Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Iran's Leader Calls Election Over, Warns of 'Bloodshed and Chaos' if Protests Continue

By Robert Dreyfuss, The Nation. Posted June 20, 2009.


Iran's Supreme Leader declares the presidential race over. But for reformists braced for more confrontations, there's no backing down.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
What if People Actually Treated Religion as Just a Metaphor (Like Trekkies and Secular Jews)?
Greta Christina

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
What Happened to That Prosperity Tax-Cutters Promised Us?
Sam Pizzigati

DrugReporter:
The War on Weed: Marijuana Is Basically Harmless -- The Monumentally Stupid Drug War Is Not
Jim Hightower

Environment:
The Real Scandal Over Climate Change Isn't About Hacked Emails But the Media's Coverage
Alex Steffen

Food:
10 Tips for a Sustainable Thanksgiving
Sarah Newman

Health and Wellness:
Is the House's Health Bill Really Worse than Nothing?
Joshua Holland

Immigration:
Hate Group, FAIR, Is Looking for "Ethnically Ambiguous" Actors to Amplify Its Racism
Adam Luna

Media and Technology:
The Memory Scrub About Why Ft. Hood Happened Is Almost Complete ... If It Weren't for Archives
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
Just When You Thought It Was Safe: 3 Potential Obstacles to Health-Care Reform
Adele M. Stan

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Why Can't We Look Away From Sarah Palin?
Vanessa Richmond

Rights and Liberties:
Obama Quietly Backs Renewing Patriot Act Surveillance Provisions
Willam Fisher

Sex and Relationships:
Hot Mormon Muffins and Models for Jesus: What's With All the Sexy Christians?
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Poseidon's Financial Shell Game: Why Is a Private Desalination Plant Asking for Public Money?
Peter Gleick

World:
Obama Will Announce 34,000-Troop Escalation in Afghanistan 'Within Days'

More stories by Robert Dreyfuss

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Speaking to a government-organized throng bused in from around Tehran and as far away as Qom, Iran's religious capital, and other cities -- a crowd, no doubt, vastly inflated by dutiful members of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps and the fascist, mosque-based Basij thugs -- Ayatollah Ali Khamenei threw down the gauntlet against the Green Wave.

He said:

 

"Nothing can be changed. It's finished, the Presidential campaign."

He added, as if we didn't know, that he's on the side of President Ahmadinejad. "The President was closest to my point of view," huffed the Leader. And he issued not-so-veiled warnings to Iranian citizens to behave, to "be careful how they are acting, careful what they are saying."

The election he said, was "a sign from God." And in case people didn't get God's message, he warned of "bloodshed and chaos" if the street protests continue. "Street challenge is not acceptable," he said.

Make no mistake: it's by far the most serious, even existential crisis for the Islamic Republic since its founding in 1979. By blatantly rigging the vote, and by their heavy-handed crackdown in the wake of the travesty, the regime has shattered its legitimacy. Its leadership, including Khamenei and Ahmadinejad, are isolated from virtually every important segment of Iranian society -- students, workers, intellectuals, the business class, and even the very clergy that is at the heart of the system -- and they stand revealed as a repressive, reactionary military dictatorship.

What remains to be seen is whether the opposition will back down in the face of that repressive power.

We'll know soon. The real explosion could some within a few days, when the so-called Guardian Council -- a group of twelve bearded old clerics slavishly loyal to Khamenei -- confirms the bogus election results. If they do, as expected, sometime mid-week, it's possible that the sustained street protests could become a revolution.

From an Iranian source, it appears that for Mir Hossein Mousavi, Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, Medhi Karroubi, and other leaders of the movement, there's no backing down. Here's what he said:

 

"Mousavi and the others cannot compromise. They know that if Ahmadinejad remains in power, he will try to eliminate all of them. All of them. And it will be violent.

"The Ahmadinejad people are trying to weaken and destroy the 'republic' part of 'Islamic republic.' They dislike democracy, they dislike elections, they dislike accountability. What they want is to establish a regime with an unelected Islamic leader, something like a caliph, who has absolute, unchallenged authority."

On the other hand, although many of the protestors -- including Mousavi and Rafanjani, the wily wheeler-dealer -- have impeccable establishment credentials, it's increasingly clear that most if not all of the opposition leaders want a fundamental change in the way Iran is organized.

That, highly informed Iranian sources say, would include replacing Khamenei with a council of leaders, radically reinterpreting the Constitutional requirement for a Leader, or rahbar, who represents the velayat-e faqih principle ("rule of the jurisprudent") with a far more flexible, collegial body. Were this to happen, it wouldn't mean the fall of the Islamic Republic, but it would represent a huge step toward eliminating its worst features.

Many supporters of the opposition -- as I learned during nearly two weeks in Iran -- don't want the clergy to rule at all. "The mullahs are like idols," one government official told me. "They must be broken."

Rafsanjani is a two-term president (1989-1997), an extremely well-connected, wealthy power broker, and chairman of the Expediency Council. Back in the 1980s, he helped to elevate Khamenei, who was president of Iran from 1981 to 1989, to the post of Leader -- succeeding Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the founder -- in exchange for Khamenei's support for Rafsanjani becoming president. Since then he's shuttled back and forth between the hardline camp and the reformist camp, while maintaining a pragmatic (opportunist) stance. Now it seems he's irrevocably thrown his lot in with the reformists, including Mousavi and former President Khatami. And it's Rafsanjani who, if he chose to, might be able to manipulate the levers of power in Iran to oust Khamenei as Leader.

So far, it's still unlikely. The ruling clique has the army, the Guard, the intelligence service, and courts, the police, the media, and its street thugs to support them -- and, according to some reports, Rafsanjani is under house arrest. But the opposition has the streets.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: iran

Robert Dreyfuss is the author of "Devil's Game: How the United States Helped Unleash Fundamentalist Islam" (Henry Holt/Metropolitan Books).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Remember Massadeqh?
Posted by: bonapartist on Jun 20, 2009 3:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You know, duly elected Iranian Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddeq who was ousted by CIA backed coup in 1953. He was a leftist who nationalized the oil industry and was replaced by the Shah.

He was also ousted by "spontaneous" mobs clamoring for restoration of the monarchy. Those pr US mobs were lionized as proponents of democracy while Mosaddeqh suporters were denounced as communist thugs backed by USSR.

Half a century later Dreyfuss is treating Ahmedinejad in the same vein his predecessors treated Mossadeqh. And for the exact the same reasons, both are certified enemies of US interests.

Ahmedinejad has his flaws however I am not arrogant enoguh to claim that I know how to rule Iran better than Iranians. And yes, I full beleive reports that the unrest is fueled by foreing influence. It wouldn't be the first time, nor it will be the last time and US is most likely and probably only culprit.

Another typical Dreyfuss article in which world is measured according to US interests. Bush is gone so imperialism has to be sugar coated again, the above article fits the bill. From the start the premise is that Ahmedinejad stole the elections, opposition demonstrators are correct and Khamenei lies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: emember Massadeqh? Posted by: lyta
» RE: emember Massadeqh? Posted by: drone
» RE: emember Massadeqh? Posted by: bonapartist
Heavy words backed by flimsy evidence
Posted by: GatoPreto on Jun 20, 2009 6:40 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"By blatantly rigging the vote, and by their heavy-handed crackdown in the wake of the travesty, the regime has shattered its legitimacy."

How do you know the vote was rigged, Mr Dreyfus?
You don't. This is pure agitprop. Get over it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ahmedinejad was Iran's answer to GW Bush
Posted by: pelican beak on Jun 20, 2009 6:56 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Iran stood by our side after 9/11 and was helping us root out the Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan until W. proclaimed them part of the world's Axis of Evil.

This unpleasant situation today is a direct result of the Bush Crime Family's wicked spawn.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

from Paul Craig Roberts...
Posted by: MyLeftFoot on Jun 20, 2009 3:41 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The claim is made that Ahmadinejad stole the election, because the outcome was declared too soon after the polls closed for all the votes to have been counted. However, Mousavi declared his victory several hours before the polls closed. This is classic CIA destabilization designed to discredit a contrary outcome. It forces an early declaration of the vote. The longer the time interval between the preemptive declaration of victory and the release of the vote tally, the longer Mousavi has to create the impression that the authorities are using the time to fix the vote. It is amazing that people don’t see through this trick.

linked text

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: from Paul Craig Roberts... Posted by: xi_people
Is Dreyfus
Posted by: Aquinas on Jun 20, 2009 5:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Italian or Eskimo?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Now that you mentioned it Posted by: bonapartist
Why is Dreyfuss being published on the Alternet?
Posted by: Petrus on Jun 20, 2009 7:39 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This guy took a wrong turn on the road to the New York Times or a Harvard think tank. We can get State Department propaganda in a lot of different places, why are we getting it at Alternet?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

leftbank
Posted by: markw4786 on Jun 21, 2009 12:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
dateline: 11-3-2004:
Kerry contests Ohio results; VOWS FIGHT!
dateline: 11-12-2004:
1/2 million remain in DC for 4th day demanding A REAL AND TRUE VOTE COUNT.
dateline: 11-13-2004:
Bush/Ashcroft order national guard to use "appropriate force" to maintain order.
dateline: 11-14-2004:
Guardsmem and Police open fire... 23 killed, hundreds hospitalized, 9 on critical list.
If Americans and Kerry?!?!?!?!?! had taken democracy seriously...does anyone doubt this scenario could not have happened? If so, hopefully other nations worldwide would have stepped in with...WHAT, ACTUALLY, IS THE RIGHT WING PROPOSING?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

One Writer Tells Why She Didn't - and Won't - Vote in Iran
Posted by: matty848 on Jun 21, 2009 1:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of all the stories Alternet has published on Iran, the article:

"No Matter Who Is The President of Iran, They Would Stone Me", by Lila Ghobady on June 20, 2009 published by CommonDreams.org (http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/06/19-11)

surpasses them all. THIS is what we should be reading about Iran - from progressive Iranian voices.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Repugs expect US to listen to them Now On Iran??
Posted by: Purple Girl on Jun 21, 2009 2:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If Cheney,McCain, Hillary and Hagee had their way Many of these current protesters would have already been dead, or at the very least, radicalized.
I never bought the propaganda coming from the Repugs (and their lil' Blue Lap War dogs)that the Iranian people were terrorists, or Jihadist or training the insurgency into Iraq.
AhMeJahadi is nothing more than a farsi speaking Dubya.The Moolas, Nothing more than Hagee's in turbins and robes. Money,Power and Sociopathic Meglomania-Mirror images of the crazy fuckers how claim they speak for US.
If a Million people say the election was rigged, I believe them- how could I not when ours was so clearly stolen in both '00 and '04. We should have taken to the streets- Would have saved US and the rest of the World a great deal of heartache.
Now these same assholes who called Iran an axis of evil, sang a song "bomb,bomb,bomb Iran", or did the back up vocals with "obliterate Iran" or was hoping to hasten the 'Rapture bus' departure schedule by pre-emptively stirking Iran, are now expecting US to believe they give a rats ass shit about the people of Iran?
Having lived through the Crook Nixon, the alzheimers patient Reagan, the "yes man" HW, the sex addict Billy and the brain damaged W- I never judge a People by the Leaders they get stuck with.
The only reason these War dogs are jacking up the rhetoric is becasue they are drooling like pavlovs dogs over the possiblity of a civil war- a Potential for more war profiteering and Oil revenues.
As Our last election has shown even when able to change one leader, there are hundreds more which must be weeded out-otherwise they are nothing more than constant opposition to real progress and change.
God's Speed and God Bless, fellow seekers of Liberty!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Suspect election in Iran?
Posted by: reg373 on Jun 21, 2009 9:57 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Solution;
have results verified by old pal Jimmy Carter... ;^)
-- found a cool site; Balkingpoints ; incredible satellite view of earth

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

More Information fron James Petras
Posted by: Artra on Jun 21, 2009 10:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At voltaire Network http://www.voltairenet.org/en
" Class struggle and imperial propaganda
Iranian Elections: The ‘Stolen Elections’ Hoax
by James Petras | New York (United States) | Focus | Despite the forecasts by western opinion leaders and reporters based in Tehran, the outcome of the Iranian presidential election leaves no room for doubt: Mahmoud Ahmadinejad won by a landslide victory. This is hardly surprising, observes Professor James Petras, since people voted according to class interests : the incumbent national-populist candidate drew his support from the far more numerous lower classes while the pro-western elite voted for the liberal candidate, boosted by the western media. A similar electoral scenario has already been witnessed in other countries. ...."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What is happening?
Posted by: GTRrocker on Jun 21, 2009 3:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would like to know why this story is front page on CNN.com, but on here there is hardly any mention at all about what is going on in Iran. Obama is doing and saying nothing at all of the horrible acts that are happening to the protesters. Oddly enough the Republicans are the only ones that are showing any actual initiative.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CIA in Iran
Posted by: MyLeftFoot on Jun 21, 2009 8:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Former Pakistani Army General Mirza Aslam Beig claims the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) has distributed 400 million dollars inside Iran to evoke a revolution.

In a phone interview with the Pashto Radio on Monday, General Beig said that there is undisputed intelligence proving the US interference in Iran.

“The documents prove that the CIA spent 400 million dollars inside Iran to prop up a colorful-hollow revolution following the election,” he added.

Pakistan’s former army chief of joint staff went on to say that the US wanted to disturb the situation in Iran and bring
to power a pro-US government.

linked text

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Zionist Shock Troops.
Posted by: Paxmana1 on Jun 24, 2009 5:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One always understands that 'Its On' when the forward skirmishers come out .. The talk of female oppression and hijab ..

So far we have not yet had any serious reports of widespread killing of children .. but just as in Iraq, bring in a team of Juba style snipers and bobs your uncle.

Then this middle class twitter twat .. Oh well played sir. jolly good show .. I see that the blood dripping from your canine teeth .. is still steaming in the cool morning air .. and you sir are a fool of the first water .. we are entering a time of accelerated karma .. good luck to you sir.

Because by your actions we can see the same old story playing out, and the working class lose out again. Well, guess what? We can wait, we can see the rising insanity .. yes we can wait.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement