COMMENTS: 129
10 Dangerous Household Products You Should Never Use Again
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.
You would never cross the street without looking both ways, walk alone down a dark alley alone at three a.m., or tell your child to accept rides from strangers. So why let hazardous, toxic, and even carcinogenic chemicals into your home everyday?
The message driven home for millions of Americans each day via TV and internet commercials is this: No need to scrub or scour. With just one squeeze of the spray bottle, you can wipe away dirt, grime, and bacteria.
Alas, there’s that dark alley again. Air fresheners, disinfectants, and cleaners found under your sink are more dangerous than you think. Mix bleach with ammonia, for example, and you’ve got a toxic fume cloud used by the military in WWI. And they weren’t cleaning kitchens.
Here is a list of the ten products you should ban from your home -- forever -- along with suggested alternatives.
1. Non-Stick Cookware
When non-stick pans were first introduced into American households in the 1960s, they were thought to be a godsend. Gone were the days of soaking pans for hours and scouring pots with steel wool. In the forty years since then, however, we’ve learned that the ease of cleaning comes at a steep price: the coating that makes Teflon pans non-stick is polytetrafluoroethylene, or PTFE for short. When PTFE heats up, it releases toxic gasses that have been linked to cancer, organ failure, reproductive damage, and other harmful health effects.
The problems with PTFE-coated pans seem to occur at high temperatures, so if you must use Teflon, cook foods on medium heat or less. Avoiding non-stick pans altogether is the safest option. If you’re able to do so, try anodized aluminum, stainless steel, or cast iron pans with a little cooking oil. SustainLane reviewers like LeCreuset cast iron pans and more cost-effective ones like Lodge Logic. Using a lower setting on the stove will reduce the chances that your food will burn, which is how it usually gets stuck to pans the first place. If you’re worried about the extra calories cooking oil adds, try baking or steaming your food.
2. Plastic Bottles
By now you’ve heard of dangers of BPA in those ubiquitous neon water bottles. BPA mimics the effects of hormones that harm your endocrine system. While the company at the heart of the controversy has switched to BPA-free plastic, those aren’t the only toxic bottles. Single-use plastic bottles are even worse for leaching chemicals, especially when you add the heat of the sun (think about bottles left in your trunk) or the microwave. Aside from the fact that bottled water sold across state lines is not as regulated as tap water, the bottles themselves are spawning grounds for bacteria and are a source of needless waste. Each year, more than one million barrels of oil are used to manufacture the more than 25 billion single-use plastic water bottles sold in the U.S. Choose a reusable, stainless steel or glass bottle instead. SustainLane users have reviewed several water bottle alternatives.
3. Conventional Cleaning Supplies
These routinely make the top ten lists of worst household offenders. They contain toxic chemicals that negatively affect every system in your body. All purpose cleaners often contain ammonia, a strong irritant that has been linked to liver and kidney damage. Bleach is a powerful oxidizer, which can burn the skin and eyes. Another danger lies in oven cleaners, which can cause chemical burns and emit toxic fumes that harm the respiratory system. The American Association of Poison Control Centers reports that more than 120,000 children under the age of five were involved in incidents involving household cleaners in 2006, the most recent year for which data is available.
To protect you and your family from the hazards conventional cleaners pose, choose non-toxic, or natural cleaners. SustainLane reviewers have particularly enjoyed Method and Seventh Generation, which are commonly found on supermarket shelves. Bon Ami is a safe alternative to Comet and Ajax. If you have the time and want to go the extra mile, you can even mix your own using common household items like vinegar and baking soda. Check out these easy-to-make recipes household cleaners.
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cherylsass123 on Jul 9, 2009 2:25 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
as for the anti-bacterial soaps and all? I've been told that if your house or trailer has a septic tank, to NEVER USE THESE! this by a plumber with a friend whom installed/cleaned septic systems. He explained that they kill the bacteria needed to digest human waste and thus make the tank fill up faster with sludge that then overflows into the leaching
fields ; clogging them up and soon costing you $20,000 for a whole new system!
that and living in "semi-rural" suburban Connecticut for 10 years, plus 11 years also here as a kid in Newtown where we had a septic system; I've often wondered just what exactly all those toilet bowl cleaners really do to the underground water used by houses with artesian wells ???
It is true that cesspools, a primitive form of the "septic tank" still used in much of Suffolk County, Long Island in New York {and portions of Nassau County's North Shore around Oyster Bay well as Southern New Jersey, Cape Cod/Martha's Vineyard/Nantucket, MA/ Block Island, RI} have literally done their important part toward making the well water UNDRINKABLE in Long Island's Hamptons and East End! That and the DDT the Potato farmers once used.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: what they don't say about products like Method
Posted by: lepidopteryx
» RE: what they don't say about products like Method
Posted by: Shey
» RE: what they don't say about products like Method
Posted by: DHopper
» RE: what they don't say about products like Method
Posted by: BreeMass
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Razional Thinker on Jul 9, 2009 2:53 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It works; it is cheap and non-toxic; and as far as I can find out, it is environmentally friendly.
I clean my drains by putting a 1/2 cup of baking soda directly over them and then pouring a cup or two of hot vinegar over the baking soda, washing the mixture down the drain...it bubbles, it stinks but it is effective.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I Use White Vinegar and Baking Soda....
Posted by: Old Horse Being Put Out To Pasture
» RE: I Use White Vinegar and Baking Soda....
Posted by: Razional Thinker
» RE: I Use White Vinegar and Baking Soda....
Posted by: Shey
» RE: I Use White Vinegar and Baking Soda....
Posted by: Lost in the Valley
» RE: I Use White Vinegar and Baking Soda....
Posted by: Longdream
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Old Horse Being Put Out To Pasture on Jul 9, 2009 3:16 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Aluminium pans are not harmless either. I remember a study about the correlation between use of Aluminium kitchenware and Alzheimer disease...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: PTFE dangerous?
Posted by: QuestionAuthority
» "Aluminum" is produced from refining/processin bauxite. It doesnt' occur naturally.
Posted by: thekidde
» RE: "Aluminum" is produced from refining/processin bauxite. It doesnt' occur naturally.
Posted by: countingdaisies
» Aluminum never occurs naturally...
Posted by: bichomau
» RE: Aluminum never occurs naturally... then why is it on the charts
Posted by: batteredup
» RE: Aluminum never occurs naturally... then why is it on the charts
Posted by: stellabloo
» RE: Aluminum most certainly is available in nature.
Posted by: Longdream
» some of the first warnings about Teflon came when pet birds died after the pans heated up
Posted by: Beck
» RE: some of the first warnings about Teflon came when pet birds died after the pans heated up
Posted by: Shey
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tony_opmoc on Jul 9, 2009 3:53 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After a couple of years we simply dug the thing up, which to be honest was a bit smelly - but the only time we'd noticed it - and dug the compost into our vegetable patch in very early spring.
In previous years, the produce from our vegetable patch has been extremely disappointing. This year the growth is phenomenal and it looks very healthy.
Tony
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Compost Really Does Work Exceedingly Well
Posted by: artcalight
» For apartment dwellers...
Posted by: BreeMass
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield on Jul 9, 2009 4:14 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: air fresheners are not necessarily toxic
Posted by: stellabloo
» RE: air fresheners are not necessarily toxic
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» RE: RE: air fresheners are not necessarily toxic
Posted by: stellabloo
» RE: air fresheners are not necessarily toxic
Posted by: babs
» RE: air fresheners are not necessarily toxic
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield
» What I would substitute for air freshners
Posted by: Shey
» RE: What I would substitute for air freshners
Posted by: Polly
» RE: #2 and #10 could use some improvement rather than abandonment.
Posted by: Blondinista
» RE: #2 and #10 could use some improvement rather than abandonment.
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield
» "Air freshener" is quite the ambiguous term.
Posted by: rafaeltoral
» A tree is an "air freshener" and they're not ambiguous
Posted by: channing
» RE: "Air freshener" is quite the ambiguous term.
Posted by: Shey
Comments are closed-
Posted by: artcalight on Jul 9, 2009 4:40 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: CF bulbs - no longer the efficient choice
Posted by: snorky2k
» RE: CF bulbs - no longer the efficient choice
Posted by: snax
» RE: CF bulbs - no longer the efficient choice
Posted by: Gary_P
» RE: CF bulbs - no longer the efficient choice
Posted by: willymack
» RE: CF bulbs - NOT
Posted by: countingdaisies
» RE: CF bulbs - NOT
Posted by: Tweck9
» RE: CF bulbs - NOT
Posted by: Python42
» RE: CF bulbs - NOT
Posted by: hilly7
» RE: CF bulbs - NOT
Posted by: Shey
Comments are closed-
Posted by: weathered on Jul 9, 2009 4:43 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rgd on Jul 9, 2009 6:30 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: rgd
Posted by: lepidopteryx
» RE: line-drying all our clothes
Posted by: stellabloo
» RE: line-drying all our clothes
Posted by: rgd
» RE: line-drying all our clothes
Posted by: babs
» RE: line-drying all our clothes... only if you have no HOA
Posted by: DaBear
» RE: line-drying all our clothes... only if you have no HOA
Posted by: stellabloo
» RE: rgd
Posted by: rob-bot
» RE: rgd
Posted by: Tweck9
» Incandescent vs. Fluorescent
Posted by: ep27
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JohnTruth2001 on Jul 9, 2009 7:42 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Fluoride in drinking water is starting to be recognized as a VERY SEVERE HEALTH PROBLEM!!!
Posted by: RTH
» RE: Fluoride in drinking water is starting to be recognized as a VERY SEVERE HEALTH PROBLEM!!!
Posted by: babs
» RE: Good Comment - Wrong Decade
Posted by: armorypk
» RE: Fluoride in drinking water is starting to be recognized as a VERY SEVERE HEALTH PROBLEM!!!
Posted by: DaBear
» Fluoride is natural
Posted by: moyshekapoyre
Comments are closed-
Posted by: stellabloo on Jul 9, 2009 8:22 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A few more notes:
Bleach - breaks down immediately to water and chloride ions (as in salt) and so is safe for your septic tank. Less is more and peroxide is safer but this is a better alternative to Pinesol and other such environmentally persistent bactericides. The real problem with Trichlosan is that it lasts for 30 years. I'm not a purist but food poisoning is not a good option, either.
CFLs - may be another greenwashing scam. As noted there are disposal problems and in addition CFLs can produce UV and electromagnetic radiation.
Rays of Rash?
Phthalates - parabens and aromatic compounds are found in most products either inhaled or applied to the body on a daily basis - or both - this is madness, people. All these chemicals are potent endocrine disruptors and while we, as good citizens, wear pink ribbons and raise more and more money to find the "cure" for cancer, very little is actually being done to address the reason behind the current proliferation of cancer. It is big business, my friends, and this could be one of the biggest scams of all (if you don't count the War on Plants or the War for Oil):
The Chemical Sunscreen Health Disaster
Seeing Deception Is Your Only Protection
Politics of Cancer
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bichomau on Jul 9, 2009 8:30 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Aluminum never occurs in free form...
Posted by: buzzsaw
» and your point is?
Posted by: rafaeltoral
» neither does stainless steel.
Posted by: rafaeltoral
Comments are closed-
Posted by: channing on Jul 9, 2009 8:42 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
#7 refers to CFL's which is a disastrous and backward greenwash if ever I've seen one. Mercury, which is a long-known neurological hazard is not even mentioned in this article, but on top of that, the manufacturing process, the un-livability of the light/noise itself and the real disappointing lifespans make CFL's out of the question compared to LED's.
#? The article fails to mention one of the most energy-consuming, toxic-waste producing, radiation-emitting household products of them all which is the CRT (Cathode Ray Tube). Though the trend is already strong and growing in the American market for switching to LCD's, people should be aware how big a difference in the quality of their household life this will make. Not only did our electric bill go down approximately 20% (no joke, with one tv and two computers used regularly), but it is literally quieter (no 60/530hz noise), our eyes are safer (no radiation), dramatically less heat-waste and delay-time for off/on substantially reduced.
One other big thing people can do to detoxify our environment is to avoid all big-corporate food brands that are not explicitly USDA Certified 100% Organic. Allowing huge corporations to poison our soil, air, water and bodies is how they keep the medical establishment in the States so profitable. At our home we've been switching everything to organics, foods, cleaners, gardening etc., adding LCD's, LED's, and ScanPans have made a world of economic and clean-living difference.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: ScanPan; they wear out too
Posted by: rational_moderate
» RE: ScanPan
Posted by: channing
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Archie1954 on Jul 9, 2009 8:48 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Yup, me too.
Posted by: kateco2
» RE: Yup, me too.
Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: Depends on your community...
Posted by: channing
» RE: I'm trying/
Posted by: m/r
» Do you mean food waste? Do you have a yard?
Posted by: Beck
» RE: I'm trying
Posted by: babs
» Yep, me three
Posted by: zigy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: archivistIII on Jul 9, 2009 9:15 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1. They are meant to be left on! If you know anything about ballast controlled lighting you know that you are not supposed to turn them on and off all day. If you are like me and don't like wasting electricity you turn your lights off when you don't need them. When you reneter the room or area again a few minutes later you turn them back on. This GREATLY reduces the life of CFL bulbs! You will be buying more of these mercury laden pollution generating devices than you think.
2. These bulbs generate more profit than standard bulbs. That is why GE and other companies want you to use them. Overall you are not going to use less electricity or spend less on them in the long run.
3. These bulbs use many more manufacturing processes than do conventional blown glass light bulbs. More manufacturing means more pollution and more waste.
I too thought these things were great when I first started using them. But through expereince of using them for over five years I don not have one bulb left that I started with and they are supposed to last at least five years each. They burn out in a year or two just like regular light bulbs.
If you have lights that are left on all the time such as in an office or other commercial building then they are great if you use a high quality unit. Don't opt for the cheapest ones if you do buy them. If they are cheaper it menas they aren't going to last as long and they are going to use more electricity.
P.S. These are technically a biohazard. If you break one in your house and notify authorities they will want you to vacate your home and intiate a process to clean the mercury. Afterwards, of course, you get a bill. I learned about this a few years back from an article featuring a single mom who had one break in her home. Try google.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Ours have lasted much longer than that, and snopes.com tells the whole story about the mom.
Posted by: Beck
» Much thanks for that information...
Posted by: zigy
» Sorry but you are wrong
Posted by: Tweck9
Comments are closed-
Posted by: archivistIII on Jul 9, 2009 9:44 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I once saw one of those plastic shopping bags floating through the air about 50 - 70 feet up. It floated by my house coming from god knows where and continued on out of site. It was caught in some channel of air and floated along as if it were a bird with a mind of its own. I couldn't believe my eyes. I'll never forget how peacful it was, motionless except for its lateral travel through the sky. Thinking back, once it took flight it got filled with air which was then heated by the sun keeping it afloat.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Morethoughts
Posted by: Tweck9
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ellie on Jul 9, 2009 10:07 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
simplify, not spend because it's supposed to be 'safe and green'... we don't need all this crap being marketed to the fearfull...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: how about...
Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: how about...
Posted by: Lilly
Comments are closed-
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Jul 9, 2009 10:11 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: PLEASE ADD ONE CATEGORY TO THE LIST
Posted by: rob-bot
» RE: PLEASE ADD ONE CATEGORY TO THE LIST
Posted by: babs
» Don't forget the slave labor.
Posted by: rafaeltoral
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rgd on Jul 9, 2009 10:33 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Longdream on Jul 9, 2009 10:59 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I clean their cages with a heavy duty steamer that has a TANCS attachment to its boiler. No other substances needed. I highly recommend plain steam as the cleaner of choice for most surfaces in your house. Non-toxic to the max.
Years ago, when Febreze was put on the market, it was only out a week when the reports of bird deaths started coming in. Every pet bird resource in the country had warnings about using that crap in your house if you wanted your birds to live.
Stuff this toxic shouldn't be allowed on the market.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Air Fresheners, Chemicals and Birds.
Posted by: body and home organics
» RE: Air Fresheners, Chemicals and Birds.
Posted by: Longdream
» RE: Air Fresheners, Chemicals and Birds.
Posted by: beijaflor
» fellow parrot "owner"
Posted by: Shey
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford on Jul 9, 2009 2:01 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
However...
One tip........
Use lemon juice or baking soda (not baking powder) as a deodorant/antiperspirant.
According to countless sites online (just google the terms) both work better (and last longer) than deodorant and both are devoid of toxic chemicals like aluminum that cause our bodies damage.
Think of the savings....
a 50¢ box of baking soda that lasts for months versus a $4 stick of deodorant ($15 stick of "organic" deodorant) that lasts less than a month.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Beck on Jul 9, 2009 2:28 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» You're absolutely right!
Posted by: Tweck9
Comments are closed-
Posted by: zigy on Jul 9, 2009 4:40 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Longdream on Jul 9, 2009 5:02 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They're small, honeycombed bamboo charcoal cubes that absorb odors, and are renewable by being placed in sunlight.
Love the concept. I'll let you know how well they do.
The website they came from is a pretty fussy one, and I've got lots of good stuff from there, so I have high hopes.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: PaulK on Jul 9, 2009 6:01 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not that commercial lawn treatments don't kill pets off like flies too. You want a safer alternative.
Oh, and there are lots of human casualties coinciding with the use of insecticides.
Don't forget commercial bug repellents. There are safe alternatives.
As a rule, if it's advertised heavily, I'm probably talking specifically about it. Yep, that one quite specifically. That one too.
Also as a rule, the high insurance costs of these products makes safer methods competitive.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Add flea collars and treatments to #4
Posted by: bobtr900
Comments are closed-
Posted by: yale on Jul 9, 2009 8:18 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For cooking we have never used anything but cast iron fry pans, and when properly seasoned, rarely does anything stick. For pots we use enamel on cast, some of them are Lacreuset(not sure on the spelling), and they are about 25 years old, and just now starting to show wear. We will need to replace them soon and it will cost a few bucks, but once you cook with these pans, no other pan will do.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Avoid plug-in air fresheners also..
Posted by: bobtr900
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxfactor on Jul 9, 2009 9:28 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bearzerker on Jul 9, 2009 11:15 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I thought they were mandated to provide a breakdown
so consumers are aware that their products maybe unhealthy?
Didn't all consumable dangerous goods and items use to be required
to provide this info on there product for consumers?
If not anymore, when did that change?
if no regulation in the past, why not now?
Air fresheners have been found to contain phthalates these are incredibly toxic and can aggravate respiratory problems like asthma.
Personally I prefer simmering water on the stove and adding nutmeg cloves, cinnamon, apple, orange peels... or use yeast it smells good and is great for indoor plants!
the list is only limited by your imagination...
potpourri have been around a lot longer then expensive canned sprayables have been... when did we as a society get so dangerously lazy?
Since when does Healthcare takes a back seat to corporate profits?
Is Febreeze safe to use around my son?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Since when does Healthcare takes a back seat to corporate profits?
Posted by: Python42
» just another nail in the current healthcare diagnosis... a single desk system could fix this!
Posted by: Bearzerker
Comments are closed-
Posted by: stormchilde1975 on Jul 10, 2009 9:29 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is not to say that recycling isn't important, or that pollution doesn't suck. It is to say that truth in reporting is critical.
Here's my source:
http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4132
If you read the article, it makes clear that there is lots of garbage in the ocean, and lots of (microscopic) plastic in the water where the "garbage patch" is supposed to be. That's pretty unsettling, but it's not an island the size of Texas.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: There is no Pacific Garbage Patch... tell that to sailors cruising to Hawaii
Posted by: DaBear
» What skepticism?
Posted by: stormchilde1975
» RE: There is no Pacific Garbage Patch - You didn't look Very Hard
Posted by: stellabloo
» RE: There is no Pacific Garbage Patch
Posted by: starushka
» I've seen it!!!
Posted by: bobtr900
» There IS a Pacific Garbage Patch
Posted by: veggiegrrrl
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DaBear on Jul 10, 2009 10:36 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's kinda funny the middlings and owning classers are just now catching on... but hey, better late than never with some things. No if we can just get them to quit whining and give us the damned universal single-payer, affordable housing, enlightened zoning laws, consumer and tenant protections we all need... pfeh, like that'll happen.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ellie on Jul 12, 2009 5:26 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
we all know how to mix up stuff to do a job but it's been laziness on our part by being convinced by the gurus in advertising they can do the job better and 'greener'... looks like most of us just woke up from a long nap...
one more thing... no one addressed the issue of water table and waterway contamination from pharmaceuticals we take for millions of reasons that are water soluble... means these drugs go in one way and come out the other...
these drugs are still active when they hit the water treatment plants, the plants don't have the technology to screen them out and the meds (including chemo that are highly dangerous to healthy folks) that are extending your comfort level or heading off personal health disasters are making their way into the waterways... then back through water treatment plants which still don't have filters to remove them and we bathe, drink and use the drug contaminated water... bottled water folks, this includes you too, you're not safe from these contaminants... everyone lives downstream from everyone else...
if we're going to clean up our acts and reject costly 'green' along with conventional chemicals in our environment, use simple products or a home brew recipe to do a job, how the heck do we clean up the pharma industry that is contributing to the mess on a grand scale???
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bobtr900 on Jul 12, 2009 6:06 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And then there is that other very good reason for avoiding oil/chemical/plastics, YOUR/OUR HEALTH and that of our children.
Isn't it strange how the Pro-life and Family Values people are killing us, our families and especially our helpless young children.
That is exactly why I don't believe their so called Pro-Life and Family Values bullshit. What a crock of crap and bald faced lies. They all are covering up a multitude of sins and burying them under the guise of Pro-Life and Family Values. What a great scam they have going for them. Kill and degrade people, and then call it Pro-Life and Family Values.
----------
An old German woman told me that in Germany their gov't does not allow the use or sale of Aluminum or Teflon cookware. Here in America, we have the Bush oil family and the GOP pimping for profits. And the Religious Reich, including my own religion, telling them their doing just fine, they call it Christianity.
That's no form of Christianity that I ever grew up with. It must be some new breed of business christianity. Something I'm not familiar with, and do not want to be.
They kill and degrade people, put them in economic slavery or destitution and then dare to offer up phony and false complaints about abortion. This goes on all over the Latin American countries, and has since the Spanish invasion.
PNAC, The American Enterprise Institute, The Heritage Foundation, the Federalist Society and dozens of other prostitutes for fascism including the entire GOP have a great scam going for them.
-------------
Back in the 60's I found Rodale Press to be a great resource, along with New Shelter magazine, Prevention and Consumer Reports.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JPHickey on Jul 12, 2009 7:18 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Though I'm glad many of you have read and commented, I'm wondering where in the world you've been.
Rather than resenting the cost of some healthy, non-toxic products, why not consider the long-term cost of damaging your health and well-being over a lifetime. How about sacrificing perhaps years off your lifespan because you lack ernest dedication to personal responsibility.
The corporatists want us to consume like sheeple. I prefer to follow the precautionary principle "better safe than sorry".
Some comments here seem to have a hint of resentment against "doing the right thing". Well, think about it this way. If nothing else, do the right thing for yourselves and your future first rather than jumping into rabid environmentalism.
Like Dr. Bronner always stated "your health is your wealth".
Taking responsibility for one's health means doing whatever is necessary to avoid the "health care" industries, which are not only bankrupting the nation, but don't even consider the fact that the body heals itself, doctors or drugs do not.
We have the best opportunity ever to be our own doctors, and heal ourselves with the wonderful resources available via the internet. Subscribe to Dr. Mercola, and/or Mike Adams (the health ranger).
Poisons listed above act like a ball and chain. Please do your best to cut yourselves free. At age 67, I have facilitated the regeneration of my health, well-being, and youthfulness beyond my wildest dreams.
Wake up and celebrate life by feeling great again! It's well worth a little knowledge, effort, and dedication. Remember the precautionary principle!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Aldebaran on Jul 12, 2009 9:40 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To be clear, I am no defender of the status quo. I am as suspicious of anyone of the powers that be, and I am open-minded to alternative thinking in all areas. As the saying goes, however, one should not be so open-minded that one's brains fall out. Because it fails to offer detailed explanation or documentation for its claims, this article is highly flawed, and it is disturbing to see a unanimous "amen corner" forming around it.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on Jul 15, 2009 8:36 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
spray them with essential oil mixed with water and liquid soap. fill a spray bottle with water, add a few tablespoons of liquid soap and 30 drops of lemon, orange, tea tree, peppermint pure essential oils. spray the spider then cover it with a glass jar for a while. no more spider.
sad but true.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ep27 on Jul 16, 2009 4:08 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: P.E.A.C.E. on Jul 17, 2009 8:19 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Benzyl acetate: Linked to pancreatic cancer
Benzyl Alcohol: Upper respiratory tract irritant
Ethanol: On the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Hazardous Waste list and can cause central nervous system disorders
Limonene: Known carcinogen
A-Terpineol: Can cause respiratory problems, including fatal edema, and central nervous system damage
Ethyl Acetate: A narcotic on the EPA's Hazardous Waste list
Camphor: Causes central nervous system disorders
Chloroform: Neurotoxic, anesthetic and carcinogenic
Linalool: A narcotic that causes central nervous system disorders
Pentane: A chemical known to be harmful if inhaled
https://shop.sixwise.com/index.asp?PageAction=Custom&ID=92
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cherylsass123 on Jul 9, 2009 2:25 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
as for the anti-bacterial soaps and all? I've been told that if your house or trailer has a septic tank, to NEVER USE THESE! this by a plumber with a friend whom installed/cleaned septic systems. He explained that they kill the bacteria needed to digest human waste and thus make the tank fill up faster with sludge that then overflows into the leaching
fields ; clogging them up and soon costing you $20,000 for a whole new system!
that and living in "semi-rural" suburban Connecticut for 10 years, plus 11 years also here as a kid in Newtown where we had a septic system; I've often wondered just what exactly all those toilet bowl cleaners really do to the underground water used by houses with artesian wells ???
It is true that cesspools, a primitive form of the "septic tank" still used in much of Suffolk County, Long Island in New York {and portions of Nassau County's North Shore around Oyster Bay well as Southern New Jersey, Cape Cod/Martha's Vineyard/Nantucket, MA/ Block Island, RI} have literally done their important part toward making the well water UNDRINKABLE in Long Island's Hamptons and East End! That and the DDT the Potato farmers once used.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: what they don't say about products like Method
Posted by: lepidopteryx
» RE: what they don't say about products like Method
Posted by: Shey
» RE: what they don't say about products like Method
Posted by: DHopper
» RE: what they don't say about products like Method
Posted by: BreeMass
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Razional Thinker on Jul 9, 2009 2:53 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It works; it is cheap and non-toxic; and as far as I can find out, it is environmentally friendly.
I clean my drains by putting a 1/2 cup of baking soda directly over them and then pouring a cup or two of hot vinegar over the baking soda, washing the mixture down the drain...it bubbles, it stinks but it is effective.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I Use White Vinegar and Baking Soda....
Posted by: Old Horse Being Put Out To Pasture
» RE: I Use White Vinegar and Baking Soda....
Posted by: Razional Thinker
» RE: I Use White Vinegar and Baking Soda....
Posted by: Shey
» RE: I Use White Vinegar and Baking Soda....
Posted by: Lost in the Valley
» RE: I Use White Vinegar and Baking Soda....
Posted by: Longdream
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Old Horse Being Put Out To Pasture on Jul 9, 2009 3:16 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Aluminium pans are not harmless either. I remember a study about the correlation between use of Aluminium kitchenware and Alzheimer disease...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: PTFE dangerous?
Posted by: QuestionAuthority
» "Aluminum" is produced from refining/processin bauxite. It doesnt' occur naturally.
Posted by: thekidde
» RE: "Aluminum" is produced from refining/processin bauxite. It doesnt' occur naturally.
Posted by: countingdaisies
» Aluminum never occurs naturally...
Posted by: bichomau
» RE: Aluminum never occurs naturally... then why is it on the charts
Posted by: batteredup
» RE: Aluminum never occurs naturally... then why is it on the charts
Posted by: stellabloo
» RE: Aluminum most certainly is available in nature.
Posted by: Longdream
» some of the first warnings about Teflon came when pet birds died after the pans heated up
Posted by: Beck
» RE: some of the first warnings about Teflon came when pet birds died after the pans heated up
Posted by: Shey
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tony_opmoc on Jul 9, 2009 3:53 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After a couple of years we simply dug the thing up, which to be honest was a bit smelly - but the only time we'd noticed it - and dug the compost into our vegetable patch in very early spring.
In previous years, the produce from our vegetable patch has been extremely disappointing. This year the growth is phenomenal and it looks very healthy.
Tony
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Compost Really Does Work Exceedingly Well
Posted by: artcalight
» For apartment dwellers...
Posted by: BreeMass
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield on Jul 9, 2009 4:14 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: air fresheners are not necessarily toxic
Posted by: stellabloo
» RE: air fresheners are not necessarily toxic
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» RE: RE: air fresheners are not necessarily toxic
Posted by: stellabloo
» RE: air fresheners are not necessarily toxic
Posted by: babs
» RE: air fresheners are not necessarily toxic
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield
» What I would substitute for air freshners
Posted by: Shey
» RE: What I would substitute for air freshners
Posted by: Polly
» RE: #2 and #10 could use some improvement rather than abandonment.
Posted by: Blondinista
» RE: #2 and #10 could use some improvement rather than abandonment.
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield
» "Air freshener" is quite the ambiguous term.
Posted by: rafaeltoral
» A tree is an "air freshener" and they're not ambiguous
Posted by: channing
» RE: "Air freshener" is quite the ambiguous term.
Posted by: Shey
Comments are closed-
Posted by: artcalight on Jul 9, 2009 4:40 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: CF bulbs - no longer the efficient choice
Posted by: snorky2k
» RE: CF bulbs - no longer the efficient choice
Posted by: snax
» RE: CF bulbs - no longer the efficient choice
Posted by: Gary_P
» RE: CF bulbs - no longer the efficient choice
Posted by: willymack
» RE: CF bulbs - NOT
Posted by: countingdaisies
» RE: CF bulbs - NOT
Posted by: Tweck9
» RE: CF bulbs - NOT
Posted by: Python42
» RE: CF bulbs - NOT
Posted by: hilly7
» RE: CF bulbs - NOT
Posted by: Shey
Comments are closed-
Posted by: weathered on Jul 9, 2009 4:43 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rgd on Jul 9, 2009 6:30 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: rgd
Posted by: lepidopteryx
» RE: line-drying all our clothes
Posted by: stellabloo
» RE: line-drying all our clothes
Posted by: rgd
» RE: line-drying all our clothes
Posted by: babs
» RE: line-drying all our clothes... only if you have no HOA
Posted by: DaBear
» RE: line-drying all our clothes... only if you have no HOA
Posted by: stellabloo
» RE: rgd
Posted by: rob-bot
» RE: rgd
Posted by: Tweck9
» Incandescent vs. Fluorescent
Posted by: ep27
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JohnTruth2001 on Jul 9, 2009 7:42 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Fluoride in drinking water is starting to be recognized as a VERY SEVERE HEALTH PROBLEM!!!
Posted by: RTH
» RE: Fluoride in drinking water is starting to be recognized as a VERY SEVERE HEALTH PROBLEM!!!
Posted by: babs
» RE: Good Comment - Wrong Decade
Posted by: armorypk
» RE: Fluoride in drinking water is starting to be recognized as a VERY SEVERE HEALTH PROBLEM!!!
Posted by: DaBear
» Fluoride is natural
Posted by: moyshekapoyre
Comments are closed-
Posted by: stellabloo on Jul 9, 2009 8:22 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A few more notes:
Bleach - breaks down immediately to water and chloride ions (as in salt) and so is safe for your septic tank. Less is more and peroxide is safer but this is a better alternative to Pinesol and other such environmentally persistent bactericides. The real problem with Trichlosan is that it lasts for 30 years. I'm not a purist but food poisoning is not a good option, either.
CFLs - may be another greenwashing scam. As noted there are disposal problems and in addition CFLs can produce UV and electromagnetic radiation.
Rays of Rash?
Phthalates - parabens and aromatic compounds are found in most products either inhaled or applied to the body on a daily basis - or both - this is madness, people. All these chemicals are potent endocrine disruptors and while we, as good citizens, wear pink ribbons and raise more and more money to find the "cure" for cancer, very little is actually being done to address the reason behind the current proliferation of cancer. It is big business, my friends, and this could be one of the biggest scams of all (if you don't count the War on Plants or the War for Oil):
The Chemical Sunscreen Health Disaster
Seeing Deception Is Your Only Protection
Politics of Cancer
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bichomau on Jul 9, 2009 8:30 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Aluminum never occurs in free form...
Posted by: buzzsaw
» and your point is?
Posted by: rafaeltoral
» neither does stainless steel.
Posted by: rafaeltoral
Comments are closed-
Posted by: channing on Jul 9, 2009 8:42 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
#7 refers to CFL's which is a disastrous and backward greenwash if ever I've seen one. Mercury, which is a long-known neurological hazard is not even mentioned in this article, but on top of that, the manufacturing process, the un-livability of the light/noise itself and the real disappointing lifespans make CFL's out of the question compared to LED's.
#? The article fails to mention one of the most energy-consuming, toxic-waste producing, radiation-emitting household products of them all which is the CRT (Cathode Ray Tube). Though the trend is already strong and growing in the American market for switching to LCD's, people should be aware how big a difference in the quality of their household life this will make. Not only did our electric bill go down approximately 20% (no joke, with one tv and two computers used regularly), but it is literally quieter (no 60/530hz noise), our eyes are safer (no radiation), dramatically less heat-waste and delay-time for off/on substantially reduced.
One other big thing people can do to detoxify our environment is to avoid all big-corporate food brands that are not explicitly USDA Certified 100% Organic. Allowing huge corporations to poison our soil, air, water and bodies is how they keep the medical establishment in the States so profitable. At our home we've been switching everything to organics, foods, cleaners, gardening etc., adding LCD's, LED's, and ScanPans have made a world of economic and clean-living difference.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: ScanPan; they wear out too
Posted by: rational_moderate
» RE: ScanPan
Posted by: channing
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Archie1954 on Jul 9, 2009 8:48 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Yup, me too.
Posted by: kateco2
» RE: Yup, me too.
Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: Depends on your community...
Posted by: channing
» RE: I'm trying/
Posted by: m/r
» Do you mean food waste? Do you have a yard?
Posted by: Beck
» RE: I'm trying
Posted by: babs
» Yep, me three
Posted by: zigy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: archivistIII on Jul 9, 2009 9:15 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1. They are meant to be left on! If you know anything about ballast controlled lighting you know that you are not supposed to turn them on and off all day. If you are like me and don't like wasting electricity you turn your lights off when you don't need them. When you reneter the room or area again a few minutes later you turn them back on. This GREATLY reduces the life of CFL bulbs! You will be buying more of these mercury laden pollution generating devices than you think.
2. These bulbs generate more profit than standard bulbs. That is why GE and other companies want you to use them. Overall you are not going to use less electricity or spend less on them in the long run.
3. These bulbs use many more manufacturing processes than do conventional blown glass light bulbs. More manufacturing means more pollution and more waste.
I too thought these things were great when I first started using them. But through expereince of using them for over five years I don not have one bulb left that I started with and they are supposed to last at least five years each. They burn out in a year or two just like regular light bulbs.
If you have lights that are left on all the time such as in an office or other commercial building then they are great if you use a high quality unit. Don't opt for the cheapest ones if you do buy them. If they are cheaper it menas they aren't going to last as long and they are going to use more electricity.
P.S. These are technically a biohazard. If you break one in your house and notify authorities they will want you to vacate your home and intiate a process to clean the mercury. Afterwards, of course, you get a bill. I learned about this a few years back from an article featuring a single mom who had one break in her home. Try google.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Ours have lasted much longer than that, and snopes.com tells the whole story about the mom.
Posted by: Beck
» Much thanks for that information...
Posted by: zigy
» Sorry but you are wrong
Posted by: Tweck9
Comments are closed-
Posted by: archivistIII on Jul 9, 2009 9:44 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I once saw one of those plastic shopping bags floating through the air about 50 - 70 feet up. It floated by my house coming from god knows where and continued on out of site. It was caught in some channel of air and floated along as if it were a bird with a mind of its own. I couldn't believe my eyes. I'll never forget how peacful it was, motionless except for its lateral travel through the sky. Thinking back, once it took flight it got filled with air which was then heated by the sun keeping it afloat.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Morethoughts
Posted by: Tweck9
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ellie on Jul 9, 2009 10:07 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
simplify, not spend because it's supposed to be 'safe and green'... we don't need all this crap being marketed to the fearfull...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: how about...
Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: how about...
Posted by: Lilly
Comments are closed-
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Jul 9, 2009 10:11 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: PLEASE ADD ONE CATEGORY TO THE LIST
Posted by: rob-bot
» RE: PLEASE ADD ONE CATEGORY TO THE LIST
Posted by: babs
» Don't forget the slave labor.
Posted by: rafaeltoral
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rgd on Jul 9, 2009 10:33 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Longdream on Jul 9, 2009 10:59 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I clean their cages with a heavy duty steamer that has a TANCS attachment to its boiler. No other substances needed. I highly recommend plain steam as the cleaner of choice for most surfaces in your house. Non-toxic to the max.
Years ago, when Febreze was put on the market, it was only out a week when the reports of bird deaths started coming in. Every pet bird resource in the country had warnings about using that crap in your house if you wanted your birds to live.
Stuff this toxic shouldn't be allowed on the market.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Air Fresheners, Chemicals and Birds.
Posted by: body and home organics
» RE: Air Fresheners, Chemicals and Birds.
Posted by: Longdream
» RE: Air Fresheners, Chemicals and Birds.
Posted by: beijaflor
» fellow parrot "owner"
Posted by: Shey
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford on Jul 9, 2009 2:01 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
However...
One tip........
Use lemon juice or baking soda (not baking powder) as a deodorant/antiperspirant.
According to countless sites online (just google the terms) both work better (and last longer) than deodorant and both are devoid of toxic chemicals like aluminum that cause our bodies damage.
Think of the savings....
a 50¢ box of baking soda that lasts for months versus a $4 stick of deodorant ($15 stick of "organic" deodorant) that lasts less than a month.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Beck on Jul 9, 2009 2:28 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» You're absolutely right!
Posted by: Tweck9
Comments are closed-
Posted by: zigy on Jul 9, 2009 4:40 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Longdream on Jul 9, 2009 5:02 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They're small, honeycombed bamboo charcoal cubes that absorb odors, and are renewable by being placed in sunlight.
Love the concept. I'll let you know how well they do.
The website they came from is a pretty fussy one, and I've got lots of good stuff from there, so I have high hopes.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: PaulK on Jul 9, 2009 6:01 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not that commercial lawn treatments don't kill pets off like flies too. You want a safer alternative.
Oh, and there are lots of human casualties coinciding with the use of insecticides.
Don't forget commercial bug repellents. There are safe alternatives.
As a rule, if it's advertised heavily, I'm probably talking specifically about it. Yep, that one quite specifically. That one too.
Also as a rule, the high insurance costs of these products makes safer methods competitive.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Add flea collars and treatments to #4
Posted by: bobtr900
Comments are closed-
Posted by: yale on Jul 9, 2009 8:18 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For cooking we have never used anything but cast iron fry pans, and when properly seasoned, rarely does anything stick. For pots we use enamel on cast, some of them are Lacreuset(not sure on the spelling), and they are about 25 years old, and just now starting to show wear. We will need to replace them soon and it will cost a few bucks, but once you cook with these pans, no other pan will do.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Avoid plug-in air fresheners also..
Posted by: bobtr900
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxfactor on Jul 9, 2009 9:28 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bearzerker on Jul 9, 2009 11:15 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I thought they were mandated to provide a breakdown
so consumers are aware that their products maybe unhealthy?
Didn't all consumable dangerous goods and items use to be required
to provide this info on there product for consumers?
If not anymore, when did that change?
if no regulation in the past, why not now?
Air fresheners have been found to contain phthalates these are incredibly toxic and can aggravate respiratory problems like asthma.
Personally I prefer simmering water on the stove and adding nutmeg cloves, cinnamon, apple, orange peels... or use yeast it smells good and is great for indoor plants!
the list is only limited by your imagination...
potpourri have been around a lot longer then expensive canned sprayables have been... when did we as a society get so dangerously lazy?
Since when does Healthcare takes a back seat to corporate profits?
Is Febreeze safe to use around my son?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Since when does Healthcare takes a back seat to corporate profits?
Posted by: Python42
» just another nail in the current healthcare diagnosis... a single desk system could fix this!
Posted by: Bearzerker
Comments are closed-
Posted by: stormchilde1975 on Jul 10, 2009 9:29 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is not to say that recycling isn't important, or that pollution doesn't suck. It is to say that truth in reporting is critical.
Here's my source:
http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4132
If you read the article, it makes clear that there is lots of garbage in the ocean, and lots of (microscopic) plastic in the water where the "garbage patch" is supposed to be. That's pretty unsettling, but it's not an island the size of Texas.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: There is no Pacific Garbage Patch... tell that to sailors cruising to Hawaii
Posted by: DaBear
» What skepticism?
Posted by: stormchilde1975
» RE: There is no Pacific Garbage Patch - You didn't look Very Hard
Posted by: stellabloo
» RE: There is no Pacific Garbage Patch
Posted by: starushka
» I've seen it!!!
Posted by: bobtr900
» There IS a Pacific Garbage Patch
Posted by: veggiegrrrl
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DaBear on Jul 10, 2009 10:36 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's kinda funny the middlings and owning classers are just now catching on... but hey, better late than never with some things. No if we can just get them to quit whining and give us the damned universal single-payer, affordable housing, enlightened zoning laws, consumer and tenant protections we all need... pfeh, like that'll happen.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ellie on Jul 12, 2009 5:26 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
we all know how to mix up stuff to do a job but it's been laziness on our part by being convinced by the gurus in advertising they can do the job better and 'greener'... looks like most of us just woke up from a long nap...
one more thing... no one addressed the issue of water table and waterway contamination from pharmaceuticals we take for millions of reasons that are water soluble... means these drugs go in one way and come out the other...
these drugs are still active when they hit the water treatment plants, the plants don't have the technology to screen them out and the meds (including chemo that are highly dangerous to healthy folks) that are extending your comfort level or heading off personal health disasters are making their way into the waterways... then back through water treatment plants which still don't have filters to remove them and we bathe, drink and use the drug contaminated water... bottled water folks, this includes you too, you're not safe from these contaminants... everyone lives downstream from everyone else...
if we're going to clean up our acts and reject costly 'green' along with conventional chemicals in our environment, use simple products or a home brew recipe to do a job, how the heck do we clean up the pharma industry that is contributing to the mess on a grand scale???
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bobtr900 on Jul 12, 2009 6:06 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And then there is that other very good reason for avoiding oil/chemical/plastics, YOUR/OUR HEALTH and that of our children.
Isn't it strange how the Pro-life and Family Values people are killing us, our families and especially our helpless young children.
That is exactly why I don't believe their so called Pro-Life and Family Values bullshit. What a crock of crap and bald faced lies. They all are covering up a multitude of sins and burying them under the guise of Pro-Life and Family Values. What a great scam they have going for them. Kill and degrade people, and then call it Pro-Life and Family Values.
----------
An old German woman told me that in Germany their gov't does not allow the use or sale of Aluminum or Teflon cookware. Here in America, we have the Bush oil family and the GOP pimping for profits. And the Religious Reich, including my own religion, telling them their doing just fine, they call it Christianity.
That's no form of Christianity that I ever grew up with. It must be some new breed of business christianity. Something I'm not familiar with, and do not want to be.
They kill and degrade people, put them in economic slavery or destitution and then dare to offer up phony and false complaints about abortion. This goes on all over the Latin American countries, and has since the Spanish invasion.
PNAC, The American Enterprise Institute, The Heritage Foundation, the Federalist Society and dozens of other prostitutes for fascism including the entire GOP have a great scam going for them.
-------------
Back in the 60's I found Rodale Press to be a great resource, along with New Shelter magazine, Prevention and Consumer Reports.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JPHickey on Jul 12, 2009 7:18 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Though I'm glad many of you have read and commented, I'm wondering where in the world you've been.
Rather than resenting the cost of some healthy, non-toxic products, why not consider the long-term cost of damaging your health and well-being over a lifetime. How about sacrificing perhaps years off your lifespan because you lack ernest dedication to personal responsibility.
The corporatists want us to consume like sheeple. I prefer to follow the precautionary principle "better safe than sorry".
Some comments here seem to have a hint of resentment against "doing the right thing". Well, think about it this way. If nothing else, do the right thing for yourselves and your future first rather than jumping into rabid environmentalism.
Like Dr. Bronner always stated "your health is your wealth".
Taking responsibility for one's health means doing whatever is necessary to avoid the "health care" industries, which are not only bankrupting the nation, but don't even consider the fact that the body heals itself, doctors or drugs do not.
We have the best opportunity ever to be our own doctors, and heal ourselves with the wonderful resources available via the internet. Subscribe to Dr. Mercola, and/or Mike Adams (the health ranger).
Poisons listed above act like a ball and chain. Please do your best to cut yourselves free. At age 67, I have facilitated the regeneration of my health, well-being, and youthfulness beyond my wildest dreams.
Wake up and celebrate life by feeling great again! It's well worth a little knowledge, effort, and dedication. Remember the precautionary principle!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Aldebaran on Jul 12, 2009 9:40 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To be clear, I am no defender of the status quo. I am as suspicious of anyone of the powers that be, and I am open-minded to alternative thinking in all areas. As the saying goes, however, one should not be so open-minded that one's brains fall out. Because it fails to offer detailed explanation or documentation for its claims, this article is highly flawed, and it is disturbing to see a unanimous "amen corner" forming around it.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on Jul 15, 2009 8:36 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
spray them with essential oil mixed with water and liquid soap. fill a spray bottle with water, add a few tablespoons of liquid soap and 30 drops of lemon, orange, tea tree, peppermint pure essential oils. spray the spider then cover it with a glass jar for a while. no more spider.
sad but true.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ep27 on Jul 16, 2009 4:08 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: P.E.A.C.E. on Jul 17, 2009 8:19 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Benzyl acetate: Linked to pancreatic cancer
Benzyl Alcohol: Upper respiratory tract irritant
Ethanol: On the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Hazardous Waste list and can cause central nervous system disorders
Limonene: Known carcinogen
A-Terpineol: Can cause respiratory problems, including fatal edema, and central nervous system damage
Ethyl Acetate: A narcotic on the EPA's Hazardous Waste list
Camphor: Causes central nervous system disorders
Chloroform: Neurotoxic, anesthetic and carcinogenic
Linalool: A narcotic that causes central nervous system disorders
Pentane: A chemical known to be harmful if inhaled
https://shop.sixwise.com/index.asp?PageAction=Custom&ID=92
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Vancouver's Games Will Be the Gayest Olympics Ever
Trial Begins for Activist Who Fought to Protect Federal Lands from Drilling -- Join the Protest
Starbucks' Cop-Out to Gun Nuts: Customers Served Coffee While Strapped




