Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Does Military Service Turn Young Men into Sexual Predators?

By Penny Coleman, AlterNet. Posted October 22, 2009.


"Everyone has the potential to be a sex offender. It depends on how they have been conditioned."

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
What if People Actually Treated Religion as Just a Metaphor (Like Trekkies and Secular Jews)?
Greta Christina

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
15 Signs American Society Is Coming Apart at the Seams
David DeGraw

DrugReporter:
When It’s Crunch Time at College, Students Turn to Adderall
Erik Hayden

Environment:
20 Weird, Crazy Ideas for Helping the Earth

Food:
The War on Soy: Why the 'Miracle Food' May Be a Health Risk and Environmental Nightmare
Tara Lohan

Health and Wellness:
Pharmaceutical Giant Paid $500,000 to Psychiatrist Who Used Chicago's Poor as Guinea Pigs
Christina Jewett and Sam Roe

Immigration:
Dobbs' Resignation Was Long Overdue
Janet Murguía

Media and Technology:
Is Right-Wing Media Hustler Trying to "Blackmail" Obama's Attorney General over ACORN Videos?
David Edwards, Muriel Kane

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
New Right-Wing Craze: Using Bible Quote to Pray That Obama’s 'Days Be Few'
Amanda Terkel

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Hey Guys, Don't Want Kids? A Vascetomy Is Probably the Way to Go
Anna Clark

Rights and Liberties:
Economic Crisis Is Getting Bloody -- Violent Deaths Are Now Following Evictions, Foreclosures and Job Losses
Nick Turse

Sex and Relationships:
How Abstinence-Only Programs Perpetuate Dangerous Stereotypes
Martha Kempner

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Poseidon's Financial Shell Game: Why Is a Private Desalination Plant Asking for Public Money?
Peter Gleick

World:
Army Sends Mom to Afghanistan, Infant to Protective Services
Dahr Jamail

More stories by Penny Coleman

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Every day, for four years as a West Point cadet, Tara Krause lived and worked alongside the men who had gang-raped her.

Still, she managed to graduate in 1982. She served as a field artillery officer during the Cold War and was attached to the 518th Military Intelligence Brigade during the Gulf War. In what she calls "an act of incredible self-destruction," she married a three-tour Vietnam vet in 1985 and, for the next eight years, lived "the private hell of his PTSD."

"Suicidal behavior, violence and degradation were common threads of daily life," she told me. She survived only because when he put his gun to her head one day, it finally gave her the courage to flee. "Like Lot's wife," she says, she struggles not to look back.

It's been almost 30 years since the rape, and Krause says she still "dance(s) the crushing daily struggle" of her own PTSD: "The nightmares, panic attacks, flashbacks, cold sweats, suicidal thoughts, zoning out, numbing all emotion and desperately avoiding triggers (reminders) -- I have become a prisoner in my own home."

Krause is rated 70 percent disabled by the Veteran's Administration and has been in treatment at the Long Beach [Calif.] VA for the past six years.

For all the work she has done to heal her own injuries, she still has no answer for the question: "How do you get a group of Southern white teenagers, all of whom were Eagle Scouts, class presidents, scholars and athletes, to be capable of raping a classmate?"

The question deserves an answer, and not a simplistic one. A 2003 survey of female veterans from Vietnam through the Gulf War found that almost 8 in 10 had been  sexually harassed during their military service, and 30 percent had been raped.

Yet for decades, in spite of the terrible numbers, the military has managed with astonishing success to get away with responding to grievances like Krause's with silence, or denial, or by blaming "a few bad apples." But when individual soldiers take the blame, the system gets off the hook.

And it can be shown that the patterns of military sex crimes are old and widespread -- for generations, military service has transformed large numbers of American boys into sexual predators.

So it seems reasonable to ask if perhaps there is something about military culture or training or experience that can be identified as causative, and then, perhaps, changed.

The correlation is difficult to dismiss. The majority of veterans behind bars today are there for a very specific type of crime: violence against women and children. That fact has held true since the first Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) surveys of veteran populations in the nation's prisons in 1981, and there is evidence that those surveys only identified a much older problem.

The orgy of demonization, however, that both fueled and justified the disgraceful neglect of veterans in the aftermath of Vietnam makes this an especially fraught issue to take on.

But -- without making any excuses for behaviors that cause irreparable harm to those who are victimized -- there is little hope of change unless the tacit complicity of military institutions and culture is acknowledged. And that complicity most certainly did not begin recently.

World War II is remembered as a crucible and a coming-of-age ritual for the baby-faced boys it turned first into men and then into the "greatest generation."

The butchery, the civilian atrocities, the summary executions, the appalling racism and the breakdown of hundreds of thousands of soldiers have been largely erased from communal memory. And so have the rapes perpetrated by American soldiers on our female enemies and allies alike.

In August and September 1944, when the fighting eased, French women were raped by their American liberators at three times the rate of civilian women in the U.S. And during the final drive through Germany in March and April 1945, more than 900 German women were raped by American soldiers, causing Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower to issue a directive to Army commanders expressing his "grave concern" and instructing that speedy and appropriate punishments be administered.

According to Madeline Morris, the Duke University law professor and military historian who uncovered that lurid fragment of history, those numbers are almost certainly on the low side.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: military, ptsd, sexual assault

Penny Coleman is the widow of a Vietnam veteran who took his own life after coming home. Her book Flashback: Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Suicide and the Lessons of War was released on Memorial Day 2006. Her Web site is Flashback.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
People and sex
Posted by: C. Rich on Oct 22, 2009 1:13 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is a lot of ways to look at sex:

http://americaspeaksink.com/2009/09/americas-war-on-sex/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: People and sex Posted by: Brb007
» RE: PEOPLE and sex Posted by: Crazy H
» RE: People and sex Posted by: Lara1967
» RE: People and sex Posted by: richholland
» RE: Rape is not sex Posted by: Sushi
» RE: People and sex Posted by: prtsimmons
Connect ALL The Dots
Posted by: Revolutionary (Direct) Democracy on Oct 22, 2009 2:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some events make psychosis bubble to the surface, including the use of alcohol and methamphetamine, political and religious brainwashing, graphic violent sexual content and being in an environment where people are trying to kill you.


FREE AMERICA

REVOLUTIONARY (DIRECT) DEMOCRACY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Connect ALL The Dots Posted by: richholland
WAR
Posted by: batmagoo on Oct 22, 2009 3:32 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is so basic that I am surprised it has to be said ( yet here we are.)

Military Service is about WAR. It is designed to tune young men into their most primal organic instincts: conquest through extermination, and domination of the opposing tribe's genetic pool (I am hoping I don't need to be more descriptive.)
Military Service conditions the individual into functioning as an automatic killing machine -

Although I respect the do-gooder mindset of someone wanting to contain the horrors of killing, brutality, aggression ( whether same sex or not,) and domination, it boggles my mind that we as a society are still daydreaming about "clean wars" where men and women coexist and fight together in peace.

Human folly does not only reside in our self-destructive impulses, it also lies in our incredible propensity for delusional idealism, and our endlessly self-aggrandizing views.

Military Service is nothing more than a preparation for war; what else needs to be said?
War has been shaped through centuries of civilization and only in ours can we find such arrogance as our desire to screw around with the wiring. Just look at a modern army......

War, much as our sexual Alpha games of reproduction through domination, has been with us, as have most tendencies, since our biological dawn. Millions of years of it!
Denial is a much more recent phenomenon.
If one doesn't recognize this, one might as well join the Christians.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: WAR Posted by: richholland
» RE: WAR Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: WAR Posted by: John Rice
» RE: WAR Posted by: cdlepthien
» RE: WAR Posted by: Tom Tele
» RE: WAR Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: WAR Posted by: jaglover
» RE: WAR Posted by: Crazy H
» statistics Posted by: Tom Tele
Men, Religion, Woman
Posted by: corey on Oct 22, 2009 4:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The bible tells men to rape woman instead of having sex with other men.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Men, Religion, Woman Posted by: richholland
» RE: Men, Religion, Woman Posted by: VZEQICVA
» Bible supports rape and slavery Posted by: grailsnail
Military men
Posted by: colinmeister on Oct 22, 2009 4:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most military men are average guys of average or below average intelligence. They do a job which involves killing other people, and are paid for it.

Unfortunately, many in the media fawn over "Our brave troops", building them up into something they are not. This must have an effect on the men, and give them the idea that they are something special and have a position in life way above what they really have.

It is time to stop the fawning, and treat military men just the same as anybody else who does a job and is being paid for it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Don't try and guilt-trip me Posted by: ETSpoon
You can't turn anyone into a sexual predator.
Posted by: Longdream on Oct 22, 2009 4:26 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It would be more accurate to say that the culture of the armed forces attracts sexual predators, and then encourages their proclivities.

It's the same with torturers. You can't create them, and an ordinary person would have a lot of trouble following orders to torture someone. But when a culture has leave to test and identify its sadists, it's easy to use them to advantage.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Military "illness".......
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Oct 22, 2009 5:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The military is a very different organization, because their mission is to go to war to "defend" this nation. As such there is a strict adherence to "code", "chain of command" and "orders". Most of these young men entering service haven't had that type of discipline or training, and therefore they take this to heart. As women have entered the military in greater numbers many of the "old guard" that resented women ("in their military"), their attitudes filtered down to "their male troops"! After all, that mind-set still reigns that says "women are still supposed to be barefoot & pregnant"!

Women on the other hand are usually trying to "fit in" being part of "the gang"! And when people are young and "indoctrinated into having each others back" (similar to the herd mentality), when rape happens, those higher ups just want to cover it up so that it goes away!

I'm not sure what the solution is, but I do know that in this time when there are more women in the service, serving alongside men in combat - until the military is willing to confront this issue head on (or is confronted with deadly consequences from their in-actions) to really deal with it, there will continue to be problems!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

morgan1
Posted by: morgan1 on Oct 22, 2009 5:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am a veteran and come for the school of thought being the military attracts those who are already dehumanized: Bullies, date rapists, etc. The military (Real Men!)allows a mindset of men can do anything and women are for use--Throwaways. They have the firepower to kill wantonly, they have the backup of command. I worked cases where women were violated. The men were confined for a time to base, loss of rank sometimes, but the women always left the service while the men stayed and moved up the chain of command. It is no different now than it was in WW2 and the years in-between. Even in times of peace (Rare) women were abused and raped. This is an emotional climate that will not change--This was behavior during the Roman glory days all the way through history in all countries with a standing military.The serial killer and the rapist is not made, he already IS. The military gives them a free pass. Its that simple.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
Lillybean
Posted by: Calamitysams@yahoo.com on Oct 22, 2009 6:21 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't think it starts with the military, it starts much younger. Just watch any group of little boys and what do you hear them taunting each other with?

"You throw like a girl" "You run like a girl"
"You're a sissy"
"You're a crybaby, cry like a little girl"

Now where does all of that start? I'll tell you, with the dads. Just watch any group of fathers with their boys and how they choose to taunt them, or someone else's boy and you'll hear it constantly.

This accomplishes two things, girls learn that just being girls is inferior and boys learn that girls are inferior. Nice lesson-and one the girls pay for the rest of their lives.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Lillybean Posted by: Crazy H
To The Victor Belongs The Spoils
Posted by: melpol on Oct 22, 2009 6:23 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Victorious armies throughout history have raped, robbed, and plundered. “To the victor belongs the spoils” is often repeated. But it wrong for male soldiers to sexually abuse their female comrades. The few sexual predators in the military should have patience until their next victory.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: To The Victor Belongs The Spoils Posted by: Sister_Lauren
Interesting
Posted by: ETSpoon on Oct 22, 2009 6:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This may be dated (written 1979) but germane to the topic at hand:
"In studies influenced by psychoanalytic concepts, there are four rape motives: uncontrollable impulse, mental illness or disease, momentary loss of control precipitated by unusual circumstances, and victim precipitation. These explanations remove responsibility from everyone except the victim. The impulse theory removes a rapist's behavior from legal jurisdiction but has never been proved empirically. It has been replaced in recent literature by the mental illness theory, a more sophisticated approach which often describes the rapist as a perverted individual with latent homosexual tendencies (emphasis added) and interprets rape as an attack on a mother figure which is symptomatic of inner conflicts. Individual theories based on the disease model are reviewed, along with beliefs regarding the relationship between alcohol use and rape. Victimology has supported victim precipitation themes in psychiatric studies, but no one has noted how easily psychoanalytic views of women can be translated into a rationalization for male sexual aggressiveness. Women are categorized as true victims and those who have an inner masochistic need to be raped, while sex offenders' mothers and wives are criticized for their behavior. Girl victims of rape are alleged to have the same motives as their adult counterparts and are often described as attractive, appealing, submissive, and seductive. Perception of fault is also affected by the belief that 'nice girls don't get raped.' A sociological theory views criminal behavior as learned behavior, and thus rapists may not be abnormal but merely conforming to their perception of male sex-role expectations."
National Criminal Justice Reference Service, abstract

Here's a more recent reference fro 2002:
"People who are insecure about their masculinity. Some may actually be harboring latent homosexual tendencies and that's a reason for the rapes(emphasis added). They're trying to prove to themselves they are in fact masculine."
philly.com

Time to end "don't ask, don't tell." Tell your US Representative to support H.R. 1283, the Military Readiness Enhancement Act.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Seriously?
Posted by: Stell on Oct 22, 2009 7:25 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"How do you get a group of Southern white teenagers, all of whom were Eagle Scouts, class presidents, scholars and athletes, to be capable of raping a classmate?"

This would be my idea of a date rapist or potential abuser. Young men groomed by macho culture, with a sense of entitlement.

Why do so many people continue to assume that rapists are uneducated, drug-using, underemployed, scary black men in a dark alley? Personally, and from experience, I would be much more wary of the entitled, privileged white guy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Seriously? Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: in the words of my mother in law Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: Seriously? Posted by: Sister_Lauren
Ah......The Glory of Service to One's Country!
Posted by: RickW on Oct 22, 2009 7:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They don't show any of this on the posters and ads!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

TRYING TO SANITIZE WAR
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Oct 22, 2009 7:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's what we're tying to do. When buildings are falling, everything is burning, children have been killed, people on both sides are terrified we want men to behave like gentlemen. The concept of remote war has given war a new definition, but yet nothing has changed. Human corpses have been named CD, collateral damage. The DoD doesn't count dead people presumed to be the enemy. When a human being doesn't even deserve a name or number it's unrealistic to believe that anyone can refine the terms of war. So an old man can be killed in a predator drone attack and that's OK. If his daughter is raped that's a tragedy. No matter how a war is fought, technology and all, it is what it is. Trying to find a way to address specific behavior is not possible. It's a package deal. My guess is that the military knows the patterns of behavior they're dealing with. If they 'clean up' part of the act, they destroy the entire structure of the mindset required to go to war in the first place. Incidentally, in the end both sides lose. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: TRYING TO SANITIZE WAR Posted by: Brb007
» RE: TRYING TO SANITIZE WAR Posted by: VZEQICVA
To the Author
Posted by: jaglover on Oct 22, 2009 8:04 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is the STUPIDEST title and article ever!!! The military is nothing more than a cross-section of society so what you find among military communities is no different than what you find in other communities well except the fact that WE have/had the BALLS to want to protect our country. I'm a Black, professional, 20 year Air Force veteran (retired), Democrat, Liberal....just in case you're wondering. How dare you write some shit like this to vilify the people who protect your sorry ass so that you can write this stupid shit. Here's an idea, why don't you do some research and write an article about how you can HELP these kids who come back with PTSD?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You tell'em Jag! Posted by: felipe
» Like a religious belief Posted by: Joshua Holland
» Arguably, yes Posted by: Joshua Holland
» To the "WE" with the "BALLS" Posted by: ppcoleman
» RE: To the Author Posted by: mrstrider
A few thoughts
Posted by: willymack on Oct 22, 2009 8:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was in the Navy from dec., 1956 until Apr., 1978.
There were female members in the Navy during that time, but they were far fewer than now, and they were NEVER aboard warships, thus minimizing interaction between them and the men. Any interaction that DID take place was usually harmless FUN, devoid of any violence.
Contrast this with the fact that my granddaughter is aboard a Navy warship in Yokosuka, Japan right now. (Yeah, I told HER some sea stories, too).
I've been out these thirty one years, now, so any opinion of mine shouldn't carry much weight, but here goes anyway:
There is NO excuse for a man brutalizing a woman, EVER.
ANY man who does so has a screw or two loose, and should be considered a dangerous sociopath and unfit for military service.
The marriage between corporate America and the military has been an unmitigated disaster, and especially harmful to the officer cadre, who, upon attaining flag rank, look forward to their military retainer while taking a post in one of the corporations getting fat off "wars" of convienence and huge profits.
We were warned of this very situation back in 1961 by none other than Dwight Eisenhower, both in a speech and a book ("Mandate for a change"), but, in typical fashion, did absolutely NOTHING about it, bringing us to the sorry mess we see today.
The criminals, both civilian and military, who preceeded the current administration have presented Pres. Obama with so many seemingly intractible problems, it's nearly enough to drive one crazy, just to prioritize them and deal with them in their proper order, but this is exactly what MUST be done.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A few thoughts Posted by: VZEQICVA
Wars can turn men and women into the worst of anything. :(
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield on Oct 22, 2009 9:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One of my older friends who served in Vietnam long before I was born had plenty to say about how serving hurt his mindset with his loss of limbs from an explosion on the battlefield changing his entire mental status forever. I'm glad he never got around to being a sexual predator and that his wife and family went through years of trouble healing him. That said, a lot of soldiers who come back from the war are neglected by even their own family. It is bad enough that the military does not train people to be controlled enough in their thinking and actions. Perhaps that would explain one of the side effects such as turning into sexual predators. :(

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

go back to basic research, then basic training
Posted by: littlepitcher on Oct 22, 2009 9:36 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Study about 25 years ago concluded that 25% of men admitted that they would rape, if they knew they would not be caught.

Percentage entering military service probably is the same or higher.

These guys are getting caught, but not getting consequences, This gives the rest of the grunts role models of men who get away with daring deeds.

The rape issue should be discussed in basic training, and rape should be prosecuted as an attack on friendly troops, and not accidental or as a forgivable lapse of impulse control. Sentencing should be dishonorable discharge.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I don't know why the sentence Posted by: cdlepthien
Which came first, the chicken or the egg?
Posted by: BlueSun on Oct 22, 2009 9:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is a fascinating question as to whether the military conditioning, values, and experience are the genesis for animal sexual behavior, or if the military attracts an inordinate number of young men who have these feelings just under the surface already.

Young men of military age are quite often confused and conflicted about their sexuality. They may be suppressing homosexual feelings or just plain confusion about what makes a man 'masculine.'

There are several ready-made molds of masculinity they can adopt in order to assure themselves they are truly 100% 'masculine.' Sports is one environment that reinforces the feelings of masculinity and suppresses uncertainties about their sexual identity. So do other traditionally 'male only' organizations like the police force, fire department, and, of course the military, with the pinnacle of the assertion of masculinity being the Marines.

When women enter these hallowed domains of 'maleness,' it undermines the one element of these men's lives that asserts their masculinity and comforts their doubts. If a woman can be a police officer, or a firefighter, or a jet pilot, or even a front-line combat soldier, then the entire artificial edifice, the crutch, of some men's external framework of masculinity is threatened, and they are once again vulnerable to all of the doubts and confusion they sought to suppress in their hyper-masculine roles.

This sometimes leads to hatred of the women who have (in their minds) undermined what makes them true men, and plays out all too often with hate-motivated sexual attacks on these women in a desperate attempt to neutralize the damage the presence of women has done to the towering, yet exceedingly fragile identity they have created to prove to themselves and the world that they are really 'real men,' 100% masculine, devoid of any feminine or effeminate 'corruption.'

I think that these organizations play very heavily on these men's need for a definition of masculinity and exploit it to create soldiers whose code of honor is a masculine bond and a willingness to kill on orders, so they do contribute to the problem. However, the traits of misogyny, sexual identity confusion, and projection of undesirable urges they have to work with are already present in many who seek out this sort of life.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Which came first, the chicken or the egg? Posted by: theblackgeorgecarlin
Don't Ask, Don't Tell
Posted by: Dolphyn on Oct 22, 2009 11:14 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can't help but think that the homophobic policies of the military are a factor in this. Does some of this sexual violence occur because the men feel a need to prove their masculinity or heterosexuality? Would that tendency be reduced if gays were serving openly? I don't know the answers, but I think these questions would make for some very interesting research.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
Waynep
Posted by: waynep on Oct 22, 2009 8:17 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Way back in 1969 in Thailand, I was a the new chaplain's assistant at the army post. I was married, with a wife back home 6 months pregnant with our first child. I was holding a religious position. My first pass to go to town, I was told that I had to take the condoms that they were issuing to EVERYONE who left the base. I assured them that I had no use for them, and that it was offensive to me to be told otherwise. It turned into a stalemate of almost one month before I was finally granted the right to a pass while refusing the condoms. My first week in Thailand, I was threatened with a court martial by the Major (chaplain) to whom I was assigned. The reason, I refused a direct order to drive the chaplain's jeep (and him of course) to the whore houses that were built by the American army with taxpayer money, and whose opening had been blessed by the chaplain. Inappropriate sexual behavior was not the exception, and those who chose to remain faithful to our partners back in the states were continually harassed and often referred to as "fags". This was the culture prevalent at that time, and I have no good reason to expect that it is different now. Fortunately, I do not know, because I did not stay in one day longer than necessary!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Live by the sword...
Posted by: celticwriter on Oct 22, 2009 9:00 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with everything the author attests and describes. However for a female to join the American Army, which basically is staffed to put a lot of non American people in pain and peril, is by itself a determination to run with the wolves. The Army is not a safe place for either young females or pacifists of any age. Prosecute to the fullest extent of the law any and all sexual perpetrators in the armed services, then tell all sane females to stay away. Time the shut this murderous and primitive adversarial system down and bring the boys home where they can be chastised and directed by their Mommas. Young male strength should support society, not destroy it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Ok, but... Posted by: MartianBachelor
Monsters are never born...
Posted by: Bearzerker on Oct 22, 2009 10:30 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...they are created by there environment and other mitigating factors!

all people [with the exception of rape victims and the offspring they are forced to have] are generally concieved in love...
the issue is what happens after, and how that molds an individual into being what they become...

with a little empathy recognition and early training in empathy, we can do away with most of todays violence.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

They rape because they are immature.
Posted by: wisegalah on Oct 23, 2009 12:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The problem is that there are no structures in western societies which assist a young male to grow into maturity.

Most primitive societies (primitive is not a perjorative word here, It signifies that the people in those societies were still in contact with the first or primary values) ----

In most primitive societies there were social rituals and processes by which a young man could learn to become independent of his family, his mother and grow into his unique maturity. The key element was the separation of the young male from the influence of the females of the society, especially his mother.
I deal on an almost daily basis with young men who have no idea who they are and have achieved no independence from their families. They look almost exclusively to their mothers for their sense of themselves. If they are from mediterranean background most have internalised almost no sense of the rights of anybody other than themselves. Most commonly they have never been asked to take any responsibility for any aspect of their lives. They are very immature, feel themselves entitled to all considerations and are incapable of making mature independent decisions. And who is there giving the finger to the press and authorities when things come badly unstuck in a court of law. Why it is mother of course. Surprising.

What is needed is a return to some form of initiation to adulthood for young men. All that they have at present is the driver's licence, the vote and the right to enter licensed premises.
Pretty poor bases for a life responsibility and mature relationships with the opposite sex.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The best traditions of the military -
Posted by: cdlepthien on Oct 23, 2009 5:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Service, discipline, honor - are betrayed when commanding officers refuse to discipline troops for criminal behavior.

Part of the problem may be that the armed forces are having a hard time recruiting & retaining troops (though that has changed some in the recession). This may contribute to some laxity on the part of the command, although it is apparent that they value male troops over female troops.

Although a draft would bring its own problems, it would be fairer and it might help keep the U.S. out of "wars of choice", especially if there are no exemptions for the children of the wealthy and well-connected. Men and women should both be drafted.

The sociological discussion on this thread has been interesting. I think that at this point the armed forces are self-selected for violent individuals (not saying that applies to all of our soldiers). This has contributed to our ineffectiveness in engagements in which we wish to retain the good will of the population of the country in which we are engaged (such as Iraq and Afghanistan).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

maven
Posted by: maven on Oct 23, 2009 11:44 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just two things--an important resource for rape info was published over 30 years ago in Susan Brownmiller's landmark study "Against Our Will" which spent a significant time on rape as it relates to the military. We are talking about just a few years after the atrocities of the Viet Nam war. And here we are again.

Secondly:
The only thing I wonder--has anyone studied the Israeli military??? As I understand, they have an even greater female presence in the ranks. Are their problems as significant? It's only a guess, but Americans' twisted sexuality in general may well be proved in the comparison.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Perhaps The Author May Want To Review Her Facts?
Posted by: Priam1 on Oct 23, 2009 8:32 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a totally misleading article. Let's review some of the facts...#1,Tara Krause says that she was gang raped years ago at WestPoint. An attempt to google the incident returns zero--no information whatsover. The only link is to this article. Pretty interesting. You would think that somewhere at some point in time someone would have heard about it.#2 Krause, like most women suffers from a marked inability to take responsibilty for her own actions--note the fact that her life is a mess, that she married a person that was abusive and made her life a living hell is not her fault, nor his apparently: it is the alleged rape that generated PTSD that she suffered so many years ago that apparently there is no record of. #3, the writer should check her facts. Her quote that according to a 2003 Survey of Female Vets that "30 per cent were raped" is untrue. Read the report. It said:" 30% reported ATTEMPTED RAPE OR rape." that is a big difference.#4 The head researcher says: "violence against women is commonplace," I'm surprised Alternet has not asked for donations to purchase flak jackets for all those poor women that have violence thrust upon them every day between lattes.#5 Dr. Sadler also mentions they obtained this info through "structured interviews," but no mention was made in corroborating this info. So if you think that someone tried to assault you--it has to be true--hey you are a woman--would you make it up? #6...Ah yes you would... at least according to the Dept. of Defense Review of Sexual Assaults FYR 20008. According to the DoD,in an effort to reduce the element of sexual assaults in the military, the Dod came up with a two tiered solution. 1) Restricted Reports--this allowed victims to file a complaint, obtain full medical and physchological services without having to go the route of having a full scale investigation. The other was an Unrestricted Report which means in filing, an immediate formal investigation takes place similar to a police investigation. The DoD study is listed in the links to the Anne Sadler's study. In 2008, of the 2,265 Unrestricted Reports, 1,594 were military service women. Because of the way the investigations took place according to the DoD, some of the 2007 sexual assualt filings were completed in 2008 and at the time of the report, approximately 592 were still pending. What the report shows--but refuses to talk about--his the high number of unsubstantiated charges. Of the 2,171 1,339 of these could not be resolved because 1,074 were ,unfounded or lacking in evidence IN WHICH THE VICTIM RECANTED. So of the total number listed, about 50% are listed as UNSUBSTANTIATED and UNFOUNDED. Another point is that the majority of sexual assaults are by people the victim is very familiar and even friends with. With this new definition of "rape," it becomes more and more difficult to separate fact from fiction. In the old days, it was very easy...a guy holds a knife to woman's throat and says scream and I'll slit your throat. No difficulty seeing rape in this scenario. But when you and your buddy Joe are playing footsie and you had a few beers and you to are sticking each other's tongue down your throats, who implied what and what happened is a lot more difficult to establish. If we are going to be discussing this subject, We need to understand the reason there are so many charges made, but far too many recantings. It makes no sense that service women would make these very serious charges and then recant them. If we really want to resolve these sexual assaults, we need to start holding these women accountable. To date we have been giving both civilian and military women a free ride. If they are raped,they have the right under the law and the (Uniform Code of Military Justice)to bring charges and to see their perpetrators punished. By the same token, if someone makes false charges then the victim also has a right to seek redress. We should not have a double standard for either gender.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Soldiers of Christ should be chaste, shouldn't they?
Posted by: smendler on Oct 24, 2009 7:59 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The possibility of access to conquered nookie has been a primary motivator for soldiers since - well, ever. But wouldn't you think that our modern, mostly hardcore Christian army should require some kind of vow of chastity - wonder what that would do to recruitment quotas?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Military service turns one into cannon fodder,
Posted by: Doubtom43 on Oct 24, 2009 11:34 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cowardly bastards like Bush and Cheney don't turn into cannon fodder, that privilege is reserved for the common people. Bush and Cheney have more important things to do. There are many more like them but I happen to despise those two the most.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

what do you think
Posted by: bvennie on Oct 25, 2009 5:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the answer in a resounding yes

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is my weapon, this is my gun...
Posted by: grailsnail on Oct 26, 2009 11:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With the nursery rhymes soldiers chant in drills, is there any wonder?

Don't trust any man who has been taught his penis is a weapon, or who equates vaginas with weakness and humiliation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement