COMMENTS: 71
Sacha Baron Cohen's "Bruno" Is the Same Old Shtick
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.
I am tired of all the “social commentary” accolades. I am fed-up with the entire “holding a mirror up to homophobic America” excuses. As I was when Sacha Baron Cohen arrived on these shores with a movie made from his hit HBO TV series, I am still not convinced he is the future of comedy. He did indeed change the face of post-modern humor -- over to Judd Apatow and the gang. Now the man who made Borat an adolescent after-party merriment (and in turn, banked a few million bucks in the process) is back, ready to redefine funny business once again (I hope the cast of The Hangover is paying attention…). This time around, it’s gender politics that’s getting the ribbing, and like my last run-in with a British comic as faux foreign correspondent, Brüno is far from brilliant. Indeed, it’s a one note movie that forgets said message early and often.
Clearly cobbled together after an initial approach didn’t work (got to give the fashionistas credit - they saw through Cohen’s ruse rather quickly) the four credited screenwriters return the narrative right back to Borat country, bringing Austria’s favorite TV boy toy to the bigoted US of A to see if lightning strikes this particular ambush angle another time. In what passes for a plot, Brüno is blackballed by the entire European media, unable to get a job after ruining a runway show with his Velcro suit. Setting up shop in LA with his sycophantic manservant Lutz by his side, he is desperate to be famous again.
He hopes to strike a deal for his own celebrity gossip show. When a focus group is less than enthused with his gay-bating gall, he tries to make a sex tape. After that, he goes charitable and adopts a baby from Africa. After a misguided talk show appearance, he is left with only one choice - go “straight”. Seeking the aid of a Christian ‘converter’, Brüno tries to fit in with a group of rednecks. Eventually, he realizes that his fawning assistant Lutz really does care about him. They go off to get married, secure in their belief that love will find a way.
Now, are you laughing yet? Does the plot description make you giggle uncontrollably? If not, you’re going to have problems with Brüno. This is a movie that relies more heavily on story than the “stop and shock” antics as before. There is clearly more scripted material here, attempts by Cohen and the rest of the cast to raise eyebrows by bringing gay life and its many sexual components to the mainstream. This is a movie obsessed with dicks -- full frontal and blacked out, anal and oral acts simulated in order to give Joe Sixpack and his adolescent complements a couple of awkward orientation heart attacks. If you’re naïve, in high school, or a dedicated follower of scatology, you’ll think this is genius. Anyone with world experience, however, will feel left out of the loop.
That’s because Brüno never rises to Cohen’s previous levels of truth. When Borat challenged people on their racial or cultural biases, he did so knowing that real reactions merit the biggest laughs. But as we sit through a sequence where desperate stage moms (and a dad) agree to exploit their children for a shot at stardom, the joke is on our lead. All he has to do is watch an episode of Toddlers and Tiaras to see he is years behind the curve in mocking the “anything for fame” mindset. It’s the same when Brüno calls his agent while getting his ass waxed and his anus bleached. We are supposed to snicker at the entire set-up. But outside of a few backwater burgs in the Bible belt, these are subjects spoken about regularly on cable channels like E!
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: billslm on Jul 11, 2009 1:28 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The constantly blunt way of missing the mark makes me think I will spare myself a lot of pain and not see this movie.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: adp3d on Jul 11, 2009 2:38 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: weathered on Jul 11, 2009 3:25 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: RandPaul on Jul 11, 2009 4:01 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But I'll probably see (sneak in without paying) Bruno, just to see the great Ron Paul call him a queer.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I'll see any movie with Ron Paul in it.
Posted by: americansheep
» RE: I'll see any movie with Ron Paul in it.
Posted by: monkeywrench
» RE: I'll see any movie with Ron Paul in it.
Posted by: rick702
» RE: I'll see any movie with Ron Paul in it.
Posted by: wwittman
» RE: I'll see any movie with Ron Paul in it.
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: I'll see any movie with Ron Paul in it.
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» RE: I'll see any movie with Ron Paul in it.
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: I'll see any movie with Ron Paul in it.
Posted by: SocoLoco
Comments are closed-
Posted by: John Annis on Jul 11, 2009 4:40 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You rather betray yourself with your talk of SBC being the future of comedy. Who said that? Comedy evolves, it doesn't follow a progressive timeline.
Betsy Sharkey in the LA Times finishes up her criticism of the film with "Baron Cohen's instincts for outrage are spot on. It's not insight we need at all right now, but a very sharp bonk on the head."
Brüno was never going to be as funny as SBC's previous work; indeed it is a testament to American lack of humour and your inability to take anything other than strictly literally that he continues to find 'rubes' out there.
I haven't seen the film, but from the sound of it your piece is written more from a sense of wounded amour propre than from an objective viewpoint. Your comment "banked a few million bucks in the process" suggests a degree of jealousy which hardly lends credibility to your bitching.
You make an issue of "the sight of a male penis bopping around in extreme close-up...". Odd. Are there female penises? Sounds like jealousy - again - to me.
I wonder if the average American will find this as funny as stereotypical American humour, which involves lowbrow slapstick and fratboy hazing. I think your preference for the revolting John Waters tells us much. Whatever SBC's solecisms he hasn't sunk to the level of eating dogshit yet.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Aw diddums
Posted by: Lemuel G.
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Moonray on Jul 11, 2009 5:37 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unfortunately, many of the Cool Kids occupy high positions in Hollywood, especially at the movie studios and TV networks, so their influence is pervasive and inescapable.
All this just another annoying symptom of our hypercapitalist society, which distorts our culture in some strange and unsavory ways.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Moonray on Jul 11, 2009 5:41 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unfortunately, many of the Cool Kids occupy high positions in Hollywood, especially at the movie studios and TV networks, so their influence is pervasive and inescapable.
All this just another annoying symptom of our hypercapitalist society, which distorts our culture in some strange and unsavory ways.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: SBC typifies Cool Kids Syndrome
Posted by: Lemuel G.
Comments are closed-
Posted by: NoPCZone on Jul 11, 2009 6:47 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This no talent hack's 15 minutes were up a couple of years ago and has been the beneficiary of more free celebutard press publicity than the Michael Jackson funeral. I was wondering how much Universal was paying Huffington Post to splash this moronic sh*t all over their increasingly tabloid pages.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The Title Should Have Been
Posted by: Aquinas
» RE: The Title Should Have Been
Posted by: babs
» RE: The Title Should Have Been
Posted by: NoPCZone
» RE: The Title Should Have Been
Posted by: Aquinas
Comments are closed-
Posted by: americansheep on Jul 11, 2009 6:49 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: For your own sake, GET A SENSE OF HUMOR
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: For your own sake, GET A SENSE OF HUMOR
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» RE: For your own sake, GET A SENSE OF HUMOR
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: For your own sake, GET A SENSE OF HUMOR
Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com
» RE: For your own sake, GET A SENSE OF HUMOR
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: The situations are very different
Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mnstra on Jul 11, 2009 8:48 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
laugh at their own stupidity for being an American citizen-sucker for the Ruling Elite.
His humor is a grade B less that any in Tonight show history, on a Parr with Joey bishop...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: monkeywrench on Jul 11, 2009 9:08 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If his next piece of ... work now stinking up theaters around the nation turns out anything like Borat, he'll be hiring another team of lawyers really soon.
Character assassination, slander, and making public fools of people through deception are never funny.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» those whom Cohen slanders?
Posted by: zipper696
» RE: Who are the bigger fools, those whom Cohen slanders or those who think it's funny?
Posted by: Aquinas
» RE: Who are the bigger fools, those whom Cohen slanders or those who think it's funny?
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Who are the bigger fools, those whom Cohen slanders or those who think it's funny?
Posted by: Aquinas
» RE: Who are the bigger fools, those whom Cohen slanders or those who think it's funny?
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Who are the bigger fools, those whom Cohen slanders or those who think it's funny?
Posted by: Aquinas
» RE: Who are the bigger fools, those whom Cohen slanders or those who think it's funny?
Posted by: Quannah
» Open your mind and do some research.
Posted by: countingdaisies
» RE: Open your mind and do some research.
Posted by: Quannah
» Quannah's in total denial mode and is too pissy to reason with.
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» RE: Who are the bigger fools, those whom Cohen slanders or those who think it's funny?
Posted by: Aquinas
» RE: Who are the bigger fools, those whom Cohen slanders or those who think it's funny?
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Who are the bigger fools, those whom Cohen slanders or those who think it's funny?
Posted by: FLYING DOOFUS
» RE: Who are the bigger fools, those whom Cohen slanders or those who think it's funny?
Posted by: Lemuel G.
Comments are closed-
Posted by: BlueTigress on Jul 11, 2009 9:58 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sasha, go home and stay there until you come up with something GOOD.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Defenestrator on Jul 11, 2009 11:17 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MotherLodeBeth on Jul 11, 2009 11:52 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Seems that as the author notes, that ridiculing American rubes is like shooting fish in a barrel filled with Jell-O. No real effort or risk.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Same old same old jingoism
Posted by: Ferdyb
» RE: Same old same old..... Yawn
Posted by: Aquinas
» RE: Same old same old..... Yawn
Posted by: Aquinas
Comments are closed-
Posted by: babs on Jul 11, 2009 12:25 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
some industry analysts (Hollywood Reporter, et al) predict it might hit $30 million by Sunday - that's American sales only and remarkable for an R-rated comedy.
Lots of sour grapes here today - you know any press is good press - and given how antagonistic people are these days, this article may sell a few dozen more tickets.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: zipper696 on Jul 11, 2009 2:34 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"...Now the man who made Borat an adolescent after-party merriment (and in turn, banked a few million bucks in the process)..."
Ah, yes. That kind of dumb luck can grind against a would be literary genius, never mind, if YOU think of something original, write it and get a producer interested maybe YOU can make millions...
A further remark on a number of posters here.
I see the ugly monster of antisemitism is alive and well and thriving on this page, remarks of "his tribe" and how they "control Hollywood" and a "European Jew" should not comment on the USA.
Time to come out from under your white hood boys.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Which reminds me.Why no mention of Bruno's efforts to solve the Middle-East crisis?
Posted by: -matti
» RE: Which reminds me.Why no mention of Bruno's efforts to solve the Middle-East crisis?
Posted by: Aquinas
» RE: Which reminds me.Why no mention of Bruno's efforts to solve the Middle-East crisis?
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Which reminds me.Why no mention of Bruno's efforts to solve the Middle-East crisis?
Posted by: Aquinas
» RE: Which reminds me.Why no mention of Bruno's efforts to solve the Middle-East crisis?
Posted by: Quannah
» What caused anti-semitism?
Posted by: countingdaisies
» RE: What caused anti-semitism?
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: What caused anti-semitism?
Posted by: FLYING DOOFUS
» RE: What caused anti-semitism?
Posted by: yellow
» RE: Our author gives his game away...
Posted by: Aquinas
» Aquinas you're jeolous.
Posted by: yellow
» RE: Our author gives his game away...
Posted by: free2disagree
Comments are closed-
Posted by: HoboHomo on Jul 11, 2009 7:30 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks for nothing, Hollywood!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mikeblack on Jul 12, 2009 6:49 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He's funny when you view him as what he really is: doing an exercise in how far you have to push people with your annoyance before they snap. With a bunch of dickjokes tossed in. Of course not everybody thinks that's funny, and that's fine. But if you're going to hate him because of someone else's interpretation of what he does, that's ridiculous.
The closest he ever came to real social commentary (by accident, I'm sure) was on the UK version of Da Ali G show where Cohen-As-Ali would interview the English elite doing his over-the-top boorish, stupid underclass wannabe rapper act that they'd never question the validity of in part because they probably expected it out of the underclass. But I'm sure his intentions were just to see how many sex jokes he could fire off before they said something.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: CHD on Jul 13, 2009 3:56 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I haven't seen Brüno so cannot comment on its content directly but I have heard that it was cut down to receive a lower age rating in the USA (it's an 18 in the UK) so perhaps something has been lost in this and there cannot be that many people (who matter) out there who don't know who Sacha Baron Cohen is and what type of stuff he does. So, to use the authors analogy, you have a rather large barrel of jelly with a few, rather small, minnows inside.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: itouch backup on Jul 15, 2009 8:46 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: meronkun on Jul 18, 2009 2:23 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: billslm on Jul 11, 2009 1:28 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The constantly blunt way of missing the mark makes me think I will spare myself a lot of pain and not see this movie.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: adp3d on Jul 11, 2009 2:38 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: weathered on Jul 11, 2009 3:25 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: RandPaul on Jul 11, 2009 4:01 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But I'll probably see (sneak in without paying) Bruno, just to see the great Ron Paul call him a queer.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I'll see any movie with Ron Paul in it.
Posted by: americansheep
» RE: I'll see any movie with Ron Paul in it.
Posted by: monkeywrench
» RE: I'll see any movie with Ron Paul in it.
Posted by: rick702
» RE: I'll see any movie with Ron Paul in it.
Posted by: wwittman
» RE: I'll see any movie with Ron Paul in it.
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: I'll see any movie with Ron Paul in it.
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» RE: I'll see any movie with Ron Paul in it.
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: I'll see any movie with Ron Paul in it.
Posted by: SocoLoco
Comments are closed-
Posted by: John Annis on Jul 11, 2009 4:40 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You rather betray yourself with your talk of SBC being the future of comedy. Who said that? Comedy evolves, it doesn't follow a progressive timeline.
Betsy Sharkey in the LA Times finishes up her criticism of the film with "Baron Cohen's instincts for outrage are spot on. It's not insight we need at all right now, but a very sharp bonk on the head."
Brüno was never going to be as funny as SBC's previous work; indeed it is a testament to American lack of humour and your inability to take anything other than strictly literally that he continues to find 'rubes' out there.
I haven't seen the film, but from the sound of it your piece is written more from a sense of wounded amour propre than from an objective viewpoint. Your comment "banked a few million bucks in the process" suggests a degree of jealousy which hardly lends credibility to your bitching.
You make an issue of "the sight of a male penis bopping around in extreme close-up...". Odd. Are there female penises? Sounds like jealousy - again - to me.
I wonder if the average American will find this as funny as stereotypical American humour, which involves lowbrow slapstick and fratboy hazing. I think your preference for the revolting John Waters tells us much. Whatever SBC's solecisms he hasn't sunk to the level of eating dogshit yet.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Aw diddums
Posted by: Lemuel G.
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Moonray on Jul 11, 2009 5:37 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unfortunately, many of the Cool Kids occupy high positions in Hollywood, especially at the movie studios and TV networks, so their influence is pervasive and inescapable.
All this just another annoying symptom of our hypercapitalist society, which distorts our culture in some strange and unsavory ways.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Moonray on Jul 11, 2009 5:41 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unfortunately, many of the Cool Kids occupy high positions in Hollywood, especially at the movie studios and TV networks, so their influence is pervasive and inescapable.
All this just another annoying symptom of our hypercapitalist society, which distorts our culture in some strange and unsavory ways.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: SBC typifies Cool Kids Syndrome
Posted by: Lemuel G.
Comments are closed-
Posted by: NoPCZone on Jul 11, 2009 6:47 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This no talent hack's 15 minutes were up a couple of years ago and has been the beneficiary of more free celebutard press publicity than the Michael Jackson funeral. I was wondering how much Universal was paying Huffington Post to splash this moronic sh*t all over their increasingly tabloid pages.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The Title Should Have Been
Posted by: Aquinas
» RE: The Title Should Have Been
Posted by: babs
» RE: The Title Should Have Been
Posted by: NoPCZone
» RE: The Title Should Have Been
Posted by: Aquinas
Comments are closed-
Posted by: americansheep on Jul 11, 2009 6:49 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: For your own sake, GET A SENSE OF HUMOR
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: For your own sake, GET A SENSE OF HUMOR
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» RE: For your own sake, GET A SENSE OF HUMOR
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: For your own sake, GET A SENSE OF HUMOR
Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com
» RE: For your own sake, GET A SENSE OF HUMOR
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: The situations are very different
Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mnstra on Jul 11, 2009 8:48 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
laugh at their own stupidity for being an American citizen-sucker for the Ruling Elite.
His humor is a grade B less that any in Tonight show history, on a Parr with Joey bishop...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: monkeywrench on Jul 11, 2009 9:08 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If his next piece of ... work now stinking up theaters around the nation turns out anything like Borat, he'll be hiring another team of lawyers really soon.
Character assassination, slander, and making public fools of people through deception are never funny.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» those whom Cohen slanders?
Posted by: zipper696
» RE: Who are the bigger fools, those whom Cohen slanders or those who think it's funny?
Posted by: Aquinas
» RE: Who are the bigger fools, those whom Cohen slanders or those who think it's funny?
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Who are the bigger fools, those whom Cohen slanders or those who think it's funny?
Posted by: Aquinas
» RE: Who are the bigger fools, those whom Cohen slanders or those who think it's funny?
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Who are the bigger fools, those whom Cohen slanders or those who think it's funny?
Posted by: Aquinas
» RE: Who are the bigger fools, those whom Cohen slanders or those who think it's funny?
Posted by: Quannah
» Open your mind and do some research.
Posted by: countingdaisies
» RE: Open your mind and do some research.
Posted by: Quannah
» Quannah's in total denial mode and is too pissy to reason with.
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» RE: Who are the bigger fools, those whom Cohen slanders or those who think it's funny?
Posted by: Aquinas
» RE: Who are the bigger fools, those whom Cohen slanders or those who think it's funny?
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Who are the bigger fools, those whom Cohen slanders or those who think it's funny?
Posted by: FLYING DOOFUS
» RE: Who are the bigger fools, those whom Cohen slanders or those who think it's funny?
Posted by: Lemuel G.
Comments are closed-
Posted by: BlueTigress on Jul 11, 2009 9:58 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sasha, go home and stay there until you come up with something GOOD.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Defenestrator on Jul 11, 2009 11:17 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MotherLodeBeth on Jul 11, 2009 11:52 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Seems that as the author notes, that ridiculing American rubes is like shooting fish in a barrel filled with Jell-O. No real effort or risk.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Same old same old jingoism
Posted by: Ferdyb
» RE: Same old same old..... Yawn
Posted by: Aquinas
» RE: Same old same old..... Yawn
Posted by: Aquinas
Comments are closed-
Posted by: babs on Jul 11, 2009 12:25 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
some industry analysts (Hollywood Reporter, et al) predict it might hit $30 million by Sunday - that's American sales only and remarkable for an R-rated comedy.
Lots of sour grapes here today - you know any press is good press - and given how antagonistic people are these days, this article may sell a few dozen more tickets.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: zipper696 on Jul 11, 2009 2:34 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"...Now the man who made Borat an adolescent after-party merriment (and in turn, banked a few million bucks in the process)..."
Ah, yes. That kind of dumb luck can grind against a would be literary genius, never mind, if YOU think of something original, write it and get a producer interested maybe YOU can make millions...
A further remark on a number of posters here.
I see the ugly monster of antisemitism is alive and well and thriving on this page, remarks of "his tribe" and how they "control Hollywood" and a "European Jew" should not comment on the USA.
Time to come out from under your white hood boys.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Which reminds me.Why no mention of Bruno's efforts to solve the Middle-East crisis?
Posted by: -matti
» RE: Which reminds me.Why no mention of Bruno's efforts to solve the Middle-East crisis?
Posted by: Aquinas
» RE: Which reminds me.Why no mention of Bruno's efforts to solve the Middle-East crisis?
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Which reminds me.Why no mention of Bruno's efforts to solve the Middle-East crisis?
Posted by: Aquinas
» RE: Which reminds me.Why no mention of Bruno's efforts to solve the Middle-East crisis?
Posted by: Quannah
» What caused anti-semitism?
Posted by: countingdaisies
» RE: What caused anti-semitism?
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: What caused anti-semitism?
Posted by: FLYING DOOFUS
» RE: What caused anti-semitism?
Posted by: yellow
» RE: Our author gives his game away...
Posted by: Aquinas
» Aquinas you're jeolous.
Posted by: yellow
» RE: Our author gives his game away...
Posted by: free2disagree
Comments are closed-
Posted by: HoboHomo on Jul 11, 2009 7:30 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks for nothing, Hollywood!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mikeblack on Jul 12, 2009 6:49 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He's funny when you view him as what he really is: doing an exercise in how far you have to push people with your annoyance before they snap. With a bunch of dickjokes tossed in. Of course not everybody thinks that's funny, and that's fine. But if you're going to hate him because of someone else's interpretation of what he does, that's ridiculous.
The closest he ever came to real social commentary (by accident, I'm sure) was on the UK version of Da Ali G show where Cohen-As-Ali would interview the English elite doing his over-the-top boorish, stupid underclass wannabe rapper act that they'd never question the validity of in part because they probably expected it out of the underclass. But I'm sure his intentions were just to see how many sex jokes he could fire off before they said something.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: CHD on Jul 13, 2009 3:56 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I haven't seen Brüno so cannot comment on its content directly but I have heard that it was cut down to receive a lower age rating in the USA (it's an 18 in the UK) so perhaps something has been lost in this and there cannot be that many people (who matter) out there who don't know who Sacha Baron Cohen is and what type of stuff he does. So, to use the authors analogy, you have a rather large barrel of jelly with a few, rather small, minnows inside.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: itouch backup on Jul 15, 2009 8:46 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: meronkun on Jul 18, 2009 2:23 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Vancouver's Games Will Be the Gayest Olympics Ever
Trial Begins for Activist Who Fought to Protect Federal Lands from Drilling -- Join the Protest
Starbucks' Cop-Out to Gun Nuts: Customers Served Coffee While Strapped




