The Real Costs of War

The President's men have compared their war in Iraq to a new product, but this is a product that nobody wants. So, they've timed it, "from a marketing point of view," and they've supported it with a "multi-million dollar P.R. blitz." But their product is a deadly distraction, bristling with nasty side effects and violating national law.

Speaking as businessperson, if I put this product out on the market, my shareholders would have my head.

This is a war based on lies:

•     The connection between Saddam and al-Qaida is a lie.

•     The idea that Saddam is capable of attacking the U.S. is a lie.

•     And a war of so-called surgical strikes is a lie.

Many thousands of people -- fathers and mothers, sons and daughters -- will be killed in this war, and yet there is no imminent threat to the security of America that justifies sending our brave men and women in uniform off to die. And the idea that the people of Iraq, who have already been terrorized by the loss of 500,000 of their children due to U.S.-led sanctions -- the idea that these mothers and fathers want to be liberated by being bombed by the United States, is absurd.

The Bush administration is engaged in the most extreme form of power politics that I've ever seen. What their actions are saying is that we are the biggest, baddest bully on the block and, therefore, we can make and break the law as we see fit. We are told that we are to attack Iraq because Saddam Hussein has violated U.N. resolutions. But just to put it into perspective, let's look at the U.S. record:

•      The U.S. has repeatedly violated, and continues to violate, the nuclear non-proliferation treaty.

•      The U.S. pulled out of the ABM treaty.

•      The U.S. has refused to ratify the comprehensive test ban treaty.

•      The U.S. has scuttled the biological weapons treaty because we wouldn't agree to inspections.

•      And we forced out the head of the chemical weapons convention, who was trying to bring Iraq into the fold.

•      The last time UN weapons inspectors were in Iraq, the U.S. violated regulations by using them as spies.

•      And now we have the Bush doctrine of preemptive war which states that WE can attack any country that we THINK might attack us, although I do not believe it gives that right to other countries.

But enough about war and lost lives and the rule of law. I mean, let's talk about money. After all, I'm a businessman and money's my game.

I've got a chart here that gives you an idea of how our government has been spending our money. Now this is a big crowd, but this is a big chart:

40 billion -- children's health care

34 billion -- children's education

15 billion -- higher education

7 billion -- job training

29 billion -- affordable housing

8 billion -- environmental protection

355 billion -- the Pentagon budget. And that does not include the 200 billion dollars that war with Iraq and the ensuing occupation and nation-building is expected to cost.

Now these are tough economic times for the U.S. America is on the brink of recession. Median household income is down. Poverty and unemployment are up. The huge surpluses of the last years have been frittered away on tax breaks. City, state and school budgets across the country are in shock. Retirement and college savings have been decimated.

And now the administration wants to add another 200 billion dollars to that last line on the chart. 200 billion -- that's a lot of money. What could we buy with that if we didn't have this war?