comments_imageCOMMENTS: 28

Conservative "Purity Test" Too Right Wing for Ronald Reagan

Rigid conservatives in the RNC want to establish a purity test for the party's candidates. Guess what? Reagan the conservative hero would have failed most of the criteria.
November 25, 2009  |  
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.

 
 
Advertisement
 

The most rigidly conservative members of the Republican National Committee are circulating a proposal to establish a purity test for the party's candidates.

If adopted, the party would withhold money from any contender who disagreed with conservative principles on more than two of 10 essential issues identified by the right-wingers.

"The problem is that conservatives have lost trust in the Republican Party that we will govern as conservatives," argues James Bopp Jr., an RNC member from Indiana who has spearheaded the purity-test push. "I think that loss of trust is warranted to a certain extent because of the fact that we in the final several years of the Bush administration were supporting increased government, earmarks and, ultimately, bailouts."

Earlier this year, Bopp and his compatriots pressured RNC chair Michael Steele to declare President Obama to be a "socialist." The conservative crusaders were rebuffed then, but if they win approval for their purity test at the committee's winter meeting in January, the party will officially express: "Republican solidarity in opposition to Obama's socialist agenda is necessary to preserve the security of our country, our economic and political freedoms, and our way of life."

With Orwellian irony, Bopp and his buddies have labeled their proposal: "Reagan's Unity Principle for Support of Candidates. "The relevant portion of the resolution reads:

WHEREAS, the Republican National Committee shares President Ronald Reagan's belief that the Republican Party should espouse conservative principles and public policies and welcome persons of diverse views; and   WHEREAS, the Republican National Committee desires to implement President Reagan's Unity Principle for Support of Candidates; and WHEREAS, in addition to supporting candidates, the Republican National Committee provides financial support for Republican state and local parties for party building and federal election activities, which benefits all candidates and is not affected by this resolution; and THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Republican National Committee identifies ten (10) key public policy positions for the 2010 election cycle, which the Republican National Committee expects its public officials and candidates to support: (1) We support smaller government, smaller national debt, lower deficits and lower taxes by opposing bills like Obama's "stimulus" bill; (2) We support market-based health care reform and oppose Obama-style government run healthcare; (3) We support market-based energy reforms by opposing cap and trade legislation; (4) We support workers' right to secret ballot by opposing card check; (5) We support legal immigration and assimilation into American society by opposing amnesty for illegal immigrants; (6) We support victory in Iraq and Afghanistan by supporting military-recommended troop surges; (7) We support containment of Iran and North Korea, particularly effective action to eliminate their nuclear weapons threat; (8) We support retention of the Defense of Marriage Act; (9) We support protecting the lives of vulnerable persons by opposing health care rationing, denial of health care and government funding of abortion; and (10) We support the right to keep and bear arms by opposing government restrictions on gun ownership; and be further RESOLVED, that a candidate who disagrees with three or more of the above stated public policy positions of the Republican National Committee, as identified by the voting record, public statements and/or signed questionnaire of the candidate, shall not be eligible for financial support and endorsement by the Republican National Committee; and be further RESOLVED, that upon the approval of this resolution the Republican National Committee shall deliver a copy of this resolution to each of Republican members of Congress, all Republican candidates for Congress, as they become known, and to each Republican state and territorial party office.

Fair enough.

So here's a question: Applying the standard established in the resolution – review of the candidate's official record, public statements and answers to questions – would Ronald Reagan pass the purity test?

Let's see:

(1) Deficit spending soared during Reagan's presidency.Strike one.

(2) As governor of California, Reagan oversaw the development of Medi-Cal, the nation's largest Medicaid program – expanding it to cover long-term care and developed massive new managed care systems. Strike two.

(3) As governor of California, Reagan Reagan established the Air Resources Board to battle California's smog problems and supported aggressive government intervention where the market had failed to protect the environment. As president, Reagan signed more wilderness protections laws – which restrict private-sector exploitation of natural resources – than any president in history. Strike three.

(4) Reagan was a former union president who campaigned against the Taft-Hartley Act and other restrictions of the right of unions to organize. Strike four.

(5) Reagan signed the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, which granted amnesty to most undocumented workers who could prove they had been in the country continuously for the previous five years. After he finished his presidency, Reagan continues to speak out forcefully for immigration rights. Strike five.

(6) After the 1983 bombing of a Marine barracks in Beirut, Reagan was urged by some to surge more troops into the region. Instead, he ordered the Marines to begin withdrawal from Lebanon. Strike six.

(7) Reagan acknowledged that during his presidency the U.S.sold weapons to Iran. Strike seven.

(8) Reagan was the first president to invite an openly gay couple to spend the night in the White House and he famously argued that gays and lesbians should not be discriminated against in a 1978 television advertising campaign. Strike eight.

(9) Shortly after his inauguration as governor of California, Reagan signed into law the most liberal abortion statute of its day". Strike nine.

(10) Here's Reagan, in 1991, on gun control: "I support the Brady Bill, and I urge the Congress to enact it without further delay." Strike ten.

Of course it is true that Reagan, like John Kerry, was for some ideas before he was against them.

Reasonable people might debate the proper point at which to try and pin Reagan down.

But no reasonable person can suggest that Ronald Reagan would have met the eight out ten test the RNC right-wingers seek to apply – especially on hot-button issues such as gun control, gay rights and immigration.

Indeed, one of the favorites of the RNC's extreme conservatives, Florida U.S. Senate candidate Marco Rubio, recently declared that Reagan was wrong to support amnesty for undocumented immigrants.

And it is probably worth noting that, when Reagan was seeking the Republican nomination in 1980, conservatives Phil Crane and John Connolly suggested that "the Gipper" was an amiable fellow but just not pure enough. Crane positioned himself that year as as a pure conservative alternative to Reagan.

Crane, the purist, won 1.8 percent of the vote in the New Hampshire Republican primary and exited stage right.

 

John Nichols is The Nation's Washington correspondent.
Email
Print
Share
Post on reddit
Post on stumbleupon
Post on facebook
Post on digg
Post on twitter
Post on delicious
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
See more stories tagged with: republicans, gop, conservatives, amnesty, ideology, reagan, purity


Comments are closed-

HAHAHAHAHAHHAHA
Posted by: Eat Politicians on Nov 25, 2009 1:31 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
oh conservatives...so ludicrous and evil it's funny. Now if us liberal could quit be so wishwashy maybe we could actually pass meaningful laws, but I doubt it. Corporate Fascism is the new democracy. Why have a constitution when it just gets in the way of the 1% profiteers?

I'll see you all in hell my friends. Oh what a lovely day in hell it will be...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Obama, a SOCIALIST?
Posted by: PJAW on Nov 25, 2009 4:38 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How freakin' dumb is that?! I wish sometime someone in the MSM would interview a leading Socialist about what the party actually stands for. Very few people in America have any understanding at all about what Socialism is, other than that it is interchangeable with "evil" in the right wing lexicon. They seem to see it as "gateway politics" leading directly to COMMUNISM, in much the same way that smoking pot leads to hard drug addiction and rampant crime.

It must be hell to be a right winger, living in constant fear.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Obama, a SOCIALIST? Posted by: Morell
» RE: Obama, a SOCIALIST? Posted by: leighsure

Comments are closed-

The Litmus test for inductees hell bent on destruction
Posted by: Purple Girl on Nov 25, 2009 5:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lets start with the nearly 11 Trillion deficit left behind after the Cheney Reign of Terror.
Lets review the fact of incompetency leading up to 9/11 along with two clusterfuck wars, killing far more of our people and wasting a good portion of our treasure (what their cronies in Big Biz bothered to leave behind)
Guns....Hellova Job arming those Drug Cartels in Mexico and supply weapons to our enemies around the world. Should we legalize Nukes as Well?
That list encompasses all the shit responsible for the implosion of our Nations economy, international alliances and Civil Liberties.
Yeah we Know what you stand for, we are standing in the Rubble of it!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Running Sacred in the Dark
Posted by: sayward2 on Nov 25, 2009 5:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is possible to be conservative in some ways and liberal in others. I like Fabian Socialism myself, because I do think change is always needed and it comes anyway wanted or not- things, times, stuff changes -nothing remains the same not that "old time religion" or country music, my first cell phone weighed nearly 2 pounds in 1998; I used to have a Commodore 64 computer, I had to use carbon paper to make a typewritten copy... Conservatives can not make time stand still nor can they stop new knowledge from intruding on their lives. They need to get their heads out of the sand and "liberals" need to clean up their language and get a thesaurus.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

The "Reality Challenged" Right
Posted by: popeurbanxxiii on Nov 25, 2009 6:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It seems the Reich-Wingers are forever harking back to some "Good Old Days" that never were. They believe America was just like Ozzie and Harriet back in the day. Kids respected their parents. We all saluted the flag. With patriotism and prosperity for all, Amen. (And then along came the Dirty Hippies!)

Our Blessed St. Ronnie just can't be purged of any stain of progressive actions or thought. Just didn't happen that way... Heck, even Nixon was relatively liberal in many ways. Winning elections meant compromise and finding common ground.

The older generation of Republican leaders knew that naked conservatism didn't win elections. They were at least pragmatic. The current party leaders are illogically dogmatic instead. They would be content with a Pyrrhic victory, knowing that at least they were ideologically pure.

The wingers peddle a mythology. All "true conservatives" must swallow the Kool-Aid without questioning - much like the fundamentalist religion many of them espouse too.

A cult is a pretty small sliver of the electoral pie to try to govern from. Good luck with that one!

Pax...
Pope Urban XXIII

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

I've heard that the RNC has established a new branch of the Republican Party
Posted by: moloko velocet on Nov 25, 2009 8:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...they're called "Democrats".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

RONALD REAGAN IS DEAD !
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Nov 25, 2009 8:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I never saw him as one of our great statesman. He wasn't very bright. Constant references to the Great Ron seem disprportionate to what he really accomplished. His presidency marked the begining of the end of the middle class and the ascent of phoney religion. As for the 'purity' thing, it's just plain silly. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ONALD REAGAN IS DEAD ! Posted by: Morell
» RE: ONALD REAGAN IS DEAD ! Posted by: madregal
» RE: ONALD REAGAN IS DEAD ! Posted by: Morell

Comments are closed-

Reagan & Abortion, etc.
Posted by: davmills on Nov 25, 2009 9:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Reagan later said he regretted having signed that bill.
Also, legislation denying gov't funding to family planning (e.g. Planned Parenthood)groups who were pro-choice was (I think) enacted during the Reagan years (I believe Obama overturned this).
And if he were pro-union, what about the airline pilots (whose union actually voted for Reagan) in 1980?
P.S.:Reagan was divorced, which more than a few conservatives disagree with in a candidate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

This actually IS consistant.
Posted by: Cybershaman on Nov 25, 2009 10:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
People just don't remember the past. Reagans early years were spent blacklising fellow Hollywood people for being 'communists'. He was one of Joe McCarthy's biggest followers. Richard Nixon, who became vice pres. under Eisenhower was one of Joe's proteges'.
Reagan was also the head of the Screen Actors Guild where his anti-commie attitudes convinced him that unions were socialist. Therefore, he was easy to buy for the polical goal of destroying the unions in this country.
This 'purity test' stuff is right down his alley. You know, the one with all those homeless mental patients and veterans dying from the cold.
He may have mellowed as his brain cells died out, but it's more about the people who bankrolled him than him personally.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Unleashed, the dogs of the right........
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Nov 25, 2009 11:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It really is unfortunate that the rabid right can't recognize that they are being not just used, but being pandered to by the MSM & the Oligarchy who controls the strings! That these people don't recognize it for what it is, though is mind boggling! How many of the rethugnikan "heroes" have "fallen short" of the ideal! Even as these people continue to shout about "small government", under rethugnikan rule government has grown exponentially! And while much of that "growth" is concealed because it has been "contracted out" - it is growth none the less!!

If the right wingers want a theocracy then maybe they should pack up and move to Iran a place that has true "theocracy"! No, they won't do that either! They want people that give them the crazy lip-service they "need" to hear, so that they feel safe, protected, and can go back to believing in their own delusions! Why can't they all just take the legalized medications, and allow adults to do the heavy thinking.....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

HA!
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford on Nov 25, 2009 1:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Glad to know that even the late great Ronnie Reagan was just a great big red commie compared to his conservative descendants.

Further testament to the polarization of America.
These people are pulling so far to the right, that the rest of us are starting to realize that pulling to the left is actually the only moral thing to do in response.

It's called, "Hey, you're going too far. What the hell are you doing?"

Then again, in principle, the idea of a list does sound appealing. It'd be nice if liberals created such a "top ten list," as it were.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: HA! Posted by: madregal
» That's why... Posted by: Rusty Shackleford

Comments are closed-

I didn't leave the Republican Party...
Posted by: Kevin Carson on Nov 25, 2009 7:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...it left me.
--Ronald Reagan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

At Least
Posted by: Sekhmetnakt on Nov 25, 2009 10:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At least they can't lie about what they stand for. They are against unions, so against the working man/woman. Against secret ballot, so against democracy, pro-destroying the environment, pro-total fascist-corporate control over all laws and people in all situations, no privacy, especially in your own home- NEVER in your own bedroom, total government and Xian church control of all sexuality, government ownership of the indivual, pro-aborting the future of the entire human species, and they admit to planning on everlasting neverending wars in Iran, Iraq, North Korea, and Afganistan! So vote Republican if you want your kids sent to die for big oil corporations, want to be wal-marted into total slavery at work, and see your grandchildren die with the rest of all life on the world. Basicly cross "1984" and "Soilent Green", any questions?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

"Purity Test"...?
Posted by: CanuckKid on Nov 26, 2009 12:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Didn't the National Socialist leadership of Germany (you know who I mean, right...?) enact such policies in the '30s?

Can we call the Repulican leadership Fascist now? Huh, can we...?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: "Purity Test"...? Posted by: Morell

Comments are closed-

Clown To The Left Of Me Jokers To My Right Here I Am Stuck In The Middle With You
Posted by: desidid on Nov 29, 2009 8:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The idea that Ronald Reagan was ever considered a statesman is comical. His hypocriscy is what should be remembered. He once was the president of the screen actors guild (real blue collar workers there) then he broke the unions as president. Of course he was no longer a member of the union so he wasn't hurting himself.

Favorite tee shirt during the Reagan administration: John Hinkley for President He's Had a Shot At The Man. Let's Give Him a Shot At The Job.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alternet Comments:

Comments are closed-

HAHAHAHAHAHHAHA
Posted by: Eat Politicians on Nov 25, 2009 1:31 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
oh conservatives...so ludicrous and evil it's funny. Now if us liberal could quit be so wishwashy maybe we could actually pass meaningful laws, but I doubt it. Corporate Fascism is the new democracy. Why have a constitution when it just gets in the way of the 1% profiteers?

I'll see you all in hell my friends. Oh what a lovely day in hell it will be...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Obama, a SOCIALIST?
Posted by: PJAW on Nov 25, 2009 4:38 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How freakin' dumb is that?! I wish sometime someone in the MSM would interview a leading Socialist about what the party actually stands for. Very few people in America have any understanding at all about what Socialism is, other than that it is interchangeable with "evil" in the right wing lexicon. They seem to see it as "gateway politics" leading directly to COMMUNISM, in much the same way that smoking pot leads to hard drug addiction and rampant crime.

It must be hell to be a right winger, living in constant fear.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Obama, a SOCIALIST? Posted by: Morell
» RE: Obama, a SOCIALIST? Posted by: leighsure

Comments are closed-

The Litmus test for inductees hell bent on destruction
Posted by: Purple Girl on Nov 25, 2009 5:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lets start with the nearly 11 Trillion deficit left behind after the Cheney Reign of Terror.
Lets review the fact of incompetency leading up to 9/11 along with two clusterfuck wars, killing far more of our people and wasting a good portion of our treasure (what their cronies in Big Biz bothered to leave behind)
Guns....Hellova Job arming those Drug Cartels in Mexico and supply weapons to our enemies around the world. Should we legalize Nukes as Well?
That list encompasses all the shit responsible for the implosion of our Nations economy, international alliances and Civil Liberties.
Yeah we Know what you stand for, we are standing in the Rubble of it!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Running Sacred in the Dark
Posted by: sayward2 on Nov 25, 2009 5:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is possible to be conservative in some ways and liberal in others. I like Fabian Socialism myself, because I do think change is always needed and it comes anyway wanted or not- things, times, stuff changes -nothing remains the same not that "old time religion" or country music, my first cell phone weighed nearly 2 pounds in 1998; I used to have a Commodore 64 computer, I had to use carbon paper to make a typewritten copy... Conservatives can not make time stand still nor can they stop new knowledge from intruding on their lives. They need to get their heads out of the sand and "liberals" need to clean up their language and get a thesaurus.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

The "Reality Challenged" Right
Posted by: popeurbanxxiii on Nov 25, 2009 6:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It seems the Reich-Wingers are forever harking back to some "Good Old Days" that never were. They believe America was just like Ozzie and Harriet back in the day. Kids respected their parents. We all saluted the flag. With patriotism and prosperity for all, Amen. (And then along came the Dirty Hippies!)

Our Blessed St. Ronnie just can't be purged of any stain of progressive actions or thought. Just didn't happen that way... Heck, even Nixon was relatively liberal in many ways. Winning elections meant compromise and finding common ground.

The older generation of Republican leaders knew that naked conservatism didn't win elections. They were at least pragmatic. The current party leaders are illogically dogmatic instead. They would be content with a Pyrrhic victory, knowing that at least they were ideologically pure.

The wingers peddle a mythology. All "true conservatives" must swallow the Kool-Aid without questioning - much like the fundamentalist religion many of them espouse too.

A cult is a pretty small sliver of the electoral pie to try to govern from. Good luck with that one!

Pax...
Pope Urban XXIII

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

I've heard that the RNC has established a new branch of the Republican Party
Posted by: moloko velocet on Nov 25, 2009 8:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...they're called "Democrats".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

RONALD REAGAN IS DEAD !
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Nov 25, 2009 8:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I never saw him as one of our great statesman. He wasn't very bright. Constant references to the Great Ron seem disprportionate to what he really accomplished. His presidency marked the begining of the end of the middle class and the ascent of phoney religion. As for the 'purity' thing, it's just plain silly. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ONALD REAGAN IS DEAD ! Posted by: Morell
» RE: ONALD REAGAN IS DEAD ! Posted by: madregal
» RE: ONALD REAGAN IS DEAD ! Posted by: Morell

Comments are closed-

Reagan & Abortion, etc.
Posted by: davmills on Nov 25, 2009 9:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Reagan later said he regretted having signed that bill.
Also, legislation denying gov't funding to family planning (e.g. Planned Parenthood)groups who were pro-choice was (I think) enacted during the Reagan years (I believe Obama overturned this).
And if he were pro-union, what about the airline pilots (whose union actually voted for Reagan) in 1980?
P.S.:Reagan was divorced, which more than a few conservatives disagree with in a candidate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

This actually IS consistant.
Posted by: Cybershaman on Nov 25, 2009 10:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
People just don't remember the past. Reagans early years were spent blacklising fellow Hollywood people for being 'communists'. He was one of Joe McCarthy's biggest followers. Richard Nixon, who became vice pres. under Eisenhower was one of Joe's proteges'.
Reagan was also the head of the Screen Actors Guild where his anti-commie attitudes convinced him that unions were socialist. Therefore, he was easy to buy for the polical goal of destroying the unions in this country.
This 'purity test' stuff is right down his alley. You know, the one with all those homeless mental patients and veterans dying from the cold.
He may have mellowed as his brain cells died out, but it's more about the people who bankrolled him than him personally.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Unleashed, the dogs of the right........
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Nov 25, 2009 11:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It really is unfortunate that the rabid right can't recognize that they are being not just used, but being pandered to by the MSM & the Oligarchy who controls the strings! That these people don't recognize it for what it is, though is mind boggling! How many of the rethugnikan "heroes" have "fallen short" of the ideal! Even as these people continue to shout about "small government", under rethugnikan rule government has grown exponentially! And while much of that "growth" is concealed because it has been "contracted out" - it is growth none the less!!

If the right wingers want a theocracy then maybe they should pack up and move to Iran a place that has true "theocracy"! No, they won't do that either! They want people that give them the crazy lip-service they "need" to hear, so that they feel safe, protected, and can go back to believing in their own delusions! Why can't they all just take the legalized medications, and allow adults to do the heavy thinking.....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

HA!
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford on Nov 25, 2009 1:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Glad to know that even the late great Ronnie Reagan was just a great big red commie compared to his conservative descendants.

Further testament to the polarization of America.
These people are pulling so far to the right, that the rest of us are starting to realize that pulling to the left is actually the only moral thing to do in response.

It's called, "Hey, you're going too far. What the hell are you doing?"

Then again, in principle, the idea of a list does sound appealing. It'd be nice if liberals created such a "top ten list," as it were.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: HA! Posted by: madregal
» That's why... Posted by: Rusty Shackleford

Comments are closed-

I didn't leave the Republican Party...
Posted by: Kevin Carson on Nov 25, 2009 7:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...it left me.
--Ronald Reagan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

At Least
Posted by: Sekhmetnakt on Nov 25, 2009 10:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At least they can't lie about what they stand for. They are against unions, so against the working man/woman. Against secret ballot, so against democracy, pro-destroying the environment, pro-total fascist-corporate control over all laws and people in all situations, no privacy, especially in your own home- NEVER in your own bedroom, total government and Xian church control of all sexuality, government ownership of the indivual, pro-aborting the future of the entire human species, and they admit to planning on everlasting neverending wars in Iran, Iraq, North Korea, and Afganistan! So vote Republican if you want your kids sent to die for big oil corporations, want to be wal-marted into total slavery at work, and see your grandchildren die with the rest of all life on the world. Basicly cross "1984" and "Soilent Green", any questions?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

"Purity Test"...?
Posted by: CanuckKid on Nov 26, 2009 12:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Didn't the National Socialist leadership of Germany (you know who I mean, right...?) enact such policies in the '30s?

Can we call the Repulican leadership Fascist now? Huh, can we...?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: "Purity Test"...? Posted by: Morell

Comments are closed-

Clown To The Left Of Me Jokers To My Right Here I Am Stuck In The Middle With You
Posted by: desidid on Nov 29, 2009 8:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The idea that Ronald Reagan was ever considered a statesman is comical. His hypocriscy is what should be remembered. He once was the president of the screen actors guild (real blue collar workers there) then he broke the unions as president. Of course he was no longer a member of the union so he wasn't hurting himself.

Favorite tee shirt during the Reagan administration: John Hinkley for President He's Had a Shot At The Man. Let's Give Him a Shot At The Job.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

 
Advertisement
From The Blog
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS