- and states are raking in the cash. By Emily Jane Goodman, The Nation. September 6, 2008. |