COMMENTS: 69
Fox TV's Bizarre New Cartoon Comedy Is a Minstrel Show, Pure and Simple
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.
It could be because for the first time America has a black president and the First Lady is a sista, and together with their two beautiful black daughters overnight improved the international image of black people, let alone Americans. But leave it to the diabolical minds at Fox Networks to pick up where BET left off with the debut of their newest show “The Cleveland Show,” where in just 22 minutes they managed to portray black mothers as unmarried promiscuous sexual objects, black teenage girls as headed down the same path as their mothers, young black boys as sexual deviants, and black people period as being unable to speak anything other than Ebonics — all in the name of comedy.
Just like with the character Shirley Q. Liquor, a black unmarried welfare mother who guzzles malt liquor, drives a Caddy, and has 19 “chirrun” some of whom are named Cheeto, Orangello, Chlamydia, and Kmartina, who is routinely performed by a white man in blackface, there’s nothing funny about an animated television series that seeks to legitimize and reinforce every negative stereotype about black people during primetime to the delight of white audiences from coast to coast.
When President Barack Obama was sworn into office, it signaled a new beginning for American politics and the end of mainstream media news reporting as we knew it because every day for the next four years, at least, a black man was going to be the lead story on the evening newscast, and not for committing a crime, dunking a ball, or singing a song. In return, the news media sought to find balance by quietly, yet intentionally, removing black anchors and reporters from newscasts around the country. I guess they figured one Negro making news on a daily basis was enough without having to hear about from one as well.
All black or majority-black casts on television are a rare commodity. Blacks almost all but disappeared from broadcast television years ago, putting black actors and actresses on the endangered species list with their news media counterparts.
Even in today’s economy and with the status of blacks on television, be it entertainment or news, Fox is willing to capitalize off the continued objectification of black women by using animation to over-sexualize their physical characteristics. (At least if the show weren’t animated, a black woman would be getting paid cash money for being objectified on screen, and a lot more than she would for just doing a voiceover, if you know what I’m saying.)
Just like BET knew they were pushing the envelope when they tried to go there with “We Can Do Better,” Fox knows it’s pushing something with “The Cleveland Show,” and it isn’t an envelope. Fox is making an attempt to capitalize off of the negative stereotypes of blacks and laughing all the way to the bank.
Don’t think so? How much do you think companies paid to advertise during a show that featured an overweight, recently divorced black man and his overweight, developmentally challenged black son, who go down south where the father hooks up with his black, overly voluptuous yet promiscuous high school crush only to play father to her delinquent black children—all while speaking whites people’s version of black Ebonics? I’m just saying.
It never ceases to amaze me what’s not off limits when it comes to black people. I say that because I know that had “The Cleveland Show” been pitched as the “The Weismans” or “The Hernandezes” — with the same characters — we’d probably have been watching re-runs of something else Sunday night.
I wonder about the black people who did bother to tune into “The Cleveland Show” debut. Were we so busy laughing that we failed to realize the joke was on us? It’s happened before. Just look at the misogynistic lyrics in rap music recited by black men, financed by white, and bought by both races that continue to portray black women as nothing more than sexual objects to the point where some of us are so confused that we’ve gladly taken on the role.
After the election of a president who is black, but neither divorced nor overweight, and a First Lady who is black but married and raising her two children — children who aren’t having sex prematurely or showing signs of early criminal activity — Fox’s debut of the “The Cleveland Show” is nothing more than a desperate and stealth attempt to work against the improved international image of black people. Fox says it’s animation domination but it’s more like animation demonization—of black people.
And before you ask, “What about ‘The Family Guy?’” – consider this. While “The Family Guy’s” father, son, and daughter may be on the chubby side, remember that the parents are married, the kids attend school regularly, and they all speak pretty good English.
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Revolutionary (Direct) Democracy on Sep 30, 2009 1:00 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
FREE AMERICA
REVOLUTIONARY (DIRECT) DEMOCRACY
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jroth420 on Sep 30, 2009 1:34 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Don't worry about it...
Posted by: Smirk
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ChrisBrown on Sep 30, 2009 4:44 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» But some are.
Posted by: Parcival01
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Sep 30, 2009 4:55 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Sep 30, 2009 5:18 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
None of the characters on Family Guy are strong enough for their own spin-off. If people want to see characters from Family Guy, they're going to watch Family Guy.
As for the racial accusations, I think they're silly. Family Guy was never about political correctness. The Cleveland Show shouldn't be either. If you want to watch old reruns of the Cosby Show, go find them on another channel.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Wiieakling on Sep 30, 2009 5:41 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My name is Earl is a good example of making fun of Caucasian people. Whatever.
Mind of Mencia is a good example of making fun of Hispanic people. Whatever.
The Cleavland Show is a good example of making fun of African American people. Whatever.
The list is a mile long... when you consider other areas of stereotype... portrayal of Jewish/Christians, GLBT, or WOMEN?!
You don't have to ascribe to that type of humor, I know it's hard to find wholesome television nowawdays, but please understand that we're all victims.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: C'mon let's be rational about entertainment.
Posted by: jaglover
» RE: C'mon let's be rational about entertainment.
Posted by: sui_generis
» thank you
Posted by: Drclaw
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ChrisBrown on Sep 30, 2009 5:53 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a silly comment. There are many examples of t.v., movies, radio making fun of Jewish and Hispanic stereotypes.
Whether or not it is funny, do you think "The Cleveland Show" is promoting negative stereotypes of black people? It is trying to make fun of the stereotypes. Should we make every black character on t.v. a brilliant, successful doctor or lawyer with a perfect marriage, family, etc? Doesn't bringing these stereotypes to light and satirizing them more healthy, honest than pretending they don't exist?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Satire
Posted by: jaglover
» RE: Satire
Posted by: sui_generis
» RE: Satire
Posted by: felipe
» RE: Satire my butt! White people DON'T understand!!!
Posted by: Shalimarali
» You are right
Posted by: felipe
» RE: Satire my butt! White people DON'T understand!!!
Posted by: hdthoreau
Comments are closed-
Posted by: souffrantfleur on Sep 30, 2009 6:05 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Chill out, Jasmyne
Posted by: jaglover
» RE: Chill out, Jasmyne
Posted by: sui_generis
Comments are closed-
Posted by: El Hombre Malo on Sep 30, 2009 6:19 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article here in Alternet seems to disagree with that notion
I mean, I though Cleveland to be a minstrel ever since I discovered he was voiced by a (terribly good) white actor, but if you cant see the overly stereotipycal portrayal of spanish speaking characters in TV and Movie fiction, you are either blind or dont want to see.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: eally?
Posted by: sui_generis
» RE: eally?
Posted by: El Hombre Malo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Ayla87 on Sep 30, 2009 6:47 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Family guy is a parody of everyday life of middle class americans
American Dad is a parody of right wing conservatism and patriotism.
The Cleaveland Show does is a parody of black people and thier stereotypes.
Every show that MacFarlane has done has isolated a specific class of people and poked fun at them for thier various quirks and naunces. Just because his latest spin off show targets the black community doesn't mean it's an attempt by Fox to push black people back 50 years. It's MacFarlane's attempt to make money by pushing people's buttons. And clearly it's worked.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Seth McFarlane is laughing his ass off right now...
Posted by: Laina27
» RE: Seth McFarlane is laughing his ass off right now...
Posted by: sui_generis
» RE: What could we call a show like that, I wonder...
Posted by: stellabloo
» What could we call a show like that, I wonder...
Posted by: Ayla87
» RE: What could we call a show like that, I wonder...
Posted by: sui_generis
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ergoat2004 on Sep 30, 2009 9:10 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Where is all the outrage from the black community for "The Boondocks" that has the most off the wall racial stereotypes and cliches and usage of the "N-Word" ... but it's okay because the writer is African American, as are most (if not all?) of the voice cast are black, but for the Cleveland show to make jokes clearly in the same spectrum (and not using the "N-Word"), it's bad because they are white?
By the way, I love the Boondocks, from the first line of the series ("Jesus was black, Ronald Reagan was the devil, and the government knew about 9-11") to the scathing, unflinching critique of "black" culture/community that pulls no punches. What if Dr. MLK Jr. was alive today? Brilliant.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Joni50 on Sep 30, 2009 9:11 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sure, you can make fun of any group, including whites (eg, redneck jokes, Polish jokes, Jew jokes, Irish jokes, etc.) But these don't exist in a context of 400 years of marginalization and scapegoating. They don't exist in the context of centuries of that group being cast as the eternal "other," the object for projection of the deepest fears, aggressions, and taboo desires of the mainstream collective unconscious. They furthermore don't exist in the context of someone from that group recently being elected to our highest office, thereby challenging said fears, aggressions, and desires of said collective unconsciousness. Moreover, they don't exist in the context of a radical backlash from the powers that be and their brownshirt minions against the due processes of democracy. Finally, they don't exist in the context of coming from the mouthpiece of said powers that be (Fox network).
Context, people, ok?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Gilgamesh on Sep 30, 2009 9:18 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
maybe you should get mad at the media for portraying every black person as a "gangsta" and things like this wouldnt be on tv to begin with.
the masses of black people in the US reinforce the stereotypes about them all by themselves.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: oh but it ok when blacks make fun of whites on BET
Posted by: ImissuSam
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ClassAct on Sep 30, 2009 9:43 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just for the record, I think the funniest thing ever on television was on The Simpsons when newscaster Kent Brockman offered his assistance to "our new insect overlords."
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: beastfan on Sep 30, 2009 9:55 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The TV sitcom formula is old and unfunny. Watch the previews, and hear how the audience is uproariously laughing at yet another sex joke, or insult of the parent by the child. It's very simple; pick up a book or put on a music CD.
By the way, SNL did a sketch where they mocked the naming conventions of black people ("Magnesium", "Cerebellum", "Onomatopoeia"), and it was actually pretty funny.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: theScale on Sep 30, 2009 9:58 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Also, what's up with the "Weismans" and "Hernandezes" point you try to make? Makes you seem even more clueless. It's "journalism" like this that makes liberals such an easy target for the right. You all seem like loonies.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sui_generis on Sep 30, 2009 10:14 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Does the author know ANYthing about Seth Macfarlane and Family Guy, AT ALL? Do they understand that every single last character on the original show was ALREADY a stereotype, not just blacks? I'm shocked that nobody in the editorial chain of command at Alternet seems to have the ounce of understanding needed to shoot down this nonsense either, and that you'd want to feature an article like this on their home page, even if it isn't by a direct staffer. Alternet is becoming increasingly marginalized and ignored as they venture farther and farther out onto the very edge of the loony-left fringe in an attempt to out-PC and out-liberal all the other decent progressive sites out there, by publishing inflammatory, mindless rhetoric like this.
As an African American, I'm embarrassed that anybody else had to read this ignorant pile of nonsense, and concerned that it undermines ACTUAL cases of racism and abuses of power against us and other minorities.
Thanks for uplifting the race, "sistah", but you've done nothing but undermine the very positive image of the Obamas that you keep citing over and over, as if it's the only one you can think of. But hey, keep on keepin' it real.
Real ignorant.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Perfect Response...
Posted by: On the Border
» TOTALLY DISAGREE!!
Posted by: Drclaw
» Oh Boy. Just Wait 'Til You See the Annual "Don't Celebrate Thanksgiving" Article...
Posted by: grumble-bum
» RE: unbelievable
Posted by: YogiBear
Comments are closed-
Posted by: neko_sake on Sep 30, 2009 10:40 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: -matti on Sep 30, 2009 10:50 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even that description is loose and ignorant on my part because I'm afraid that I don't know the specific ethnic groups in his mother's background or the likely more contiguous and coherent ethnic/tribal group his father belonged to.
But at least I'm not following in the tradition of the "one drop rule" in characterizing our Corporatist-Imperialist President.
What he identifies himself as is a whole other story. But self-identification alone does not guaruntee accuracy in identification.
For instance, Barack Obama and many others self-identify as "American". While this is true in a larger sense, it is decidedly NOT true in the sense that he/they mean it. They mean it as a national group label when it is correctly a geographic one. Obama and these other "Americans" mean to say they are people "from the United States of America", but instead imply that such people represent the totality of those living in the Americas.
In the same way, Obama may self-identify as "black" and yet still not be so. Actually, since "black" is a concept that only applies to people in an abstract cultural sense (and then only poorly), the fact that Obama did NOT spend his formative period in anything like that culture (Hawaii, Harvard) should raise eyebrows over this self-identification straight off. Methinks Mr. Hope and Change's "black"-ness has as much to do with Chicago politics as it does anything else.
But this is all pointless, isn't it. No amount of discussion and persuasion on this subject will be for the good, because the fact that we are even having it is for the ill.
The one truly good thing that should have come out of Obama's success in the Dem Party nomination elections and the public Presidential one would have been the final end of "race" thinking and arguing in the U.S.. Election of a "mixed-race" person should have accomplished this overdue hurdle-leap and allowed us to move on to more practical and pressing matters.
Alas it did not.
Likely because it was never meant to.
What a sad State we find ourselves in.
-matti.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Obama is whatever he says he is. Race is a social construct.
Posted by: sui_generis
» RE: Obama is not "black".
Posted by: Joni50
» RE: Obama is not "black".
Posted by: YogiBear
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jebpgh on Sep 30, 2009 11:12 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I thought Cleveland wasn't very funny so that was my first and last episode. Thank God my remote is still functioning.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Adam_Kirur on Sep 30, 2009 12:06 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: that one ethnic group in America that CANNOT BE CRITICIZED
Posted by: ergoat2004
» RE: Is Seth McFarlane the Producer?
Posted by: astralman
» RE: Is Seth McFarlane the Producer?
Posted by: luther6
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mrfixdit on Sep 30, 2009 2:13 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JoeDiPatera on Sep 30, 2009 5:27 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just to list a few examples:
1) White people think black men don't get sad, they just get angrier
2) White people think that loudly spouting an Ebonics catchphrase passes as humor for blacks
3) Because the President is black, black people should be expected to weigh in on - or justify - the presidency because, of course, they are black.
And there's a big difference between stereotypes about blacks and unfortunate statistics. Just to address two points that were brought up in the article: a disproportionate number of black people come from broken families or single-parent households and blacks are disproportionately likely to suffer from obesity. These aren't really laugh lines in the show: they're just part of the characters and stories (as lazy and/or ill-conceived as they may be).
Basically, do you think HBO's The Wire is a minstrel show too? I'd like to point out that very few of the show's drug dealers come from economically stable, morally traditional two-parent households that place a high precedent on higher education.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» It's all about PERCEPTION
Posted by: Kym525
» RE: It's all about PERCEPTION
Posted by: sui_generis
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ninjanurse on Sep 30, 2009 5:53 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Looks Like Garfield
Posted by: TheNamelessCity
Comments are closed-
Posted by: angie70 on Sep 30, 2009 6:11 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article, like so many here on Alternet, uses lots of exaggeration and very little facts to back up its main idea. I consider myself very liberal yet so many times I find Alternet uses a "the sky is falling" approach that is a huge turn-off for me in the same way Fox News is with all its screaming, lies and misplaced accusations.
I wonder if the writer even watched the series premiere. Cleveland is a kind-hearted man who, in the first episode at least, wants to do the right thing and is thrilled to find his high school sweetheart (she didn't strike me as a promiscuous at all) still single. This "Brady Bunch" like family is certainly not fully fleshed out the way good characters should be on television, but neither are they something you'd find in a minstrel show.
As far as "Family Guy" goes...Peter is clearly supposed to be seen as an idiot with crass tastes and limited education. No one has ever (to my knowledge) found his character to be a role model. Lois and Brian are clearly the only shining light bulbs among mostly dim ones. Seth MacFarlane spares NO ONE in his neverending quest to make fun of people, ideas and stereotypes...He's not nearly as clever or funny as he thinks he is, but he is (as far as I can tell) not being nasty or racist.
There were very few laughs to be found in "The Cleveland Show" and it is definitely a far far cry from the wonderful "Cosby Show," but is it racist? I don't think so.Of course, we all approach the same thing differently with so many amazingly varied responses...it's what makes life so interesting and so frustrating.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: "The Cleveland Show" and "The Sky is Falling" approach Alternet uses
Posted by: sui_generis
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Kym525 on Oct 1, 2009 3:28 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
However, one doesn't have to look just at BET. Most of the so-called "black themed" shows in prime time are nothing more than modern-day minstrel shows, and worse these shows are created by other blacks. Of course, "reality shows" like 'I Love New York', 'Flava of Love' and "Cops" (which tend to feature black and brown people more often than white) certainly don't help matters either. I turned off the television a long time ago, but I do have family and friends who love these shows and don't see the harm they do. As far as The Cleveland Show, the fact that it's voiced by a white actor (when there are a lot of talented black voice actors who could have done the part) is typical of Hollywood's so-called "colorblind casting".
But here's the problem. This will definitely come off as racist but it still needs to be said. Most white people aren't very bright in spite of their assertions to the contrary. Most of them lack any serious critical thinking skills and take what they see on television and/or radio as the gospel truth about black people. Most were shocked about 'The Cosby Show' because they couldn't imagine that black people could (were and ARE) successful with loving and attentive parents and intelligent kids.
Don't believe me? Read some of the posts on Alternet whenever an article about race is posted. Now these are supposed to be "liberals" who tend to pride themselves as being smarter than conservatives, and yet many of these white "liberals" can spout off talking points about blacks that come straight from Limbaugh's mouth. Few, if any of them could name ten famous black inventors (without googling the information), nor are they aware that the CEO of Xerox is a black woman (which they know NOW), but dollars to doughnuts they all CAN tell you about the high rates of black male incarceration and why asians (supposedly) do better in society.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The image of black people has been taking a hit LONG before this show
Posted by: YogiBear
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kanekoa64 on Oct 2, 2009 5:35 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It wouldn't be the first cartoon starring a Black cast that got similar reviews for being anti-Black. The PJ's had seriously derogatory Black stereotypes but I guess as it was written by a mostly, if not all Black crew, everybody shuts up about it. It was genius level humor and brilliant voiced by a talented cast. I doubt this new show will even scratch the level of social parody achieved by Eddie Murphy's show. Family Guy has a lot of funny moments, but was based on a formulaic routine and tried to be as be as crass as possible. That's what made it so fun! I imagine this effort won't be much different, in the long run. Besides, if you want crass, over the top social parody that should outrage EVERYBODY who's overly sensitive about a cartoon, nothing is going to come close to "Drawn Together".
Now THAT'S a heavy show with LOTS of stuff to get up in arms about.
AND it's funny as HELL! I can't tell you how many times I was left with my jaw hanging open because even I was surprised they went there.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cdmsr on Oct 2, 2009 6:14 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In fact, the pinnacle of racial and gender equality is on display in TV ads: Black men are now regularly presented in these ads as every bit as stupid and incompetent as white men have been for years.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: YogiBear on Oct 3, 2009 1:05 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A talking bear? And did anyone else notice that Clevland Jr. looks just like Peter? Are the Fox cartoonists so poorly paid?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Priam1 on Oct 3, 2009 12:41 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: leftinAK on Oct 3, 2009 8:14 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Removal of black anchors? Really?
"It never ceases to amaze me what’s not off limits when it comes to black people." Off limits? Why just black people? Why anybody at all???
Whining, whining, whining...
That's all I'm hearing out of AlterNet articles lately. I'm getting to the point where I cringe when I see another post in my email.
Come on AlterNet. REAL JOURNALISM PLEASE.
thank you.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Ellie1 on Oct 4, 2009 7:03 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wallace530 on Oct 13, 2009 6:35 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Revolutionary (Direct) Democracy on Sep 30, 2009 1:00 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
FREE AMERICA
REVOLUTIONARY (DIRECT) DEMOCRACY
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jroth420 on Sep 30, 2009 1:34 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Don't worry about it...
Posted by: Smirk
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ChrisBrown on Sep 30, 2009 4:44 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» But some are.
Posted by: Parcival01
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Sep 30, 2009 4:55 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Sep 30, 2009 5:18 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
None of the characters on Family Guy are strong enough for their own spin-off. If people want to see characters from Family Guy, they're going to watch Family Guy.
As for the racial accusations, I think they're silly. Family Guy was never about political correctness. The Cleveland Show shouldn't be either. If you want to watch old reruns of the Cosby Show, go find them on another channel.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Wiieakling on Sep 30, 2009 5:41 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My name is Earl is a good example of making fun of Caucasian people. Whatever.
Mind of Mencia is a good example of making fun of Hispanic people. Whatever.
The Cleavland Show is a good example of making fun of African American people. Whatever.
The list is a mile long... when you consider other areas of stereotype... portrayal of Jewish/Christians, GLBT, or WOMEN?!
You don't have to ascribe to that type of humor, I know it's hard to find wholesome television nowawdays, but please understand that we're all victims.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: C'mon let's be rational about entertainment.
Posted by: jaglover
» RE: C'mon let's be rational about entertainment.
Posted by: sui_generis
» thank you
Posted by: Drclaw
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ChrisBrown on Sep 30, 2009 5:53 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a silly comment. There are many examples of t.v., movies, radio making fun of Jewish and Hispanic stereotypes.
Whether or not it is funny, do you think "The Cleveland Show" is promoting negative stereotypes of black people? It is trying to make fun of the stereotypes. Should we make every black character on t.v. a brilliant, successful doctor or lawyer with a perfect marriage, family, etc? Doesn't bringing these stereotypes to light and satirizing them more healthy, honest than pretending they don't exist?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Satire
Posted by: jaglover
» RE: Satire
Posted by: sui_generis
» RE: Satire
Posted by: felipe
» RE: Satire my butt! White people DON'T understand!!!
Posted by: Shalimarali
» You are right
Posted by: felipe
» RE: Satire my butt! White people DON'T understand!!!
Posted by: hdthoreau
Comments are closed-
Posted by: souffrantfleur on Sep 30, 2009 6:05 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Chill out, Jasmyne
Posted by: jaglover
» RE: Chill out, Jasmyne
Posted by: sui_generis
Comments are closed-
Posted by: El Hombre Malo on Sep 30, 2009 6:19 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article here in Alternet seems to disagree with that notion
I mean, I though Cleveland to be a minstrel ever since I discovered he was voiced by a (terribly good) white actor, but if you cant see the overly stereotipycal portrayal of spanish speaking characters in TV and Movie fiction, you are either blind or dont want to see.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: eally?
Posted by: sui_generis
» RE: eally?
Posted by: El Hombre Malo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Ayla87 on Sep 30, 2009 6:47 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Family guy is a parody of everyday life of middle class americans
American Dad is a parody of right wing conservatism and patriotism.
The Cleaveland Show does is a parody of black people and thier stereotypes.
Every show that MacFarlane has done has isolated a specific class of people and poked fun at them for thier various quirks and naunces. Just because his latest spin off show targets the black community doesn't mean it's an attempt by Fox to push black people back 50 years. It's MacFarlane's attempt to make money by pushing people's buttons. And clearly it's worked.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Seth McFarlane is laughing his ass off right now...
Posted by: Laina27
» RE: Seth McFarlane is laughing his ass off right now...
Posted by: sui_generis
» RE: What could we call a show like that, I wonder...
Posted by: stellabloo
» What could we call a show like that, I wonder...
Posted by: Ayla87
» RE: What could we call a show like that, I wonder...
Posted by: sui_generis
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ergoat2004 on Sep 30, 2009 9:10 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Where is all the outrage from the black community for "The Boondocks" that has the most off the wall racial stereotypes and cliches and usage of the "N-Word" ... but it's okay because the writer is African American, as are most (if not all?) of the voice cast are black, but for the Cleveland show to make jokes clearly in the same spectrum (and not using the "N-Word"), it's bad because they are white?
By the way, I love the Boondocks, from the first line of the series ("Jesus was black, Ronald Reagan was the devil, and the government knew about 9-11") to the scathing, unflinching critique of "black" culture/community that pulls no punches. What if Dr. MLK Jr. was alive today? Brilliant.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Joni50 on Sep 30, 2009 9:11 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sure, you can make fun of any group, including whites (eg, redneck jokes, Polish jokes, Jew jokes, Irish jokes, etc.) But these don't exist in a context of 400 years of marginalization and scapegoating. They don't exist in the context of centuries of that group being cast as the eternal "other," the object for projection of the deepest fears, aggressions, and taboo desires of the mainstream collective unconscious. They furthermore don't exist in the context of someone from that group recently being elected to our highest office, thereby challenging said fears, aggressions, and desires of said collective unconsciousness. Moreover, they don't exist in the context of a radical backlash from the powers that be and their brownshirt minions against the due processes of democracy. Finally, they don't exist in the context of coming from the mouthpiece of said powers that be (Fox network).
Context, people, ok?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Gilgamesh on Sep 30, 2009 9:18 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
maybe you should get mad at the media for portraying every black person as a "gangsta" and things like this wouldnt be on tv to begin with.
the masses of black people in the US reinforce the stereotypes about them all by themselves.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: oh but it ok when blacks make fun of whites on BET
Posted by: ImissuSam
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ClassAct on Sep 30, 2009 9:43 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just for the record, I think the funniest thing ever on television was on The Simpsons when newscaster Kent Brockman offered his assistance to "our new insect overlords."
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: beastfan on Sep 30, 2009 9:55 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The TV sitcom formula is old and unfunny. Watch the previews, and hear how the audience is uproariously laughing at yet another sex joke, or insult of the parent by the child. It's very simple; pick up a book or put on a music CD.
By the way, SNL did a sketch where they mocked the naming conventions of black people ("Magnesium", "Cerebellum", "Onomatopoeia"), and it was actually pretty funny.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: theScale on Sep 30, 2009 9:58 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Also, what's up with the "Weismans" and "Hernandezes" point you try to make? Makes you seem even more clueless. It's "journalism" like this that makes liberals such an easy target for the right. You all seem like loonies.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sui_generis on Sep 30, 2009 10:14 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Does the author know ANYthing about Seth Macfarlane and Family Guy, AT ALL? Do they understand that every single last character on the original show was ALREADY a stereotype, not just blacks? I'm shocked that nobody in the editorial chain of command at Alternet seems to have the ounce of understanding needed to shoot down this nonsense either, and that you'd want to feature an article like this on their home page, even if it isn't by a direct staffer. Alternet is becoming increasingly marginalized and ignored as they venture farther and farther out onto the very edge of the loony-left fringe in an attempt to out-PC and out-liberal all the other decent progressive sites out there, by publishing inflammatory, mindless rhetoric like this.
As an African American, I'm embarrassed that anybody else had to read this ignorant pile of nonsense, and concerned that it undermines ACTUAL cases of racism and abuses of power against us and other minorities.
Thanks for uplifting the race, "sistah", but you've done nothing but undermine the very positive image of the Obamas that you keep citing over and over, as if it's the only one you can think of. But hey, keep on keepin' it real.
Real ignorant.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Perfect Response...
Posted by: On the Border
» TOTALLY DISAGREE!!
Posted by: Drclaw
» Oh Boy. Just Wait 'Til You See the Annual "Don't Celebrate Thanksgiving" Article...
Posted by: grumble-bum
» RE: unbelievable
Posted by: YogiBear
Comments are closed-
Posted by: neko_sake on Sep 30, 2009 10:40 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: -matti on Sep 30, 2009 10:50 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even that description is loose and ignorant on my part because I'm afraid that I don't know the specific ethnic groups in his mother's background or the likely more contiguous and coherent ethnic/tribal group his father belonged to.
But at least I'm not following in the tradition of the "one drop rule" in characterizing our Corporatist-Imperialist President.
What he identifies himself as is a whole other story. But self-identification alone does not guaruntee accuracy in identification.
For instance, Barack Obama and many others self-identify as "American". While this is true in a larger sense, it is decidedly NOT true in the sense that he/they mean it. They mean it as a national group label when it is correctly a geographic one. Obama and these other "Americans" mean to say they are people "from the United States of America", but instead imply that such people represent the totality of those living in the Americas.
In the same way, Obama may self-identify as "black" and yet still not be so. Actually, since "black" is a concept that only applies to people in an abstract cultural sense (and then only poorly), the fact that Obama did NOT spend his formative period in anything like that culture (Hawaii, Harvard) should raise eyebrows over this self-identification straight off. Methinks Mr. Hope and Change's "black"-ness has as much to do with Chicago politics as it does anything else.
But this is all pointless, isn't it. No amount of discussion and persuasion on this subject will be for the good, because the fact that we are even having it is for the ill.
The one truly good thing that should have come out of Obama's success in the Dem Party nomination elections and the public Presidential one would have been the final end of "race" thinking and arguing in the U.S.. Election of a "mixed-race" person should have accomplished this overdue hurdle-leap and allowed us to move on to more practical and pressing matters.
Alas it did not.
Likely because it was never meant to.
What a sad State we find ourselves in.
-matti.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Obama is whatever he says he is. Race is a social construct.
Posted by: sui_generis
» RE: Obama is not "black".
Posted by: Joni50
» RE: Obama is not "black".
Posted by: YogiBear
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jebpgh on Sep 30, 2009 11:12 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I thought Cleveland wasn't very funny so that was my first and last episode. Thank God my remote is still functioning.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Adam_Kirur on Sep 30, 2009 12:06 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: that one ethnic group in America that CANNOT BE CRITICIZED
Posted by: ergoat2004
» RE: Is Seth McFarlane the Producer?
Posted by: astralman
» RE: Is Seth McFarlane the Producer?
Posted by: luther6
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mrfixdit on Sep 30, 2009 2:13 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JoeDiPatera on Sep 30, 2009 5:27 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just to list a few examples:
1) White people think black men don't get sad, they just get angrier
2) White people think that loudly spouting an Ebonics catchphrase passes as humor for blacks
3) Because the President is black, black people should be expected to weigh in on - or justify - the presidency because, of course, they are black.
And there's a big difference between stereotypes about blacks and unfortunate statistics. Just to address two points that were brought up in the article: a disproportionate number of black people come from broken families or single-parent households and blacks are disproportionately likely to suffer from obesity. These aren't really laugh lines in the show: they're just part of the characters and stories (as lazy and/or ill-conceived as they may be).
Basically, do you think HBO's The Wire is a minstrel show too? I'd like to point out that very few of the show's drug dealers come from economically stable, morally traditional two-parent households that place a high precedent on higher education.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» It's all about PERCEPTION
Posted by: Kym525
» RE: It's all about PERCEPTION
Posted by: sui_generis
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ninjanurse on Sep 30, 2009 5:53 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Looks Like Garfield
Posted by: TheNamelessCity
Comments are closed-
Posted by: angie70 on Sep 30, 2009 6:11 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article, like so many here on Alternet, uses lots of exaggeration and very little facts to back up its main idea. I consider myself very liberal yet so many times I find Alternet uses a "the sky is falling" approach that is a huge turn-off for me in the same way Fox News is with all its screaming, lies and misplaced accusations.
I wonder if the writer even watched the series premiere. Cleveland is a kind-hearted man who, in the first episode at least, wants to do the right thing and is thrilled to find his high school sweetheart (she didn't strike me as a promiscuous at all) still single. This "Brady Bunch" like family is certainly not fully fleshed out the way good characters should be on television, but neither are they something you'd find in a minstrel show.
As far as "Family Guy" goes...Peter is clearly supposed to be seen as an idiot with crass tastes and limited education. No one has ever (to my knowledge) found his character to be a role model. Lois and Brian are clearly the only shining light bulbs among mostly dim ones. Seth MacFarlane spares NO ONE in his neverending quest to make fun of people, ideas and stereotypes...He's not nearly as clever or funny as he thinks he is, but he is (as far as I can tell) not being nasty or racist.
There were very few laughs to be found in "The Cleveland Show" and it is definitely a far far cry from the wonderful "Cosby Show," but is it racist? I don't think so.Of course, we all approach the same thing differently with so many amazingly varied responses...it's what makes life so interesting and so frustrating.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: "The Cleveland Show" and "The Sky is Falling" approach Alternet uses
Posted by: sui_generis
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Kym525 on Oct 1, 2009 3:28 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
However, one doesn't have to look just at BET. Most of the so-called "black themed" shows in prime time are nothing more than modern-day minstrel shows, and worse these shows are created by other blacks. Of course, "reality shows" like 'I Love New York', 'Flava of Love' and "Cops" (which tend to feature black and brown people more often than white) certainly don't help matters either. I turned off the television a long time ago, but I do have family and friends who love these shows and don't see the harm they do. As far as The Cleveland Show, the fact that it's voiced by a white actor (when there are a lot of talented black voice actors who could have done the part) is typical of Hollywood's so-called "colorblind casting".
But here's the problem. This will definitely come off as racist but it still needs to be said. Most white people aren't very bright in spite of their assertions to the contrary. Most of them lack any serious critical thinking skills and take what they see on television and/or radio as the gospel truth about black people. Most were shocked about 'The Cosby Show' because they couldn't imagine that black people could (were and ARE) successful with loving and attentive parents and intelligent kids.
Don't believe me? Read some of the posts on Alternet whenever an article about race is posted. Now these are supposed to be "liberals" who tend to pride themselves as being smarter than conservatives, and yet many of these white "liberals" can spout off talking points about blacks that come straight from Limbaugh's mouth. Few, if any of them could name ten famous black inventors (without googling the information), nor are they aware that the CEO of Xerox is a black woman (which they know NOW), but dollars to doughnuts they all CAN tell you about the high rates of black male incarceration and why asians (supposedly) do better in society.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The image of black people has been taking a hit LONG before this show
Posted by: YogiBear
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kanekoa64 on Oct 2, 2009 5:35 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It wouldn't be the first cartoon starring a Black cast that got similar reviews for being anti-Black. The PJ's had seriously derogatory Black stereotypes but I guess as it was written by a mostly, if not all Black crew, everybody shuts up about it. It was genius level humor and brilliant voiced by a talented cast. I doubt this new show will even scratch the level of social parody achieved by Eddie Murphy's show. Family Guy has a lot of funny moments, but was based on a formulaic routine and tried to be as be as crass as possible. That's what made it so fun! I imagine this effort won't be much different, in the long run. Besides, if you want crass, over the top social parody that should outrage EVERYBODY who's overly sensitive about a cartoon, nothing is going to come close to "Drawn Together".
Now THAT'S a heavy show with LOTS of stuff to get up in arms about.
AND it's funny as HELL! I can't tell you how many times I was left with my jaw hanging open because even I was surprised they went there.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cdmsr on Oct 2, 2009 6:14 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In fact, the pinnacle of racial and gender equality is on display in TV ads: Black men are now regularly presented in these ads as every bit as stupid and incompetent as white men have been for years.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: YogiBear on Oct 3, 2009 1:05 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A talking bear? And did anyone else notice that Clevland Jr. looks just like Peter? Are the Fox cartoonists so poorly paid?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Priam1 on Oct 3, 2009 12:41 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: leftinAK on Oct 3, 2009 8:14 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Removal of black anchors? Really?
"It never ceases to amaze me what’s not off limits when it comes to black people." Off limits? Why just black people? Why anybody at all???
Whining, whining, whining...
That's all I'm hearing out of AlterNet articles lately. I'm getting to the point where I cringe when I see another post in my email.
Come on AlterNet. REAL JOURNALISM PLEASE.
thank you.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Ellie1 on Oct 4, 2009 7:03 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wallace530 on Oct 13, 2009 6:35 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Vancouver's Games Will Be the Gayest Olympics Ever
Trial Begins for Activist Who Fought to Protect Federal Lands from Drilling -- Join the Protest
Starbucks' Cop-Out to Gun Nuts: Customers Served Coffee While Strapped




