Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

California Senate Passes Ambitious Renewable Energy Standard -- Schwarzenegger Says He'll Veto

By Matthew McDermott, TreeHugger. Posted September 14, 2009.


Schwarzenegger's solution -- he supports the higher renewable energy goal in principle -- is to mandate the change through executive order.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Atheism and Diversity: Is It Wrong For Atheists To Convert Believers?
Greta Christina

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Don't Fear the Deficit Bogeyman
John Miller

DrugReporter:
The War on Weed: Marijuana Is Basically Harmless -- The Monumentally Stupid Drug War Is Not
Jim Hightower

Environment:
White House Garden Won't Make Up for Obama's Nomination of Pesticide Lobbyist for US Chief Agriculture Negotiator
Jill Richardson

Food:
Don't Be Scared of Food: Are We Being Needlessly Hysterical About Food Safety?
David E. Gumpert

Health and Wellness:
47,000 Women Could Die As a Result of the New Mammogram Guidelines
George Lakoff

Immigration:
Lou Dobbs, Eyeing Public Office, Endorses Policy He's Long Spun as "Amnesty for Illegals"
Joshua Holland

Media and Technology:
The Memory Scrub About Why Ft. Hood Happened Is Almost Complete ... If It Weren't for Archives
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
Disney Apocalypse: Why 2012 Sucks
Alexander Zaitchik

Politics:
White House's Ties to Health Care Industry Deeper Than Visitor Records Show
Daniela Perdomo

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Why Can't We Look Away From Sarah Palin?
Vanessa Richmond

Rights and Liberties:
Whatever Happened to the CIA Black Sites?
David Corn

Sex and Relationships:
Hot Mormon Muffins and Models for Jesus: What's With All the Sexy Christians?
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Poseidon's Financial Shell Game: Why Is a Private Desalination Plant Asking for Public Money?
Peter Gleick

World:
Is Obama Following in the Footsteps of Bill Clinton?
Jeff Cohen

More stories by Matthew McDermott

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Ah, politics... Late last Friday the California Senate passed an ambitious renewable energy bill which would mandate that the state generate 33% of its electricity from renewable sources by 2020. Too bad Governor Schwarzenegger has issued a statement saying he'll veto the bill, even though he supports the greater green power goal. Here's why:

Bill Would Promote In-State Power Generation, Jobs
In addition to the 33% renewable by 2020 part, Senate Bill 14 also includes provisions that limit the amount of out-of-state renewable energy that counts towards that mandate. The state could still import power, but it would have to come from a plant that connects to the CA grid. All of this was included in a bid to help promote job growth in the state.

Opponents Say Some Small Projects Will Be Stymied
Which is where the opposition comes in: Reuters reports that the Governor is under pressure from some small energy producers and from smaller local utilities to veto the bill. They feel that some parts of the bill would threaten some solar power projects currently in development.

On Saturday, the Governor's office issued this statement:

The poorly drafted, overly complex bills passed by the Legislature are protectionist schemes that will kill the solar industry in California and drive prices up like the failed energy deregulation of the late 1900s. (AP)

Schwarzenegger's solution -- remember he supports the higher renewable energy goal in principle -- is to mandate the change through executive order.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: energy, california, solar

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

You've chosen to turn comments off for the entire site. Would you like to turn them back on?
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement