Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Van Jones' Resignation: A Moment of Truth For Liberal Institutions in the Veal Pen

By Jane Hamsher, Firedoglake. Posted September 6, 2009.


Where are all the statements defending Van Jones by liberal organizations? They are staying silent, while the White House sells out the interests of their members.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
What if People Actually Treated Religion as Just a Metaphor (Like Trekkies and Secular Jews)?
Greta Christina

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Why Can't Prosecutors Even Come Close to Taking Down Wall Street Thugs?
Sam Pizzigati

DrugReporter:
When It’s Crunch Time at College, Students Turn to Adderall
Erik Hayden

Environment:
Is Obama's Latest Agriculture Nominee a Textbook Pesticide-Pusher?
Kate Sheppard

Food:
8 Steps Obama Could Take to Save Food
Robyn O'Brien

Health and Wellness:
Pharmaceutical Giant Paid $500,000 to Psychiatrist Who Used Chicago's Poor as Guinea Pigs
Christina Jewett and Sam Roe

Immigration:
Organizers Fire up Grassroots for Immigration Reform Fight Ahead
Marcelo Ballve

Media and Technology:
Maddow: Anti-Muslim 'McCarthyism' Making Us Less Safe
David Edwards

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
New Right-Wing Craze: Using Bible Quote to Pray That Obama’s 'Days Be Few'
Amanda Terkel

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Hey Guys, Don't Want Kids? A Vascetomy Is Probably the Way to Go
Anna Clark

Rights and Liberties:
Economic Crisis Is Getting Bloody -- Violent Deaths Are Now Following Evictions, Foreclosures and Job Losses
Nick Turse

Sex and Relationships:
How Abstinence-Only Programs Perpetuate Dangerous Stereotypes
Martha Kempner

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Poseidon's Financial Shell Game: Why Is a Private Desalination Plant Asking for Public Money?
Peter Gleick

World:
Reagan Didn't End the Cold War -- Leftist Intellectuals Did
Stephen Zunes

More stories by Jane Hamsher

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

I first met Van Jones when he was honored last year by the Campaign for America's Future at their gala dinner.  He was being swarmed by all of the liberal institutional elite, who just could not be more full of praise for the impressive environmental leader and prison reform organizer.  Everybody wanted Van Jones on their board.  Everyone wanted him at their fundraisers.  Everyone wanted a piece of his formidable limelight.

Now he's been thrown under the bus by the White House for signing his name to a petition expressing something that 35% of all Democrats believed as of 2007 -- that George Bush knew in advance about the attacks of 9/11.  Well, that and calling Republicans "assholes."  I'm pretty sure that if you search through the histories of every single liberal leader at the CAF dinner that night, they have publicly said that and worse.

So where are all the statements defending Van Jones by those who were willing to exploit him when it served their purpose?  Why aren't they standing up  and defending one of their own, who has done nothing that probably the majority of people in the Democratic party haven't done at one time or another?  Is he no longer "one of their own?"

Someone asked me over the weekend to be more explicit about what the term "veal pen" means:

The veal crate is a wooden restraining device that is the veal calf's permanent home. It is so small (22" x 54") that the calves cannot turn around or even lie down and stretch and is the ultimate in high-profit, confinement animal agriculture.(1) Designed to prevent movement (exercise), the crate does its job of atrophying the calves' muscles, thus producing tender "gourmet" veal.

[]

About 14 weeks after their birth, the calves are slaughtered. The quality of this "food," laden with chemicals, lacking in fiber and other nutrients, diseased and processed, is another matter. The real issue is the calves' experience. During their brief lives, they never see the sun or touch the Earth. They never see or taste the grass. Their anemic bodies crave proper sustenance. Their muscles ache for freedom and exercise. They long for maternal care. They are kept in darkness except to be fed two to three times a day for 20 minutes.

Soon after the election, the Administration began corralling the big liberal DC interest groups into a variety of organizations and communication networks through which they telegraphed their wishes -- into a virtual veal pen.  The 8:45 am morning call co-hosted by the "liberal" Center for American Progress, Unity 09, and Common Purpose are just a few of the overt ways that the White House controls its left flank and maintains discipline. 

My own experience with the Veal Pen came indirectly, when some of them had the temerity to launch a campaign against Blue Dogs.  They were rebuked and humiliated in front of their peers as a lesson to them all at a Common Purpose meeting, which is run by lobbyist Erik Smith.  White House communications director Ellen Moran attends.  It isn't an arms-length relationship between these groups and the administration.

A few weeks ago, Rahm Emanuel showed up at a Common Purpose meeting and called these liberal groups "fucking stupid" for going after Blue Dogs on health care and ordered them not to do so any more.  Since that time, to the best of my knowledge, none of them have. 

These organizations may kid themselves that they're doing no harm, but that's not true.  They are the institutional liberal validators who telegraph to liberals that there are problems, that things are happening that are not in their interest. 

When the White House met with bankers after the AIG scandal and they said they didn't want to be criticized for getting huge bonuses paid for by taxpayers, the White House complied and "cooled their rhetoric."  The President told the public that Timothy Geithner had been instructed to do everything in his power to claw back those bonuses, and the House passed a bill doing just that.  But it died in the Senate.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: liberals, obama, progressives, white house, van jones

Jane Hamsher blogs at firedoglake and the Huffington Post.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
van Jones was just a temporary placeholder.
Posted by: maxpayne on Sep 6, 2009 12:54 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If he didn't cave in to Big Oil/Coal/Gas/Nuclear, Obama's "job" was to give him the pink slip. Keep it up Obama. You're working hard as hell to get your next pink slip by 2012 the more you keep trying to "appease" the rightwing !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Van Jones was just a token... Posted by: DR. LARRY MITCHELL
wrensis
Posted by: wrensis on Sep 6, 2009 12:54 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Big Surprise

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I Can't Stand It
Posted by: FrustratedInCT on Sep 6, 2009 1:08 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Republicans can call Obama and liberals fascists, commies, Nazis, but a liberal can't call Republicans - and himself - assholes? He specifically said he could be an asshole as well.

Also, the petition he signed included the word "may."

Fuck the Republicans. Fuck Rahm Emanuel. I never expected Obama to be a liberal, but I didn't expect him to be a conservative. I do expect "progressive" groups to be, well, progressive.

We all know Beck went after Jones because of the successful boycott organized by ColorOfChange.org, which he helped found, but is no longer active in. That's what makes this move by the White House so damned dangerous. What I don't understand is what exactly Obama thinks he's gaining by capitulating. Because so far, he's gained nothing but contempt from the rightwing every time he has capitulated. Contempt until he does give in, then even more contempt when he does capitulate. What's the point?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I Can't Stand It Posted by: morgan1
I LOVE VEAL
Posted by: maxfrisson on Sep 6, 2009 1:14 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So tender, so tasty, so hated by the vegan liberals. I bet Glenn does to!!

So here's a big, fat, juicy Bar-B-Qued Van Jones Veal Chop for Glenn Beck's Labor Day Picnic. Next we savor Mark Lloyd Lamb Roast and Foie Gras de Cass Sunstein and for dessert Emanuel Bros. Iced & Creamed.

Ain't great to be a carnivore?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I LOVE VEAL Posted by: HalEBurton
don't sacrifice public option
Posted by: politicky on Sep 6, 2009 1:28 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Liberals are told that the public option is an acceptable sacrifice such that we don't repeat the 54 seat swing to the GOP after health care failed in 1994.

What horseshit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rep. Mike Pence, Who Led Witch Hunt Against Van Jones, Took $1000s From Extremist Erik Prince
Posted by: politicky on Sep 6, 2009 2:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rep. Mike Pence, Who Led Witch Hunt Against Van Jones, Took $1000s From Extremist Erik Prince

And the christian extremist wingnuts celebrate another hit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Van Jones is Better Off Outside the White House ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Sep 6, 2009 2:08 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Obama Administration is nothing but neoliberals doing neoliberal policy. Jones would have got exactly nothing done being undermined, back stabbed and his character and ability defamated by these people. In the long run he is much better off getting out of there.

Obama's Record ... let's review ...

~Escalation of War ... War Funding

~Trillions for criminal banksters ... trillions more on the way, billions every day ...

~More torture, more renditions, more domestic spying, more civil rights taken ...

The Left Needs to WTFU ...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Many, Many, Many Kudos To Alternet for Posting This ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Sep 6, 2009 2:10 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And ...

Thank You Jane Hamsher for telling it like it is ...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The war between Glenn Beck and Color Of Change.
Posted by: GuitarBill on Sep 6, 2009 2:10 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Source: Orlando Republican Examiner: Boycott on Glenn Beck backfires as Van Jones is forced to resign.

By Blas Padrino, 6 September 2009, 1:21 PM

"...In a move apparently designed to contain the public perception that the Obama Administration is a hotbed of far-left activism, ‘green jobs’ czar Van Jones was thrown under the bus in the wee hours of Sunday. The timing of Mr. Jones’ resignation also suggests a White House effort to dampen publicity over the first high-Van Jones.

"The irony of this development is that Mr. Jones became an object of public scrutiny after an organization he co-founded and led, ColorofChange.org, began a campaign to pressure advertisers to boycott Fox News’ Glenn Beck’s TV program. The reason for the boycott was the organization’s displeasure over Beck’s remark that President Obama’s comments in connection with the arrest of a black Harvard professor were ‘racist.’ After ColorofChange.org made some highly publicized claims of success with the boycott, Mr. Beck fought back. Armed with information about the extremist background of Van Jones first uncovered by WorldNetDaily reporter Aaron Klein, Glenn Beck used his program to publicize the former ‘green jobs’ czar’s communist leanings as well as Jones’ assertions that the 9/11 attacks were plotted by President George W. Bush, rather than the work of Islamic terrorists.

"While he has subsequently denied believing the 9/11 attacks were an ‘inside job’ and now claims to be the victim of lies and distortions, he has not adequately explained why he signed a petition demanding an investigation of the Bush Administration over the terrorist attack. Moreover, it is disingenuous to suggest that such a high profile boycott was carried out by ColorofChange.org without his knowledge and approval – and perhaps even without his initial encouragement.

"His resignation letter, however, is accurate in one respect: he bemoans the fact that he has become a distraction to the Administration’s efforts to pass health care reform and cap-and-trade energy legislation. He is correct on that point, but only in the sense that the presence in the Administration of far-left radicals like Jones underscores the socialist inclinations of the President and reaffirms the public’s concerns over Obama’s proposals on health and energy."




It appears that Glenn Beck and his army of fact checkers have won the battle, but the war is far from over.

That said, I don't understand why the Obama administration didn't see this coming.

After all, Van Jones' radical past is like a red flag to a bull for Glenn Beck and the extreme right.

[GuitarBill shakes his head in disgust]




'9/11 Conspiracy Theories Ridiculous' - Al Qaeda.


The Biggest Conspiracy Of The Century.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not surprising
Posted by: crackbaby2 on Sep 6, 2009 3:30 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That the liberal elites have sold out or otherwise excluded someone who doesn't share their exact beliefs or who isn't content with simply "participating in the process" should not surprise anyone.

What would be surprising was if these same weenies actually stood up, effectively, and countered the right-wing freakshow's litany of idiotic attacks on science and the environment.


In my experience, those who step outside the box get blasted particularly by those left inside.

Remember, it's not about good policy or ethics or dedication or merit, it's about being able to soothe the egos of low self-esteemers and the like.

Mr. Jones, speaking frankly, told the truth and that is a no no in the rarified atmosphere of the subaru set.

buh bye
cb

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Repost from "Other" Jones Article Today
Posted by: pauldd on Sep 6, 2009 3:42 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm reposting my opinion because it seems that the democratic party can never learn that success would lie in representing their constituents' interests.

That said, perhaps the structural imbalance in the MSM (or broader "corporatocracy") may simply disallow the successful execution of policies in the interests of majority of "the people" when wealthy corporate interests oppose those policies. Chomsky is, and has been, right all along!

Campaign finance reform is our only chance to save the republic. But given the make-up of the SCOTUS, it's difficult to believe there's a chance at reform though.

And for my earlier post:

"Given the scrutiny any administration is under since the advent of the internet, it's difficult to understand how Jones wasn't vetted better. Signing onto the truther movement is AND SHOULD BE a disqualification from a presidential appointment.

Unfortunately, this will dominate the news cycle for the next week (or more) and will embolden the far right "fringers" like Beck to become more belligerent.

In spite of the right's claims that Obama is a radical leftist, many of us left liberals feel he's failing to deliver on his campaign promises and appears to be swinging further right at every opportunity. This includes his positions on war, detainee treatment, health care, financial sector policy, DADT, etc. Jones' resignation will further weaken what's left of Obama's progressive agenda.

The structural imbalance in the media has and will continue to favor the right until progressives invest in the infrastructure necessary to respond to it.

Until then it may be that, no matter how progressive the executive and legislative majority are, they will be on a defensive footing with the media which will result in an inability to enact the agenda of the majority of the people that they represent."


It's almost unfathomable that, at this early point in his first term, Obama has already conceded the WH to his Republican challenger in 2012.

Goodbye republic, hello fascist America...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I am truly appalled
Posted by: badkitty on Sep 6, 2009 3:52 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am truly appalled that Van Jones was forced to resign. As articulate as he is, he was truly needed at the White House. I heard him speak back in February, before he was appointed, at a Green Jobs imformation fair hosted by my congresswoman, and he was extremely impressive.

Furthermore, although I'm not much of a 9/11 conspiracy theorist (Bush et al seemed to be incompetent enough just to let this happen), I still think there are serious questions about it, and I don't think it's a crime to ask those questions or sign those petitions (even though I really am on Guitar Bill's side!). What, is there no room for diversity of opinion in the White House?

I was never a big supporter of Obama, because "hope" and "change" are not a campaign platform, and I have been very happy about some of things he's done, and I am definitely willing to wait for some things--he's only been in office nine months, but, and it's a big "but", this is a real negative, right up there with funding the illegal war in Afghanistan after December.

I am so angry.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I am truly appalled Posted by: badkitty
» RE: I am truly appalled Posted by: Augustus_818
» RE: I am truly appalled Posted by: badkitty
When I saw the headline...
Posted by: Farmertim on Sep 6, 2009 3:59 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
this morning I felt the whole purpose we were told of what this administration was for disappear.
Not that my hopes had been fullfilled or even addressed so far... it just seems this loss paints the future of the possibility of a discussion or accounting of where we are at as a country or any hope of "change" of the current system will not happen.
The shepple system is back..one doesn't even have to prove anything anymore.. just ramp it up with advertising money and stagnation is good enough for the right wing.
FarmerTim

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Shamefull cowardice on Obama's part - he apparently wanted a figurehead in there
Posted by: Paul_C on Sep 6, 2009 4:17 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
not a skilled leader.

Obama acts frighteningly like his predecessor, Bumbling Bush.

peace,
Paul

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rahm Emanuel is right
Posted by: SteveA on Sep 6, 2009 4:19 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As unattractive as he is to both edges of the political spectrum, Rahm Emanuel is exactly right in his warning to let off the Blue Dogs and about a 54-seat turnaround ala 1994. The Blue Dogs are much, MUCH closer to the majority of Americans than - well, most readers here at AlterNet. Sorry! Sometimes reality must be faced.

The moderates out in the lonely middle would read the Left's attacking moderate Blue Dog Democrats as extraordinarily out of step.

P.S.: Really? 35% of Democrats were lame enough to think that 9/11 was an inside job? Over a third? No wonder Al Gore and John Kerry thought they could win the White House. Golly.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ahm Emanuel is right Posted by: bigbad
» RE: ahm Emanuel is right Posted by: thrdr
Vendetta = "You're a Commie"?
Posted by: Lilly on Sep 6, 2009 4:26 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am not an authority on Van Jones' biography and am quoting what I read on AlterNet the other day, but if it is true that Jones is the co-founder of Color of Change and that Color of Change is the agency orchestrating the flight of sponsors from Glenn Beck's program, then it would seem likely that Beck has a personal vendetta against Jones, whom he has been featuring lately in his anti-Communism campaign. I haven't seen that angle mentioned on any of the conservative websites I go to. Are we back in the early 1950's? Does Joseph McCarthy live? The SOP then, when anyone was displeased about something (like an interracial meeting of a church committee) was to accuse the party of being a Communist. Last week Beck was implying that the Rockefellers were Communists based on Beck's personal interpretation of statuary art at Rockefeller Center. And nobody says anything. How far will this go? It is as if crazy people have taken over the world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

61 Percent Agreed with the Statement
Posted by: bigbad on Sep 6, 2009 4:36 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It would be more accurate to say that 61 pct of Democrats agreed with the statement, which said "people within the current administration may" have allowed 9/11 to happen.

Follow the link to the survey, and you find that of Democrats, 35 pct thought Bush knew about 9/11 ahead of time, and 26 pct were not sure (61 pct combined). This is specifically about Bush, not "people" in the administration.

Of ALL people surveyed (not just Dems), 44 pct thought Bush knew, or were not sure, and 59 pct thought the CIA knew, or were not sure.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Does anybody think the 9/11 Commission told the whole truth ?
Posted by: mmckinl on Sep 6, 2009 4:59 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't think so ...

We need another investigation ...

I am NOT a 9/11 "truther" ... I don't believe 9/11 was a false flag operation ...

However there is enough that has come out that we need a new investigation.

The 9/11 Widows thinks so and so do I ...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

My heart goes out to Van Jones who was the victim of both Obama and Beck !
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield on Sep 6, 2009 6:27 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Beck I blame because he was a typical rightwing bully who was getting scared most likely due to colorforchange busting Beck and forcing more corporate advertisers for Beck to come clean and take a stand. I don't watch that creep and I already know what a nut he is. He did one hell of a job going after Van Jones and expected Obama to fold like a tent and throw him out. Well, it happened !

Obama I also blame but I'm not surprised to say the least. Every bold progressive and liberal Obama has happily thrown under the bus. This was evident starting in 2007 when Obama through the party's liberal and progressive base under the bus issue after issue, action after action. Those who voted for him that I had met tried to tell me that Obama is "doing the right thing" and will revert to progressive and liberal governing once in office. Well ? 7 months so far and none of it. In fact, on some issues, he's actually moving to the right of Dubya and forcing me to wonder if perhaps we would have been better off with Mccain on those issues.

Van Jones may not be perfect but I think that he would make a much better president. I'm planning to write him a letter begging him to join the Green Party and run for governor of his state or better yet president in 2012. He has more clout and recognition than most of us. Mr. Jones, my heart goes out to you ! Shame on Obama and Beck !!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We must reject the irrationality of right and left
Posted by: dayahka on Sep 6, 2009 6:27 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
OK, so 35% of Democrats believe irrational conspiracy theories about 911. I'd say these 35% of Democrats are "assholes" who should be rejected. We have no need for irrational people from the left or the right--they all should be rejected for the assholes they are.

Then, Van called Republicans assholes. Well, he may be right, but then so are Democrats, and a lot of Libertarians and real Communists (who exist, if at all, only in the freaked-out imagination of weak-minded people), and a lot of people from every walk of life. Among friends, the insult is fine, but it doesn't belong in public life. We have enough incivility as it is.

No, Van shot himself in the mouth, did himself in, and deserved to go--in fact he should have been fired. Calling each other assholes does nothing to advance public discourse.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Van Jones can run against Pelosi in her district next year.
Posted by: CarlaWaters on Sep 6, 2009 7:16 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A true Green who balances the environment and the economy versus a Beltway elitist would be interesting. If San Francisco isn't racist and it really believes in going green, Van Jones is the man for Congress !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

KIDSJOBS
Posted by: kidsjobs on Sep 6, 2009 7:42 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Excuse me, Fellow Americans...
Posted by: Age of Reason on Sep 6, 2009 8:14 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are several posts above decrying those poor fools who believe that 9/11 wasn't all it was cracked up to be, that you don't believe in "conspiracy theories."

But you seem to believe that 19 Arabs - most of whom couldn't pilot a Cessna - with hand tools led by a bearded man in a cave managed to outwit our multi-trillion dollar defense systems and accurately hit 3/4 of their targets. Now there is a conspiracy theory of the finest sort, but somehow you don't have a problem with it. Doesn't that seem strange?

You don't have any explanation for say, molten metal which ran under the pile for months, or for GWB's utter lack of surprise at 9:05am upon hearing that this was an attack an not an accident, or for the total lack of interference by our most capable NEADS and NORAD and interceptor pilots, or for the collapse of WTC 7. Among so many other things. And yet you have the nerve to call people who realize that Arabs did not plant the Nano-Thermate explosives or that there something is rotten in Denmark - you call them (people like me, who happen to know something about these things): "Conspiracy Theorists." Tell me then, who are the close-minded fools?

You think all these military officers and professionals are wrong? Shame on you, Alternet posters!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: xcuse me, Fellow Americans... Posted by: Age of Reason
Fresh Dick
Posted by: RevolutionNet on Sep 6, 2009 9:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pressure Obama to dump Rahm. We may be stuck with Bush Lite but we don't need a Dick Cheney surrogate.


FREE AMERICA

REVOLUTIONARY (DIRECT) DEMOCRACY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

what does this prove?
Posted by: Jack Canuck on Sep 6, 2009 9:38 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What lessons can liberals, progressives and other such riff raff draw from Mr. Jones' resignation?

1 - That the truth shall set you free.
Mr. Jones had stated that he believed that Republicans are "assholes", a statement which recent history has proven to be essentially true, though I would say that it is a gross understatement.
So to amend the lesson, the truth shall set you free to look for a new job.

2 - That thought crimes will not go unpunished in the Obama administration, just as in the Bush administration..
Mr. Jones is accused of having believed that the original 9/11 enquiry was insufficient, and he signed a petition demanding further investigation of those events.

Such a demand is unacceptable, as we all know, the integrity of the Bush administration is unassailable, and so to ask further questions about Bush administration relationship to the events of September 11, 2001 is in and of itself an intolerable thought crime.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How soon we forget what we failed to see from the start.
Posted by: anambrose on Sep 6, 2009 10:58 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When the Dems won back the House in 06 Rahm made many on air comments as head of the DCCC that it was their organization that did it. In fact it was Howard Dean as DNC head and uncounted thousands of volunteers who made an effort to campaign in all 50 states and attempt to provide resources to anyone even if they had a slim to none chance of winning in so-called red states. DCCC and Rahm wanted to control the $ and have them go only to the places where we had a sure shot which like in 2000 and 2004 was about 19 states. Right in line with the former DLC Terry McCauliffe idea of big corporate donors and the blue dogs were at the top of the list while progressives especially in tougher fights didn't get any until Dean and others came to the rescue. I will admit to not knowing everything that was going on and the DNC had its own circular firing squad moments by disenfranchising Florida and Michigan and other crazy distracting stuff taking candidates off message etc but the only thing Rahm has done is what he said he'd do which is ram as much through as he could but he did not say who's agenda it would be. Now that we are in the governance phase it appears that the lobbying against any real reform any single payer any public plan will be successful. So what is aborning from this process will be so mutated and mutilated as to be unrecognizable. The Senate has a very similar scenario in which 6 Senators who represent less than 6% of our country's population are holding the other 94% hostage at the behest of Insurance, Pharma, Corporate Medicine, and the campaign contributions they provide strings attached. Nader called it when he said this would be the likely result if we did not get elections publicly funded and it did not matter what the issue would be. They didn't bail out the crash victims they bailed out the banks, credit card co's ,financial institutions that caused it. Bailing out Wall St not Main St was Wall Streets plan. Our cowardly Congress didn't do a damn thing to stop or slow down the Bush insanity so I didn't think they would suddenly grow a spine when Obama won. He as well as they will not get out front unless we push them, turn up the heat, write more letters, emails, faxes and make it known to the blue dogs they will not be supported if they do not get with the program. We did many great things to get the turnaround in the Congress to manifest but we are flunking the opportunity because we went back to sleep once the election was won. That was just crossing the starting line. I wish I had the good health needed to get out and march and you know that's just where they want us. We the people we the underclass too busy too poor too sick to kick their ass into gear.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another Conspiradroid Moonbat Bites The Dust: Good Riddance!
Posted by: oilmonkey on Sep 7, 2009 6:24 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You have to be dumb, nuts or have seriously poor judgement if you're a public figure and you a) sign a document containing even the slightest hint of nine-eleven-was-an-inside-job conspiradroid moonbat language and/or b) associate yourself in any way, shape, or form with any group which--or any person who--promulgates nine-eleven-was-an-inside-job nonsense.

Van Jones has no excuse. This article does not absolve Van Jones of his mistake in signing the document in question.

He was called to task for this, as should Paul Hawken, Richard Heinberg, Cynthia McKinney, Ralph Nader, and many others.

Speaking of which, the Peak Community (Peak Oil, Peak Food, Peak Water, Peak Rare Earth Metals: "Peak Everything") would do well to do the same with its numerous public-figure moonbats.

For some absurd and indefensible reason the Peak Community, such as it is, gives refuge to many moonbats (Richard Heinberg, Matthew Savinar, Michael Ruppert, Jan Lundberg, Carolyn Baker, et al.).

Bart Anderson--editor of EnergyBulletin.net which regularly publishes articles by many of these moonbats--has told me (via email) that it's a matter of being an "open-minded" intellectual.

So "open-minded", apparently, that their brains have fallen out of their heads.

James Howard Kunstler, to the best of my knowledge, is the only public figure in the Peak Community with enough integrity to repeatedly go on record stating the blatantly obvious: it's counterproductive and offensive to welcome pseudoscientific, opportunistic, conspiradroid moonbats into the Peak Community (Van Jones' well deserved public humiliation and forced resignation being the perfect case in point).

--

For those still suffering conspiradroid moonbat delusion and denial, wtc7lies.googlepages.com is good for what ails you and it will be there for you when and if you come to your senses.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Draft Van Jones for California governor
Posted by: greenferret on Sep 8, 2009 6:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Join the movement to draft Van Jones for governor of California!

Draft Van Jones for CA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

NRDC has commented on this
Posted by: gotard on Sep 9, 2009 10:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement