Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Iran Had a Democracy Before We Took It Away

By Chris Hedges, Truthdig. Posted June 23, 2009.


Iranians do not need or want us to teach them about liberty and representative government. It is we who need to be taught.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Atheists, It's Time to Stand Up to Jesus
Russell Blackford, Udo Schuklenk

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
As Foreclosure Nightmares Increase, Will More Homeowners Pay Off Their Bankers in Violence?
Scott Thill

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why We Need Bees and More People Becoming Organic Beekeepers
Makenna Goodman

Food:
Despite Censorship By Beef Magnate, Michael Pollan Spreads Message About the Real Price of Cheap Food

Health and Wellness:
New York May Stop Heartless Health Insurers from Dropping Coverage When It Stops Being Profitable
William Ehart

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
Focusing on Fort Hood Killer's Beliefs Is an Easy Out to Avoid the Deeper Reasons for the Massacre
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Michelle and Barack's Marriage Has in Common with 56 Million Other Ones
Annabelle Gurwitch

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Fetus-Shaped Potatoes? Going Undercover Inside the Weird World of Right-Wing Abortion Foes
Ann Neumann

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
Instant Sex: Has the Digital Age Destroyed Relationships or Made Them Better?
Vanessa Richmond

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
With Unemployment at 40 Percent, Afghan Teens Enlist in Army, Police
Lal Aqa Sherin

More stories by Chris Hedges

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Iranians do not need or want us to teach them about liberty and representative government. They have long embodied this struggle. It is we who need to be taught. It was Washington that orchestrated the 1953 coup to topple Iran’s democratically elected government, the first in the Middle East, and install the compliant shah in power. It was Washington that forced Prime Minister Mohammed Mossadegh, a man who cared as much for his country as he did for the rule of law and democracy, to spend the rest of his life under house arrest. We gave to the Iranian people the corrupt regime of the shah and his savage secret police and the primitive clerics that rose out of the swamp of the dictator’s Iran. Iranians know they once had a democracy until we took it away. 

The fundamental problem in the Middle East is not a degenerate and corrupt Islam. The fundamental problem is a degenerate and corrupt Christendom. We have not brought freedom and democracy and enlightenment to the Muslim world. We have brought the opposite. We have used the iron fist of the American military to implant our oil companies in Iraq, occupy Afghanistan and ensure that the region is submissive and cowed. We have supported a government in Israel that has carried out egregious war crimes in Lebanon and Gaza and is daily stealing ever greater portions of Palestinian land. We have established a network of military bases, some the size of small cities, in Iraq, Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Kuwait, and we have secured basing rights in the Gulf states of Bahrain, Qatar, Oman and the United Arab Emirates. We have expanded our military operations to Uzbekistan, Pakistan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Egypt, Algeria and Yemen. And no one naively believes, except perhaps us, that we have any intention of leaving.

We are the biggest problem in the Middle East. We have through our cruelty and violence created and legitimized the Mahmoud Ahmadinejads and the Osama bin Ladens. The longer we lurch around the region dropping iron fragmentation bombs and seizing Muslim land the more these monsters, reflections of our own distorted image, will proliferate. The theologian Reinhold Niebuhr wrote, “Perhaps the most significant moral characteristic of a nation is its hypocrisy.” But our hypocrisy no longer fools anyone but ourselves. It will ensure our imperial and economic collapse.

The history of modern Iran is the history of a people battling tyranny. These tyrants were almost always propped up and funded by foreign powers. This suppression and distortion of legitimate democratic movements over the decades resulted in the 1979 revolution that brought the Iranian clerics to power, unleashing another tragic cycle of Iranian resistance.

“The central story of Iran over the last 200 years has been national humiliation at the hands of foreign powers who have subjugated and looted the country,” Stephen Kinzer, the author of “All the Shah’s Men: An American Coup and the Roots of Middle East Terror,” told me. “For a long time the perpetrators were the British and Russians. Beginning in 1953, the United States began taking over that role. In that year, the American and British secret services overthrew an elected government, wiped away Iranian democracy, and set the country on the path to dictatorship.”

“Then, in the 1980s, the U.S. sided with Saddam Hussein in the Iran-Iraq war, providing him with military equipment and intelligence that helped make it possible for his army to kill hundreds of thousands of Iranians,” Kinzer said. “Given this history, the moral credibility of the U.S. to pose as a promoter of democracy in Iran is close to nil.

Especially ludicrous is the sight of people in Washington calling for intervention on behalf of democracy in Iran when just last year they were calling for the bombing of Iran. If they had had their way then, many of the brave protesters on the streets of Tehran today—the ones they hold up as heroes of democracy—would be dead now.”

Washington has never recovered from the loss of Iran—something our intelligence services never saw coming. The overthrow of the shah, the humiliation of the embassy hostages, the laborious piecing together of tiny shreds of paper from classified embassy documents to expose America’s venal role in thwarting democratic movements in Iran and the region, allowed the outside world to see the dark heart of the American empire. Washington has demonized Iran ever since, painting it as an irrational and barbaric country filled with primitive, religious zealots. But Iranians, as these street protests illustrate, have proved in recent years far more courageous in the defense of democracy than most Americans. 


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: iran, iran, violence, us, foreign policy, ahmadinejad, protests, khamenei, Mousavi, revolutionary guard

Chris Hedges, a Pulitzer prize-winning reporter, is a Senior Fellow at the Nation Institute. His latest book is Collateral Damage: America's War Against Iraqi Civilians.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Yes but...
Posted by: CosmoViking on Jun 23, 2009 1:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...It's mainstream news, historically challenged senators and their intelligence handlers who keep "forgetting" this fact. The rest of us are well aware of what Iran looked like before the disastrous 1953 intervention that has seeded so many problems. Blame the Seven Sisters of Oil, not the public...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Yes but... Posted by: mjglow
» RE: Yes but... Posted by: CosmoViking
» Bilderberg Posted by: bonzi
Wrong pronoun
Posted by: Julian on Jun 23, 2009 1:36 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who is this "we" that the author says overthrew Dr Mossadeq in 1953? How many of today's Americans were even born at the time? How many who were alive then had the slightest say in decisions to overthrow the democratic Persian government? Decent Americans need not listen to poseurs who try to gag them on the ground that their own home-grown enemies were also the enemies of the Persian people at the time? If the Iranian election swindle is for real, as seems virtually certain, then it is in the interest of all decent Americans to add their voices to the protest and to getting theocrats out of power everywhere including at home but not excluding in Iran. Hosing down Americans' outrage on phoney "progressive" grounds strikes a blow for the enemies of liberty in Iran.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» One more thing Posted by: HeroesAll
» RE: Wrong pronoun Posted by: weindeb
» RE: Wrong pronoun Posted by: Mrs. Jefferson
» RE: Spare us the bs Posted by: judette
» RE: Spare us the bs......agreed Posted by: Captainmagic
Obama's Confession Re US Overthrowing Democratically Elected Government Was Political Masterpiece
Posted by: tony_opmoc on Jun 23, 2009 1:58 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And will have had a major impact on current events in Iran.

But once Presidents start telling the Truth, people will demand and expect more of it.

The problem is that the Truth about Obama's real agenda is extremely dangerous and has been analysed and predicted very accuarately by Webster Tarpley link 1 link 2.

It wasn't that difficult for Tarpley - all he had to do was to analyse everything that Zbigniew Brzezinski has clearly stated will be policy. Brzezinski doesn't want Iran at War with the US - he wants Iran as a US Puppet ultimately at War with Russia.

This strategy is even worse than Cheney's neocons. All they wanted was to take all the oil.

Brzezinski wants to take the entire World and encircle and dominate Russia and China.

Thats a recipe for Worldwide Nuclear destruction.

This insanity has got to stop - or we will all be dead.

Trying to control the world isn't doing us any good. It is simply impoverishing us. Lunatics like Cheney and Brzezinski are turning the World into Hell.

What does it take to stop them. Maybe we can learn from Iran - but the Protestors don't realise what the real agenda is.

Tarpley spells it out so accurately from before the Election - that his analysis has to be taken very seriously as its all coming true.

Tony

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thanks a heap, Ike!
Posted by: Tom Degan on Jun 23, 2009 4:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The birth of Islamic extremism can be traced directly to the 1953 overthrow of the government of Iran that was orchestrated at the behest of Dwight D. Eisenhower and his Secretary of State, John Foster Dulles.

And to think that we are still paying for the mistakes of two guys who have been dead for almost half a century! Just ask the poor people of Guatemala.

In 1955, that country was in the tenth year of a democracy that was inspired by FDR's New Deal. One of the things that Jacabo Arbenz did when he entered office was to nationalize the farm land that grew the fruit, their main export. Big mistake. Dulles was a stockholder in the Delmonte Company. Good bye democracy. HELLLOOOO, DESPOTISM!

By the way, I do not buy Delmonte products; You shouldn't either. Food for thought - no pun intended.

Freshman Diplomacy 101

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Misreading History Posted by: progressive-life
» RE: Misreading History Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: Misreading History Posted by: mjglow
» *** TROLL ALERT!!! *** Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Thanks a heap, Ike! Posted by: luzmejor
» One more thing, Purple Girl.... Posted by: Tom Degan
Destroyer of Democracy
Posted by: US Citizen on Jun 23, 2009 5:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Whoever ultimately leads Iran, I doubt they will have any great respect for the United States, the destroyer of democracy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Destroyer of Democracy Posted by: Mrs. Jefferson
» RE: Totally agree Posted by: judette
Democracy is inimical to imperial mobilization
Posted by: login@bugmenot.com on Jun 23, 2009 5:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A democratic Middle East is a threat to US (and EU) interests in the region.

No democratic free people would agree to the theft of their natural resources.

First it was the Suez Canal and the spice trade, now it's the oil and the pipelines.

It happened with the mines and minerals of Africa, now it's happening with the gas and oil of Asia.

Every single state in the Middle East is run by oppressive regimes, including Israel which is merely an extension of European colonialism.

"Democracy is inimical to imperial mobilization."

Z. Brzezinski.The Grand Chessboard, 1997

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

One final though....
Posted by: Tom Degan on Jun 23, 2009 5:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush's ideological heirs are literally foaming at the mouth for Barack Obama to "take action" (most of them never exactly specifying what that "action" should be) against the government of Iran for perverting the results of their recent election. A few of them have even had the chutzpah to suggest that the president send in the Marines. Mind you, if the Iranian military had come in and kicked some serious ass in the state of Florida eight years ago when Jeb Bush and Katherine Harris stole the 2000 election from Al Gore, I'd be all for a military incursion into that country - after all, what's fair is fair. But they did not act against Florida in 2000 (Damn them!) We lack any moral justification interfering in their internal matters in 2009.

God bless the people of Iran.

Shame on the U.S. Military Industrial Complex.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: One final though.... Posted by: progressive-life
» You Pointy-headed TROLL! Posted by: Quannah
» Childish name calling Posted by: countingdaisies
» RE: One final though.... Posted by: Aquinas
» Amen Posted by: judette
Green Flags
Posted by: login@bugmenot.com on Jun 23, 2009 5:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Especially ludicrous is the sight of people in Washington calling for intervention on behalf of democracy in Iran when just last year they were calling for the bombing of Iran. If they had had their way then, many of the brave protesters on the streets of Tehran today—the ones they hold up as heroes of democracy—would be dead now.”

This seems to be the absurdity that escapes many and the hypocrisy that makes the Muslim world nauseous.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Green Flags Posted by: Aquinas
Israel's role
Posted by: daw13 on Jun 23, 2009 5:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is more complex than Hedges implies, but otherwise this is a great statement. Israel is not the tail that wags the dog. Israel has always been more instrument than designer of what Hedges describes. But the split within the country over this instrumentality is far deeper and more profound than what is reflected by current analysts of the Left or Right. Itzhak Rabin was assassinated for his abhorence of it.

Which is not to imply that the Israeli community has stepped up and rejected imperialism as an immoral and unfeasible policy. Just as we here have not.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Israel's role Posted by: login@bugmenot.com
Deja Vu all over again...
Posted by: MyLeftFoot on Jun 23, 2009 7:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The US has laid economic siege to Iran for 30 years, blocking desperately needed foreign investment, preventing technology transfers, and disrupting Iranian trade. In recent years, the US Congress voted $120 million for anti-regime media broadcasts into Iran, and $60-75 million funding opposition parties, violent underground Marxists like the Mujahidin-i-Khalq, and restive ethnic groups like Azeris, Kurds, and Arabs under the so-called "Iran Democracy Program."

The arm of Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, remains withered from a bomb planted by the US-backed Mujahidin-i-Khalq, who were once on the US terrorist list.

Pakistani intelligence sources put CIA’s recent spending on "black operations" to subvert Iran’s government at $400 million.

According to an ABC News investigation, President George Bush signed a "finding" that authorized an accelerated campaign of subversion against the Islamic Republic. Washington’s goal was "regime change" in Tehran and installation of a pro-US regime of former Iranian royalist exiles.

linked text

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sing Your Lil' Song- Songbird!!!
Posted by: Purple Girl on Jun 23, 2009 7:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's almost hysterical to hear the Repugs suddenly become advocates of the iranian people, after years of painting them All as terrorist hell bent on destroying US and Israel. To be a Republican these days requires a daily dose of Thorazine to cope with the party's schizophrenia.
Let's have Songbird sing his revised Beach Boys song again..How'd that go birdie? "Bomb, bomb bomb Iran"? Gee ya think you might have killed some of those on the Streets protesting right now- or at least changed their perception of US in the process?
Why the Hell would We listen to these War dogs who were pushing for a Third War? History alone should have kept US from listening to them about putting boots on the Ground in Afghanistan. Worse yet listening to them about regime change of a dictator they aided in power and tyranny. What's a matter boys, Was Saddam going to blow the whistle on your Covert, illegal operations? Announce to the World it was Our Anthrax he used to commit his genocidal atrocity?
Hey Johnny boy- still sending boots to your beneficary Bin laden- do you send them now to his safe haven palace called "Hell"- do they merely leave them at the Gates? Or do you provide that service STILL?
The true intentions of these Repugs is obvious- they want some way to profit off a conflict in Iran_ either by our direct involvement or through a civil war (one of their most advantgeous methods- Divide & conquer).
Their 'empathy' for the Protesters is as disingenous as Rush's 'compassion' for the Pirates who held our Citizen hostage at gun point.
Wipe the Rabid foaming Drool off your Chins, Repug War dogs (and any of their ball licking lil' blue lap dogs),The Iranian people have proven they are able to change their political landscape whenever they so choose, and are willing to sacrific their lives in the process if need be. Something We Americans should have done after You stole our '00 election!
As far as I'm concerned McCain and his cronies shouldn't be standing in the Well of the Senate- they should be hanging from the platform of the Gallows for Decades of Acts of treason, war crimes and crimes against humanity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where Were American Protestors After 9/11
Posted by: edgar_michel on Jun 23, 2009 8:24 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why didn't Americans take to the streets when it became apparent that 9/11 was a coup against the American people? David Ray Griffin commented that the "American people are very tolerant." But perhaps tolerant isn't the right word; perhaps cowed is the more proper term.

Americans embrace dictatorship and they just pray that they aren't one of those sacrificed in the interest of consolidating dictatorial powers by their "elected representatives."

Why is it that America destroys democracies and promotes dictatorship? Perhaps the words of George W. Bush are more universally embraced by all American politicians than just the fringe right. George W. Bush said, "A dictatorship would be a heck of a lot easier, there's no question about it, "

Yes, Americans need to take a hard look at the courage of the Iranian people and take another hard look at their thirst for democracy. What does it take for Americans to stand up to their corrupt government; a million innocent dead homeless in the interest of improving the image of American cities? Certainly 2,972 dead victims of the World Trade Center demolitions didn't stir their passions. What does it take?

9/11 proved one thing about America and that is Americans are cowards and that includes the writers for Alternet.

I think Alternet needs to take a hard look at the courage of the Iranian people and perhaps Iranian journalists and then report back what they see.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» damn right, guy Posted by: tazdelaney
How Could We Let This Happen?
Posted by: Southern Gal on Jun 23, 2009 9:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We look back on Nazi Germany and ask how the Germans could let that happen? How could they let all those Jews be killed? We should look at ourselves and ask the same questions. How can we let our country intervene in all of these other countries, kill many innocent civilians and children and for what purposes? What has been accomplished and what will be accomplished that makes this world a better and safer place through our foreign, intelligence and military policies and that solves many of the important issues such as poverty, environmental degradation, disease and famine, etc. We should show some backbone with our government and stand up for what is right.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thank you
Posted by: Archie1954 on Jun 23, 2009 9:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
for that article. I'm saving it in my favourites. In a very few concise words it explains a half century of war and destruction in the Middle East.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

One flaw
Posted by: bonapartist on Jun 23, 2009 9:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good article but there is one big flaw in its conclusion.

Namely the call to support the demonstrators no matter what. I say let's not and let us keep out of it for a number of reasons.

US and UK medias painted them as some sort of an overwhelming pro western movement. The fact is that the protestors are far fewer than orginally estimated, the unrest is limited almost exclusively to Teheran and no media reports more than few thousands of demonstrators. They are NOT French Revolution style Levée en masse numbers.

Further more the deomonstators oppose Ahmedinejad for different reasons with Mousavi's group being the loudest. Mousavi himself was/is a hardliner who served as Khomeini's Prime minister and Foreign Minister.

By proxy the western media, primarly US and UK ones, assumed that enemy of my enemy is my friend. So if Ahmedinejad is a hardline tyrant those who oppose him must be tolerant democrats.

This is a perfect sham to sell the pseudo revolution to western public. If history thought us anything than it is the fact that opposite of a tyrant can be another tyrant, take the conflict betweent he factions of Nazi party in 1930s for example. Hitler destroyed Rohm's SA in a bloody purge but Rohm was himself was a bloody thug.

In short the demonstrators are not numerous enough to constitute a "revolution" nor are their goals clear enough to earn a label of "democratic".

Also if, as many suspect and some reports indicate, this is indeed a CIA backed scam to destabilize Iran than supporting the demosntrators plays right into the hands of US rulling oligarchy. Perfect heads-I-win-tails-you-lose approach. If protestors succeede Iran gets destabilized and possibly ruled by a puppet regime.

That is however unlikely but that opens second best option - another proof Ahmedinejad is a tyrant monster. What a wonderful reason to start say a bombing campaign of Iran in say 2010, by say Israel, I mean we all know what that bastard did to poor freedom loving protestors.

After all, good old now retired Rumsfeld was shaking hands with Saddam when fellow was using the poison gas during Iran-Iraq War. Us has wested interests in the region since 1950s and they can be summarized as oil and Israel.

Obama is the better dressed and better talking piece of turd working for the same oligarchical garbage as his predecessor. In case anybody missed it Iraq and Afghani wars now belogn to him and the money was found to finance them despite the economic crisis.

Add to the above mixture the bleeding hearts who will support any and every dissent no matter the background and US "progressives" wanting to vent their frustration over "stolen" 2000 elections and you get a volatile combination. One that makes moderates/left/progressives an easy prey of proimperialist medias.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Timing is everything Posted by: kettleblack
Truth 101
Posted by: SlyGuy on Jun 23, 2009 9:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A course of instruction sadly missing in today's educational and political climate. High time.

What's allowed all this nonsense that America is a friend of democracy around the world to persist? How's this for an answer. I was born in 1955. I became politically active in middle school with the onset of the Vietnam War. But it wasn't until after college that I began reading The Nation magazine and others like it that I began to collect information and truths about the U.S. role in the world to undermine democracies and promote its increasingly imperial advantage resulting from WWII. Why, the national media even 30+ years ago never delved deeper than to proclaim Iran an ally, the Shah our friend, and confined all discussion of peace and democracy in the Middle East to Isreal's plight. That's all we heard.

Today is no different. The average American has no idea how much the U.S. has sown the seeds of its own problems and the world's. The Shah, wasn't he one of us??? Didn't we do good helping the mujadeen kick the Russians out of Afghanistan? Nevermind the truth. Now more than ever, Americans' interest and understanding of these historical matters is increasingly and simply ahistorical--don't know, don't care. Attention deficit disorder is at the heart of our media culture. Too distracted by our petty pursuits and gizmos and sound-byte level anti-intellectualism.

Keep up the good work.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

HISTORY IS BEING MADE IN IRAN
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Jun 23, 2009 9:34 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The people want their country back and it looks as though it's going to happen. It's violent and it comes at a high price, but it's worth it. They are making history, not because of awful weapons but because of a collection of little gadgets, gizmos and electronic devices that didn't exist a few short years ago. That's why we know what's going on in Iran. The people are able to communicate under the radar of politicians and military leaders and without the permission of other countries. That would be us. The major news outlets have been shut down, internet service is limited but it doesn't matter. I find that remarkable. I watch this in amazement. It's not the same old, same old. It's new and it's working. Typically, Americans always look back before they look forward. Always going on about how history repeats itself but everything had to happen for the first time. When we think of 'freedom' the automatic association is with bloodshed. Well there is some blood being spilled but the biggest battle is that of people able to communicate with people all over the world and the overwhelming majority are on the side of the Iranian people. By the way, they are grateful for all the support they have. I wonder who's next? ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Funny enough
Posted by: bonapartist on Jun 23, 2009 9:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
According to Reuters no other than Benjamin Netanyahu gave his support to Iranian protestors. Oh and he deplored violence and supported freedom fighters in Iran.

What a surprise, first US president, then UK Prime minister and now Israel. All certified freinds of democracy and peace in Middle East.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Funny enough Posted by: Aquinas
thanks and some more
Posted by: tazdelaney on Jun 23, 2009 9:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
while i should've surmised that, didn't know it. however, i do know that the united states government has overthrown more democracies than any other nation in history and set up more puppet military dictatorships than even the soviet union. in the 1898 spanish american war, while telling the american public it was to bring 'freedom and democracy, the usg overthrew the filipino democracy and killed at least 600,000 there, many in corrals were gatling-gunned, according to mark twain. same in cuba. the usg installed brutal dictatorships in both countries. it took castro to overthrow the brutal batista and the united states backed marcos til the end in the philippines, then invited him to come to miami's fontainebleu with his billions.

then there's allende, aristide, the usg-backed coup of chavez (unsuccessful), etc. a list of vicious dictators installed or supported in power is lengthy: franco, botha, pinochet, somoza, thieu-ky, pol pot, suharto, noriega, fujimori, several bolivian coups, el salvador, guatemala, etc.

something you'll never hear on faux-news... a thug named saddam hussein was hired by CIA in 1959 to carry out assassinations to protect the oil companies' iraqi concessions (resource colonialism as usual), then CIA/state department gradually brought him to supreme power like the shah, including backing hussein in the 8-year iran-iraq war of the 1980s, until he was more convenient as an 'enemy.' that was 2 million murdered iraqis ago...

also as a matter of deep record, taliban were empowered by reagan's CIA and state department in the us/ussr war in 1980s afghanistan. that war led to 400,000 deaths in the civil war it caused and some 2 million refugees, too.

no wonder the usa is so widely beloved around the world. most folks know who the real terrorists are... i want to make a new 'casablanca' in which the nazis are played as americans. the freedom fighter has escaped from a 'rendition' torture chamber and his wife was a captive in a concentration camp called 'gaza.'

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: thanks and some more Posted by: Aquinas
Correction Chris,,,
Posted by: Aquinas on Jun 23, 2009 10:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Its not that we need to be taught about democracy, its more that we need to get our asses kicked up around our shoulder blades. We've been imposing on the nations of the world for far too long a time, and like Venezuela's Chavez, the world at large needs to tell us to get screwed and even show us how, if necessary. Nobody likes a bully and that's what the United States of America has become, in spades.

We are NOT promoting democracy; you don't promote democracy at the end of a gun. What we are doing is demanding that everyone conform to what we decide is good for everyone, which, beyond its arrogance, is unworkable in a world of vastly different cultures. Our fine democratic nation is the only one to my knowledge, with an agency designed to subvert the governments of other nations, so as to make them more agreeable to our business interests. It has nothing to do with democracy per se, as we really don't give a damn how many bodies we have to step over to achieve our "noble" goal. And as far as democracy reigning in these United States, only the most deluded believe that we are a functioning democratic Republic. The rest wonder why it is that when you send your Senator a scathing letter, denouncing his/her recent stand on an issue, you get a form letter announcing that he/she "is pleased to hear from you and will be sure to keep your concerns in mind" while the Senator's waiting room is overflowing with lobbyists. I use the plural "we" because everything these ambitious scum do they do in our name. When you travel, be sure to identify yourselves as Canadians.
Really folks, the most pressing issue before us as a nation, is to begin NOW to educate our students on the real nature of this government of ours and quit all this lying and high flying patriotism which are nothing more than a cover for the ambitions of the few in control.
We have a very beautiful flag, with real significance in each detail of its design, but it has been thoroughly soiled before the world's nations, by the foul machinations of the greedy corporate bosses, those same bosses who have devised the clever "too big to fail" category that so well undergirds our phony capitalistic house of cards. We are teaching our students pure bullsh--! And we are not teaching them a damn thing about what the CIA does in our name. Secret agencies have no place in a free country!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

lindae
Posted by: tibetsun on Jun 23, 2009 10:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After reading Chris's article, I know that there is hope his accuracy in comments, will spread around the globe. I and my family and friends, will do our best to aid in that endeavor. People everywhere need to know that the US govt. is nothing but a "bully", and arrogant enough to believe that we are the only ones capable of exhibiting a perfect govt. body--what a farce!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Declassified documents regarding the 1953 coup (Operation Ajax)
Posted by: Defenestrator on Jun 23, 2009 11:25 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cursed by Geography and OIL
Posted by: persian on Jun 23, 2009 1:29 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Iran is cursed by geography and oil. This combination has always brought foreign interference. We, Iranians, have been struggling for democracy ever since the contitutional revolution of 1905. Big powers meddling, intially by Britain and Russia in 1905 and later by U.S in 1953 helped deny us true democracy. What is holding Iran back today, it pains me to say is of no fault of any outsider.
Iran's dual system of democracy and theocracy, the so called islamic democracy is clashing before our own eyes.It has a built in contradition, an oxymoron if you will. Iran's mostly young, educated and forward looking population is ruled by a group of old bearded biggoted men who are tied to 13th century mind set. I am certain that one day we will rid ourselves from these hate peddlers and we will turn our country a place of envy and inspiration.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Cursed by Geography and OIL Posted by: login@bugmenot.com
» RE: Cursed by Geography and OIL Posted by: weathered
IT'S A BEAUTIFUL ARTICLE. IT'S ESSENTIALLY CORRECT. EXCEPT THAT IT DOES NOT
Posted by: Raymond Emerson on Jun 23, 2009 4:10 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
finish the story. It leaves out the recent republican meddling in Iranian affairs. You need to go back to the 20s. Winston Churchill was the civilian head of the Royal Navy. He/they realized that the day of coal burning navy vessels were numbered. A corporation jointly owned by the British government and privateers was formed. It was called British Petroleum. They drilled, exclusively, the Iranian oil fields. Then they lost access to them during the Second World War. After the war big U S concerns horned in.

Then in the early 50s the Iranian people foolishly elected a democratic government. Big oil was going to lose its control. Eisenhower and his CIA cooperated with British military intelligence to arrange for the removal of Mossadeq. The Shah was brought from the south of France where he was living in wealthy exile and installed on the throne.

The CIA during the Nixon administration knew the Shah had cancer. The Viet Nam war and the Nixon way made the CIA truly corrupt. Jimmy Carter learned this and cleaned house. This was a bad idea. They knew enough to sink his ship. Have you wondered why Obama seems so timid when he deals with the CIA? Is it just possible, as a result of their secret knowledge, that at imes they are more powerful than the presidency of the United States?

One of the fired CIA operatives was Bill Casey. Bill Casey had cancer and knew that his days were numbered. He knew that gave him a freedom that no one else had. You cannot prosecute a dead man. The CIA had been sending 500,000 dollars a year to an obscure cleric's villa just outside of Paris. The purpose of the payoff was too keep him from returning to Iran. We, later, got to know him as the Ayatollah Khomeni. Jimmy Carter, for one reason or another, did not send the 500,000 dollars. I'm pretty sure that the CIA conveniently forgot.

This annoyed the Khomeni. The Shah was getting sicker. Bill Casey was fighting for his life also. He was mad because he had been fired. Bill Casey was station chief in Paris for the OSS during W.W.2.

Gary Sick wrote a nice book about this. It is called "October Surprise". You either will or won't believe it. I do.

To start shortening this tale Bill Casey started negotiations with the Ayatollah to return to Iran and set up a government to replace the Shah. Casey mind you was a private citizen. Either he or the Khomeni engineered the take over of the embassy. Jimmy Carter tried unsuccessfully to dislodge the occupiers. Casey, Reagan, and likely Bush I dealt to keep the standoff going past election day. Reagan became president. Carter lost. Casey became Director of the CIA and Bush I his second in command. Bush knew Casey had terminal cancer. Casey died. Bush became Director. The rest is nearly all public knowledge.

So the conclusion is this. The current theocracy in Iran had its birth in the bowels, the think tanks, of the Nixon CIA. The unholy deal between the Ayatollah and Casey-Reagan created today's Iranian government. Are there members of the Iranian intelligentsia that know all of this. I am certain that there are. Is this one of the reasons for the Obama hesitancey? What do you think?

When the radical right starts telling you what an angel Ronald Reagan was, think of this story. Had you or I done this we would have been shot at sunrise for treason. Ronald Reagan was a criminal. His cohort was George H. W. Bush. George the First had to sit in for Casey when he was too sick to deal so the story goes. Find me an honest republican?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Iran and your Warped Opinions
Posted by: snugglekiller on Jun 23, 2009 7:51 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We all know that the earth twirls on somebodies axis. Get over it and move on. Many countries have had involvement in other countries problems. Iran has it bad, Venezuela has it worse?? Come on, get a grip!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Iran and your Warped Opinions Posted by: bonapartist
Iran is not a democracy and won't be for a while
Posted by: lorenzodimedici1 on Jun 24, 2009 5:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
fixating on 1953 won't help comprehend current events in Iran. The world moves on, so should you.
Ask yourself if you really understand what it means to be an Iranian citizen now. Then try to see what they see and what they would like.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

why right-wing blowhards want Ahmadinejad
Posted by: Higher Reptile on Jun 24, 2009 9:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I preface this with the big omission regarding Iran: Western oil companies have been shut out of the emerging Russia/China/Iran cartel- http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175071.

John McCain sits on the advisory board of Terror Free Tomorrow - http://www.terrorfreetomorrow.org/ ,which along with the New America Foundation (Henry Kissinger, Walmart and some libertarians) commissioned the “only credible poll” on the 2009 Iranian presidential elections, with a solid win for Ahmadinejad. Curious, the polling was conducted by phone, outside of Iran by and undisclosed call center!

Douglas Bloomfield writes in the Jerusalem Post: "I'm glad Ahmadinejad won"... “a victory by the relatively moderate Mir Hussein Mousavi could have created a dangerous complacency that would tempt some in the West to ease up on the pressure to thwart Iran’s nuclear ambitions”
http://www.jpost.com/

then there’s the GOP pushing for a December showdown on Iran, pushing AIPAC’s bill in Congress,the Iran Refined Petroleum Sanctions Act:

http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=46949

so, I conclude, western corporations want Ahmadinejad in power in order to justify another hostile takeover of Iran’s hydrocarbon reserves

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

well !
Posted by: isayes on Jul 20, 2009 9:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
yes, quite interesting except for :

"The fundamental problem in the Middle East is not a degenerate and corrupt Islam. The fundamental problem is a degenerate and corrupt Christendom. We have not brought freedom and democracy and enlightenment to the Muslim world. We have brought the opposite."

It's huge to call degenerate and corrupt REPUBLICANS >>> Christendom :)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement