comments_image -

Wal-Mart's Wicked Ways

The National Organization for Women says Wal-Mart, the nation's largest employer of women, treats its female workers unfairly.
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.

 
 
 
 

In June, a group of National Organization for Women (NOW) members gathered in St. Paul, Minn. for the organization's annual meeting. It was as good a time as any to declare Wal-Mart, the discount retailer, a Merchant of Shame. To emphasize the declaration, the members held a protest in front of a St. Paul Wal-Mart store.

Thirty-five NOW chapters did the same in September at Wal-Marts throughout the country.

"We had signs and fliers to hand out," says Dara Bergmann, the chapter's president. "Our goal is to educate people. We hope they'll consider where they're spending their money. I'd like to see Wal-Mart not do as well until they make some changes."

Bergmann was not in St. Paul when the first protest was held, but she has been told that many Wal-Mart customers had their eyes opened. "I heard that some women walked away from the store, saying 'I'm not shopping here,'" Bermann reports. "One person went back into the store and returned the stuff she had just bought after learning about what they're doing."

"What they're doing," according to Olga E. Vives, vice president at NOW's headquarters in Washington D.C., is discriminating against women by not promoting then to management positions as frequently as they should and by not paying women as well as they pay men.

Vives also notes that Wal-Mart does not stock the "morning-after pill," a contraception women can use after intercourse if they fear pregnancy, nor does it provide birth control coverage under its health care plan. A class-action lawsuit asking for reimbursement of contraceptive expenses is pending in Atlanta, says Vives.

There's also a lawsuit in Alabama filed by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission alleging that female employees have been sexually harassed, and a lawsuit in San Francisco filed by current and former employees alleging sex discrimination in pay and promotion.

Wal-Mart has the dubious distinction of being the most sued retailer in America.

The NOW vice president became concerned about the treatment of female workers in foreign countries as well after seeing research conducted by Ellen Rose, a Brandeis University professor and author of "The Women Who Work For Wal-Mart."

Female employees in El Salvador working for Wal-Mart contractors earn 15 cents for a pair of pants that Wal-Mart sells for $16.95 in the United States, says Rosen. These same women are subjected to forced pregnancy tests. Other Central American workers live in shacks without running water or plumbing, and women workers in China sleep in government-sponsored rooms that house up to 11 other people.

While American workers are not treated as badly as contractors in foreign countries, there's not much to celebrate on the homefront either, according to Rosen's research:

Wal-Mart employs approximately 800,00 people, 72 percent of whom NOW says are women. On average, the "sales associates" make $6.57 an hour, or $13,665.60 a year for full-time work. The low wages puts some families, depending on their size, below the poverty level. Half of the female sales associates qualify for food stamps.

Vives says the women employees at the stores convinced her to name Wal-Mart a Merchant of Shame. "We listened to complaints we got," she says, "and we found they checked out."

Bill Wertz, a spokesman at Wal-Mart's headquarters in Bentonville, Ark., counters Vives' conclusions. He says the female employees he has spoken to are unhappy about NOW's criticisms. "They tell me NOW isn't taking into account the opportunities for women at Wal-Mart."

A request to interview female employees at Norfolk's Military Highway store had not been granted as of press time for this article.

Wertz estimated that 60 percent of Wal-Mart employees are women, a lower figure than NOW's 72 percent. And while NOW says only one-third of the managers are female, Wertz declined to report the number, stating that the issue of female managers was part of the lawsuit pending in San Francisco.

submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
Fox, Breitbart, and Ricketts Try to Bring Back D'Souza's Pseudo-Birtherism

By Steve M | No More Mister Nice Blog

 
 
Activists Speak Out Against Lack of Access to Bradley Manning

By Agence France Presse

 
 
NYPD Catches Sexual Assailant, Then Lets Him Go Free Because He Didn't Feel Like Being Questioned

By Jill F | Feministe

 
 
Gov. Scott Orders Purging of Florida’s Voter Rolls - Just in Time For Prez Election

By Adele Stan | Washington Monthly

 
 
Abortion Clinics Across Country Put On Alert In Wake of Georgia Clinic Arson Cases

By Robin Marty | RH Reality Check

 
 
Former GOP Congresswoman Blasts New GOP Women’s Caucus: ‘They’re Not Voting In Best Interest Of All Women’

By Josh Israel | ThinkProgress

 
 
Debbie Wasserman Schulz is Wrong on Wisconsin

By LaFeminista | DailyKos

 
 
Pro-Coal Group Pays People to Wear Its Shirts at EPA Hearing

By Heather Moyer | Sierra Club

 
 
Kids Inundate NY Governor With Concerns About Fracking

By Seth Gladstone | Food and Water Watch

 
 
Shareholders, Top Doctors Demand McDonald's Assess its Health Impacts

By Sara Deon | Civil Eats

 
 
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 1 ]