COMMENTS: 164
We're Screwed on Everything From Health Care to the Economy If the Dems Don't Shape Up
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.
The governing party faced an awkward dilemma. People were hurting and furious at the government's generous bailouts for banks. But how could the Democrats do something for the folks without upsetting their friends and patrons in the banking industry? Democrats think they found a way. They are enacting a series of measures described as "breakthrough" reform and "unprecedented" defeat for the bankers. Only these achievements are more accurately understood as "reform lite." The house is on fire and Democrats brought a garden hose.
The Democratic Party is changing in some promising ways, but what's impressive is how much it has not changed. Does that sound harsh? I am relying on private judgments from Washington players regarded as the "white hats" on this subject -- consumer lobbyists and other public-interest reformers, who for years have labored in frustration to enact laws that would restore equity and honest relationships to the out-of-control financial system. These organizations mostly endorse the Democrats' efforts and celebrate their "victories." But a few minutes of private conversation reveals their doubt and disappointment. "It's a good bill," they will say, then after enumerating the shortcomings add, "It's better than nothing."
"This has to be on background, OK?" one of the reformers said. "This crisis brought down the world economy and yet Congress still hasn't passed a bill making sure it doesn't happen again."
Julia Gordon, a lawyer with the Center for Responsible Lending, did not seek anonymity. "We have reached the moment to ask ourselves Rabbi Hillel's question: if not now, when?" Gordon said. "I fear we are letting this crucial moment pass without putting forward-looking rules in place to fundamentally change how mortgages are made and prevent predatory lending. Plus, when we look back at the foreclosure tsunami that devastated so many families, we're going to be ashamed that we did not fix the bankruptcy code to permit mortgage modification. That move alone could have prevented more than a million foreclosures, and while I predict we will revisit the issue in the future, it will be like closing the barn door after the horse has died."
If not now, when? That question ought to haunt the Democratic Party and President Obama, who has been missing in action himself on key issues. Congressional Democrats are responding to this epic conflagration with the same risk-avoidance tactics they learned during many years in minority status. In those days, they could always blame right-wing Republicans for blocking their good intentions. But whom do the Dems blame now that they have the White House and fifty-nine votes in the Senate and a seventy-eight-seat majority in the House? Their standard explanation for not doing more is, "We didn't have the votes." So when might we expect Democrats to achieve more? When they have eighty votes in the Senate?
The party's ideological intentions are being defined with greater clarity in these new circumstances, and so are the President's. It's still early, but the implications are ominous for other issues. If Democrats are reluctant to disturb the power of other major interests, it seems improbable that fundamental change will occur on healthcare, energy conversion or the restoration of work and wages. The problem now is the Democrats, not the Republicans. The party aids and protects its free-roaming entrepreneurial politicians and does not punish those who undermine the party's larger promises. When Republicans were in charge, they enforced party loyalty with Stalinist discipline. Democrats are the party of safe incumbents, weak convictions.
The much-celebrated "Credit Cardholders' Bill of Rights" is a fresh example of how the Democratic Party tries to have it both ways -- avoiding the tough votes while mollifying the folks. The credit card reform measure imposes new rules on the industry and does away with many of the most outrageous gimmicks bankers use to extract more money from debtors. Banks cannot raise interest rates retroactively on old credit card balances or pile on hidden fees or fail to give advance notice for rate increases. These and other changes are worthy.
The achievement seems less courageous if you know that Congress was largely ratifying the regulatory rules already adopted by the Federal Reserve last year. Or that the legislation gives the industry another nine months to gouge their customers before the new rules go into effect. Or that Visa and MasterCard, Citigroup and JPMorgan Chase are free to raise future interest rates to the sky -- without limit. That is the industry's intention, as bank lobbyists reported after the bill was passed.
American Usury
One of the fundamental issues that party managers wished to avoid was the scandal of American usury. Usury is the ancient sin of charging inflated interest rates sure to ruin the borrowers. It is considered immoral by Judaism, Christianity and Islam because usury involves the powerful using their wealth to ensnare weak and defenseless borrowers. The classic usurer offers an impossible choice that debtors cannot easily refuse. If they reject the terms of the loan, they will not be able to pay the rent or buy necessities. If they accept the usurious interest rates, their debts will accumulate until they are bankrupted (at which point the creditors claim their property). No civilized society can endure in such conditions.
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: NoPCZone on Jun 9, 2009 12:19 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Until we get these leeches off of our backs and out of the party we are screwed...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» The hand wringing left
Posted by: Teller
» No, that's exactly what a Democrat is...
Posted by: Tweck9
» RE: No, that's exactly what a Democrat is...
Posted by: johnnyfarout
» "Money Ruined Democracy."--Bill Moyers
Posted by: mcartri
» RE: ed State DINOs (Democrats In Name Only)
Posted by: addisong
» Sarah Palin
Posted by: SeattlePackedSnowandCollidedCars
» RE: THE DEMOCRATS ARE 'SUPPOSED' TO BE THE PARTY OF THE POOR AND WORKING PEOPLE
Posted by: joeocho88
» RE: ed State DINOs (Democrats In Name Only)
Posted by: lawton
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Jay Randal on Jun 9, 2009 12:28 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Overwhelming majority of Americans demand an end to medical insurance industry screwing them over. Since neither Dems nor Repubs in Congress stand up for single-payer system, therefore We the People are forced to vote out all incumbents (of both parties) who betray us. A New Labor party for America is needed to eliminate stranglehold of the existing corporate-owned parties.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Go Green
Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: Go IRV FIRST!
Posted by: Zaratamara
» And restore equal time too
Posted by: Bliss Doubt
» I've SEEN the Green(s) -- and am SOOOO not impressed
Posted by: AdamSelene40
» RE: I think you're lying.
Posted by: oregoncharles
» Green splits Democrat. GOP wins.
Posted by: Bliss Doubt
» RE: I've SEEN the Green(s) -- and am SOOOO not impressed
Posted by: gwbushmalecheerleader
» Newsflash: The Deomcrat Voter...
Posted by: SeattlePackedSnowandCollidedCars
» RE: Newsflash: The Democrat Voter...
Posted by: madregal
» psst....dems and repubs are on the same team.
Posted by: rafaeltoral
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mmckinl on Jun 9, 2009 12:42 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Greider ignores the elephant in the living room ... the Democrats need leadership from the White House and with a 60% approval rating there is plenty of politicaal capital to spend ... But Where's the Love? The banksters are getting plenty of Love ... trillions of dollars worth ...
Barack has betrayed those who counted on him to do the right thing, the moral thing and Greider pretends not to notice ...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Barack Obama: The Audacity of Betrayal ...
Posted by: gathaiga
» Obama is "The Audacity of HYPE"
Posted by: bthespoon
» RE: Obama is "The Audacity of HYPE"
Posted by: freelyb
» You're right, say it again.
Posted by: freelyb
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Col. Jackleg on Jun 9, 2009 12:46 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: How many must suffer?
Posted by: billslm
» Mike Connell was his name, billslm, but the story
Posted by: paulmagillsmith
» RE: How many must suffer?
Posted by: gwbushmalecheerleader
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Mathew Trisencusean on Jun 9, 2009 2:48 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We are pleased to announce to the world that we now have a President who can use the word obfuscate in a sentence.
GREEN SHOOTS.
And many other polyslyabic words.
THERE IS NOT A ESCALATING HUMANITARIAN CRISES IN AMERICA.
If there was we would have responded to it in the same way we responded to the humanitarian crises in Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan ect
Which we havent so there isnt one.
Except for that one time.
Which we had no prior knowledge of or involvment in.
THE FUNDEMENTALS OF THE ECONOMY ARE STRONG.
Step on your nieghbors face.
"Nothing personal buddy, its only business"
THE PREVIOUS TWO SENTENCES WERE THE RESULT OF FAULTY INTELLIGENCE.
We meant to say love thy neighbour and do unto others as you would have done unto you.
AMERICA HAS NEVER BEEN AND NEVER WILL BE A SOCIALIST COUNTRY.
For those of you who believe we are living in the midst of an Orwellian nightmare we are not listening to your phone calls or tracing your emails.
Because we're not and we dont.
Unless your a terrorist.
AMERICA DOES NOT TORTURE.
NOBODY IS ABOVE THE LAW.
In a nation of laws anybody who broke the law would be charged tried and convicted in a court of law.
Nobody has been so we never did.
WE WOULD LIKE TO ENCOURAGE AMERICANS TO KEEP SENDING ANGRY EMAILS TO PROGRESSIVE WEBSITES AS THIS IS A EFFECTIVE MEANS OF ACHIEVIEVING CHANGE.
It is imperative that we move forward with the forwardness that we all so desperatly look forward to.
And always twirling, twirling, twirling into the future.
AMERICA IS SCREWED UNLESS WE LEARN HOW TO PROTEST COLLECTIVELY.
Faulty intelligence.Faulty intelligence...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: A NEW AND IMPROVED MESSAGE FROM THE GOVERNMENT VIA THE MEDIA
Posted by: cahorton
» ahhhh...hahahahahahahahahahaha!
Posted by: cvstoner
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Perry Logan on Jun 9, 2009 3:27 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The fight occurred during the Democratic primaries, which were more like World War III than like normal primary elections. There was a pitched battle between the Obama Democrats--who fancy themselves progressives--and the Clinton contingent of the party.
As you should know, millions of Democrats were grossed out by the Obama primary camapign--which was the dirtiest ever--and left the party.
The Obama people's favorite trick was to call their fellow Democrats racists, which they did over and over and over. They called Hillary's female supporters the C word constantly.
Since no real Democrat would do such a sh*tty thing, I knew then we were screwed.
After handing the primaries to their neocon candidate, the Democrats pretended to reconcile...and then went on to conduct a Presidential campaign which was as clean as his primary campaign was dirty.
What a shocker! The primary campaign--waged against their fellow Democrats--was the sorriest mess I ever saw, with Obamites fighting like rabid weasels. The Presidential campaign, by contrast, was perfectly nice.
In other words, the Obama supporters were willing to do anything to defeat their fellow Democrats...but they would never harm a Republican.
That's who's running the party: people who hate Democrats. Is there any wonder we're in trouble?
The official story is that the acrimony ended with the primary, Obama and Hillary joined forces, and everything is hunky-dunky.
But it just ain't so. The hardcore Obama people hate the Clintons, and they hate the DLC. This is odd, since subsequent events have shown that the Obama contingent are are far more corporate than the DLC could ever hope to be.
So the progressives had their first shot at the big-time in decades, and they completely blew it. Obama has dispelled any belief that progressives are smart.
My prediction: Obama will be known as The Worst Democrat Ever™. With the lowered popularity of the Democrats, the Pubs will flip Jeb Bush into the White House in 2012.
Of course, Jeb will vigorously prosecute members of the Obama Administration for their many crimes. Maybe then we can pick up the pieces of the party the Obama people have wrecked.
Swine!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Again this illusion that Democrats are anything but corporate
Posted by: Tweck9
» You realize that
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: A coup within the Democratic Party
Posted by: gwbushmalecheerleader
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Perry Logan on Jun 9, 2009 3:30 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The fight occurred during the Democratic primaries, which were more like World War III than like normal primary elections. There was a pitched battle between the Obama Democrats--who fancy themselves progressives--and the Clinton contingent of the party.
As you should know, millions of Democrats were grossed out by the Obama primary camapign--which was the dirtiest ever--and left the party. The Obama people's favorite trick was to call their fellow Democrats racists, which they did over and over and over. They called Hillary's female supporters the C word constantly.
Since no real Democrat would do such a sh*tty thing, I knew then we were screwed.
After handing the primaries to their shockingly weak candidate, the Democrats pretended to reconcile...and then went on to conduict a Presidential campaign which was as clean as his primary campaign was dirty.
What a shocker! The primary campaign--waged against their fellow Democrats--was the sorriest mess I ever saw, with Obamites fighitng like rabid weasels. The Presidential campaign, by contrast, was perfectly nice.
This means the Obama supporters were willing to do anything to defeat their fellow Democrats...but they would never harm a Republican.
These are the Obama Democrats. Our party has been taken opver by poeh people
The story we all want to tell is that the acrimony ended with the primary, Obama and Hillary joined forces, and everything is hunky-dunky.
But it just ain't so. The hardcore Obama people hate the Clintons, and they hate the DLC. This is opdd, since subsequent events have shown that the Obama contingent are are far more corporate than the DLC could ever hope to be.
Among other sthings, Obama has dispelled any belief that progressives are smart. They had their first shot at the big-time in decades, and they completely blew it.
My prediction: Obama will be known as The Worst Democrat Ever™. The Pubs will flip Jeb Bush inot the White House in 2012. Jeb will vigorously prosecute members of the Obama Administration for their many crimes.
Maybe then we can pick up the pieces of the party the Obama people have wrecked.
Swine!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Teller on Jun 9, 2009 5:02 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JohnHKennedy Denver CO on Jun 9, 2009 5:11 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have long maintained that as long as Democrats can get away with refusing to Impeach Bush/Cheney, now refusing to prosecute them, they will never give us Single Payers or fix the problems that are hurting families.
They simply don't have the courage to buck their campaign contributors.
And WE apparently Don't Have The Courage To Put Enough Pressure On our Politicians To Change Their Behavior.
In each age there is one defining issue which can push Congress right or left. In our generation that defining issue is
Prosecution of Bush, Cheney and Lawyers for Torture.
If WE, You and I can't make our politicians do that the rest probably won't happen.
If you do nothing else for your Country today,
SIGN THE PETITION To Prosecute Them For Torture
ANGRYVOTERS.ORG
Over 250,000 have signed
Join them and call yourself a Patriot
.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bthespoon on Jun 9, 2009 5:39 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can anyone explain to them that will only make the problem(s) WORSE?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Dems feeding the Beast That IS the Problem
Posted by: wwittman
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lilly on Jun 9, 2009 5:56 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» time is running out...
Posted by: Drclaw
» Maybe you should pay attention to what Obama has already done!
Posted by: rafaeltoral
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MeyravLevine on Jun 9, 2009 6:13 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: chlamor on Jun 9, 2009 6:14 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even many whose views are developed enough to recognize such truths as the fundamental rottenness of the 2-party system & the complicity of Democrats in all of the Republicans' major crimes, are still unable to draw the logical consequences of these insights. (Those so naive that they still conceive of Democrats as being the "opponents" of Republicans are another case altogether.)
The central point is this: capitalist society permits the Democrats to be one of the 2 allowed parties for a very definite reason. It's not because the Democrats "serve the people." It's because in a subtle but effective way, they help the capitalists keep the populace under control by providing them with the illusion of possible change. TPTB don't want the people "served." They want them managed, or controlled.
It is the job, the central social function of the Democrats to always be dangling before the people's noses vague pseudo-hints of possible change, so as to keep them from bolting from bourgeois politics altogether. It is the Democrats' intention to never deliver meaningful change, but rather to keep dangling hints of it alluringly forever. This produces control -- a populace habituated to remain safely within the lines required by ruling class interests.
This is why the Democrats NEVER paint a picture of US history that's the slightest bit accurate -- they want a brainwashed population every bit as much as the Republicans do. This is why they NEVER are willing to set forth an honest socioeconomic analysis of why things are as they are -- they much prefer that people not understand such things.
As long as a large chunk of voters can be deceived by the seemingly "nicer guy" act of the Democrats, there is no hope whatever of coming to grips with the core problems of our society. The most dangerous trends -- a wasteful consumer society, environmental destruction, grotesque social inequality, and an uncontrollable propaganda/war machine -- cannot even be approached within the framework of bourgeois politics, because they all serve ruling class interests. This is what is really being protected, when people opt to support Democrats just because they seem less blatantly cruel on TV.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I agree with everything you say but...
Posted by: sausage
» RE: We need to start the Average, Dull-Witted American Party
Posted by: kettleblack
» Instead of being a smartass, ask yourself, who voted...
Posted by: sausage
» RE: So it's the POLITICIANS that are dumbasses?
Posted by: oregoncharles
» RE: Yeah! Who voted for these guys?
Posted by: kettleblack
» RE: That's what the DEMS say.
Posted by: oregoncharles
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lucidity on Jun 9, 2009 6:14 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: AdamDunny on Jun 9, 2009 6:26 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
RT
Online Privacy when it Counts
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» don't click on that link!
Posted by: frantic1971
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Jun 9, 2009 6:29 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The problem is much like the banking elite, these politico's have not faced serious competition for their seats which means they are just way too comfortable! Opponents (other Dems, Independents) with more progressive agendas need to be sought out and encouraged to run for office! The time to act is now!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: We can't stop the pressure...
Posted by: lawton
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JohnTruth2001 on Jun 9, 2009 6:35 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama is a tool of the Elites, as were all our other presidents for decades before, with the exception of JFK, perhaps.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: frantic1971 on Jun 9, 2009 6:37 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would immediately throw out any that mention how many years the candidate has worked in K street in Washington DC.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: daw13 on Jun 9, 2009 6:39 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Jun 9, 2009 6:44 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Or that a messiah would come and have a different approach, with a complicit Congress! Gee, feels like 2000 again, except many Americans are doing worse and getting worse day by day.
Oh, and those little perpetual democrat and republican sponsored wars.
Nevermind, cronyism and imperialism died with the republican ouster and the ushering in of a new, golden, democrat age. Long live cronyism and imperialism.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» True but we didn't expect worse worse. Is asking the "establishment" to even try coming to their
Posted by: maxpayne
» Missing the conflict of interests. You think you voted for someone because of their message.
Posted by: ABetterFuture
» I didn't say that. You're completely misinterpreting what I said.
Posted by: maxpayne
» Nonetheless, the electorate keeps doing the same thing...
Posted by: ABetterFuture
» RE: Nonetheless, the electorate keeps doing the same thing...
Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Missing the conflict of interests. You think you voted for someone because of their message.
Posted by: weathered
» Well, EXCUSE me, but I, indeed have a magical pixie pony!
Posted by: zigy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rgd on Jun 9, 2009 6:43 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The two parties are really one party with the ability to cover both ends of the spectrum while making us believe they are separate.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: CUnknown on Jun 9, 2009 6:47 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Left needs a Ron Paul movement like the Right has. Until the Left wakes up and gets organized enough to fight back, there is no hope for the Democratic party. Whether we go Green or try to win back the Dems is immaterial, but we absolutely have to stop voting for them until they change.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Protest with your wallet.
Posted by: rafaeltoral
Comments are closed-
Posted by: picket on Jun 9, 2009 6:52 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Internet Progressives have the numbers and the $$$$$$$$. The time is NOW.
We must start NOW if it is a possibility. Time is running out. As it is many will never live long enough to see a REAL change.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Honest Question...Is There a Viable Third Party/Independent
Posted by: oregoncharles
» RE: Honest Question...Is There a Viable Third Party/Independent
Posted by: Bliss Doubt
» RE: Honest Question...Is There a Viable Third Party/Independent
Posted by: oregoncharles
» Important things are starting to happen.
Posted by: freelyb
Comments are closed-
Posted by: robertmc on Jun 9, 2009 6:53 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxpayne on Jun 9, 2009 6:56 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Zaratamara on Jun 9, 2009 7:02 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
IRV means you have an all-important SECOND CHOICE at the ballot, so you can RISK voting a third party WITHOUT having your vote DEFAULT TO YOUR LAST CHOICE.
This adjustment to our voting mechanism can also make all the difference when it comes to all this graft and corruption, because the lobbyists and corporate party BRIBERS won't automatically be able to assume that either a Dem or a Repug would win, because with the People having MORE CHOICE, all bets would be off!
I am disappointed that Moyers hasn't been championing this from his advantaged position.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: State by State
Posted by: oregoncharles
» RE: WE NEEED IRV! Break the Stranglehold!
Posted by: ecsd
Comments are closed-
Posted by: james108 on Jun 9, 2009 7:04 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They're the liberal rationalization that holds it together and prevents something better. It's great to try to shape them for the better and demand peace and freedom from fascism, like we would from the republicans. If we think this is new, or the democrats are any the less status quo, and haven't had control of things for years, it's gonna screw us.
It's like supporting terrorism in other countries pushes people into recruitment and creates insurgents out of children. Everyone's responsible for their own actions. Support for "democratic" fascism and big money misdirection recruits republicans, who do the same.
The democrats act weak when it comes to doing right, like the republicans acted dumb. Neither or neither. They're both powerful branches of big money imperialism stifling public discussion of meaningful details with catch phrases, nice speeches and photo ops.
It's good that we can talk like this, but if realistic discussion doesn't get pushed to the mainstream soon we leave it open for Obama's new Internet Czar program to seriously stifle free speech. Although with a media that acts like we never fought one war for oil and the democrats aren't just another party of the elite, murderous imperialism, our options are limited.
This mess relates to the wars too. One of Obama and the democrat's main tasks right now is to drum up military recruitment. Putting people in debt goes greatly towards that, as history has proven. We still need to support Africa pushing China out so they can fight with Russia over more local oil, and swamp Afghanistan with more troops, among other things. National poverty swells military ranks.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: nobyjingo on Jun 9, 2009 7:21 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
NO OTHER POLITICAL PARTY is equipped to remedy the situation, only the Democratic Party, the remedy will have to be done through the Democratic Party, the only institutionalized political left party, and these right-wingers have to be VOTED OUT; there is no other way, THEY WILL NEVER LEAVE ON THEIR OWN, and they will never do anything beneficial for the left, the 70% MAJORITY COMMON POPULATION.
The PRIMARY ELECTION in my state will be July 27, 2010, which is time for ALL PEOPLE LEANING DEMOCRATIC to get registered as Democrats and VOTE ALL POSSIBLE RIGHT-WINGERS out of the "ONE" LEFT POLITICAL PARTY, so WE THE PEOPLE can clean up the political system. Forget any other party and forget the Republican Party, the Republican Party is AUTOCRATIC, NOT DEMOCRATIC. We as a people must zero in on the Democratic Party and vote out all incumbents possible, without fail.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Now you're talking
Posted by: sausage
» RE: Good Luck
Posted by: oregoncharles
» RE: "the only institutionalized political left party"
Posted by: oregoncharles
» RE: And the Dems are REPUBLICANS
Posted by: lawton
» RE: And the Dems are REPUBLICANS
Posted by: lawton
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sausage on Jun 9, 2009 7:31 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In that time the Democratic Party morphed into, what I term, a white, suburban, socially-liberal, economically-conservative party. In part this was due to the Vietnam war--the Republican Party had no room for anti-war activists, primarily suburban, coordinator-class, white males--and the so-called Reagan Revolution--the Republican Party had no room for so-called Rockefeller Republicans, primarily suburban, coordinator-class white males.
So in essence from the end of Lyndon Johnson's administration in 1969 to present the Democratic Party is now the party of Nelson Rockefeller.
True, due to Democratic stances on social issues, the party has made great gains in the African American and Hispanic American communities yet in its soul leading Democrats are committed to the chimera of a "free market" economy with all the fervence of their supposed opposites in the Republican Party.
Point of fact a couple of years ago when the issue of telephone deregulation came up in my state's legislature a Democratic representative said, she wanted the state to lead the parade in deregulation and expected more legislative action on public utility deregulation to follow. Fortunately cooler heads prevailed and further deregulation in my home state is on hold, permanently I hope.
Also on the state level my DLC state senator is active in improving health care access. However he poo-poo's any and all talk of a single payer health care system. Instead his "brilliant" idea is what he calls a "beautiful patchwork quilt" of public and private health insurance. I have news for him, a beautiful patchwork quilt my great-grandmother made for me fell to tatters long ago, but a wool blanket the US Navy issued to my dad in World War II is still good. See the analogy?
By the way while we're on the topic of the credit card usury law My Blue Dog U.S. Representative voted for this piece of shit. He also voted with the Republicans on the bankruptcy deform bill and the "death tax" bill. When a mutual friend asked him why he voted against the average Joe and for big money, Rep Blue dog said if he didn't the Republicans would use it against him in the upcoming campaign!
Look, I've voted straight Democratic ticket since 1972. I've voted for all the losers, McGovern, Carter, Mondale and Dukakis. And the winners Clinton and Obama. But I'm getting a little tired of getting stabbed in the back. I keep thinking a "real" liberal Democrat will rise out of the dung heap and give us a "real" people's party.
I'm always disappointed.
America can solve its energy crisis simply by plugging the electric grid into the graves of William Jennings Bryant, Huey Long, FDR, Harry Truman, JFK, LBJ and Hubert Humphrey. They have to be spinning at the shape the Democratic Party is now in.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The Democratic Party stopped being the "people's" party...
Posted by: kettleblack
» RE: Doing great until the end.
Posted by: oregoncharles
» When the Greens start winnign elections, maybe.
Posted by: sausage
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bliss Doubt on Jun 9, 2009 7:37 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've never once heard this terminology in the mainstream media.
It is what it is.
And yes, Obama took a walk on reform.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: This, from a Christ-ian Nation
Posted by: kettleblack
Comments are closed-
Posted by: FLYING DOOFUS on Jun 9, 2009 7:40 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Ranjit Kumar on Jun 9, 2009 7:53 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Ranjit Kumar on Jun 9, 2009 7:57 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: steven w on Jun 9, 2009 8:21 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: They have us exactly where they want us.
Posted by: ellie
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cahorton on Jun 9, 2009 8:37 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
................
"Whereas the Massachusetts Democratic Party supports the Rule of Law in the federal government and elsewhere; and
"Whereas the Massachusetts Democratic Party reveres the Constitution of the United States and finds abhorrent acts contrary to its intent, such as excessive executive privilege leading to 'preemptive' war and torture
"Therefore be it resolved that the Massachusetts Democratic Party instructs our Congressional delegation to support and work for the appointment of a Special Prosecutor to investigate, and, where appropriate, to hold accountable, any person, including persons at any level of government, who is found to be responsible for willfully violating the laws and the Constitution of the United States, and/or willfully violating the rights of citizens and the rights guaranteed to all persons under international treaties, and/or employing or advocating torture, and/or waging illegal wars with wanton disregard for truth and for the lives and safety of civilians, and/or presenting false testimony, and/or ignoring, bypassing and sabotaging the law, or resolutions and subpoenas issued by the Congress of the United States."
.................
This and many other events at the Convention underscore a growing struggle between the base of the Democratic Party and its leadership for control over its direction and program. However it turns out it is a necessary struggle with potential for good. Don't dismiss it lightly.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Lightly
Posted by: oregoncharles
» Revolutionary patience
Posted by: cahorton
» RE: That's how you build a NEW party, too.
Posted by: oregoncharles
Comments are closed-
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Jun 9, 2009 8:45 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
perhaps caring about the impact of American policies & corruption
UPON BILLIONS OF NON-AMERICANS is a worthy interest?
nah, that's not worth discussing, is it??
If its not about AMERICANS, its just not worth reading, I suppose
can you define a narcissistic culture?
I can.
Perspective.
The Jeff Farias Show: streams FREE & LIVE Mon-Fri, 6-9pmEDT
FREE podcast
"... tolerance of intolerance is cowardice..." ~ Ayaan Hirsi Ali.
"We, two, form a Multitude" ~ Ovid.
"Violence can only be concealed by a Lie, & the Lie can only be maintained by Violence." ... "Any man, who has once proclaimed Violence as his Method, is inevitably forced to take the Lie as his Principle" – Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn.
Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: if AMERICANS have a problem: STOP THE PRESSES!!
Posted by: ellie
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sirios on Jun 9, 2009 9:00 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
PS WTF are the flashing " you have won our hourly prize" ads doing on Alternet ? New lows have been achieved on this site by allowing this crap. Disgusting!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rafaeltoral on Jun 9, 2009 9:04 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You repeat the same mistakes because you fail to learn from history. Heck, you fail to even remember history let alone learn from it.
You teach your children this same mode of thinking and they continue to make the same mistakes you made.
All the while the ultra rich get more powerful. You have less rights, liberties and opportunities. Dont worry about your children being slaves, because you already are slaves.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Most of you dont have a clue.
Posted by: Zeugitai
» What history lessons do think people need to reread?
Posted by: clresu
» RE: What history lessons do think people need to reread?
Posted by: rafaeltoral
» RE: What history lessons do think people need to reread?
Posted by: clresu
» It seems that.
Posted by: rafaeltoral
» RE: A Violent Revolution (1)
Posted by: clresu
» RE: A Violent Revolution (2)
Posted by: clresu
» Perhaps you will clue us in...
Posted by: zigy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: oregoncharles on Jun 9, 2009 9:16 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
www.gp.org
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: monkeywrench on Jun 9, 2009 9:26 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One way would be to expose – advertise – the financial corruption of Congress. Put out ads documenting how much in graft ... er..."campaign contributions" each person in Congress collects from each lobbying group, cross-referenced with which way they voted on issues those lobbyists work for.
Another, more difficult, move would be to bury Washington in people: send huge delegations of citizens who would both lobby and get across the point to our esteemed legislators that "business as usual" CANNOT be carried out in Washington until The People who put them there are supported.
The choices are difficult; but we as a nation are in a similar situation to where blacks stood before the Civil Rights movement and the marches of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. in the '60's – and this time, the destruction of our lives directly affects ALL of us. I'm afraid that, with Congress' corruption at an all-time high and Washington D.C. completely bought-and-paid-for by Big Business, it will take nothing less than a peaceful and legal – but MASSIVE – new civil rights movement to get results. We have been abandoned by our legislators who, I believe, are in the clutches of a de-facto "shadow government" of wealthy insiders.
At this point in our history, however, two things should be obvious: that letters to the editor, calls to Congresspeople and complaining to eachother are not getting the job done; and, more critically, that usurious interest rates/predatory lending, coupled with the most individually expensive and predatory healthcare system in the industrialized world, along with cruel bankruptcy laws that guarantee the creation of indentured servants and shattered lives, will destroy this nation if allowed to stand. A nation that is democratic but horribly oppressed, financially and psychologically, by its own corrupt elite, even if it maintains a modicum of other freedoms, cannot endure. No democratic nation under these conditions ever has. That would require a dictatorship – a possible future that, maybe, we also should be worrying about if we don't right our own ship.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I agree, but we need to be informed on what works and what doesn't
Posted by: clresu
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Ghoulman on Jun 9, 2009 9:28 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Seemed appropriate to post this.
The Democrats are still stuck in the Free Market ideology that, since the 80s, has been the only capitalism in Washington. And has been the philosophy that has brought us to todays economic collapse.
A return to common sense capitalism (think FDR) that has basic protections of competition, regulation, law, and utility for the stability and slow growth of the nation (not the hyper-growth free-for-all of the banks on Wall Street) is the only sane economy. An economy that looks into the far future instead of creating depression and dept upon our children.
The power must come from government, not the banks. But it's the banks that are calling the shots thanks to the Democrats still being stuck on the Free Market religion, just like the Republicans are.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» END THE FED
Posted by: CUnknown
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on Jun 9, 2009 9:30 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Looie the Lender was more honest
Posted by: Drclaw
Comments are closed-
Posted by: clresu on Jun 9, 2009 9:43 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
35 million worldwide protested the Iraq war before it even started, which was unheard of both in numbers and in being before the war even began. This set a U.S. and worldwide record. It achieved absolutely nothing. Yes, Bush was in office, but it likely wouldn't have mattered who was in office.
You can protest things that aren't concerned with finance & imperialism and possibly get a result, but when it comes to protesting wars and imperialism and financial matters there is a highly, highly likely chance that nothing will change.
Also, it's close to impossible to get the info out that the masses need to reach the kind of momentum necessary for achieving a positive result. Corporate media won't let it through, and as alternative info grows in availability - info that might produce a change in the status quo - corporate media goes on ahead and tweaks there coverage so that the alt news is undercut before it reaches enough people.
"Let's pressure the democrats" is a strategy that hasn't worked very well in the past. Someone posted a pretty good link on another thread the other day to questionwar.com . . . there's an article there entitled "liberal holocaust," which goes through the deaths/slaughters that took place under democrats and liberals . . . I already knew the number was high, but, as usual, it was even worse than I thought. I bring this up just to say, the idea of appealing (intellectually or emotionally) to a group of people who can consistently kill innocent people (think Iraqi children under the sanctions) is a rather depressing and silly thought.
The green party is appealing, but as I've said elsewhere, it'd damn near take a revolution to get one in office. The media would have to radically change, for one, and everyone knows how likely that is. The only viable way for a green party candidate to get elected is for him or her to sell out.
Civil Rights legislation was passed not after protesting or emotional appeals or intellectual appeals but rather after weeks of rioting. It goes to show what the state is apt to respond to.
"Voting with your wallet" is another strategy that Peter Gelderlos in "How Nonviolence Protects the State" argues is not effective enough on its own to produce the desired result. I do vote with my wallet, but as a poster above said, "the bigger the wallet, the bigger the vote" - which means my vote is very, very small. The problem with this strategy, while I don't discourage it (or any others), is that corporations have, to use the phrase, a much bigger wallet. & By the way, "voting with your wallet" is part of a bigger nonviolent strategy that's called something to the effect of "building an alternative lifestyle," which means relying on locals for good, independent news, local farmers for food, and so forth . . . it's a "live as you'd have others live" strategy, to some degree. Once again, I'm all for it, but I don't know how much change it'll produce . . . or rather if it's likely to produce the large changes we need soon: lower carbon footprint, ending war, addressing hunger and water shortages, etc.
These aren't things that are enjoyable to point out, but I believe everyone here who has a problem with healthcare or war or media or any other thing ought to bear in mind what the state responds to and what it doesn't respond to.
&, By the way, personally I still believe in non-violence, I've just come to realize it's not very likely to produce much.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» 5% will get the Green Party in the game!
Posted by: Alan8
» RE: Third Parties
Posted by: clresu
» Parties are easy pinpoints of corruption
Posted by: james108
» I mean Baldwin :)
Posted by: james108
» RE: Highly doubtful that protests will bring change
Posted by: ecsd
» Read "How Non-Violence Protects the State" by Peter Gelderlos
Posted by: clresu
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Alan8 on Jun 9, 2009 10:09 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Excuse me -- They ALREADY chose to screw their constituents by not voting on it!
Yet another disgusting example of how the corporate-funded Democrats have been selling us out for decades.
This betrayal of citizens by Democrats is repeated in virtually every area, from health care to job outsourcing. Yet the average ignorant American liberal continues to vote for them.
Get a clue: The corporate-funded Democrats (like the corporate-funded Republicans) ARE NOT ON OUR SIDE!
You keep them in power with your votes. Voting Green or Socialist is the only way to send them a wake-up call.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: a losers game
Posted by: clresu
» RE: a losers game
Posted by: Alan8
» RE: a losers game
Posted by: clresu
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Pop on Jun 9, 2009 10:16 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Heathcare
Posted by: ecsd
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Southern Gal on Jun 9, 2009 10:54 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: zrants on Jun 9, 2009 11:03 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If corporate America is allowed to set prices at unreasonable levels, we can refuse to buy their services.
If enough citizens quit using credit cards and quit paying for optional health care programs that don't deliver the care they promise, corporate America will have no choice but to change.
We keep hearing that the market should be left alone to correct itself. We are the market so let's do the correcting. Buy local products. Support your local farmers and manufacturing base. Pay with cash. Barter when you can.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Zeugitai on Jun 9, 2009 11:37 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No, the Dems will not "shape up." They are the powerful playing the game of the powerful by its rules and this is a matter of structure and national institution. These are inflexible matters. But the powerless cannot conceive of themselves as valueless, insignificant, negligible. One of them at one time wrote that all men are created equal, and they wave this document in the air as they cry. But it never really was and never really will be. Only the relatively "privileged" whites of America will attempt to argue this point, and their cries of protest do not matter. No, people will not "wake up"; no, they will not unify; no, they cannot grow tall and see the world as it is above the level of their mouse holes. No, the Dems will not shape up. No, the Repubs will not become human. No, the corporations and banks that run this world will not have a change of heart. Any argument predicated upon tigers changing their stripes is self-mooting.
Now get back to the hunt for cheese. . .
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wormfarmer on Jun 9, 2009 11:41 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: solrev on Jun 9, 2009 12:24 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Option one; have the government buy insurance for the uninsured, currently covered by Medicaid.
Option two; pass a law forcing everyone to purchase affordable health insurance, and tax benefits to help pay the cost of affordable health insurance, currently covered by Medicaid.
Option three; create a public healthcare insurance, which will lead the way to single payer. Economic affects would be minimal because the change would take place slowly.
If Obama signs anything but option three, we should start an “impeach Obama” movement. Not representing the people should be a high crime.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: A. Z. Arrow on Jun 9, 2009 12:48 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Any attempt at mandatory and obligatory “private insurance” will backfire. Subsidies are not a substitute for real coverage.
America needs to join the civilized and industrial nations.
Plain and simple, that means a Universal Single-Payer insurance plan for all Americans.
This week’s European Parliamentary elections moved that body to the extreme fascistic RIGHT because the labor and Democratic parties in Europe keep coming up with non-solutions in their bid to “triangulate,” their effort to expand government power without accountability, to hang on to office while undermining progressive solutions, and by actively blocking progressive appointments within their governments in favor of their subservient version of the status-quo. The reason for this leap to fascism according to the BBC is the failure of laborites to enforce the distinction between “legal” citizens and “illegal” refugees. Voters did not go to the polls within nations that did not protect their citizen’s jobs nor provided sound programmatic economic “security.”
In the US, the Clintonoid pro-insurance-company “Health Care” scheme is one more example of why people become frustrated with the Democratic Party, and with their pro-corporate, and pro-capitalist liberal ideology. Change this, or the Democrats will become irrelevant on the morrow. Sounds impossible, doesn’t it? You had better look closely at the European elections.
For leftist and progressives the alarm bells are ringing!
The government bankrupting of American Auto producers while bailing out Banksters, crooks, and Billionaires is insane!
The time has come to close down shop on the Military/Contract/Complex and to create a non-war human centered economy.
For many newly unemployed American workers its’ either guaranteed socio-economic equality with protection of citizen Rights, and, especially, good paying jobs, or it is bust, and, perhaps, extreme political reaction.
Alternative to fascism: Onward to socialism, on to democratization of the Federal Reserve and to nationalizing of the US currency > with an eye towards the rapid re-industrialization of America . OR, otherwise, it could get very ugly.
I for one will never click my heels and shout “Sig-Heil” at the finance-capitalist bastards, at media liars, at the rulers of the corporate police state, at pirate bankers and thieves that steal wealth created by the public for personal use. (Change . . . What Change? The ship of state is still being piloted by lobbyist, and social wealth is still being pirated by corporate lawyers and by most of the “representatives” and elected officials in DC, and by a fully-armed sleazy group of aggressive warmongers beyond.)
Have a good day,
A.Z. Arrow
---------->
June 09,2009
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: reelman on Jun 9, 2009 2:06 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My lack of experience, my questionable ethics, my monstrous ego, and my association with evil doers are of no consequence.
One lone reporter asked, "That shouldn't be, isn't that Marxist policy?" And she was banished from the kingdom! Then a citizen asked, "With no foreign relations experience and having zero military experience or knowledge, how will you deal with radical terrorists?" And "The One" said, "Simple. I shall sit with them and talk kindly to them and show them how nice we really are; and they will forget that they ever wanted to kill us all!"
Then "The One" said, "I shall give 95% of you lower taxes." And one, lone voice said, "But 40% of us don't pay ANY taxes."
Then "The One" said, "I shall tax your Capital Gains when you sell your homes!" And the people yawned and the already slumping housing market fully collapsed. And He said, "I shall mandate employer-funded health care for EVERY worker and raise the minimum wage, and lower the white collar wage. And I shall also give every person unlimited healthcare and medicine and even transportation to the free clinics." And the people said, "Give me some of that!"
Then "The One" said, "I shall bankrupt the coal industry, and perhaps even the oil industry (Cap & Trade/Carbon Tax) and though electricity rates will skyrocket, we shall soon build wind farms and solar power stations and drive green cars that I shall mandate in Detroit!"
So "The One" said, "Not to worry. If your rebate ($10/week) isn't enough to cover your extra expenses ($3,000/year), we shall bail you out. Just sign up with ACORN and your troubles are over!" "Only the fat cats will have to pay." Then He said, "Illegal immigrants feel scorned and slighted. Let's grant them amnesty, Social Security, free education, free lunches, free medical care, bi-lingual signs and guaranteed housing..."
And so it came to pass that employers, facing spiraling costs and ever-higher taxes, raised their prices and laid off workers; though they sold much less of their products. Others simply gave up and went out of business, and the economy sank like unto a rock dropped from a cliff. The banking industry was destroyed. Manufacturing slowed to a crawl. And more of the people were without a means of support.
So "The One" again blamed the prior administration, extended unemployment benefits to a year, bailed out his favorite banks, and then took over the banks and auto industries. "The One" said, "I am the "The One" - The Messiah - and I'm here to save you! We shall just print more money so the government will have enough!" "Surely one trillion dollars will make everyone happy." And immediately the Fed complied and the money presses roared. And China reconsidered their one trillion dollars of loans to the US ,, and threatened to call in their debts.
Other foreign trading partners said unto "The One", "Wait a minute. Your dollar is not worth a pile of camel dung! You will have to pay more.. for everything.. as your dollar becomes worth less." And the people said, "Wait a minute.. That is unfair!!" And the world said, "Neither are these other idiotic programs you have embraced.
Lo, you have become a Socialist state and a second-rate power. What factories are not owned by your government are owned by us. Now you shall play by our rules!" And "The One" said "Americans are arrogant, divisive, and derisive!" "We will listen."
And the people cried out, "Alas, alas!! What have we done?"
And the people beat their chests in despair and cried out in anguish, "Give us back our nation and our pride and our hope!!
This is NOT a fairy tale, its happening RIGHT NOW.....SUCKAS
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Amy27605 on Jun 9, 2009 2:12 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good grief!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ecsd on Jun 9, 2009 2:53 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Like it or not, if we need to in order to get our way, we'll have to demand at a grassroots level that people don't vote for ANYONE who makes more than $100,000 per year or who owns more than $100,000 in wealth. That will fix things in a hurry. Then we'll be represented by "people like us", and apparently, not until we do this.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Gentle Axeman on Jun 9, 2009 3:16 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I did not vote Obama, because what he promised to all and sundry, simply could not be done....
Unless he and the Dems really kicked some butt...
Pick yer siren call, and it ain't gonna happen...
I went the other way, because he wasn't lying as much...maybe woulda been worse, but at this point really can't see that...
Same issues, same problems next election...
We might just remember that.....
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: artie on Jun 9, 2009 3:42 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Dems will not shape up.
Thus:
We're Screwed on Everything From Health Care to the Economy.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lulugeez on Jun 9, 2009 3:46 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A couple months ago Rep. John Dingell came to an Ann Arbor Dem. Party meeting. He touted his support for the House’s credit card “reform" bill; assuring us that he opposed those “outrageous fees”. I asked for clarification. Did that mean, at long last we are saved? An end to usury? That limits would be set on interest rates? "No, no, we couldn't do that", Big John responded. I noticed that his spouse was not in attendance and wondered if she had gotten herself kidnapped. How else to explain the crushing impotence, our little rep who “couldn’t”?
Sen. Debbie Stabenow--who has a long, (probably permanent) tenure, on the list of Political Sows of the World-- helped draft and pass the 2005 Bankruptcy “Reform” bill. More recently, as Greider reported, voted against an interest rate cap proposed by Bernie Sanders. I believe she will actually show her face in Michigan sometime again, claiming to be a sow of the people. And why not? The Michigan Dems. will likely re-nominate her. The logic is, alas, unassailable: though she is but a sow, she is our sow. So much for brand Democrat.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Right on the mark! Lipstick for all the swine!
Posted by: kettleblack
Comments are closed-
Posted by: reelman on Jun 9, 2009 4:00 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who just spent a trillion? Who just forced 9 trillion in debt on us? Who just 4x the budget debt in his first budget?
This, as others are saying, is simply code for…..drum roll….many big taxes from the Party of Taxes! Bet you didn’t see that coming. Okay, voters for JCO did not see it coming but the thinkers (not the feelers, the Oz Landers) have the common sense to realize the vote-buying is over on our VISA. Now its coming out of your 2010 paycheck.
Its ALWAYS part of the democrat strategy to assume you dropped out in 7th grade.
That you missed the Jimmah Carter Misery Index Era.
That you think massive borrowing has no consequences.
That economic laws and history never matter.
That inflation is a myth.
That there is always a free lunch.
Here come the predicted taxes on top of 9.4% unemployment…ya like ya 401k balance this month?…SUCKAS.
http://conservablogs.com/theconservativecrawfish
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: FrankChurch on Jun 9, 2009 5:29 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Ebony on Jun 9, 2009 7:37 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cori on Jun 9, 2009 8:50 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Jeanne on Jun 9, 2009 9:58 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ender on Jun 10, 2009 3:20 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our entire "American way of life" has been based on unsustainable practices, which, by definition, cannot continue indefinitely. The next time someone tells you, "No one could've seen this coming," know that they are either very stupid, very uninformed or they are lying to you.
(If they do all three, they're probably Republican.)
Well what now? Are we going to follow the path of the baby boomers to absolute calamity or are we finally going to grow up and reign in the unholy power of corporations?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JohnHKennedy Denver CO on Jun 10, 2009 10:56 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
SIGN THE PETITION To Prosecute Them For Torture
ANGRYVOTERS.ORG
Over 250,000 have signed
Join them and call yourself a Patriot
.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: apefist on Jun 10, 2009 11:41 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And this Democratic congress is nothing short of the Republican congress we voted out. How in blazes can they be so inept?!?!?
dang.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» You mean how in blazes could we be so inept!
Posted by: shinseiji
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cori on Jun 11, 2009 8:48 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: John Steinsvold on Jun 11, 2009 6:51 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://evans-experientialism.freewebspace.com/steinsvold.htm
John Steinsvold
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: reelman on Jun 12, 2009 4:24 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
May 30, 2008…..12,638.32
June 6, 2008……12,209.81
July 4, 2008…….11,288.54
August 1, 2008…11,326.32
September 5, 2008.11,220.96
October 3, 2008..10,325.38
OBAMA ELECTED
November 7, 2008…8,943.81
December 5, 2008….8,635.42
December 31, 2008…8,776.39
January 2, 2009……..9,034.69
February 6, 2009…….8,280.59
March 6, 2009………..6,626.94
April 3, 2009………….8,017.59
May 1, 2009…………..8,212.41
AFTER BAILOUTS, PROMISES AND BORROWING TRILLIONS
June 5, 2009…………..8,763.13
NOW IMAGINE AFTER THE COMING TAX RAISING WAVE
(look closely at your retirement fund balance again)
http://conservablogs.com/theconservativecrawfish/
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: shinseiji on Jun 16, 2009 3:27 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: shinseiji on Jun 16, 2009 3:53 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Finally ready to dump "your" party? For good? No looking back?
Like a hopelessly screwed up marriage, there comes a time when it just has to end.
Just wait until the great health "reform" con is pulled off. They are already setting up for the con in the congressional finance committees (which like insurance companies, somehow qualify as the arbiters of health care, but, hey, only in the USA), as well as on the pages of the NYT, where coverage of this issue is being carefully filtered. Stay tuned.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: NoPCZone on Jun 9, 2009 12:19 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Until we get these leeches off of our backs and out of the party we are screwed...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» The hand wringing left
Posted by: Teller
» No, that's exactly what a Democrat is...
Posted by: Tweck9
» RE: No, that's exactly what a Democrat is...
Posted by: johnnyfarout
» "Money Ruined Democracy."--Bill Moyers
Posted by: mcartri
» RE: ed State DINOs (Democrats In Name Only)
Posted by: addisong
» Sarah Palin
Posted by: SeattlePackedSnowandCollidedCars
» RE: THE DEMOCRATS ARE 'SUPPOSED' TO BE THE PARTY OF THE POOR AND WORKING PEOPLE
Posted by: joeocho88
» RE: ed State DINOs (Democrats In Name Only)
Posted by: lawton
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Jay Randal on Jun 9, 2009 12:28 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Overwhelming majority of Americans demand an end to medical insurance industry screwing them over. Since neither Dems nor Repubs in Congress stand up for single-payer system, therefore We the People are forced to vote out all incumbents (of both parties) who betray us. A New Labor party for America is needed to eliminate stranglehold of the existing corporate-owned parties.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Go Green
Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: Go IRV FIRST!
Posted by: Zaratamara
» And restore equal time too
Posted by: Bliss Doubt
» I've SEEN the Green(s) -- and am SOOOO not impressed
Posted by: AdamSelene40
» RE: I think you're lying.
Posted by: oregoncharles
» Green splits Democrat. GOP wins.
Posted by: Bliss Doubt
» RE: I've SEEN the Green(s) -- and am SOOOO not impressed
Posted by: gwbushmalecheerleader
» Newsflash: The Deomcrat Voter...
Posted by: SeattlePackedSnowandCollidedCars
» RE: Newsflash: The Democrat Voter...
Posted by: madregal
» psst....dems and repubs are on the same team.
Posted by: rafaeltoral
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mmckinl on Jun 9, 2009 12:42 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Greider ignores the elephant in the living room ... the Democrats need leadership from the White House and with a 60% approval rating there is plenty of politicaal capital to spend ... But Where's the Love? The banksters are getting plenty of Love ... trillions of dollars worth ...
Barack has betrayed those who counted on him to do the right thing, the moral thing and Greider pretends not to notice ...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Barack Obama: The Audacity of Betrayal ...
Posted by: gathaiga
» Obama is "The Audacity of HYPE"
Posted by: bthespoon
» RE: Obama is "The Audacity of HYPE"
Posted by: freelyb
» You're right, say it again.
Posted by: freelyb
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Col. Jackleg on Jun 9, 2009 12:46 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: How many must suffer?
Posted by: billslm
» Mike Connell was his name, billslm, but the story
Posted by: paulmagillsmith
» RE: How many must suffer?
Posted by: gwbushmalecheerleader
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Mathew Trisencusean on Jun 9, 2009 2:48 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We are pleased to announce to the world that we now have a President who can use the word obfuscate in a sentence.
GREEN SHOOTS.
And many other polyslyabic words.
THERE IS NOT A ESCALATING HUMANITARIAN CRISES IN AMERICA.
If there was we would have responded to it in the same way we responded to the humanitarian crises in Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan ect
Which we havent so there isnt one.
Except for that one time.
Which we had no prior knowledge of or involvment in.
THE FUNDEMENTALS OF THE ECONOMY ARE STRONG.
Step on your nieghbors face.
"Nothing personal buddy, its only business"
THE PREVIOUS TWO SENTENCES WERE THE RESULT OF FAULTY INTELLIGENCE.
We meant to say love thy neighbour and do unto others as you would have done unto you.
AMERICA HAS NEVER BEEN AND NEVER WILL BE A SOCIALIST COUNTRY.
For those of you who believe we are living in the midst of an Orwellian nightmare we are not listening to your phone calls or tracing your emails.
Because we're not and we dont.
Unless your a terrorist.
AMERICA DOES NOT TORTURE.
NOBODY IS ABOVE THE LAW.
In a nation of laws anybody who broke the law would be charged tried and convicted in a court of law.
Nobody has been so we never did.
WE WOULD LIKE TO ENCOURAGE AMERICANS TO KEEP SENDING ANGRY EMAILS TO PROGRESSIVE WEBSITES AS THIS IS A EFFECTIVE MEANS OF ACHIEVIEVING CHANGE.
It is imperative that we move forward with the forwardness that we all so desperatly look forward to.
And always twirling, twirling, twirling into the future.
AMERICA IS SCREWED UNLESS WE LEARN HOW TO PROTEST COLLECTIVELY.
Faulty intelligence.Faulty intelligence...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: A NEW AND IMPROVED MESSAGE FROM THE GOVERNMENT VIA THE MEDIA
Posted by: cahorton
» ahhhh...hahahahahahahahahahaha!
Posted by: cvstoner
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Perry Logan on Jun 9, 2009 3:27 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The fight occurred during the Democratic primaries, which were more like World War III than like normal primary elections. There was a pitched battle between the Obama Democrats--who fancy themselves progressives--and the Clinton contingent of the party.
As you should know, millions of Democrats were grossed out by the Obama primary camapign--which was the dirtiest ever--and left the party.
The Obama people's favorite trick was to call their fellow Democrats racists, which they did over and over and over. They called Hillary's female supporters the C word constantly.
Since no real Democrat would do such a sh*tty thing, I knew then we were screwed.
After handing the primaries to their neocon candidate, the Democrats pretended to reconcile...and then went on to conduct a Presidential campaign which was as clean as his primary campaign was dirty.
What a shocker! The primary campaign--waged against their fellow Democrats--was the sorriest mess I ever saw, with Obamites fighting like rabid weasels. The Presidential campaign, by contrast, was perfectly nice.
In other words, the Obama supporters were willing to do anything to defeat their fellow Democrats...but they would never harm a Republican.
That's who's running the party: people who hate Democrats. Is there any wonder we're in trouble?
The official story is that the acrimony ended with the primary, Obama and Hillary joined forces, and everything is hunky-dunky.
But it just ain't so. The hardcore Obama people hate the Clintons, and they hate the DLC. This is odd, since subsequent events have shown that the Obama contingent are are far more corporate than the DLC could ever hope to be.
So the progressives had their first shot at the big-time in decades, and they completely blew it. Obama has dispelled any belief that progressives are smart.
My prediction: Obama will be known as The Worst Democrat Ever™. With the lowered popularity of the Democrats, the Pubs will flip Jeb Bush into the White House in 2012.
Of course, Jeb will vigorously prosecute members of the Obama Administration for their many crimes. Maybe then we can pick up the pieces of the party the Obama people have wrecked.
Swine!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Again this illusion that Democrats are anything but corporate
Posted by: Tweck9
» You realize that
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: A coup within the Democratic Party
Posted by: gwbushmalecheerleader
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Perry Logan on Jun 9, 2009 3:30 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The fight occurred during the Democratic primaries, which were more like World War III than like normal primary elections. There was a pitched battle between the Obama Democrats--who fancy themselves progressives--and the Clinton contingent of the party.
As you should know, millions of Democrats were grossed out by the Obama primary camapign--which was the dirtiest ever--and left the party. The Obama people's favorite trick was to call their fellow Democrats racists, which they did over and over and over. They called Hillary's female supporters the C word constantly.
Since no real Democrat would do such a sh*tty thing, I knew then we were screwed.
After handing the primaries to their shockingly weak candidate, the Democrats pretended to reconcile...and then went on to conduict a Presidential campaign which was as clean as his primary campaign was dirty.
What a shocker! The primary campaign--waged against their fellow Democrats--was the sorriest mess I ever saw, with Obamites fighitng like rabid weasels. The Presidential campaign, by contrast, was perfectly nice.
This means the Obama supporters were willing to do anything to defeat their fellow Democrats...but they would never harm a Republican.
These are the Obama Democrats. Our party has been taken opver by poeh people
The story we all want to tell is that the acrimony ended with the primary, Obama and Hillary joined forces, and everything is hunky-dunky.
But it just ain't so. The hardcore Obama people hate the Clintons, and they hate the DLC. This is opdd, since subsequent events have shown that the Obama contingent are are far more corporate than the DLC could ever hope to be.
Among other sthings, Obama has dispelled any belief that progressives are smart. They had their first shot at the big-time in decades, and they completely blew it.
My prediction: Obama will be known as The Worst Democrat Ever™. The Pubs will flip Jeb Bush inot the White House in 2012. Jeb will vigorously prosecute members of the Obama Administration for their many crimes.
Maybe then we can pick up the pieces of the party the Obama people have wrecked.
Swine!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Teller on Jun 9, 2009 5:02 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JohnHKennedy Denver CO on Jun 9, 2009 5:11 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have long maintained that as long as Democrats can get away with refusing to Impeach Bush/Cheney, now refusing to prosecute them, they will never give us Single Payers or fix the problems that are hurting families.
They simply don't have the courage to buck their campaign contributors.
And WE apparently Don't Have The Courage To Put Enough Pressure On our Politicians To Change Their Behavior.
In each age there is one defining issue which can push Congress right or left. In our generation that defining issue is
Prosecution of Bush, Cheney and Lawyers for Torture.
If WE, You and I can't make our politicians do that the rest probably won't happen.
If you do nothing else for your Country today,
SIGN THE PETITION To Prosecute Them For Torture
ANGRYVOTERS.ORG
Over 250,000 have signed
Join them and call yourself a Patriot
.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bthespoon on Jun 9, 2009 5:39 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can anyone explain to them that will only make the problem(s) WORSE?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Dems feeding the Beast That IS the Problem
Posted by: wwittman
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lilly on Jun 9, 2009 5:56 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» time is running out...
Posted by: Drclaw
» Maybe you should pay attention to what Obama has already done!
Posted by: rafaeltoral
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MeyravLevine on Jun 9, 2009 6:13 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: chlamor on Jun 9, 2009 6:14 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even many whose views are developed enough to recognize such truths as the fundamental rottenness of the 2-party system & the complicity of Democrats in all of the Republicans' major crimes, are still unable to draw the logical consequences of these insights. (Those so naive that they still conceive of Democrats as being the "opponents" of Republicans are another case altogether.)
The central point is this: capitalist society permits the Democrats to be one of the 2 allowed parties for a very definite reason. It's not because the Democrats "serve the people." It's because in a subtle but effective way, they help the capitalists keep the populace under control by providing them with the illusion of possible change. TPTB don't want the people "served." They want them managed, or controlled.
It is the job, the central social function of the Democrats to always be dangling before the people's noses vague pseudo-hints of possible change, so as to keep them from bolting from bourgeois politics altogether. It is the Democrats' intention to never deliver meaningful change, but rather to keep dangling hints of it alluringly forever. This produces control -- a populace habituated to remain safely within the lines required by ruling class interests.
This is why the Democrats NEVER paint a picture of US history that's the slightest bit accurate -- they want a brainwashed population every bit as much as the Republicans do. This is why they NEVER are willing to set forth an honest socioeconomic analysis of why things are as they are -- they much prefer that people not understand such things.
As long as a large chunk of voters can be deceived by the seemingly "nicer guy" act of the Democrats, there is no hope whatever of coming to grips with the core problems of our society. The most dangerous trends -- a wasteful consumer society, environmental destruction, grotesque social inequality, and an uncontrollable propaganda/war machine -- cannot even be approached within the framework of bourgeois politics, because they all serve ruling class interests. This is what is really being protected, when people opt to support Democrats just because they seem less blatantly cruel on TV.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I agree with everything you say but...
Posted by: sausage
» RE: We need to start the Average, Dull-Witted American Party
Posted by: kettleblack
» Instead of being a smartass, ask yourself, who voted...
Posted by: sausage
» RE: So it's the POLITICIANS that are dumbasses?
Posted by: oregoncharles
» RE: Yeah! Who voted for these guys?
Posted by: kettleblack
» RE: That's what the DEMS say.
Posted by: oregoncharles
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lucidity on Jun 9, 2009 6:14 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: AdamDunny on Jun 9, 2009 6:26 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
RT
Online Privacy when it Counts
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» don't click on that link!
Posted by: frantic1971
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Jun 9, 2009 6:29 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The problem is much like the banking elite, these politico's have not faced serious competition for their seats which means they are just way too comfortable! Opponents (other Dems, Independents) with more progressive agendas need to be sought out and encouraged to run for office! The time to act is now!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: We can't stop the pressure...
Posted by: lawton
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JohnTruth2001 on Jun 9, 2009 6:35 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama is a tool of the Elites, as were all our other presidents for decades before, with the exception of JFK, perhaps.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: frantic1971 on Jun 9, 2009 6:37 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would immediately throw out any that mention how many years the candidate has worked in K street in Washington DC.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: daw13 on Jun 9, 2009 6:39 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Jun 9, 2009 6:44 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Or that a messiah would come and have a different approach, with a complicit Congress! Gee, feels like 2000 again, except many Americans are doing worse and getting worse day by day.
Oh, and those little perpetual democrat and republican sponsored wars.
Nevermind, cronyism and imperialism died with the republican ouster and the ushering in of a new, golden, democrat age. Long live cronyism and imperialism.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» True but we didn't expect worse worse. Is asking the "establishment" to even try coming to their
Posted by: maxpayne
» Missing the conflict of interests. You think you voted for someone because of their message.
Posted by: ABetterFuture
» I didn't say that. You're completely misinterpreting what I said.
Posted by: maxpayne
» Nonetheless, the electorate keeps doing the same thing...
Posted by: ABetterFuture
» RE: Nonetheless, the electorate keeps doing the same thing...
Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Missing the conflict of interests. You think you voted for someone because of their message.
Posted by: weathered
» Well, EXCUSE me, but I, indeed have a magical pixie pony!
Posted by: zigy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rgd on Jun 9, 2009 6:43 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The two parties are really one party with the ability to cover both ends of the spectrum while making us believe they are separate.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: CUnknown on Jun 9, 2009 6:47 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Left needs a Ron Paul movement like the Right has. Until the Left wakes up and gets organized enough to fight back, there is no hope for the Democratic party. Whether we go Green or try to win back the Dems is immaterial, but we absolutely have to stop voting for them until they change.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Protest with your wallet.
Posted by: rafaeltoral
Comments are closed-
Posted by: picket on Jun 9, 2009 6:52 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Internet Progressives have the numbers and the $$$$$$$$. The time is NOW.
We must start NOW if it is a possibility. Time is running out. As it is many will never live long enough to see a REAL change.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Honest Question...Is There a Viable Third Party/Independent
Posted by: oregoncharles
» RE: Honest Question...Is There a Viable Third Party/Independent
Posted by: Bliss Doubt
» RE: Honest Question...Is There a Viable Third Party/Independent
Posted by: oregoncharles
» Important things are starting to happen.
Posted by: freelyb
Comments are closed-
Posted by: robertmc on Jun 9, 2009 6:53 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxpayne on Jun 9, 2009 6:56 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Zaratamara on Jun 9, 2009 7:02 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
IRV means you have an all-important SECOND CHOICE at the ballot, so you can RISK voting a third party WITHOUT having your vote DEFAULT TO YOUR LAST CHOICE.
This adjustment to our voting mechanism can also make all the difference when it comes to all this graft and corruption, because the lobbyists and corporate party BRIBERS won't automatically be able to assume that either a Dem or a Repug would win, because with the People having MORE CHOICE, all bets would be off!
I am disappointed that Moyers hasn't been championing this from his advantaged position.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: State by State
Posted by: oregoncharles
» RE: WE NEEED IRV! Break the Stranglehold!
Posted by: ecsd
Comments are closed-
Posted by: james108 on Jun 9, 2009 7:04 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They're the liberal rationalization that holds it together and prevents something better. It's great to try to shape them for the better and demand peace and freedom from fascism, like we would from the republicans. If we think this is new, or the democrats are any the less status quo, and haven't had control of things for years, it's gonna screw us.
It's like supporting terrorism in other countries pushes people into recruitment and creates insurgents out of children. Everyone's responsible for their own actions. Support for "democratic" fascism and big money misdirection recruits republicans, who do the same.
The democrats act weak when it comes to doing right, like the republicans acted dumb. Neither or neither. They're both powerful branches of big money imperialism stifling public discussion of meaningful details with catch phrases, nice speeches and photo ops.
It's good that we can talk like this, but if realistic discussion doesn't get pushed to the mainstream soon we leave it open for Obama's new Internet Czar program to seriously stifle free speech. Although with a media that acts like we never fought one war for oil and the democrats aren't just another party of the elite, murderous imperialism, our options are limited.
This mess relates to the wars too. One of Obama and the democrat's main tasks right now is to drum up military recruitment. Putting people in debt goes greatly towards that, as history has proven. We still need to support Africa pushing China out so they can fight with Russia over more local oil, and swamp Afghanistan with more troops, among other things. National poverty swells military ranks.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: nobyjingo on Jun 9, 2009 7:21 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
NO OTHER POLITICAL PARTY is equipped to remedy the situation, only the Democratic Party, the remedy will have to be done through the Democratic Party, the only institutionalized political left party, and these right-wingers have to be VOTED OUT; there is no other way, THEY WILL NEVER LEAVE ON THEIR OWN, and they will never do anything beneficial for the left, the 70% MAJORITY COMMON POPULATION.
The PRIMARY ELECTION in my state will be July 27, 2010, which is time for ALL PEOPLE LEANING DEMOCRATIC to get registered as Democrats and VOTE ALL POSSIBLE RIGHT-WINGERS out of the "ONE" LEFT POLITICAL PARTY, so WE THE PEOPLE can clean up the political system. Forget any other party and forget the Republican Party, the Republican Party is AUTOCRATIC, NOT DEMOCRATIC. We as a people must zero in on the Democratic Party and vote out all incumbents possible, without fail.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Now you're talking
Posted by: sausage
» RE: Good Luck
Posted by: oregoncharles
» RE: "the only institutionalized political left party"
Posted by: oregoncharles
» RE: And the Dems are REPUBLICANS
Posted by: lawton
» RE: And the Dems are REPUBLICANS
Posted by: lawton
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sausage on Jun 9, 2009 7:31 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In that time the Democratic Party morphed into, what I term, a white, suburban, socially-liberal, economically-conservative party. In part this was due to the Vietnam war--the Republican Party had no room for anti-war activists, primarily suburban, coordinator-class, white males--and the so-called Reagan Revolution--the Republican Party had no room for so-called Rockefeller Republicans, primarily suburban, coordinator-class white males.
So in essence from the end of Lyndon Johnson's administration in 1969 to present the Democratic Party is now the party of Nelson Rockefeller.
True, due to Democratic stances on social issues, the party has made great gains in the African American and Hispanic American communities yet in its soul leading Democrats are committed to the chimera of a "free market" economy with all the fervence of their supposed opposites in the Republican Party.
Point of fact a couple of years ago when the issue of telephone deregulation came up in my state's legislature a Democratic representative said, she wanted the state to lead the parade in deregulation and expected more legislative action on public utility deregulation to follow. Fortunately cooler heads prevailed and further deregulation in my home state is on hold, permanently I hope.
Also on the state level my DLC state senator is active in improving health care access. However he poo-poo's any and all talk of a single payer health care system. Instead his "brilliant" idea is what he calls a "beautiful patchwork quilt" of public and private health insurance. I have news for him, a beautiful patchwork quilt my great-grandmother made for me fell to tatters long ago, but a wool blanket the US Navy issued to my dad in World War II is still good. See the analogy?
By the way while we're on the topic of the credit card usury law My Blue Dog U.S. Representative voted for this piece of shit. He also voted with the Republicans on the bankruptcy deform bill and the "death tax" bill. When a mutual friend asked him why he voted against the average Joe and for big money, Rep Blue dog said if he didn't the Republicans would use it against him in the upcoming campaign!
Look, I've voted straight Democratic ticket since 1972. I've voted for all the losers, McGovern, Carter, Mondale and Dukakis. And the winners Clinton and Obama. But I'm getting a little tired of getting stabbed in the back. I keep thinking a "real" liberal Democrat will rise out of the dung heap and give us a "real" people's party.
I'm always disappointed.
America can solve its energy crisis simply by plugging the electric grid into the graves of William Jennings Bryant, Huey Long, FDR, Harry Truman, JFK, LBJ and Hubert Humphrey. They have to be spinning at the shape the Democratic Party is now in.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The Democratic Party stopped being the "people's" party...
Posted by: kettleblack
» RE: Doing great until the end.
Posted by: oregoncharles
» When the Greens start winnign elections, maybe.
Posted by: sausage
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bliss Doubt on Jun 9, 2009 7:37 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've never once heard this terminology in the mainstream media.
It is what it is.
And yes, Obama took a walk on reform.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: This, from a Christ-ian Nation
Posted by: kettleblack
Comments are closed-
Posted by: FLYING DOOFUS on Jun 9, 2009 7:40 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Ranjit Kumar on Jun 9, 2009 7:53 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Ranjit Kumar on Jun 9, 2009 7:57 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: steven w on Jun 9, 2009 8:21 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: They have us exactly where they want us.
Posted by: ellie
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cahorton on Jun 9, 2009 8:37 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
................
"Whereas the Massachusetts Democratic Party supports the Rule of Law in the federal government and elsewhere; and
"Whereas the Massachusetts Democratic Party reveres the Constitution of the United States and finds abhorrent acts contrary to its intent, such as excessive executive privilege leading to 'preemptive' war and torture
"Therefore be it resolved that the Massachusetts Democratic Party instructs our Congressional delegation to support and work for the appointment of a Special Prosecutor to investigate, and, where appropriate, to hold accountable, any person, including persons at any level of government, who is found to be responsible for willfully violating the laws and the Constitution of the United States, and/or willfully violating the rights of citizens and the rights guaranteed to all persons under international treaties, and/or employing or advocating torture, and/or waging illegal wars with wanton disregard for truth and for the lives and safety of civilians, and/or presenting false testimony, and/or ignoring, bypassing and sabotaging the law, or resolutions and subpoenas issued by the Congress of the United States."
.................
This and many other events at the Convention underscore a growing struggle between the base of the Democratic Party and its leadership for control over its direction and program. However it turns out it is a necessary struggle with potential for good. Don't dismiss it lightly.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Lightly
Posted by: oregoncharles
» Revolutionary patience
Posted by: cahorton
» RE: That's how you build a NEW party, too.
Posted by: oregoncharles
Comments are closed-
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Jun 9, 2009 8:45 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
perhaps caring about the impact of American policies & corruption
UPON BILLIONS OF NON-AMERICANS is a worthy interest?
nah, that's not worth discussing, is it??
If its not about AMERICANS, its just not worth reading, I suppose
can you define a narcissistic culture?
I can.
Perspective.
The Jeff Farias Show: streams FREE & LIVE Mon-Fri, 6-9pmEDT
FREE podcast
"... tolerance of intolerance is cowardice..." ~ Ayaan Hirsi Ali.
"We, two, form a Multitude" ~ Ovid.
"Violence can only be concealed by a Lie, & the Lie can only be maintained by Violence." ... "Any man, who has once proclaimed Violence as his Method, is inevitably forced to take the Lie as his Principle" – Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn.
Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: if AMERICANS have a problem: STOP THE PRESSES!!
Posted by: ellie
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sirios on Jun 9, 2009 9:00 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
PS WTF are the flashing " you have won our hourly prize" ads doing on Alternet ? New lows have been achieved on this site by allowing this crap. Disgusting!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rafaeltoral on Jun 9, 2009 9:04 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You repeat the same mistakes because you fail to learn from history. Heck, you fail to even remember history let alone learn from it.
You teach your children this same mode of thinking and they continue to make the same mistakes you made.
All the while the ultra rich get more powerful. You have less rights, liberties and opportunities. Dont worry about your children being slaves, because you already are slaves.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Most of you dont have a clue.
Posted by: Zeugitai
» What history lessons do think people need to reread?
Posted by: clresu
» RE: What history lessons do think people need to reread?
Posted by: rafaeltoral
» RE: What history lessons do think people need to reread?
Posted by: clresu
» It seems that.
Posted by: rafaeltoral
» RE: A Violent Revolution (1)
Posted by: clresu
» RE: A Violent Revolution (2)
Posted by: clresu
» Perhaps you will clue us in...
Posted by: zigy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: oregoncharles on Jun 9, 2009 9:16 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
www.gp.org
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: monkeywrench on Jun 9, 2009 9:26 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One way would be to expose – advertise – the financial corruption of Congress. Put out ads documenting how much in graft ... er..."campaign contributions" each person in Congress collects from each lobbying group, cross-referenced with which way they voted on issues those lobbyists work for.
Another, more difficult, move would be to bury Washington in people: send huge delegations of citizens who would both lobby and get across the point to our esteemed legislators that "business as usual" CANNOT be carried out in Washington until The People who put them there are supported.
The choices are difficult; but we as a nation are in a similar situation to where blacks stood before the Civil Rights movement and the marches of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. in the '60's – and this time, the destruction of our lives directly affects ALL of us. I'm afraid that, with Congress' corruption at an all-time high and Washington D.C. completely bought-and-paid-for by Big Business, it will take nothing less than a peaceful and legal – but MASSIVE – new civil rights movement to get results. We have been abandoned by our legislators who, I believe, are in the clutches of a de-facto "shadow government" of wealthy insiders.
At this point in our history, however, two things should be obvious: that letters to the editor, calls to Congresspeople and complaining to eachother are not getting the job done; and, more critically, that usurious interest rates/predatory lending, coupled with the most individually expensive and predatory healthcare system in the industrialized world, along with cruel bankruptcy laws that guarantee the creation of indentured servants and shattered lives, will destroy this nation if allowed to stand. A nation that is democratic but horribly oppressed, financially and psychologically, by its own corrupt elite, even if it maintains a modicum of other freedoms, cannot endure. No democratic nation under these conditions ever has. That would require a dictatorship – a possible future that, maybe, we also should be worrying about if we don't right our own ship.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I agree, but we need to be informed on what works and what doesn't
Posted by: clresu
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Ghoulman on Jun 9, 2009 9:28 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Seemed appropriate to post this.
The Democrats are still stuck in the Free Market ideology that, since the 80s, has been the only capitalism in Washington. And has been the philosophy that has brought us to todays economic collapse.
A return to common sense capitalism (think FDR) that has basic protections of competition, regulation, law, and utility for the stability and slow growth of the nation (not the hyper-growth free-for-all of the banks on Wall Street) is the only sane economy. An economy that looks into the far future instead of creating depression and dept upon our children.
The power must come from government, not the banks. But it's the banks that are calling the shots thanks to the Democrats still being stuck on the Free Market religion, just like the Republicans are.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» END THE FED
Posted by: CUnknown
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on Jun 9, 2009 9:30 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Looie the Lender was more honest
Posted by: Drclaw
Comments are closed-
Posted by: clresu on Jun 9, 2009 9:43 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
35 million worldwide protested the Iraq war before it even started, which was unheard of both in numbers and in being before the war even began. This set a U.S. and worldwide record. It achieved absolutely nothing. Yes, Bush was in office, but it likely wouldn't have mattered who was in office.
You can protest things that aren't concerned with finance & imperialism and possibly get a result, but when it comes to protesting wars and imperialism and financial matters there is a highly, highly likely chance that nothing will change.
Also, it's close to impossible to get the info out that the masses need to reach the kind of momentum necessary for achieving a positive result. Corporate media won't let it through, and as alternative info grows in availability - info that might produce a change in the status quo - corporate media goes on ahead and tweaks there coverage so that the alt news is undercut before it reaches enough people.
"Let's pressure the democrats" is a strategy that hasn't worked very well in the past. Someone posted a pretty good link on another thread the other day to questionwar.com . . . there's an article there entitled "liberal holocaust," which goes through the deaths/slaughters that took place under democrats and liberals . . . I already knew the number was high, but, as usual, it was even worse than I thought. I bring this up just to say, the idea of appealing (intellectually or emotionally) to a group of people who can consistently kill innocent people (think Iraqi children under the sanctions) is a rather depressing and silly thought.
The green party is appealing, but as I've said elsewhere, it'd damn near take a revolution to get one in office. The media would have to radically change, for one, and everyone knows how likely that is. The only viable way for a green party candidate to get elected is for him or her to sell out.
Civil Rights legislation was passed not after protesting or emotional appeals or intellectual appeals but rather after weeks of rioting. It goes to show what the state is apt to respond to.
"Voting with your wallet" is another strategy that Peter Gelderlos in "How Nonviolence Protects the State" argues is not effective enough on its own to produce the desired result. I do vote with my wallet, but as a poster above said, "the bigger the wallet, the bigger the vote" - which means my vote is very, very small. The problem with this strategy, while I don't discourage it (or any others), is that corporations have, to use the phrase, a much bigger wallet. & By the way, "voting with your wallet" is part of a bigger nonviolent strategy that's called something to the effect of "building an alternative lifestyle," which means relying on locals for good, independent news, local farmers for food, and so forth . . . it's a "live as you'd have others live" strategy, to some degree. Once again, I'm all for it, but I don't know how much change it'll produce . . . or rather if it's likely to produce the large changes we need soon: lower carbon footprint, ending war, addressing hunger and water shortages, etc.
These aren't things that are enjoyable to point out, but I believe everyone here who has a problem with healthcare or war or media or any other thing ought to bear in mind what the state responds to and what it doesn't respond to.
&, By the way, personally I still believe in non-violence, I've just come to realize it's not very likely to produce much.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» 5% will get the Green Party in the game!
Posted by: Alan8
» RE: Third Parties
Posted by: clresu
» Parties are easy pinpoints of corruption
Posted by: james108
» I mean Baldwin :)
Posted by: james108
» RE: Highly doubtful that protests will bring change
Posted by: ecsd
» Read "How Non-Violence Protects the State" by Peter Gelderlos
Posted by: clresu
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Alan8 on Jun 9, 2009 10:09 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Excuse me -- They ALREADY chose to screw their constituents by not voting on it!
Yet another disgusting example of how the corporate-funded Democrats have been selling us out for decades.
This betrayal of citizens by Democrats is repeated in virtually every area, from health care to job outsourcing. Yet the average ignorant American liberal continues to vote for them.
Get a clue: The corporate-funded Democrats (like the corporate-funded Republicans) ARE NOT ON OUR SIDE!
You keep them in power with your votes. Voting Green or Socialist is the only way to send them a wake-up call.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: a losers game
Posted by: clresu
» RE: a losers game
Posted by: Alan8
» RE: a losers game
Posted by: clresu
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Pop on Jun 9, 2009 10:16 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Heathcare
Posted by: ecsd
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Southern Gal on Jun 9, 2009 10:54 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: zrants on Jun 9, 2009 11:03 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If corporate America is allowed to set prices at unreasonable levels, we can refuse to buy their services.
If enough citizens quit using credit cards and quit paying for optional health care programs that don't deliver the care they promise, corporate America will have no choice but to change.
We keep hearing that the market should be left alone to correct itself. We are the market so let's do the correcting. Buy local products. Support your local farmers and manufacturing base. Pay with cash. Barter when you can.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Zeugitai on Jun 9, 2009 11:37 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No, the Dems will not "shape up." They are the powerful playing the game of the powerful by its rules and this is a matter of structure and national institution. These are inflexible matters. But the powerless cannot conceive of themselves as valueless, insignificant, negligible. One of them at one time wrote that all men are created equal, and they wave this document in the air as they cry. But it never really was and never really will be. Only the relatively "privileged" whites of America will attempt to argue this point, and their cries of protest do not matter. No, people will not "wake up"; no, they will not unify; no, they cannot grow tall and see the world as it is above the level of their mouse holes. No, the Dems will not shape up. No, the Repubs will not become human. No, the corporations and banks that run this world will not have a change of heart. Any argument predicated upon tigers changing their stripes is self-mooting.
Now get back to the hunt for cheese. . .
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wormfarmer on Jun 9, 2009 11:41 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: solrev on Jun 9, 2009 12:24 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Option one; have the government buy insurance for the uninsured, currently covered by Medicaid.
Option two; pass a law forcing everyone to purchase affordable health insurance, and tax benefits to help pay the cost of affordable health insurance, currently covered by Medicaid.
Option three; create a public healthcare insurance, which will lead the way to single payer. Economic affects would be minimal because the change would take place slowly.
If Obama signs anything but option three, we should start an “impeach Obama” movement. Not representing the people should be a high crime.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: A. Z. Arrow on Jun 9, 2009 12:48 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Any attempt at mandatory and obligatory “private insurance” will backfire. Subsidies are not a substitute for real coverage.
America needs to join the civilized and industrial nations.
Plain and simple, that means a Universal Single-Payer insurance plan for all Americans.
This week’s European Parliamentary elections moved that body to the extreme fascistic RIGHT because the labor and Democratic parties in Europe keep coming up with non-solutions in their bid to “triangulate,” their effort to expand government power without accountability, to hang on to office while undermining progressive solutions, and by actively blocking progressive appointments within their governments in favor of their subservient version of the status-quo. The reason for this leap to fascism according to the BBC is the failure of laborites to enforce the distinction between “legal” citizens and “illegal” refugees. Voters did not go to the polls within nations that did not protect their citizen’s jobs nor provided sound programmatic economic “security.”
In the US, the Clintonoid pro-insurance-company “Health Care” scheme is one more example of why people become frustrated with the Democratic Party, and with their pro-corporate, and pro-capitalist liberal ideology. Change this, or the Democrats will become irrelevant on the morrow. Sounds impossible, doesn’t it? You had better look closely at the European elections.
For leftist and progressives the alarm bells are ringing!
The government bankrupting of American Auto producers while bailing out Banksters, crooks, and Billionaires is insane!
The time has come to close down shop on the Military/Contract/Complex and to create a non-war human centered economy.
For many newly unemployed American workers its’ either guaranteed socio-economic equality with protection of citizen Rights, and, especially, good paying jobs, or it is bust, and, perhaps, extreme political reaction.
Alternative to fascism: Onward to socialism, on to democratization of the Federal Reserve and to nationalizing of the US currency > with an eye towards the rapid re-industrialization of America . OR, otherwise, it could get very ugly.
I for one will never click my heels and shout “Sig-Heil” at the finance-capitalist bastards, at media liars, at the rulers of the corporate police state, at pirate bankers and thieves that steal wealth created by the public for personal use. (Change . . . What Change? The ship of state is still being piloted by lobbyist, and social wealth is still being pirated by corporate lawyers and by most of the “representatives” and elected officials in DC, and by a fully-armed sleazy group of aggressive warmongers beyond.)
Have a good day,
A.Z. Arrow
---------->
June 09,2009
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: reelman on Jun 9, 2009 2:06 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My lack of experience, my questionable ethics, my monstrous ego, and my association with evil doers are of no consequence.
One lone reporter asked, "That shouldn't be, isn't that Marxist policy?" And she was banished from the kingdom! Then a citizen asked, "With no foreign relations experience and having zero military experience or knowledge, how will you deal with radical terrorists?" And "The One" said, "Simple. I shall sit with them and talk kindly to them and show them how nice we really are; and they will forget that they ever wanted to kill us all!"
Then "The One" said, "I shall give 95% of you lower taxes." And one, lone voice said, "But 40% of us don't pay ANY taxes."
Then "The One" said, "I shall tax your Capital Gains when you sell your homes!" And the people yawned and the already slumping housing market fully collapsed. And He said, "I shall mandate employer-funded health care for EVERY worker and raise the minimum wage, and lower the white collar wage. And I shall also give every person unlimited healthcare and medicine and even transportation to the free clinics." And the people said, "Give me some of that!"
Then "The One" said, "I shall bankrupt the coal industry, and perhaps even the oil industry (Cap & Trade/Carbon Tax) and though electricity rates will skyrocket, we shall soon build wind farms and solar power stations and drive green cars that I shall mandate in Detroit!"
So "The One" said, "Not to worry. If your rebate ($10/week) isn't enough to cover your extra expenses ($3,000/year), we shall bail you out. Just sign up with ACORN and your troubles are over!" "Only the fat cats will have to pay." Then He said, "Illegal immigrants feel scorned and slighted. Let's grant them amnesty, Social Security, free education, free lunches, free medical care, bi-lingual signs and guaranteed housing..."
And so it came to pass that employers, facing spiraling costs and ever-higher taxes, raised their prices and laid off workers; though they sold much less of their products. Others simply gave up and went out of business, and the economy sank like unto a rock dropped from a cliff. The banking industry was destroyed. Manufacturing slowed to a crawl. And more of the people were without a means of support.
So "The One" again blamed the prior administration, extended unemployment benefits to a year, bailed out his favorite banks, and then took over the banks and auto industries. "The One" said, "I am the "The One" - The Messiah - and I'm here to save you! We shall just print more money so the government will have enough!" "Surely one trillion dollars will make everyone happy." And immediately the Fed complied and the money presses roared. And China reconsidered their one trillion dollars of loans to the US ,, and threatened to call in their debts.
Other foreign trading partners said unto "The One", "Wait a minute. Your dollar is not worth a pile of camel dung! You will have to pay more.. for everything.. as your dollar becomes worth less." And the people said, "Wait a minute.. That is unfair!!" And the world said, "Neither are these other idiotic programs you have embraced.
Lo, you have become a Socialist state and a second-rate power. What factories are not owned by your government are owned by us. Now you shall play by our rules!" And "The One" said "Americans are arrogant, divisive, and derisive!" "We will listen."
And the people cried out, "Alas, alas!! What have we done?"
And the people beat their chests in despair and cried out in anguish, "Give us back our nation and our pride and our hope!!
This is NOT a fairy tale, its happening RIGHT NOW.....SUCKAS
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Amy27605 on Jun 9, 2009 2:12 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good grief!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ecsd on Jun 9, 2009 2:53 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Like it or not, if we need to in order to get our way, we'll have to demand at a grassroots level that people don't vote for ANYONE who makes more than $100,000 per year or who owns more than $100,000 in wealth. That will fix things in a hurry. Then we'll be represented by "people like us", and apparently, not until we do this.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Gentle Axeman on Jun 9, 2009 3:16 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I did not vote Obama, because what he promised to all and sundry, simply could not be done....
Unless he and the Dems really kicked some butt...
Pick yer siren call, and it ain't gonna happen...
I went the other way, because he wasn't lying as much...maybe woulda been worse, but at this point really can't see that...
Same issues, same problems next election...
We might just remember that.....
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: artie on Jun 9, 2009 3:42 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Dems will not shape up.
Thus:
We're Screwed on Everything From Health Care to the Economy.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lulugeez on Jun 9, 2009 3:46 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A couple months ago Rep. John Dingell came to an Ann Arbor Dem. Party meeting. He touted his support for the House’s credit card “reform" bill; assuring us that he opposed those “outrageous fees”. I asked for clarification. Did that mean, at long last we are saved? An end to usury? That limits would be set on interest rates? "No, no, we couldn't do that", Big John responded. I noticed that his spouse was not in attendance and wondered if she had gotten herself kidnapped. How else to explain the crushing impotence, our little rep who “couldn’t”?
Sen. Debbie Stabenow--who has a long, (probably permanent) tenure, on the list of Political Sows of the World-- helped draft and pass the 2005 Bankruptcy “Reform” bill. More recently, as Greider reported, voted against an interest rate cap proposed by Bernie Sanders. I believe she will actually show her face in Michigan sometime again, claiming to be a sow of the people. And why not? The Michigan Dems. will likely re-nominate her. The logic is, alas, unassailable: though she is but a sow, she is our sow. So much for brand Democrat.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Right on the mark! Lipstick for all the swine!
Posted by: kettleblack
Comments are closed-
Posted by: reelman on Jun 9, 2009 4:00 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who just spent a trillion? Who just forced 9 trillion in debt on us? Who just 4x the budget debt in his first budget?
This, as others are saying, is simply code for…..drum roll….many big taxes from the Party of Taxes! Bet you didn’t see that coming. Okay, voters for JCO did not see it coming but the thinkers (not the feelers, the Oz Landers) have the common sense to realize the vote-buying is over on our VISA. Now its coming out of your 2010 paycheck.
Its ALWAYS part of the democrat strategy to assume you dropped out in 7th grade.
That you missed the Jimmah Carter Misery Index Era.
That you think massive borrowing has no consequences.
That economic laws and history never matter.
That inflation is a myth.
That there is always a free lunch.
Here come the predicted taxes on top of 9.4% unemployment…ya like ya 401k balance this month?…SUCKAS.
http://conservablogs.com/theconservativecrawfish
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: FrankChurch on Jun 9, 2009 5:29 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Ebony on Jun 9, 2009 7:37 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cori on Jun 9, 2009 8:50 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
