comments_image -

No Public Option in Senate Health Care Bill?

Early reports on the Senate Finance Committee health care bill say it will not have a public plan.
July 28, 2009  |  
 
Advertisement
 

As Congress wrangles its way through the crafting of health care reform, one long-awaited proposal seems poised to drop with a thud.  The Senate Finance Committee, led by conservative Democrat Max Baucus of Montana, is closing in on completing a draft bill, according to the Associated Press, that stands at odds with the bill recently passed by the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, in that it does not require employers to offer insurance coverage to employees, nor does it have a public health insurance plan.  Oh, and it may feature a tax on health-care benefits. 

Here's Nate Silver, writing about the reported Finance proposal, at FiveThirtyEight:

Does this look familiar to anyone?

-- No employer mandate

-- No public option

-- But yes, an individual mandate

It should -- because this particular permutation on health care reform looks an awful lot like the incomplete draft of the HELP Committee's bill that the CBO scored last month, which also lacked an employer mandate and a public option but contained an individual mandate. That bill, the CBO estimated, would cost about $1.0 trillion -- but would only cover a net of about 16 million people. In contrast, the revised version of the HELP Committee's bill, which did include both a public option and an employer mandate, would cost about the same amount but cover a net of 37 million people.

Unlike the Democrats on the Senate HELP Committee, and the three House committee chairmen who jointly crafted a health care bill, Baucus has been seeking a bipartisan compromise, something that maybe a few Republicans will vote for -- along with conservative Democrats.

The AP suggests that the public insurance plans featured in both the House bill and the Senate HELP bill would be replaced in the Finance Committee bill by a non-profit co-op scheme proposed by conservative Democrat Kent Conrad of North Dakota.  At least one progressive Democrat is not amused.

"I don't call that an acceptable alternative [to a public insurance plan]," said Progress Caucus co-chair, Rep. Lynn Woolsey, D-Calif.  "I call that gaming the system."

Woolsey made her comments this morning on NPR's The Diane Rehm Show.

 

Adele M. Stan is AlterNet's acting Washington bureau chief.
submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
See more stories tagged with: max baucus, lynn woolsey, health care reform
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
Pro-Coal Group Pays People to Wear Its Shirts at EPA Hearing

By Heather Moyer | Sierra Club

 
 
Kids Inundate NY Governor With Concerns About Fracking

By Seth Gladstone | Food and Water Watch

 
 
Shareholders, Top Doctors Demand McDonald's Assess its Health Impacts

By Sara Deon | Civil Eats

 
 
Republicans Block NY Minimum Wage Increase That Would Give 880,000 Workers a Raise

By Laura Clawson | Daily Kos

 
 
Why Don't TV Meteorologists Believe in Climate Change?

By Katherine Bagley, | Inside Climate News

 
 
New Book Says Teenage Obama Was a Huge Pot Head -- So Why Won't He Legalize It for the Rest of Us?!

By Kristen Gwynne | AlterNet

 
 
Pew Poll Finds Clean Energy Is A Political Wedge Issue for Republicans

By Stephen Lacey | Climate Progress

 
 
Mitt 'Not Concerned with the Very Poor' Romney Visits West Philly, Gets Lesson in Keeping it Real

By Kristen Gwynne | AlterNet

 
 
Corporate Media Stokes Racial Angst in Election Coverage

By Adele M. Stan | AlterNet

 
 
5 Things to Know About the Paycheck Fairness Act (The Next Big Legislative Battle for Women)

By Annie-Rose Strasser | Think Progress

 
 
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 1 ]