comments_image -

Should We Ban Manipulative Marketing?

Marketers today are learning how to reach down into the wiring of the brain itself.
July 29, 2009  |  
 
Advertisement
 

You may have heard that some European countries have banned models that are underweight because seeing them has a harmful effect on teenage girls.

Should we be thinking about the negative societal effects of marketing? Should we ban marketing that is based on manipulating people by harming their self-esteem or encouraging them to do unhealthy things?  Should we ban advertising that utilizes techniques that effect how our brains work?  Should we demand that ads stop distracting us from our thoughts?  I have been wondering about this.

Marketers today are learning how to reach down into the wiring of the brain itself, to manipulate us at a level that we do not consciously perceive and cannot control.  Science has come a long way in recent decades.  There is a new kind of marketing called neuromarketing that actually uses brain scans to measure how our brains react to certain stimuli.  We are in danger of marketers using the information gained from these new techniques to come up with ways to sell us things and make us do things and we may in many cases be literally unable to resist.

It is not unprecedented to think about restricting marketing, even in the "free market" United States.  We have confronted the problem of people being harmed by marketing in the past, with tobacco advertising and false claims of medical benefits.  It used to be against regulations to make false claims in TV ads.  But by and large companies have free range to manipulate people as they see fit.

 
But today we have an epidemic of obesity, the result of food-company marketing.  The companies have learned to literally manipulate our metabolisms to the point where many of us cannot resist overeating.  When you have a third of all of our people obese and another third seriously overweight it is obvious that the problem is not "self-control."  The problem is systemic and beyond an individual's ability to control.  Don't we as a society have an obligation to step in and correct this?

submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
See more stories tagged with: marketing, ads
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
Pro-Coal Group Pays People to Wear Its Shirts at EPA Hearing

By Heather Moyer | Sierra Club

 
 
Kids Inundate NY Governor With Concerns About Fracking

By Seth Gladstone | Food and Water Watch

 
 
Shareholders, Top Doctors Demand McDonald's Assess its Health Impacts

By Sara Deon | Civil Eats

 
 
Republicans Block NY Minimum Wage Increase That Would Give 880,000 Workers a Raise

By Laura Clawson | Daily Kos

 
 
Why Don't TV Meteorologists Believe in Climate Change?

By Katherine Bagley, | Inside Climate News

 
 
New Book Says Teenage Obama Was a Huge Pot Head -- So Why Won't He Legalize It for the Rest of Us?!

By Kristen Gwynne | AlterNet

 
 
Pew Poll Finds Clean Energy Is A Political Wedge Issue for Republicans

By Stephen Lacey | Climate Progress

 
 
Mitt 'Not Concerned with the Very Poor' Romney Visits West Philly, Gets Lesson in Keeping it Real

By Kristen Gwynne | AlterNet

 
 
Corporate Media Stokes Racial Angst in Election Coverage

By Adele M. Stan | AlterNet

 
 
5 Things to Know About the Paycheck Fairness Act (The Next Big Legislative Battle for Women)

By Annie-Rose Strasser | Think Progress

 
 
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 2 ]