Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Adam and Eve Did What? A Visit to the Creationism Museum Makes Scientists Laugh, Cry

AFP. Posted July 2, 2009.


The museum argues, among other things, that war, famine and natural disasters are to blame on belief in evolution.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Are the "New Atheists" As Bad as Christian Fundamentalists?
Frank Schaeffer

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
How a Public Jobs Program Could Put America Back on Track
Julianne Malveaux

DrugReporter:
Pot Is More Mainstream Than Ever, So Why Is Legalization Still Taboo?
Steven Wishnia

Environment:
Why We Need Bees and More People Becoming Organic Beekeepers
Makenna Goodman

Food:
The Raw Milk Revolution: Behind America's Emerging Battle Over Food Rights
Makenna Goodman

Health and Wellness:
New York May Stop Heartless Health Insurers from Dropping Coverage When It Stops Being Profitable
William Ehart

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
Focusing on Fort Hood Killer's Beliefs Is an Easy Out to Avoid the Deeper Reasons for the Massacre
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Michelle and Barack's Marriage Has in Common with 56 Million Other Ones
Annabelle Gurwitch

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Fetus-Shaped Potatoes? Going Undercover Inside the Weird World of Right-Wing Abortion Foes
Ann Neumann

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
Instant Sex: Has the Digital Age Destroyed Relationships or Made Them Better?
Vanessa Richmond

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
With Unemployment at 40 Percent, Afghan Teens Enlist in Army, Police
Lal Aqa Sherin

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

For a group of paleontologists, a tour of the Creation Museum seemed like a great tongue-in-cheek way to cap off a serious conference.

But while there were a few laughs and some clowning for the camera, most left more offended than amused by the frightening way in which evolution -- and their life's work -- was attacked.

"It's sort of a monument to scientific illiteracy, isn't it?" said Jerry Lipps, professor of geology, paleontology and evolution at University of California, Berkeley.

"Like Sunday school with statues... this is a special brand of religion here. I don't think even most mainstream Christians would believe in this interpretation of Earth's history."

The 27 million dollar, 70,000-square-foot (6,500-square-metre) museum which has been dubbed a "creationist Disneyland" has attracted 715,000 visitors since it opened in mid-2007 with a vow to "bring the pages of the Bible to life."

Its presents a literal interpretation of the Bible and argues that believing otherwise leads to moral relativism and the destruction of social values.

Creationism is a theory not supported by most mainstream Christian churches.

Lisa Park of the University of Akron cried at one point as she walked a hallway full of flashing images of war, famine and natural disasters which the museum blames on belief in evolution.

"I think it's very bad science and even worse theology -- and the theology is far more offensive to me," said Park, a professor of paleontology who is an elder in the Presbyterian Church.

"I think there's a lot of focus on fear, and I don't think that's a very Christian message... I find it a malicious manipulation of the public."

Phil Jardine posed for a picture below a towering, toothy dinosaur display.

The museum argues that the fossil record has been misinterpreted and that Tyrannosaurus rex was a vegetarian before Adam and Eve bit into that sin-inducing apple.

Jardine, a palaeobiologist graduate student from the University of Birmingham, was having fun on the tour, but told a reporter that he was disturbed by the museum's cartoonish portrayal of scientists and teachers.

"I feel very sorry for teachers when the children who come here start guessing if what they're being taught is wrong," Jardine said.

Arnie Miller, a palentologist at the University of Cincinnati who was chairman of the convention, said he hoped the tour would introduce the scientists to "the lay of the land" and show them firsthand what's being put forth in a place that has elicited vehement criticism from the scientific community.

"I think in some cases, people were surprised by the physical quality of the exhibits, but needless to say, they were unhappy with things that are inaccurately portrayed," he said.

"And there was a feeling of unhappiness, too, about the extent to which mainstream scientists and evolutionists are demonized -- that if you don't accept the Answers in Genesis vision of the history of Earth and life, you're contributing to the ills of society and of the church."

Daryl Domning, professor of anatomy at Howard University, held his chin and shook his head at several points during the tour.

"This bothers me as a scientist and as a Christian, because it's just as much a distortion and misrepresentation of Christianity as it is of science," he said.

"It's not your old-time religion by any means."


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: religion, science, christianity, bible, creationism, disneyland, dinosaurs, creationist museum, adam, eve, literal interpretation

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Confessions of an embarrassed cancer cell
Posted by: pelican beak on Jul 2, 2009 12:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What's so bad about simply bequeathing humanity to its idiots?

Fine. Come take it.

I'll take my pride from being part of Earthlife, and from the fact that my reaction to being part of its cancer, humanity, has been cosmically deep embarrassment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Von Danikenland is Bankrupt Posted by: strahlungsamt
where?
Posted by: norsegirl on Jul 2, 2009 12:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
it might be helpful if the article were to identify the location of the museum or perhaps the conference attended?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: where? Posted by: Arousiak
» RE: paleontologists Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: paleontologists Posted by: laurenaislinn
» Not True Posted by: login@bugmenot.com
» RE: where? Posted by: hagwind
» RE: where? Try looking it up Posted by: editnetwork
» RE: where? Posted by: badkitty
Journalistic creationism
Posted by: batmagoo on Jul 2, 2009 1:27 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This piece would be of value to sympathetic readers among us, if it as much as offered location details. Are we supposed to know where this museum is located ( is there only one in the country? )
What other like-minded aberrations can we find within a small radius?
When was it built? By whom? Who paid for it? Who goes to see it? Does it make a profit? How does the neighboring community feel about it? Any hints?
It's nice to know how much it cost to build, and what the square footage happens to be, but honestly, what is the point of writing an article on scientific illiteracy and selective information gathering when the writer cannot even do a slightly better job of penning a simple article?
This is why Journalism is sorely needed on the Web.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Journalistic creationism Posted by: Darklady
» RE: Journalistic creationism Posted by: login@bugmenot.com
» RE: Journalistic creationism Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» This is a blog post?? Posted by: hagwind
» RE: Journalistic creationism Posted by: zodiac12
Kentucky isn't the only one...
Posted by: ESPA on Jul 2, 2009 2:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Kentucky isn't the only one. There's one in Big Valley, Alberta (Canada) too, and many others according to http://creationwiki.org/Creation_museum.

Delusional idiots, all of them (IMHO).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Creationism
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Jul 2, 2009 2:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I had no idea paleontologists were so sensitive.

It must have been scary for humans to live during the same time that the T Rex was a vegetarian...acting all superior and constantly lecturing everybody about the evils of eating meat.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Holy rollers Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» And the Burgiss shale. Posted by: Parcival01
» RE: Creationism HA!!!! Posted by: Beck
Like Lewis Black said...
Posted by: MyLeftFoot on Jul 2, 2009 2:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
they're watching the Flintstones like it's a documentary.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Like Lewis Black said... Posted by: That_SOB
KY Logic
Posted by: ehensleyky on Jul 2, 2009 3:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a Kentuckian, it never fails to confound me how we "reason" here. A bill to allow slot machines at racetracks and off-track betting parlors was defeated to "save the family." Instead, we promote nonsense such as this Creationist Museum to save our families. Go figure.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: KY Logic Posted by: conuly
» I love that Kentucky is abbreviated KY Posted by: Gabba_Gabba_Hey
a monument to ignorance
Posted by: masthead on Jul 2, 2009 3:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i am aware that most kentuckians have a good head on their shoulders...nevertheless they should have run ken ham, the founder of the creation museum out of town. but that's hard to do when it's such a money-maker, around $17 million last year, people come from all over the country to visit this monument to ignorance.

its entire “theory” of creationism is based on fake science, the same methods used by other wackaloon institutions like the Templeton Foundation, or the Discovery Institute, that doesn’t like it when you point out their fallacies. The creation museum is on the same level as this business where you can reserve a spot in heaven for $12.95 or 9.95 if you pay cash.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: a monument to ignorance Posted by: kimberlydeann
» Reserve a spot Posted by: JohnTodd
Another Oxymoronic Argument of the 'Right'
Posted by: Purple Girl on Jul 2, 2009 3:59 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They despise the idea that we are merely animals, yet Condemn Eve for having facilitiated our ability to be the top species through 'Knowledge'. In fact If Eve would not have eaten the apple would we even be able to conceptualize the idea of a 'God'? I doubt my Bassethound says a nightly prayer. I have yet to see a Dog Bible, or K-9's artistic rendition of a Biblical story.
Why is it considered more 'devote' to study 'God' from mere texts than to utilize the vast evidence of the physical world?
Failing to use the brain capacity we have been granted is doing a disservice to ourselves, the planet and an insult to whatever granted us this magnificant brain.
If 'Eve' is the one who accepted the Management position of 'Gods Green Earth'- I should think the HOLEY Rollers should be praising her name for giving Us the abiliity to not only study this grand 'creation', but revere the 'Creator'.Apparently, If left to 'Adam' we would be Still living in caves, eating raw meat and licking our asses clean.
Thanks Eve!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» "Quiver full" kids rebel, too Posted by: iolanthe
» Awesome Comment! Go, Eve! ;-> Posted by: iolanthe
how much do you want to bet that some salesman pushed the idea
Posted by: Suzon on Jul 2, 2009 4:24 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
just like Sulo pursuaded your local authority into buying its big plastic wheeled bins?

Some entrepreneur (the very word raises my hackles) saw a niche market. Would be interesting to know who built this palace of ignorance and for how much?

It is wrong to make money out of lies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Creation Museum Website Link
Posted by: ynotu on Jul 2, 2009 4:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://creationmuseum.org/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I drove through Kentucky last week,while on vacation,
Posted by: Ellie1 on Jul 2, 2009 4:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
but I only stopped to buy bourbon. I think my priorities were correct.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oxymoronic
Posted by: jmmartin on Jul 2, 2009 4:57 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Howard Univerity professor you quoted as shaking his head at touring the creationist museum is identified in your story as "an anatomist and a Christian." Isn't this oxymoronic? These people are the enablers of religious bigotry and anti-science. You cannot be a scientist and a Christian. Scientists know that homo sapiens came into being about 200,000 years ago, while Christians teach that our species is are only about 6,000 years old. Scientists know that dinosaurs disappeared 65 million years ago, while Christians claim that we walked with dinosaurs. Some things cannot be reconciled. It is impossible to be a real Christian and a scientist.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You should get out more Posted by: Curio
» RE: You should get out more Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: You can have faith and be a scientist Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
» Do you have any suggestions Posted by: factbased
» You're kidding, right? Posted by: hagwind
» RE: My sister told me Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: My sister told me Posted by: Hiroak
» RE: My sister told me Posted by: pelican beak
» RE: Just curious Posted by: solrev
» Newton Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Newton Posted by: laurenaislinn
» RE: Newton Posted by: EncinoM
» Religious Morality? Posted by: Karlh
» RE: eligious Morality? Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Newton Posted by: u2r1
» RE: Newton Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Newton Posted by: lyta
» Oxymoronic - minus 'oxy' Posted by: photon's feather
A nation that can believe in Creationism can believe in anything......like the lies of 911.
Posted by: pfgetty on Jul 2, 2009 4:59 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Creationism is such an easily refuted set of bs facts.
If we can believe that garbage, what protects us from unscrupulous leaders telling us anything at all, and having us believe it?
Well, nothing. Certainly not the press, certainly not our scientific community.
Neither of these institutions have helped us assess and understand that we were lied to about 911. Facts, evidence, science..........all ignored in telling the story about the 19 hijackers.

One day there will be a 911 museum, and a few people will still believe the official story, while scientists and journalists and other "sophistocated" people will stream along its hallways laughing at how stupid people could be to believe the official story nonsense.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: 9/11 Commisssion Posted by: D. Shenary
darjohn
Posted by: darjohn on Jul 2, 2009 5:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i wonder when they get sick do they go to the museum & pray to get better, or do they go to that science guy/gal doctor thingy. hmmmmm

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

uh, no...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Jul 2, 2009 5:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"I think there's a lot of focus on fear, and I don't think that's a very Christian message... I find it a malicious manipulation of the public."


I dunno... when the basics of your faith are believe in this particular god or you will burn in hell for all eternity, that seems pretty damned fear based.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: uh, no... Posted by: photon's feather
Tough Job, But Someone Has to Do It
Posted by: Brez on Jul 2, 2009 5:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The average IQ is still only 100. Just think what it would be if it weren't for these idiots.

So, I can live forever if I prove I love a zombie called Jesus by practicing ritual cannibalism and vampirism because a talking snake told a rib lady to eat magic fruit so she'd be smarter.

Extracted from the Bible Cliff Notes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Tough Job, But Someone Has to Do It Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
» RE: IQ tests Posted by: solrev
» RE: IQ tests Posted by: photon's feather
By their idiocy shall ye know them
Posted by: weindeb on Jul 2, 2009 6:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One great contribution we can thank our Creationist subscribers for, other than the economic stimulation encouraged among the hordes of Barnum suckers, is that they do make the pursuit of humanism and atheism far more acceptable and indeed necessary if we are to survive.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

rgd
Posted by: rgd on Jul 2, 2009 6:43 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't believe I have ever read a group of more idiotic comments than some of the above. Believe what you will and leave the other side alone. We are all entitled to our beliefs.
Contrary to what you or them think, creation and evolution are still theories and neither side is proven to be fact dispite what all the so-called Christians or scientist think. Just because it is in print doesn't mean its true.
How many of us were around 100 years ago let alone 1000 or 1,000,000 years. The professor from Howard isn't the only one shaking his head and rubbing his chin. I'll just bet you God in Heaven is doing the same and asking where in the hell do they come up with this stuff.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: rgd Posted by: Blix
» Thank you, Blix Posted by: Parcival01
» RE: rgd Posted by: chaoslegs
» RE: rgd Posted by: YogiBear
» RE: rgd Posted by: laurenaislinn
» RE: rgd - Well said! Posted by: UnEasyOne
» No Equivalency Posted by: curiousdwk
» RE: No Equivalency Posted by: u2r1
» RE: rgd Posted by: Ahimsa
Very disturbing
Posted by: chaoslegs on Jul 2, 2009 7:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lisa Park of the University of Akron cried at one point as she walked a hallway full of flashing images of war, famine and natural disasters which the museum blames on belief in evolution.

Wasn't the theory of evolution first conceptualized in 1800s? Didn't war, famine and natural disaster exist prior to that time?

Were those horrible things just part of the sin of eating an apple?
Is the theory of evolution another result of the negative consequence of that eating of the apple?
Wasn't that apple the apple of knowledge?
And do we really want to stay ignorant?
Isn't being able to figure things out a consequence of eating the apple?
Is knowledge a sin?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Very disturbing Posted by: laurenaislinn
» RE: Very disturbing Posted by: wolfgangmo75
Well, that's wrong, but it's right
Posted by: marjani on Jul 2, 2009 7:31 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just misconstrued.

It's not a belief in evolution that kills us -- God created things to "evolve."

It's a DIS-belief in God that causes the problems. Evolution was instituted by God for everything in life to inherently recreate, regenerate and procreate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Well, that's wrong Posted by: Vark
» RE: Well, that's wrong, but it's right Posted by: TheNamelessCity
Seek and you will find
Posted by: solrev on Jul 2, 2009 7:38 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you put so much faith in skull bones and jaw bones, why do you ignore the rest of the story? What else has survived in the archaeological record? From the earliest sites what survived is a record of their rituals. Religion is fundamentally a human quality in the archaeological record. Is religion just a rational step in understanding the space time continuum and science is the next step in human evolution? Is religion just a rational step in understanding more than one dimension and science is just a tool? Make your choice and place a bet. In ten thousand years we will see who digs up your bones.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I don't discount religion. Posted by: Parcival01
» RE: Seek and you will find Posted by: buschthebearrefreshing
But don't underestimate the morons.
Posted by: Parcival01 on Jul 2, 2009 7:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article is funny, and it gets us to challenge those who take this creationism nonsense seriously. But don't underestimate those who choose to believe in it.

First, I often post comments in places like YouTube and other web sites. I'm sometimes amazed at what I get in response. (It's usually from those who purport to be "conservative," not necessarily "creationist." Despite centuries of science, academic rigor, legal decisions, the believers in these fairy tales hold on to their beliefs. And their holding on is, to them, a sign of the righteousness of their cause!

(I'm just now listening to an interesting course from the Teaching Company entitled "The Conservative Tradition." From that, I'm beginning to understand where some of this idiotic "reasoning" comes from.)

Anyway, don't immediately discount places like the Creationist Museum, or Orlando's "Holy Land." They DO, alas, have an audience, and they take themselves seriously.

I wish I knew what to do to counter them, but it doesn't do us any good to simply discount them as if they had no influence.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You're probably right. Posted by: Parcival01
No Longer Quivering ‹(ô¿ô)›
Posted by: deni_haven on Jul 2, 2009 8:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"I feel very sorry for teachers when the children who come here start guessing if what they're being taught is wrong," Jardine said.

I'm guessing that the majority of the "teachers" whose students tour the creation science museums are homeschooling moms ~ so they're going to be delighted when their kids question evolution.

This article very well expresses the atomosphere and feelings of fear and negativity generated by the creation scientists.

Unfortunately ~ homeschooling is growing ~ exponentially as those who teach their children at home have an average of 4 children per family ~ significantly more than the average American family.

Be ready to deal with the fallout ~ creation science ~ along with extreme fundamentalism ~ is on the rise and the children being raised in fear, ignornance and strictly sheltered from "the world" are coming of age.

I know because we got into homeschooling and bought the whole package ~ until my oldest daughter (who graduated from homeschool) couldn't take the fear and isolation any more ~ she attempted suicide and that was my wake up call.

No Longer Quivering

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Has anyone noticed...
Posted by: Beadmaster on Jul 2, 2009 8:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the cost of an admission ticket to this crapola? It's $21.95 for an adult, and that includes ages 13-59. Way to go! No wonder pregnant teens (thanks to abstinence-only education) aren't a big deal - guess they're really adults!

Not even for a laugh would I pay them $22 to be preached at and misinformed. I can think of far better things to buy with that money.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wow, what an assertion...
Posted by: maddy on Jul 2, 2009 8:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I knew about the whole TRex was a vegetarian nonsense, but I was really bowled over at the claim that it was a "belief in evolution" that is responsible for global human suffering, including the history of human warfare.

I mean, really? Cuz that isn't just an ignorance of science, that's an ignorance of basic world history.

The theory of evolution isn't even two hundred years old. Quick: think of all the wars and death that have resulted historically from some religious group forceably removing, converting, enslaving, or just plain killing nonbelievers... Which example pops in your head first?

Off the top of my head: The Crusades? The Spanish Inquisition? The Salem Witch Trials? Columbus? The Trail of Tears? The California Spanish Missions? Southern slavery (justified via the Christian Bible)?

Maybe we should set up a George Carlin museum across the way as a counterpoint. We could begin with his bit about how God is actually THE leading cause of death. It goes something like this:

"You believe in God?"
"No."
Boom, dead.

"You believe in God?"
"Yes."
"You believe in my God?"
"No."
Boom, dead.

Here's a thought: some Christian nutjob from Tennessee shot up a church last year to kill people who didn't agree with him politically. Recently, another right-wing lunatic went into a Holocaust museum to kill some folks as some wouldbe revenge against the Jews. When was the last time we had an evolutionary biologist start shooting up a church because its followers don't "believe" in evolution?

UGH. I need a drink, and it's not even noon.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This article is horrible, and the author is a horrible person for writing it.
Posted by: rickiey on Jul 2, 2009 9:05 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since when is it "news" to make fun of people stupid enough to believe that crap? Just because some one isn't born with the intelligence to recognize lies when they are told to them, does not make them suitable targets for for your vendetta.

I bet you make fun of the kids in the Special Olympics too, it is an equivalent to what you are doing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A very unfunny joke
Posted by: willymack on Jul 2, 2009 9:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But I'm laughing anyway because of the above comments. It's such a pleasure to read what people with BRAINS have to say.
I've reconciled myself to the fact that there are dummies all around us who are immune to logic, reason, Scientific Method, and the (otherwise) upward progression of the human condition, despite them. I only wish there weren't so MANY of them.
If you haven't already, beg, borrow, or steal Charles P. Pierce's book: "Idiot America" and the DVD of Bill Maher's movie: "Religulous".
You'll laugh 'till you cry.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A personal tale
Posted by: maddy on Jul 2, 2009 9:19 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ok, so this incident occured at my family's 2005 July 4th celebration. I remember the date because I was there very much against my will.

Setup: My family is from the same area of Western NY that "produced" Timothy McVeigh, and the protagonist of our story--my uncle--is a member of the militia right.

Sad for me, I know.

Anyway, over our lovely outdoor meal--the usual American barbeque--my uncle announces that the Iraq war wouldn't be so difficult if we just adopted the most obvious solution:

"Use nukes to kill every last one of them and then we can just resettle the area."

The rest of the family nodded or voiced agreement. I, never one to know my place as a woman, quipped, "Yeah, genocide. That's the solution." My mother, quaking with fear, interrupted, "Oh, don't get HER started!" The remainder of the day was preoccupied with me fighting with her--a fight we've had for nearly 2 decades--about why she insists on defending the moronic men in our family who advocate violence as the solution to every problem (micro and macro) and, worse, join them in their attacks on me for trying to speak to some countervision of equity, peace, and a world beyond fear. So, my own stupidity emerges at this point in our story: we both know why she does that, so there's no reason even arguing about it.

Ah, the sanctity of family.

To the point: putting aside the madness of his argument, consider how much scientific ignorance it reveals. He clearly doesn't know that to use enough nuclear firepower to kill every Iraqi would, for one, make Iraq uninhabitable and, for another, would kill millions upon millions of people outside of Iraq's borders, including some of those precious white people he thinks are God's chosen few.

He doesn't know what radioactive fallout is. And he doesn't know that because he doesn't know what an isotope is. Sh**, I'd bet he couldn't tell you an atom is either.

So, to this story about the creationist museum. If the "average" (oh please tell me these people aren't the average) American doesn't know basic science, it can be reduced to this bs about "it's just one opinion against another" or "your belief isn't my belief."

If you don't know what an atom is, you don't know what an isotope is. If you don't know what an isotope is, you can't know what half-life means. And if you don't know what half-life means, you can't understand radioactive carbon dating.

So, if you don't know all that, when a scientist tells you that a dinosaur bone is 650,000 years old (and that no human remains date from that time) you can rest easy in your claim that "that's just his opinion" because you don't know how he figured out the age of the bone in the first place.

I tell ya, in graduate school I was surrounded by humanities academics who, while good-intentioned, thought that the "best" teaching model was one where people sat around sharing their personal experiences all day long. And I would want to rip my hair out of my head: substantive knowledge, including scientific knowledge, matters. And it matters to politics. And it matters to issues of human survival and global suffering.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Those who don't believe in evolution, don't evolve.
Posted by: DCostello2 on Jul 2, 2009 10:14 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Church is a perfect example of this. Condemn evolution and you condemn your own ability to evolve - and it shows.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I notice this was a Agence France-Presse news story
Posted by: sausage on Jul 2, 2009 10:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, if the USA weren't all ready a laughing stalk in Europe over the "freedom fries" brouhaha, this will surely send us over the top.

I want to thank all the evil corporate bastards who've funded these fundamentalist morons over the years for making it possible that the United States now looks for all the world like one giant hillbilly theme park.

Yee-haw!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I rescind my criticism! ;-> Posted by: iolanthe
Thank you
Posted by: rgd on Jul 2, 2009 10:36 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks to those who commented on my comment. They were anything but idiotic. I believe there is one item that is consistently overlooked however, and that is the assumptions. Evolutions based on certain assumptions as is Christianity. I believe in creation but I reject the mainstream Christian assumptions of an arbitrary and capricious God. If creation science is based on that, it will fail every time. People can kick these issues to death but it still come down to what a person is willing to believe and why. There is much credible science behind creation, but unfortunatly the "nutjobs" are in front pushing their agenda.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Here you go rgd Posted by: VeroniqueD
This is why the GOP went after the fundie vote...
Posted by: Jdog on Jul 2, 2009 2:41 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The GOP is nothing but awful ideas that hurt 95% of Americans...The poorer the worse they are for you. So you have to be a complete fucking idiot to vote for the GOP and to actually believe in the validity of their positions. Hence the GOP's targeting of fundies: These are people who already demonstrated their willingness to swallow any amount of silly bullshit regardless of the facts and their ready availability. Every con man knows to target the biggest sucker.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Christian creationist myths and the belief in a Judeo-Christian God are "indoctrinated".
Posted by: Quist on Jul 2, 2009 6:35 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Proof, facts, critical thinking, logical reasoning and scientific discovery do not exist when discussing the existence of any religious God or religious creationist "myths". And yes, I have much experience in these areas and have discussed these subjects in great detail. I have not seen one iota of proof, facts, critical thinking, logical reasoning and/or scientific discovery.

BTW, the concept of religious faith has been passed on through "indoctrination" for various reasons. Further more, religious faith is a human abstraction passed on by indoctrination. I am still waiting for anyone to demonstate to me that a religious God and/or religious creationist myths truly exists utilizing proof, facts, scientific method, critical thinking, and/or logical reasoning. Until then, I am skeptical at best.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ken Carson as Adam
Posted by: Freticat on Jul 2, 2009 7:58 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I just finished reading Charles P. Pierce's book: "Idiot America" (with a bow to willymack). In the introduction, he describes a visit to the creation museum as the motivation for the book. One statue of Adam was as devoid of genitalia as Barbara Millicent Rogers' boyfriend. Ken Ham must have used his own body as a model - mannequins don't have brains either.

What I can't understand is why the appropriately named Ham established a religious foundation based on a British art-rock group that flourished in the 1970s and '80s.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Admission should be free for Creationists...
Posted by: localhost008 on Jul 3, 2009 1:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why? Children under 5 get free admission. Anyone who visits the museum to "learn" something obviously has a developmental learning disability and should be regarded as a 5 year old with all the rights and privileges that comes with it.

Anyone who goes there for "yucks" (both laughs and perhaps vomiting) should be charged full price.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Do we need God?
Posted by: james_allen on Jul 3, 2009 2:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One comment, by marjani, read
"It's a DIS-belief in God that causes the problems."

This is a common viewpoint: Humans need to believe in God, whether He really exists or not, so that they will be moral (e.g. because they fear God's wrath).

However this view seems to be contrary to the facts. Arabs, Israelis, and right-wing Americans are among the most religious people today, but many would place some of these as among the least moral. (Exclude, e.g., Buddhism which does not depend on a belief in God, let alone His wrath.)

(It's a different topic, but I'm a fan of Julian Jaynes who, very roughly, attributes the origin of religion to a sort of hypnosis needed for the transition to Neolithic society.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You Can Have an Occasional Drink While Pregnant
Posted by: iolanthe on Jul 3, 2009 8:55 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The "THOU SHALT NOT DRINK WHILE PREGNANT!" dogma is just that: dogma. It's less than 30 years old, based on some pretty muddy research, and yet is treated like revealed wisdom from Mt. Sinai.

I'm Grandma age, and the mother of several children. I've lived long enough to have seen the medical profession utterly reverse itself on many of its once-cherished tenets, and I know that, in private, most OB/GYNs think this one is utter bullshit.

Yes, fetal alcohol syndrome harms babies. But to develop FAS in your coming child, you have to be pretty much constantly pickled, as in, four or five drinks every day ... or more.

But, in a masterful display of "Cover Your Ass", the medical profession (which, like most of America, craves binary, black-and-white, Manichaean judgments over reason and sanity and *MUCH* more than, say, preaching responsibility and moderation) has decided that *ALL* alcohol consumption is risky.

Light and/or infrequent consumption is not risky.

Enjoy your weekly margarita or glass of wine, as long as you're a person who can stop at one drink.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Sorry. Misthreaded. Posted by: iolanthe
A source of factual information
Posted by: buschthebearrefreshing on Jul 4, 2009 4:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The TalkOrigins Archive" http://www.talkorigins.org/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ball of Twine
Posted by: Dboy on Jul 4, 2009 9:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Prediction: The creation museum will end up becoming a mausoleum for the dead ideas of christianity. It will be another stop on the road kitsch tour along with the corn palace, the world's largest ball of twine, and cadillac ranch.

dboy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just Plain Moronic
Posted by: thornwolf on Jul 5, 2009 4:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The pathetically moronic paying visitors to the super-ridiculous "creation" museum deserve what awaits them: separation from their hard-earned money while being served more born-again dumb-you-down Christian™ brand kool-aid.

"Step right up, Folks! See the amazing dinosaurs cavorting in the Garden of Eden as Earth's Very First Family breaks God's immutable law with tragic consequences for all of humanity. Hurry, hurry, hurry, step right up!"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How can I get in on this scam?
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Jul 5, 2009 9:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How much does it cost to make something like this? Seriously, if there's only one of these in the US - in KY, of all places - it seems to me like this is a high-growth opportunity.

*starts making phone calls*

#@!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

sex
Posted by: sex on Jul 6, 2009 2:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ad sense on google/
Posted by: ruruben on Jul 7, 2009 1:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
MKV to AVI ,Professionally convert your mkv files to avi format, other popular video and audio format supported

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

mkv to dvd converter
Posted by: bestbbb on Jul 22, 2009 8:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How to convert MKV files to DVD?
VSO ConvertXtoDVD is an excellent MKV to DVD Converter and Burner, which can convert MKV and other video formats (AVI, MWV, MPEG, VOB, FLV, MOV, DivX, RM etc. .) to DVD and burn MKV files to DVD disc after converting. Use discount coupon code of MKV-1NVK-BEST to get 10% discount from mkvconverter.com. Click here to Buy . .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The GOP
Posted by: hahaho on Jul 30, 2009 4:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The GOP is nothing but awful ideas that hurt 95% of Americans...The poorer the worse they are for you. links of london
tiffanySo you have to be a complete fucking idiot to vote for the GOP and to actually believe in the validity of their positions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement