Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Will the 'Dollar Wars' Kill What's Left of the American Dream?

By Scott Thill, AlterNet. Posted June 26, 2009.


Countries yoked to America's currency, and therefore its cratering empire, want to kick the dollar to the curb. And that's bad news for the U.S.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Nobel Laureate Slams the Bible, Calls It "A Catalogue of Cruelties"
Mario de Queiroz

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
As Foreclosure Nightmares Increase, Will More Homeowners Pay Off Their Bankers in Violence?
Scott Thill

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Despite Censorship By Beef Magnate, Michael Pollan Spreads Message About the Real Price of Cheap Food

Health and Wellness:
Do We Really Want to Enshrine Insurance Monopoly into Law? This and 5 Other Complaints About the Health Bill
John Nichols

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
How Biased Media Can Brainwash You
Melinda Burns

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
4 Ways the Stupak Amendment Deprives Women of Access to Abortion
Jessica Arons

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Fetus-Shaped Potatoes? Going Undercover Inside the Weird World of Right-Wing Abortion Foes
Ann Neumann

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
Instant Sex: Has the Digital Age Destroyed Relationships or Made Them Better?
Vanessa Richmond

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
With Unemployment at 40 Percent, Afghan Teens Enlist in Army, Police
Lal Aqa Sherin

More stories by Scott Thill

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Here's a terrible joke: An elderly man walks into a bar and says, "I got good news and I got bad news."

"What's the good news?" the bartender asks.

"I stayed out of the stock market, so my retirement dollars are safe."

"What's the bad news?"

"They're dollars." 

OK, I said it was a terrible joke. But that may be what the dollar is becoming, now that the critical mass of wartime spending, rampant consumption, hyper-real finance  and environmental collapse has hit the fan.

The hangover from the last three presidential terms, but especially the last two, has taken the American economy down the rabbit hole, with the international monetary system begging for mercy while hitched to its off-the-ralls crazy train. But the ride has stopped, and some countries yoked to America's currency, and therefore its cratering empire, don't want to get back on. 

Namely, Brazil, Russia, India and China, loosely termed BRIC by Goldman Sachs economist Jim O'Neill, who is not alone in predicting the four countries' ascendant power, as the United States and the Eurozone fade into the 20th century.

With Brazil and Russia lording over a large share of what's left of the planet's natural gas and oil, and China and India providing a titanic labor force that rivals the intelligence, productivity and regimentation of workers anywhere outside their borders, BRIC is in the house, big time. And it wants a say in what's going on, as Marvin Gaye sang.

What's going on is that the dollar, to which the majority of the planet's economies and currencies are now reliant, has us all by the proverbial balls, and BRIC is screaming about it in the press. Something has to give, it's saying, and that thing is the dollar

"There is a lot of political and economic posturing involved," Rachel Zimeba, lead analyst at economist Nouriel Roubini's RGE Monitor, explained to AlterNet. "But I think there is substance to it. China has been trying, relatively unsuccessfully, to diversify for a couple of years, which has conflicted with its desire to have undervalued exports. Same thing has happened to countries in the Middle East, which are pegged to the dollar. And we're going to see even more pressure to diversify from these countries to reduce the share of their [dollar] assets.

"They see that the U.S. has a rising debt burden and record financing needs. Over time, they are worried that inflation and a weaker dollar will reduce the value of those assets." 

They should be worried. Since the Bush administration took office, the dollar has lost 33 percent of its value. And since the Bushies left office, the dollar has been on autopilot, hovering beneath the pound and euro and jockeying for position with the Canadian dollar for the bronze medal in underperforming currencies, losing or gaining altitude every time a politician from Russia or China slams or praises it in the press. Like the American economy itself, the Humpty Dumpty dollar is wobbling on the fence, hoping reality doesn't hop along and give it a shove. 

The good news? It could land softly. 

"This is not an overnight thing," Ziemba added. "Same thing goes for these countries' attempts to turn their own currencies into transactional and reserve currencies." 

That's reassuring, especially to what's left of those who still have a lot of dollars, as the American unemployment rate rises to levels nearly unseen since World War II. But once you wormhole a bit further into the future, the dollar's fate is much more murky. 


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: dollar, bric

Scott Thill runs the online mag Morphizm. His writing has appeared on Salon, XLR8R, All Music Guide, Wired and others.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
A little too Chicken-little
Posted by: pb120669 on Jun 26, 2009 5:04 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The major point of the article is good -- U.S. fiscal policy and foreign policy have been abysmal under Bush, under Clinton, under Bush, ... (how far back do you want to go?).

But the sky-is-going-to-fall message is over-the-top, as Zimeba appears to indicate but never really fleshes out: "There is a lot of political and economic posturing involved."

Have a look at the recent CRS report, Jan. 2009. The main problem with Thill's article is what it omits. I don't think we can seriously discuss the value of the dollar without taking into account the role that the purchase of US Treasury bills plays. China, among others, has a vested interest in maintaining the value of the dollar. Besides owning about 15% of the privately held US debt, China's exports are kept high by a stronger dollar. All public pronouncements by Chinese officials and the public finance record show that China is invested in the US, for better or worse, for many years to come.

Nice try, Scott, but I think it's back to the drawing board with this idea. There's some good stuff here -- and the potential for catastrophe is very high if the US continues following current (read "Obama's") policies. I just don't think the givens of the real political situation currently allows much possibility for the "dollar wars" to end "the American Dream" -- whatever that is.

How about this: the Federal Reserve has been flooding the market with dirt-cheap credit since the "financial crisis" started 18 months ago. What effect with the ensuing hyper-inflation have on the value of the dollar?

They made the rope with which they hung themselves...

In solidarity,
Mark Wayne

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good Article
Posted by: Gravitas on Jun 26, 2009 6:17 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This way the only useful article on the front page of Alternet today. This is something we should be aware of and worried about. It could very well devalue the dollar. Just because it may not happen overnight doesn't mean it is not a cause for concern.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Good Article Posted by: tommy_slothrop
Time to go local even on currency.
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield on Jun 26, 2009 6:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
By going local on our currency, Washington cannot misuse our tax dollars for more war funding, bailouts for Wall $treet, corrupt elections and rigging, etc ... Let the American dollar collapse and let's go local on currency.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

People who live in glass houses...
Posted by: BigRon on Jun 26, 2009 6:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...shouldn't throw stones. The USA doesn't regard economic war as "aggression", just as a useful tool that it uses most days. (And has done so for well over 50 years) Right now, Iran is the favourite target of the USA's economic agression; back in the 1930's, it was Japan.

The previous poster is clearly some kind of economist, who buys enthusiastically into the myth that rationality underlies economic behaviour, whereas in reality, it quite clearly doesn't. Rational decisions are made by people who have a firm grip on reality, not ones who are high on their own halucinogenic nationalistic propaganda.

The Once-Mighty Dollar can no longer leap tall buildings at a single bound. In fact, it's as fragile as a house of cards. (But it's "unpatriotic" to admit that!) Money that was invested in Euros when the "Eurozone" began, would be worth a LOT more todsy than an equivalent sum invested in $$. Of course, if you're someone like Saudi Arabia, there are other considerations too (like remembering what happened to Saddam when he started selling his oil priced in Euros) For them it's cheapest just to buy American presidents.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

buy gold
Posted by: ozonehole on Jun 26, 2009 8:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you're worried about your dollars becoming worthless (likely), I'd suggest buying gold. It's what I've done. I would also suggest avoiding "paper gold" (the gold derivatives sold on the stock market, known as ETFs - exchange traded funds). In the long run, paper gold may be as good as credit default swaps and mortgage backed securities - that is to say, not worth the paper they're printed on. Take a look at this:

http://gata.org/node/7491

Physical gold, kept in a safe-deposit box or other safe place, may be the only option. For Americans, the best are either American gold Eagle coins, or American gold Buffaloes. Canadian Maple Leafs might be an acceptable alternative, especially if you live near the border. South African Krugerrands work too, but they've fallen somewhat out of favor in the USA (and thus sell for a little less). Avoid the Chinese gold pandas - too many fakes. Gold bars are a whole different thing - rather difficult to sell. Note that's not true everywhere in the world (in the Far East, gold bars are the only thing traded).

Silver coins can be good too, but they're very bulky - you need 50 times the storage space compared to gold for the same value.

Lots of reputable gold & silver dealers out there - I won't recommend any, because I don't want anyone to accuse me of posting spam. Look in the yellow pages for "coin dealers".

Good luck.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: buy gold Posted by: IRIQUOIS227
It's worrying that the propaganda has taken hold so quickly
Posted by: BigRon on Jun 26, 2009 11:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Which is why we hear so much about "sub-prime loans". Average American incomes have been in real decline (i.e. adjusted for inflation) for decades. Americans convinced themselves that they were circumventing this reality by exploiting the rise in house prices, remortgaging, then spending the cash they'd raised on non-esential items. Americans were briefly able to "enjoy the good life" - by saving nothing, and borrowing up to the full (and absurdly inflated) value of their homes. A 100% mortgage makes some sense for new house purchases, but recheduling to borrow 100% against an inflated house value as standard practise is a recipe for tears before bedtime. A "solid citizen" with a steady job who borrows a LOT of money against his over-valued house is riding a handcart to hell just as much as a recipient of "sub-prime" lending. Yet only one of the two gets singled out as "the cause of the problem".

Gorbachev got it about right when he claimed that you can't deal with a problem until you accept what the problem is. Before Perestoika, there must be Glasnost. What the USA has isn't "Glasnost"... it's just plain denial. America has deep rooted problems... but flatly refuses to see them - it's just "not patriotic" to do so. When I predicted the collapse, three or four years back, the response I got was "You're just saying that because you hate America!" Sure... those are like the words of a drunk when you try to take away his car keys and persuade him to take a cab. If you really hated him, you'd be happy to see him drive off a cliff.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The US gets the government it deserves!
Posted by: drfun on Jun 26, 2009 12:04 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When Geitner was in China last week he was laughed off the stage when he referenced the world has a strong $.

There is a Russian billionaire who has put together debt swaps negating the need for $'s to complete business transactions which is gaining much interest amongst BRIC countries.

You can thank the nearly tripling of the federal deficit under the wife and political party swapping, B rated senile sap Reagan. The championing of deregulation and wasteful Pentagon programs that had nothing to do with the collapse of the former USSR, but everything to do with making your future great grandchildren debt-slaves before they were born. To spawn the largest heists of American economic power for the benefit of a few.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So, they don' like our dollar no mo',eh?
Posted by: willymack on Jun 26, 2009 2:00 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Goooooood! I, for one am pretty weary of us being the bully boys of the world, insisting on the dollar being the de facto world currency. Maybe now, we can get out of the two illegal, immoral, and unwinable "wars" we're in and spend the money we're wasting there on universal health care and better schools.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ehswan
Posted by: eric swan on Jun 26, 2009 3:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Long time visiter to your site. Most humbly suggest that the contributers to this thought stream consider the following. We are collectively destroying our mother the Earth, or at least consider that we are destroying that which sustains us. This talk about the destruction of the global "economy", (like living is about money), is but a tipping point indicating a far, far larger problem. Our Global way of life is going to seriously reduce our numbers. This dieoff is neither good nor bad. It is. Suck it up, we are in for unimagineably hard times. Have courage and persevere.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The only difference between the dumb-asses who ran the
Posted by: abusedbypenguins on Jun 26, 2009 6:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
former soviet empire into the ground and the dumb-asses who are running the american empire into the ground is the russian dumb-asses spoke russian and ours try to speak english. Other than that it is "Do as I say, not as I do" which is normal operating procedure in dictatorships and want-to-be corporate dictatorships. Do we really have a say in what is going on?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Dollar is Flawed
Posted by: BenL8 on Jun 27, 2009 9:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From The Dollar Crisis, by Richard Duncan, Introduction, 2005, "The dollar standard is inherently flawed and increasingly unstable. Its collapse will the most important economic event of the 21st century." When the U.S. government sells about $700 billion in loans to foreigners every year (5% of GDP), it becomes scary when the nations who loan us that money become upset. Both interest rates and taxes would increase substantially if foreign nations stopped (or reduced) sending us their extra cash. That would drop our GDP by a good bit,which would contribute to more unemployment, poverty and raise taxes. But it is inevitable. We cannot maintain a trade deficit forever, soon we run out of credit worthiness and assets. This article does not do justice to a very large and real dilemma. And its chicken little tone does little to help us understand, but it is amusing. I'll advertise my blog, go to http://benL8.blogspot.com for economic reform ideas. The real problem is the imbalance of wealth and income, nationally and internationally. Duncan prescribes a tariff on exporting industries to raise workers wages directly in low incomes countries, and an international currency, like SDRs. Our trade and internal economic policies could and should support economic justice, that's how I would frame the issue.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

article misses the entire supply and demand equation tho...
Posted by: Bearzerker on Jun 27, 2009 4:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...which is that the US is by far the largest buyer of everything from everywhere!

other nations are trying to catch up but atm the US buys as much of the earths resources now then all the other economies combined...

supply and demand is where we have the true slippery slope... if American consumerism wanes the entire world feels it... the US in its true altruistic spirit exports a lot of its manufacturing outside of its borders thus increasing other countries GDP making them better consumers of high tech American goods and services... can the US dollar take this pounding... i believe it can and with lots to spare, the rising nations of BRIC do have rather large rising GDP numbers on their side with them as a combine force reaching equity with US consumer hegemony in the very near future... what we need to do as a society is evolve into more high tech industries that promote a greener venue with a comparable profit engine to support green initiatives...

anyways... just my 2 cents worth...
good read all the same

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You can't devalue the dollar any further.
Posted by: Eddie Van Helsing on Jun 30, 2009 7:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It became utterly worthless as soon as Nixon killed the gold standard by unilaterally pulling the United States out of the Bretton-Woods system. Everybody in America is buying and selling with monopoly money.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

spot on
Posted by: awilson5280 on Jul 2, 2009 1:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article is absolutely correct about the issues facing the global economy. Once the recession eases in the United States, the U.S. will be facing hyperinflation due to the liquidity pumped into the economy by stimulus packages. This will cause major problems both domestically and internationally - domestically because people won't be able to afford anything, and internationally because dollar-denominated holdings (like the T-bills of which the Chinese hold so many) will rapidly lose value.

When this happens, the United States will be relegated to second-tier power status until it restores its credit, either through painful repayments financed by taxes or through slow growth (on the timeline of 25-50 years). The other possibility is that Americans will tire of the hole that they have dug for themselves and will tilt strongly rightward, listening to the siren song about preserving the "American way of life" and starting wars of aggression in pursuit of cheaper commodities.

The article is also correct in pointing out at its conclusion that China has its own problems that will prevent it from becoming a world hegemon. This is true of each of the "ascendant" powers in BRIC - Russia has a declining population, India has overpopulation, and Brazil (probably the best-positioned of the four) has its corruption, gangs and shantytowns.

I think that the article is pointing to the need for single-world currency, which I think is an important step on the path toward a single-world government. Rally the militiamen, but I think it will happen by 2100.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

article missing the point...
Posted by: Bearzerker on Jul 3, 2009 8:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The reason our dollar is the currency of choice is because we are the largest consumers of goods and services anywhere on the planet...

and that's not gonna change anytime soon, but I can see a shift in consumerism towards India and China very soon using real commodities and goods instead of greenbacks... a step back to the barter and trade system and chaos!

We need hard currency for hard manufactured items... we are currently betting the farm on intellectual property rights and soon those will be as valuable as our currency will be...

we need a better vision and program for the 21st century

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement