Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

The Military Invades U.S. Schools: How Military Academies Are Being Used to Destroy Public Education

By Brian Roa, TruthOut.org. Posted July 1, 2009.


In Chicago, there's a push to replace public schools with military academies. This model may soon spread to the rest of the country.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
What if People Actually Treated Religion as Just a Metaphor (Like Trekkies and Secular Jews)?
Greta Christina

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
15 Signs American Society Is Coming Apart at the Seams
David DeGraw

DrugReporter:
When It’s Crunch Time at College, Students Turn to Adderall
Erik Hayden

Environment:
20 Weird, Crazy Ideas for Helping the Earth

Food:
The War on Soy: Why the 'Miracle Food' May Be a Health Risk and Environmental Nightmare
Tara Lohan

Health and Wellness:
Pharmaceutical Giant Paid $500,000 to Psychiatrist Who Used Chicago's Poor as Guinea Pigs
Christina Jewett and Sam Roe

Immigration:
Dobbs' Resignation Was Long Overdue
Janet Murguía

Media and Technology:
Is Right-Wing Media Hustler Trying to "Blackmail" the Obama's Attorney General over ACORN Videos?
David Edwards, Muriel Kane

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
New Right-Wing Craze: Using Bible Quote to Pray That Obama’s 'Days Be Few'
Amanda Terkel

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Hey Guys, Don't Want Kids? A Vascetomy Is Probably the Way to Go
Anna Clark

Rights and Liberties:
Economic Crisis Is Getting Bloody -- Violent Deaths Are Now Following Evictions, Foreclosures and Job Losses
Nick Turse

Sex and Relationships:
How Abstinence-Only Programs Perpetuate Dangerous Stereotypes
Martha Kempner

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Poseidon's Financial Shell Game: Why Is a Private Desalination Plant Asking for Public Money?
Peter Gleick

World:
Army Sends Mom to Afghanistan, Infant to Protective Services
Dahr Jamail

More stories by Brian Roa

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

For the past four years, I have observed the military occupation of the high school where I teach science. Currently, Chicago's Senn High School houses Rickover Naval Academy (RNA). I use the term "occupation" because part of our building was taken away despite student, parent, teacher and community opposition to RNA's opening.

Senn students are made to feel like second-class citizens inside their own school, due to inequalities. The facilities and resources are better on the RNA side. RNA students are allowed to walk on the Senn side, while Senn students cannot walk on the RNA side. RNA "disenrolls" students and we accept those students who get kicked out if they live within our attendance boundaries. This practice is against Chicago policy, but goes unchecked. All of these things maintain a two-tiered system within the same school building.

This phenomenon is not restricted to Senn. Chicago has more military academies and more students in JROTC than any other city in the US. As the tentacles of school militarization reach beyond Chicago, the process used in this city seems to serve as a model of expansion. There was a Marine Academy planned for Georgia's Dekalb County, which includes 10 percent of Atlanta. Fortunately, due to protest, the school has been postponed until 2010. Despite it being postponed, it is still useful to analyze the rhetoric used to rationalize the Marine Academy. Many of the lies and excuses used to justify school militarization in Chicago and Georgia may well be used in other cities as militarism grows.

Not for Recruiting?

A favorite lie used to defend the expansion of military academies is that they are not used to recruit for the military.

"This is not a training ground to send kids into the military," Dekalb Schools' Superintendent Crawford Lewis told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution in March. Those same words could have come straight from Col. Rick Mills, director of military academies and JROTC in Chicago, who explained away recruitment in a similar fashion.

"This is not a recruiting tool, but a way to help students succeed at whatever career they might choose," Mills told the Chicago Tribune.

Yet military academies receive money from the Department of Defense (DoD). The DoD would be derelict in its responsibilities were that money not spent as an investment in future soldiers. Accepting the claim that there is no recruiting in military academies makes about as much sense as allowing gangs to fund and operate within schools, on the assumption that they won't recruit on school grounds.

Moreover, since military academies are staffed with ex-service members (many don't even require valid teaching certificates), students are likely to receive career advice that favors a military path.

There are more blatant examples of recruiting at RNA. The cadets - the label applied to students at military academies - have taken a school-sponsored field trip to the Naval Academy in Annapolis, Maryland. Furthermore, last year the school hosted Adm. Michael Mullen, the current chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Mullen told the cadets that the Navy was a "great career choice." RNA has hosted ten admirals in their short four-year history.

In addition to these direct tactics, the academies use more insidious approaches. A military culture permeates these schools. Students dress in uniform, receive demerits, and are introduced to the military hierarchy and way of life. For example, I have witnessed students marching with fake rifles. This cultivation of a militarized mind is the best explanation for why 40 percent of all Naval Junior Reserve Officer Training Corps program graduates wind up entering military service. This statistic is especially telling, considering that less than one percent of the population has served in the military at any given moment since 1975.

The Choice Argument

Military academies are promoted as an option within the public school system for parents. We heard it from Arne Duncan (ex-CEO of CPS and current secretary of education) and we hear it from Dale Davis, public information officer for the Dekalb County School System, who calls the military school "an addition" for parents to consider. Compare that with what Colonel Mills said in December 2007 in the Online News Hour: "The purpose of the military academy programs is to offer our cadets and parents an educational choice among many choices in Chicago Public Schools and to provide an educational experience that has a college prep curriculum, combined with a military curriculum."

We must dissect what kind of "choice" parents are given. If one's only choices are a school in desperate need of repair or a shiny new military academy, parents will often "choose" the "better" school.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: propaganda, army, military, department of justice, chicago, public education, u.s. schools, charter

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Cannon Fodder Factories
Posted by: DrBrian on Jul 1, 2009 12:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's drop the euphemisms and call these institutions what they are: cannon fodder factories for the empire. This is yet another step down into the abyss of a permanent war economy. We need a strong defense, but we don't need to send our youth off to far-flung places for dubious objectives conceived by people lacking foresight and ethics.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» LIVE TO OBEY, not THINK... Posted by: BlueBerry PickN
few factoids...
Posted by: ellie on Jul 1, 2009 3:34 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
military schools can have their place in education, a minor place, but here are the results as of today...

all branches of the service are packed to the gills and even getting to sign a contract is hard to do... recruiters are turning away applicants... the stop loss program has held so many from discharge that there are no open jobs...

not a personal fan of the military, but an air force recruiter we know told us that in this economy, people who are in, are re-enlisting because if nothing else, its a job...

recruits that are already in service are completing basic but the backlog is hundreds of newly minted on home leave (paid) waiting for a place in training schools including usually unwanted job areas and may play out their enlistment contracts sitting at home before a slot opens up...

most kids that wind up in military schools have a checkered past, a run-in with someone or institution... the 'moral waivers' are not available to these kids anymore, program was a disaster... our gang bangers were upsetting folks in other countries, more violent too then military contractors if you can believe that!!!

boot camps for the unruly turned out militarized teenagers who had no hope of getting into the services, so they took what they learned to the streets... to us folks...

do we really think military schools in public schools will have any other result???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: few factoids... Posted by: Ayla87
Chicago's corrupt enough already. Military studies will only worsen it.
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield on Jul 1, 2009 6:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From business corruption to political corruption, all I can say is that in Chicago, MARS rules and the growing poverty only confirms that sad truth.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Now wait a minute!
Posted by: Tom Degan on Jul 1, 2009 7:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Be all you can be!

It's not just a job, it's an adventure!

Well not really. This is going to seem horribly unpatriotic. So be it.

It's an easy thing to say that anyone who would join the military ought to have his or her head examined. Sometimes economics have a lot to do with their decisions.

But what if we were to start a media campaign that put out the message that the reason for having a military in the first place is to promote war or, at the very least, the intimidation of weaker countries?

John Lennon did the same thing forty years ago with the famous Bed Ins For Peace that he and Yoko Ono staged all over the world. Remember them?

All we are saying is give peace a chance.

Yeah, I know. It's sounds utterly simplistic, even child-like. But that's a good thing - a noble thing!

A child shall lead them.

peace....

"The Rant"

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Now wait a minute! Posted by: rinthy
» RE: Now wait a minute! Posted by: rinthy
Good
Posted by: Ayla87 on Jul 1, 2009 8:35 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ever see 'Stupid in America'? Public schools deserve to be underminded because of how poorly they teach our children. How much do you want to bet that these military schools have better student achievement solely for the fact that they don't put up with bullshit from thier students?

We spend more annually per student than any other country in the world, yet we lag behind those same nations every year in terms of achievement. Not only do we lag behind other nations, but by the governments own low standards, only five percent of highschool graduates are considered 'proficiently literate'.(Souce pg 15). 'Proficient' meaning you can read a chart, compare the view points of two editorials, and calculate the cost per ounce of food.

I say shut them all down. Then set up new ones that don't allow politics, administrators, and unions to get in the way of our childrens education.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another phase of the conversion to an empire
Posted by: Changling on Jul 1, 2009 9:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is just becoming much more obvious now. I am sure those militant crusaders for Christ are all for it. After all you need soldiers to fight the wars of domination don't you?

Most schools will become military academies or for labor slots in a war economy going strong since 1950! Corporate uber alles!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The "F" word
Posted by: susanhathaway on Jul 1, 2009 11:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The push to privatize and/or militarize public institutions is a symptom that our elected officials work hard to convince us is not present, a symptom of a disease they pretend does not and cannot exist in our country: fascism.

Our supposedly democratic government gives taxpayer money to failed corporations without requiring them to do much of anything in return; advocates military intervention in other countries; practices indefinite imprisonment, torture, and illegal surveillance; and allows schools to fail and people to die for lack of health care while spending vast amounts of money on obsolete weapons and corporate welfare. Every ugly, harsh, repressive tactic, every screwing-over of the middle class, every oppression of the poor, is justified as necessary for either "national security" (which somehow always means loss of civil liberties) or "the economy" (which somehow always means Wall Street, never Main Street).

How long before we will call it what it is? Why can't we use the "F" word?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Military school can help kids
Posted by: dhistory on Jul 1, 2009 11:57 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have worked in education and military type schools help kids on average. Since we have an all volunteer military, it gives kids an idea of whether they can handle the discipline and conformity required in the military. It seems that if they then choose to join the real military, they have a better idea of what it could be like. I went to a military high school and got more physical training than I would have in a regular high school. I also learned marksmanship which was fun which also was not available at the local public high school.

I wouldn't be concerned about the educators seeking cannon fodder from among minorities. According to US military statistics whites are overrepresented as a percentage of combat deaths at least in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Generally military schools have the added benefit of real military personnel that work with students. Male students benefit from the positive male role model. It can also be a way to channel their aggressive energy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It ain't all bad
Posted by: willymack on Jul 1, 2009 12:21 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Shortly aftet I retired from the Navy, I was offered a job as Assistant JROTC Instructer at a high school. I taught Naval history and customs, Navy regulations, rate and rank structures, and close order drill to name a few things.
There was no obligation for anyone to enter the Navy upon graduation, but for those who were going to do this anyway, it was a good leg up.
For some of the better students, there were college ROTC scholarships, which obligated the student to active Naval service upon graduation, and a commission as an Ensign. My brother got his college education this way. This was all up front, with no nasty surprises. I can speak only of the Navy ROTC program at that time, of course.
Almost anything can be perverted and coarsened by the wrong people, and I think the wrong people are in the Pentagon now. The LAST thing we need here is another Hitler Youth program

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It ain't all bad Posted by: progressive-life
WeMadeAmistake
Posted by: aroleflin on Jul 1, 2009 12:38 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The truth hurts. The answer is that the schools are failing because of the failed social malaise caused by liberal corrupt idealogy of permissiveness. Kids know now, thanks to the progressive twisted ideology of leftists, that they can get away with abusing their parents, their teachers, even authority because they are taught that no one can enforce corporal punishment on them. Secondly, cultures in the USA are corrupt from the very beginning of birth. 70% of Black children grow up wihout fathers. This is a disgrace. Libtards complain about a solution without accepting what the problem causes are. Take an overlay of crime in the U.S. and there is a undenial correlation with 'progressive voter' strong holds....urban areas in the northeast, east, southern large cities, western citties like Los Angeles. Detroit is a perfect example. There are more murders in Detroit than in Bagdad now. I think that should say it all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: WeMadeAmistake Posted by: MT512
» RE: WeMadeAmistake Posted by: bnvasquez
Brian...how can you break what's already been broken for years!
Posted by: donl51 on Jul 1, 2009 12:48 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...read your pc. have read better on the same subjct and chukkled at them all....we've got one of the Worst education systems on the planet,save for a handfull of high schools and top drawer universities where only richy Rich can attend....makes me happy to be in my mid 60's ...got my MA's that mean little today...We broke it!!...Military has nothing to do w/it!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Public Indoctrination
Posted by: Fred Flintstone on Jul 1, 2009 1:14 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most people don't seem to realize that mandatory public education has only been around since 1915...two years before America entered WWI.

The whole purpose of "public education" is NOT to teach kids to read and write and THINK for themselves it is to indoctrinate the American sheeple with a false reality about their country and government. It is to destroy the imaginations and independence the sheeple so as to make it easier for our masters to hoodwink us into making war without questioning the motives behind the war.

So integrating the Military with "public education" is a logical step in the process. Just look at the thoroughly indoctrinated morons on here saying "it's not such a bad thing" even though they have NO CLUE what the US military is REALLY about. The US military has ONE MISSION which is to protect American (and British and Israeli) business interests...PERIOD.

If you really want to know what "Public Education" is about read John Taylor Gatto's brilliant book The Underground History of American Education

Perry

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The truth is
Posted by: progressive-life on Jul 1, 2009 5:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the public school system sucks.. most are hotbeds for gangs...visit a few in NYC and see what a wonderful learning center they are..
Out of control students can use some discipline!!

Military Academies are the way to go.. West Point, Annapolis, Texas A&M, Airforce Academy for example are some of the best schools around.

Imagine the shock when they actually start to learn something!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

As a 2008 graduate from a "poor" high school...
Posted by: bnvasquez on Jul 1, 2009 6:58 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I may not have all the inside knowledge to comment on this article. However, people are reluctant to let students in on this issue. The militarization of schools will NOT solve the U.S. school system's failures. I am a product and graduate of a school that lacks resources, great sex ed, and students with motivation and money. How are these things related to this article? It doesn't take a whole lot of effort to realize that these schools do not provide an alternative and adequate education. It is a trap to target minority students like myself into later joining the military once we graduate. I was bombarded with military information mail during my senior year and was visited by Army recruits and I was asked "Do you know how you're going to pay for college", to which I replied with a simple "Yes, I have scholarships".

What people don't know, which may be counter to what may be apparent here, is that the military is also trying to recruit the "smart" kids. Especially the ones that come from low-income and minority schools who actually have a high chance of becoming something better than what everyone already things of students at that school.

I'm not aware of policies and track record of the Chicago school district, but it's obvious that it's a simple "solution" for lacking the will to truly revolutionize education. I could go on and on with a longer analysis, but where are the students' voices in the legislative decisions being made in not only Chicago, but in all of the United States?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Obviously, a young elitist Posted by: Sgellero
» RE: Obviously, a young elitist Posted by: bnvasquez
JROTC and West Point
Posted by: tomu4ia on Jul 1, 2009 8:33 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
An increase in the number of high school and college ROTC's adds to the argument for eliminating this country's "service academies" (West Point, Annapolis, the Air Force Academy, the Coast Guard Academy and the Merchant Marine Academy). Why should we continue to pay $400,000 for every cadet's or midshipman's education (btw, they each receive a "salary" of over $1,000 per month for the 48 months of their second-rate educations) when we can harvest enough mercenaries for almost no public funds to produce widows, orphans and disabled in the U.S. and throughout the infidel Third World forever and ever.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Much Ado About Nothing, Folks...
Posted by: Wild Peach on Jul 2, 2009 8:07 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As an Atlanta resident and spouse of a ex-Marine who served 14 years in the Marine Corps, I’m familiar with the argument surrounding the proposed DeKalb County school and find this entire issue much ado about nothing, frankly. My husband’s previous service may leave me a bit biased in some respects, but I’m also looking at this from the standpoint of a Georgia parent who has dealt with the Georgia educational system for over 20 years as the parent of five.

The article mentions about ROTC programs that have been in existence for many years in many school districts throughout the country and these programs aren’t mandatory for anyone, they are contingent on choice. The curriculum may not be a good fit for every child and at the end of the day, parents – who know their children and their needs best – decide what type of learning institution is best for their children and from what I can see coming out of the Georgia school systems, some children would benefit from this type of school. You see many schools of this nature in the private sector, but yet hear no such outrage or opposition.

Yes, there is an expectation that some will continue to explore careers in the military and there is nothing wrong in helping those students achieve that goal. There’s nothing wrong or dishonorable in pursuing a military career. For many students whom the public educational system has failed - especially in the inner-cities - this may provide another outlet to not only get a basic education, but learn discipline and other virtues that weren’t taught at home for a plethora of reasons.

There may be some problems in the Chicago schools that DeKalb County should look to and refine, but I wouldn’t automatically discount these schools as being subversive. They provide a particular niche of students whom would otherwise end up feeding another industry that’s far worse and with serious and lasting consequences – the prison-industrial complex – in which the alternative schools, particularly the Crossroads program, seem to do quite nicely.

It would seem the major problem in Chicago is them being housed in the same building with traditional public schools. The proposed DeKalb County school (DeKalb Marine Corps Institute) would be housed in its first year with an expected enrollment of about 150 freshman students in a facility that currently houses special needs students who are merging with another program this upcoming school year. The military academy would then move into a permanent facility the following year. The main opposition is from neighbors who say the facility is too small and would cause neighborhood traffic problems. The obvious solution is for DoD and the county school board to find a building to house from the start.

Bottom line, it may not be a perfect option for some but for some children, this might be their best chance in life.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We started as Athens
Posted by: Zeugitai on Jul 2, 2009 10:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and ended as Sparta

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Neoliberalism in Education
Posted by: newworld on Jul 2, 2009 10:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hi Oskar,

Thanks for the great article

One correction-as someone who is 62 y.o. and from Chicago, i don't ever
remember the school board being elected in Chicago

Based on Chicago being one of the worst of all cities for over a century,
in terms of big boss politics-now far worse than any other city, every
board-schools, library, park district, etc. is directly appointed by the
mayor

Daley is perhaps the best example/symbol of the newer, slicker local
Democrats who epitomize neoliberalism in all its aspects

Of course 95% of the nationally elected Democrats including the President,
and members of Congress are all part of this same ideology

How do we think Obama got to where he is?

His wife Michelle worked directly for Daley.

She facilitated the political connection between the two which got things
going.

His rise in politics had nothing to do with his background in community
organizing.

That is a myth people hope for who do not know Obama's politics historically.

So it is no coincidence that Obama chose his basketball partner, Arnie
Duncan, who has done more to destroy public education than anyone else in
the country.

The point in the article regarding gentrification is particularly important:

In geographic areas of the Chicago where there is high population density
of working class and poor African Americans and Latinos neighborhood
schools continue to deteriorate while middle and high schools increase
their Military Programs/ROTC and corporate or "non-for-profit" Charter
schools are opened.

For a long time Chicago had the ONLY middle school, Madero, JROTC program
(begun >15 years ago) in the country, in the largest Latino neighborhood,
Little Village, outside of NYC and LA.

In those neighborhoods where population density is sparse, primarily in
African American areas of the west and south side, Daley and Duncan have
closed school after school as a tool to accelerate depopulation in
preparation for gentrification.

In those same areas where gentrification and re population has occurred
with higher income African Americans and whites, the same schools have
been reopened either as Charter schools or as public schools with
extensive renovation, a better teacher to student ration, more IT
equipment, etc.

One big reason all of this has happened is because of the significant
weakness of both the Chicago Teachers Union (CTU) and the Chicago School
Reform movement.

Although Chicago had the most significant school reform/democracy based
restructuring in the U.S. in 1987-i.e. ANY person living in a school
boundary area could be elected to a local school board-called local school
council (LSC)-regardless of citizenship status in which thousands of
people ran and were elected, a fundamental error from the beginning was
the lack of unity between the CTU and LSC movement, especially at the
leadership level.

Since then the only CTU President to oppose Daley/Duncan has been voted
out of office after only a few years and most of the school reform
movement leaders have been bought off by the school board and/or Daley.

Daley has successfully gotten almost EVERY foundation to stop funding school reform groups (one of the only ones left PURE-Parents United for Responsible Education is hanging on by its bootstraps). It is important to note that at no time in his Illinois political career
did Obama ever criticize ANY of the above

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You Can't Have
Posted by: osd on Jul 2, 2009 7:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
wars if you don't have cannon fodder. There shouldbe a ban on interferring in other countries for corporate/political gain. Meddleing is what has caused more trouble in alot of other countries for over 150 years.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement