COMMENTS: 8
Robert McNamara Was Never Really in Touch with His Role in Causing Atrocity in Vietnam
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.
Living in Vietnam during the war as a child, I witnessed enough of American military power to know that no ideology or rationale can justify killing more than a million innocent civilians. So upon news of Robert McNamara's death I took another look at his confession in "The Fog of War," the documentary by Errol Morris.
While it was gratifying to hear Robert McNamara, one of the principle architects of that war, finally admitted that he, too, thought it was a mistake for Americans to go into Vietnam. Yet if I was glad that near the end of his life the former secretary of defense was admitting his mistakes, I was also sorely disappointed. McNamara was a highly intelligent man living a kind of self-deception. While readily confessing that the war was wrong, and that he knew it was wrong all along, he somehow absolved himself just as quickly. The ex-secretary of defense suggests on camera that he did the best he could under the circumstances and that, if he hadn't been at the helm micromanaging the war's first half, things might have been far worse. Never mind that under his watch the war widened and escalated.
I had hoped for an honest, gut-wrenching mea culpa. What I got instead was an elaborate explanation that sounded like an excuse. Not once did McNamara say, "I'm sorry." His well-argued confessions seemed rehearsed and disconnected from the emotional honesty one associates with remorse. It is as if the head acknowledged that mistakes were made, but the heart refused to feel the horrors that were unleashed.
Near the end of the film, McNamara talked about what he called the fog of war. "What the fog of war means," he said, "is that war is so complex it's beyond the ability of the human mind to comprehend all the variables. Our judgment, our understanding are not adequate, and we kill people unnecessarily."
Errol Morris, known for his films "The Thin Blue Line," about an unjust murder conviction, and "A Brief History of Time," about physicist Stephen Hawking, uses that statement to give the movie its title. In one interview, Morris said, "I look at the McNamara story as 'the fog of war ate my homework' excuse." He added: "After all, if war is so complex, then no one is responsible."
While the Vietnamese, both north and south, are not free from blame for killing each other in Vietnam's bloody civil war, McNamara and his bosses, presidents Kennedy and Johnson, are clearly responsible for escalating it. The U.S. government, after all, under McNamara and president Kennedy, helped engineer the coup that killed South Vietnamese president Ngo Dinh Diem, when Diem was considering peace negotiations with the North without U.S. interference. His death destabilized South Vietnam and plunged it into another dozen years of bloodshed.
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: colinsyme on Jul 9, 2009 2:21 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lumenborealis on Jul 9, 2009 5:34 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He credits U.S. empathy with Kruschchev and the Soviet mind with the idea of providing him with a face-saving concession to avert WWIII at the time of the Cuban missile crisis. The deal was that the U.S. would not invade Cuba if the missiles were taken away.
Conversely, lack of empathy was behind the non-recognition of Vietnam's fierce opposition to colonization of any kind. Had the U.S. understood this, there would have been no fear of Soviet or Chinese expansionism, and the disastrous war in Vietnam would not have taken place.
It's important to remember this - perhaps the most important lesson passed on by McNamara - especially when the Conservatives have tried to make empathy a bad word in connection with Judge Sotomayor's nomination to the Supreme Court of the USA.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: xvictor on Jul 9, 2009 6:49 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ironically, it's his type of savvy that's needed now in the business and government world as there is so much waste and inefficiency.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: motamanx6 on Jul 9, 2009 8:33 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: AlteredStates on Jul 10, 2009 2:31 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
MacNamara is just one of many who have given their faux repentance speech as a way of "cleansing themselves" of all their dirty deeds. If only it were that simple.
So, let them talk and talk about how terrible war is and how they try to avoid war. The bottom line is, they love it!! They love the idea behind, "Patriotism", "Duty", "Honor" and "Victory" and quietly slink into the background when things go wrong.
The best thing that all these "repentant" fellows could do is keep their mouths shut and do some real soul searching. Maybe then they will find real inner peace, but don't bank on it. Remember, these self-flagellating clowns come from a world of deceit and trickery that is unmatched by any other profession. So take what they say with a "grain of salt". If you do that, then everything they say will seem like a joke and you will, at least, have a good laugh. Anything more than that would be a waste of time.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Longdream on Jul 11, 2009 1:20 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What next? George W. Bush admits to his negligent, arrogant ignorance and tells us the Endless War should never have been brought?
Thanks, Bob. Thanks in advance, George.
And fuck you both all the way to hell.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Alam on Jul 14, 2009 7:59 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The literati of course wrote about it, as history. But after a
deceitful war in Iraq (America's longest war) while a relatively-true
war in Afghanistan (America's longest "war")languished - I don't think
Americans are much in a soul-searching frame of mind. And we're still
struggling with incrustations of hypocrisy that have ruined our
economy and created a two-tier social-economic class system. We are,
oddly enough, finally peeling back the moral hypocrisy it seems.
We'll always have philandering politicians - that's life. But we
might be seeing the end of moralizing bombast as our self-appointed
reverend-congressmen show their true colors one by one.
I saw the Fog of War in February (Netflix is great for documentaries!)
- and was both surprised that McNamara was such a smart guy - and also
dismayed to see that he had devoted his long life after the Vietnam
war living two intellectual lives. One coming to terms with his Error
(and for one always the smartest guy in the room, truth seems to have
been revealed at a glacial pace), and the other building great
constructs of mitigating factors around his Error. Humility is a
necessary foundation for truth - but for a nation of marketers, the
elusiveness of humility makes truth as unapproachable as the x-axis is
to an asymptotic curve. Altho not said expressly, of course, McNamara
did seem to see his World Bank career as making amends in some way.
It struck me as a subconscious thing that the US does. Hawks of both
misconceived wars of the past century have been sent to penance at the
World Bank, advocating for development in countries similar to the
ones they've helped to destroy.
The one quibble I'd have with your thoughtful piece is that it painted
south Vietnamese leadership responsibility out of the picture. Not
comparable to the US role, of course, but not entirely a victim or
bystander either.
Isn't it odd that our true paragons of penitence are people like Nixon
and Sanford? It seems to me that the American tendency is to despise
the truly humble. The fact is, we see it as wretched weakness - and
even the far right would, if being honest with themselves, prefer to
have a President who can look you in the eye and say "it depends on
what the meaning of 'is' is."
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
My Experience with a Psychedelic Plant That Thousands Have Used for Release from Severe Addictions
Is Using a Checklist the Answer to All Your Problems?
On Anniversary of Iraq Invasion, Time to Rethink Anti-War Activism




