Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Commencement Speech to Graduates of the Bush Years: Empire Continues in the Obama Era

By Tom Engelhardt, Tomdispatch.com. Posted June 12, 2009.


Empire. It's the word no one in Washington can say. Its absence from the conversation is at the heart of what makes our empire so hard to define.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Who's Paying for the Recession Most of All? Young Workers
Lizzy Ratner

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Do We Really Want to Enshrine Insurance Monopoly into Law? This and 5 Other Complaints About the Health Bill
John Nichols

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
How Biased Media Can Brainwash You
Melinda Burns

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
4 Ways the Stupak Amendment Deprives Women of Access to Abortion
Jessica Arons

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
How the Stupak Amendment Radically Undermines Abortion Rights
Rachel Morris

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
10 Suicides a Month at Ft. Hood -- War Stress Is Taking Soldiers to the Brink
Dahr Jamail

More stories by Tom Engelhardt

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Graduates of the Bush years, initiates of the Obama era, if you think of a commencement address as a kind of sermon, then every sermon needs its text. Here's the one I've chosen for today, suitably obscure and yet somehow ringing:

 

"The idea that somehow counterterrorism is a homeland security issue doesn't make sense when you recognize the fact that terror around the world doesn't recognize borders. There is no right-hand, left-hand anymore."

That's taken directly from the new national security bible of Obama National Security Advisor (and ex-Marine General) James Jones. He said it last week at a press briefing. The occasion was the integration of a Bush-era creation, the Homeland Security Council -- which, if you're like me, you had never heard of until it lost its independence -- into the National Security Council, which Jones runs, a move that probably represents yet another consolidation of power inside a historically ever more imperial White House.

After four years in this college, I assume you are students of the word and like all biblical texts, this one must be interpreted. It must be read. So let's start by thinking of it this way: If we are, in some sense, defined by our enemies, then consider this description of terrorism -- even though most acts of terror are undoubtedly committed by locally-minded individuals -- as something like a shadow thrown on a wall. The looming figure to which the shadow belongs is not, however, al-Qaeda, but us. We are, after all, in the war-on-terror business. It's how we've defined ourselves these last years.

If you accept Jones's definition, then you only have to go a modest distance to conclude that we are the other great force on the planet that "doesn't recognize borders." Keep in mind that, right now, we're fighting at least two-and-a-half wars thousands of miles from this sylvan campus, and in your name no less. When it comes to our "national security," as we define it, borders turn out to matter remarkably little in a pinch, as long, of course, as they're other people's borders.

After all, we have established an extensive network of military bases, some gigantic, in Iraq and Afghanistan, and secured the right to treat them essentially as U.S. territory; we have hundreds of such bases, large and small, scattered across the Earth, most not in war zones, a startling number of them built up into impressive "little Americas." It's through them that we garrison much of the planet (something you will almost never see commented upon in the mainstream media, obvious though it may be). Our drone aircraft, flown by remote control from bases in the United States, now regularly patrol distant skies, as if borders did not exist, to smite our foes, whatever any locals might think. Typically, as far as we know, our secret warriors continue to fund, to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars, a Bush-era project, which also knows no borders, aimed at destabilizing the Iranian government.

The Architecture of Meaning

Instead of simply continuing down this superhighway of borderlessness, let's just consider two sentences buried deep in a recent piece on the inside pages of the New York Times about a roadside explosive device in Iraq that killed three Americans in a vehicle. It's the sort of thing that Americans tend not to find strange in the least. So as an experiment, try, as I read it aloud, to take in the deep strangeness it represents:

 

"The Americans were driving along a road used exclusively by the American military and reconstruction teams when a bomb, which local Iraqi security officials described as an improvised explosive device, went off. No Iraqi vehicles, even those of the army and the police, are allowed to use the road where the attack occurred, according to residents."

Keep in mind that this isn't a restricted road in Langley, Virginia. It's a road outside the Iraqi city of Falluja, where we conducted two massive, city-destroying assaults back in 2004; in other words, the road which "no Iraqi vehicles… are allowed to use" is thousands of miles and many borders away from Washington.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: bush, obama, united states, empire, imperial presidency

Tom Engelhardt, editor of Tomdispatch.com, is co-founder of the American Empire Project and author of The End of Victory Culture.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
And we are conned by the lies of 911 to keep the imperial wars going
Posted by: pfgetty on Jun 13, 2009 3:23 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All of the military now and all of our wars and occupations and Homeland Security, all of it, has ties to the attacks of 911.
If you expose the lies told to us about 911, most of it will disappear.
Do you know that, Tom?
Do you know about the lies of 911?

Our government lied to us. It was complicit in the attacks of 911. There is overwhelming evidence of this, but it is censored from the press, even the alternative media like the Nation magazine. Apparently this information is censored in TomDispatch. And it is censored in Alternet.

It has been almost eight years since 911, and yet there has not been a real story about the evidence of the lying and the coverup and the proof of complicity by our government in any of the press, other than insults about 911 truthers. What gives? How can the media investigate so deeply so much else, but completely avoid glaring and blatant bits of evidence that the official story of 911 is a lie?
Do you really not know it, or are you pressured or threatened to ignore it? Or are you part of a group that would be hurt by the exposure of the lies of 911?

A real hero would tell the people that the truth is being covered up. This would be a hero that actually got something done about the horror of the wars and occupations. Otherwise, you are wasting your time writing about empire and its abuses. It will all go on and on and on and on. I think you know that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Maybe that is it. Posted by: pfgetty
we never stopped being part of what is commonly, though misleadingly, known as the British Empire
Posted by: Suzon on Jun 13, 2009 3:25 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Norman-English Empire founded by the rapist, arsonist and murderer William the Conquerer in the 11th century is not mere history.

Yes, there was a successful revolution in 1776 and our constitution was agreed and implemented. But what did this mean to an empire which routinely revoked its own charters? The Magna Carta which English-speaking people tend to see as the foundation of our rights and liberties* is not just the document which King John was forced to sign in 1215 was revoked and replaced in 1225 and later. (The MO is draw it up when you have to and rip it up when you can.)

The Norman-English Empire made another stab at reclaiming by force in 1812, but when that didn't succeed, they simply used other means: the corporation, a monarchical device which almost always concentrates power and privilege at the top. (The CEOs are more subversive than any number of reds-under-the-bed could ever be.)

The American Empire's origins are in the Norman-English monarchy. The US is the infant grown into strapping adult--however big it is, the parent still regards it as its own.

*Thomas Jefferson rightly credited his Anglo-Saxon ancestors for providing the ideals underpinning democracy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Empires
Posted by: Aquinas on Jun 13, 2009 6:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The law of unintended consequences can be blamed for revealing, through electronic communications, the uncomfortable truth that has been eluding the American public for ages and that is, The United States of America is an empire. Nowhere is this addressed in our schools or in our text books on government. It is only through the heightened awareness brought about by the Internet, that the average American citizen is being made to face this most uncomfortable truth; a truth that still remains unspoken, unacknowledged, by anyone in our government or academia. We are unable to admit that we're an empire, although it is painfully obvious to everyone else in the world.

We continue professing democratic principles while forcing our idea of democracy on the nations of the world, at the point of a gun or by secretly undermining freely elected foreign governments if they don't conform to our imperial designs. If the world hates us, it's with good and ample reason. Our citizens are finally awakening, along with the entire South American continent, and a revolution is in progress which will find the United States more and more isolated and like a cornered rat, will lash out in multiple directions in an attempt to maintain it's control of the world. It is doomed to fail, as have all former empires.

We are a nation of liars and hypocrites, being led by the biggest and baddest liars, whose only god is money/power.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Truer words were rarely spoken, Tom Engelhardt, and....
Posted by: peterjkraus on Jun 13, 2009 7:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
as all true words, end up as pearls before, ahem, swine. After all, who gives a damn? It's Amurrica, and Amurrica can do no wrong.

The Empire, becoming a bit long in the tooth, is then destined for the dust bin when every damn policing action is turned into a "war", the "warriors" lionized, only to fail against "enemies" too insignificant for true empires to war against, be they other countries' Asian ex-colonies, Caribbean islands, Latin American banana republics or Middle Eastern desert lands ruled by tin pot dictators. We fight 'em, we lose 'em.

Time for some navel-gazing, I'd suggest. Get back to some basics, get off the singularity trip, the chosen-by-gawd kick, and see ourselves as what we are.... fairly well educated, too well fed and truly industrious people of diverse backgrounds, who, as a country and society, have enough to do with ourselves without having to rule the rest of mankind.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rise and fall
Posted by: sirios on Jun 13, 2009 7:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The seeds of destruction are inherent in the belief of superiority.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alternot
Posted by: rafaeltoral on Jun 13, 2009 9:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What happened to the Obama article where Naomi Kline is giving us a lesson in hypocracy and irony?

It was here this morning and it just vanished.
I guess the mix really is the message.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Endless war, and colossal profits for a favorite few
Posted by: Garvagh on Jun 14, 2009 4:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bravo! The utter insanity of the US approach is all too obvious: the more "insurgents" the US kills, the more innocent civilians etc. who also die, thus resulting in even more "insurgents" to be killed, so even more innocent civilians can die, and the cycle continues. The basic problem is the US has no business whatever maintaining huge military forces in Muslim countries, year after year after year. The American taxpayer is getting hosed, to put it bluntly.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nokia Middle East
Posted by: menokia on Jun 25, 2009 7:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
منتديات نوكيا الشرق الاوسط
نوكيا الشرق الاوسط

دليل المواقع
العاب فلاشيه
دردشة
طب الاعشاب
Site Map

احدث اجهزة نوكيا
برامج نوكيا

برامج نوكيا الجيل الثالث
برامج الجوال العربية

برامج نوكيا الجيل الخامس
شاشات التوقف - خطوط الجوال
تعريب البرامج , كسر البرامج

العاب جوال
العاب نوكيا الجيل الثالث

العاب الانجيج الجيل الثالث
العاب نوكيا الجيل الخامس
ثيمات الجوال
ثيمات نوكيا الجيل الثالث
ثيمات نوكيا الجيل الخامس
مسجات
فديو
اناشيد
نغمات, تحميل نغمات
اي فون
سوني اريكسون
برامج كمبيوتر
برامج الحماية و الصيانة
برامج المالتيميديا, برامج الصوتيات, برامج الفيديو
شرح استخدام البرامج
العاب الكترونية, العاب الكمبيوتر, العاب بلاي ستيشن
افلام سينما
تحميل افلام عربية
تحميل افلام اجنبية
منتدى السيارات
صور
نكات, صرقعه
اعشاب طبية
عالم حواء
الديكور و الأثاث المنزلي - The Design and Decor Section
تحديث سوفت وير نوكيا
خيمة رمضان

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ED Hardy
Posted by: jiji530 on Jul 2, 2009 1:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
thanks for your post.perhaps you will like abercrombie ed hardy mortgage rates tiffanys ed hardy Is not it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

thank you for this excellent piece
Posted by: rodgerlvu on Jul 7, 2009 11:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The seeds of destruction are inherent in the belief of superiority. Christian Audigier

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement