Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Is Larry Summers Taking Kickbacks From the Banks He's Bailing Out?

By Mark Ames, AlterNet. Posted May 29, 2009.


Why did Goldman Sachs, Citigroup and Morgan Stanley steer millions to a company Larry Summers directed while he administered "stress tests" on them?

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Nobel Laureate Slams the Bible, Calls It "A Catalogue of Cruelties"
Mario de Queiroz

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
As Foreclosure Nightmares Increase, Will More Homeowners Pay Off Their Bankers in Violence?
Scott Thill

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Despite Censorship By Beef Magnate, Michael Pollan Spreads Message About the Real Price of Cheap Food

Health and Wellness:
Do We Really Want to Enshrine Insurance Monopoly into Law? This and 5 Other Complaints About the Health Bill
John Nichols

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
How Biased Media Can Brainwash You
Melinda Burns

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
4 Ways the Stupak Amendment Deprives Women of Access to Abortion
Jessica Arons

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Fetus-Shaped Potatoes? Going Undercover Inside the Weird World of Right-Wing Abortion Foes
Ann Neumann

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
Instant Sex: Has the Digital Age Destroyed Relationships or Made Them Better?
Vanessa Richmond

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
With Unemployment at 40 Percent, Afghan Teens Enlist in Army, Police
Lal Aqa Sherin

More stories by Mark Ames

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Is Larry Summers taking kickbacks from the banks he’s bailing out?

Last month, a little-known company where Summers served on the board of directors received a $42 million investment from a group of investors, including three banks that Summers, Obama’s effective “economy czar,” has been doling out billions in bailout money to: Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, and Morgan Stanley. The banks invested into the small startup company, Revolution Money, right at the time when Summers was administering the “stress test” to these same banks.

A month after they invested in Summers’ former company, all three banks came out of the stress test much better than anyone expected -- thanks to the fact that the banks themselves were allowed to help decide how bad their problems were (Citigroup “negotiated” down its financial hole from $35 billion to $5.5 billion.)

The fact that the banks invested in the company just a few months after Summers resigned suggests the appearance of corruption, because it suggests to other firms that if you hire Larry Summers onto your board, large banks will want to invest as a favor to a politically-connected director.

Last month, it was revealed that Summers, whom President Obama appointed to essentially run the economy from his perch in the National Economic Council, earned nearly $8 million in 2008 from Wall Street banks, some of which, like Goldman Sachs and Citigroup, were now receiving tens of billions of taxpayer funds from the same Larry Summers. It turns out now that those two banks have continued paying into Summers-related businesses.

According to filings obtained for this story, Summers first joined the board of directors of Revolution Money back in 2006 (when it was called “GratisCard”), the same year that Summers was forced to resign as president of Harvard after his disastrous tenure. Revolution Money/GratisCard was a startup headed by former AOL chief Steve Case. Revolution Money billed itself as the Next Big Thing in online payment, “PayPal meets Mastercard,” according to their own pitch.

In September 2007, Revolution Money announced that it had raised $50 million from a group of investors including Citigroup, Morgan Stanley and Deutsche Bank. Some found the investment strange even then, because normally big banks don’t get involved in seeding small startups -- that’s the domain of venture capitalists, not mega-banks. Especially not in September, 2007, when these same megabanks were Chernobyling their way into full-fledged balance-sheet meltdown.

What seems clear is that at least part of Revolution Money’s success in raising funds is due to their star-studded board of directors -- which included not only Larry Summers, but also the notorious Frank Raines, the former Fannie Mae chief whom Time Magazine named to its “25 People To Blame For The Financial Crisis” list. Raines is still a board member.

Over the next year and a half, Revolution Money didn’t quite live up to its promise of competing with PayPal or Visa/Mastercard. At least some of this could be attributed to the difficulty of starting up an online credit card company in the middle of a triple-cluster credit crunch, banking crisis and recession. But there is also evidence that the company wasn’t run well. Another one of Steve Case’s “Revolution” brand startups, “Revolution Health,” (which also features a star-studded board of directors including Carly Fiorina, Colin Powell, and several future-Obama Administration officials) essentially folded last autumn when it was sold to Everyday Health last September and merged into that company’s operations.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: obama, white house, citigroup, goldman sachs, larry summers, revolution money, national economic council

Read more of Mark Ames at the Exiled. He is the author of Going Postal: Rage, Murder, and Rebellion: From Reagan's Workplaces to Clinton's Columbine and Beyond.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Gee, Summers helps run DC "Bail Outs" for Wall Street? Sounds like "Conspiracy Theory"
Posted by: Mister_PsyOps on May 29, 2009 1:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My, my...

Next they'll tell us 9/11 was a CoverUp crime and false-flag job. And that drunken Arabs with dollar store tools had about as much to do with 9/11 as Elvis did at the Chicago Fire.

Here's an interesting little quote:

“Obama is Bilderberg’s obedient little boy. He’ll follow orders.”
Jim Tucker (editor American Free Press and Bilderberg investigator. Quoted in Politico magazine - 5/26/09)

With old David Rockefeller-Kissinger CFR proteges Paul Volker, Tim Geithner (despite recent denials by Geither), Larry Summers , Richard Holbrooke, James Steinberg, etc, at this years secret Bildeberg meet those words may be the revelation of the times...

Oh, last and not least - arch NeoCons Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz as architects of phony 1,000 lie old 9/11 "war on terror" on Iraq and Afghanistan were at the secretive Bilderberg meet-up.

Bilderberg 2009 (Politico)

Ah, but maybe the Logan Act wasn't broken. I'm sure they were all just comparing tan lines and vacation homes at their ultra-high security secret summit, not global policy. No, nothing to see here folks. (yeah...)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

OF COURSE HE IS...
Posted by: joeocho88 on May 29, 2009 2:11 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just like the kickbacks in the way of campaign contributions that Al Gore picked up in the Buddhist monastery and like Clinton got from the Red Chinese...

Not surprising when you consider he went to RUSSIA under the aegis of being a RHODES SCHOLAR and the lady who was later to head the Communist Czech secret service was right there with him...

WHO DOES BILL CLINTON KNOW

IF BILL CLINTON CAN GET MONEY --NOW HILLARY CAN BE HIS BAG LADY EQUALLY AND SOLICIT THOSE CONTRIBUTIONS TO HIS AND FORMER PRESIDENT GEORGE HERBERT WALKER BUSH'S "CHARITABLE FOUNDATION| ( They will only accept cash contributions)...

I AM SURE SOME BERNIE MADOFF APPRENTICE OF A SCUMBAG would be amendable to BRIBES.

When given the choice of taking the money OR being killed if he exposed their plots, I am SURE he made the wise choice and took the money.

THIS INTERNATIONAL CARTEL OF FINANCIERS AND BANKERS CONSTITUTE THE NEW WORLD ORDER --they ARE the ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT!

This officious little yuppie is only ONE of MANY of their minions and it was left up to George H.W. "Poppy" Bush to come in here and set things up for them after his mentor NIXON messed up...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not to worry
Posted by: Perry Logan on May 29, 2009 2:25 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't worry. Republicans are nowhere near as shy to prosecute as Democrats.

I'm sure that--when they take office in 2012--the Jeb Bush Administration will prosecute members of the Obama Administration to the fullest extent of the law.


Da Banksta tells all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» LIEberman laughs in your face Posted by: weathered
» RE: Not to worry Posted by: scootmandubious
Two-faced One Party System...
Posted by: popeurbanxxiii on May 29, 2009 6:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Same as it ever was. Same as it ever was. Same as it ever was..." --David Byrne

Well, I guess it's "[Spare] Change we can believe in" for the masses and trillions of dollars for the incestuous, fraudulent, scheming bankers.

The best way for the Republicans to come out on top in the next election cycle would be for millions of voters to get completely turned off by the glaring hypocracy of the Democrats.

Why turn out and vote when all that accomplishes is putting a new face on the same old S#%t! This story just adds more weight to the perception that Obama is morphing into "W lite" (registered trademark of the Democratic Party LLC).

Obama is also caving on Guantanamo, indefinite detention, military tribunals. He's cowering before Mr. 23% approval rating -- Darth Cheney. Welcome to "Scaredy-Cat Nation"! (joint venture of the Republican Party LLC and Democratic Party LLC)

Dolus,furtum, sis Nobis
Pope Urban XXIII

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The future is what you make it
Posted by: mkdelta69 on May 29, 2009 7:12 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Perry your negativity is surprising with your excellent videos. This is participatory democracy. Don't loose the belief that you can defeat DA Bankstas. Take back access and power.

"The first person or group to quit looses"


"If the game continues then you just have to play it smarter, better and harder"


"How much of the negative energy people are ready to throw the towel in?"


My Life Motto:


"I'm telling you where I'm going to go. And I dare you to stop me."


Where do you want to go?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» sorta but yeah... Posted by: james108
Duh
Posted by: JDutty6 on May 29, 2009 7:19 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
OF course he is taking money. You dont think he is in it for his health do you? Money, its what makes the world go round. Politics as usual!

RT
Privacy Center

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Duh= Identity theft alert Posted by: surfreality
Rhetorical Question
Posted by: alexandra_hamilton on May 29, 2009 7:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That doesn't require an answer as the answer is blatantly obvious.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sadly
Posted by: JSquercia on May 29, 2009 8:21 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sadly ,it certainly appears that the Bailout is being run by the same crooks who looted the system . At the same time people who could effectively run the system are being Shut OUT of any role . Summers , Rubin ,Geithner and the sainted Greenspan were all part of the crowd who told us that we didn't need antiquated laws restricting the creativity of our Financial System . The free market would self regulate not too worry . Of that group only Greenspan has admitted he was WRONG .

These guys helped create the too big to fail model by repealing the Roosevelt Era Glass Steagil Act . The act had kept the industries of Commercial Banking , Investment Banking , and Insurance Companies Separated . As Elisabeth Warren pointed out prior to that law the country had suffered from a boom to bust on regular 15 year cycles . Once Roosevelt changed the rules we avoided them for over 50 years .
We have an SEC that is totally clueless they were notified numerous times concerning Madoff
but they chose to ignore the warnings . Most of the members were lawyers with no financial training and were content to look whether the i's were dotted and the t's were crossed. This is the fellow who should be running the SEC

I saw an interview with the man who supervised the S&L cleanup ,I believe his name is Black ,
and he says the approach is entirely wrong and in his opinion even in conflict with laws passed after the S&L scandal .

Lastly there is Brooksley Born who tried to regulate derivatives only to be forced out by the aforementioned geniuses who declared the market would magically value these investment vehicles .

So we have the people with expertise and talent sitting outside unused while the very people who were WRONG every step of the way get to fix the mess the created . Even more frightening is their solution seems to be enlarging the very institutions deemed to big to fail .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

broken banking system supported by Obama
Posted by: poppaphil2007 on May 29, 2009 8:36 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is exactly the same kind of bullshit that brought our economy down in the first place. Obama has been misled, even blinded, by the economic team of Summers/Geithner he hired to fix the banking system.
I can tell you, as a citizen of the United States, that the banking system is far from fixed. Obama has been wrong to ignore the advice of Paul Krugman, and others, who have advocated government takeover of the banks and restructuring of the entire banking system. Instead, the banks have taken billions in bailout money, but their lending and foreclosure practices are largely unchanged. Mr Obama needs to step outside the box, fire the incompetent Geithner and the nefarious Summers, and re-create our banks as agents of public service.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Misreality Posted by: james108
Summers is a creep and a crook...
Posted by: RegK on May 29, 2009 8:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...and he has powerful friends. Robert Rubin propped Summers up at Harvard even after his gaffes and goofiness made Harvard a laughingstock, hurt competition for recruiting both top students and great faculty, and damaged fundraising among alums. It was the last that finally got him sacked--money, money, money.

To the absolute astonishment of people who actually know and have tried to work with Summers, Obama put this nut in charge. Surely Obama knew better--who pressured Obama to do this? The Clinton machine?-- Now Summers can loot the Treasury for himself and his pals, just the was Cheney/Bush/Snow did. And there's no difference between the parties on this one--they're all crooked thieves.

The economists who should be in charge are Krugman, Stieglitz, and Reich, not the discredited free-marketeers who created the problems to begin with. Thanks to the free-market religionists the US is now a third world country with a dangerously strong military. This arrangement never bodes well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» This is how they do it!!! Posted by: foius
So Much Talent Going to Waste
Posted by: Southern Gal on May 29, 2009 8:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With knowledgable people like Roubini, Krugman, Galbraith, Black, and others out there, you'd think that Obama could pick better financial advisors to develop plans to save our economy. Politicians and the power and money hungry people that surround them be dammed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You've got to be joking, right.........
Posted by: Spiritgirl on May 29, 2009 8:51 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Imagine that Larry Summers taking kickbacks, what a concept! Wake up people you've been asleep for soooo long that the thought that these people are really only "working" for their own benefits is an anathema to you! Come on, this is not "rocket science", over the last 30 years even as the economy was prospering - the average American hasn't been - yet the moneyed elite have continued to make out like the bandits and thieves that they are! What makes you think good ole Larry isn't leading the way!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wall Streeters
Posted by: Solar Wind on May 29, 2009 9:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
cannot and will not help us out of the very mess they created. I'm aghast and appalled and very, very disappointed that Obama has chosen to keep these greedy, incompetent bastards in place. Is anyone else as sick of incompetence leading this country in every damn way? It truly is now not "what you know" but "who you know" and those "who's" are equally stupid. God forbid you hire anyone who just might have a brain.

Having working for a start-up company in 2000 that had a product very much like Revolution Money I can tell you for a fact that our capital came from Venture Capitalists not BIG Banks - that is not their game; oh, I forget, it's all one big game now and the average U.S. citizen is getting his butt handed to him.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

IS THAT A REAL QUESTION?
Posted by: VZEQICVA on May 29, 2009 9:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If we're still asking ourselves questions like this one, then we haven't been paying attenton. Consider what got us to this point. One set of people robbing the people blind and another set of people letting it all happen. We have billiant serious auditors who ought to be in charge of examining banks. Larry Summers is no dope, but he has a vested interest in the outcome. He's the wrong man for the job. We're having doubts for very good reason. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So? What now?
Posted by: willymack on May 29, 2009 9:24 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nice bit of factual information, sprinkeled through with lots of speculation. I don't think there's any doubt among those of us who actually think about it that the collapse and subsequent "bailouts" are nothing other than grand theft on a scale heretofore unseen in history. So? what now?
Is that all there is?
Is that all there is?
If that's all there is, my friend
Then, let's keep dancing.
Let's break out the booze
And have a ball
If that's all there is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: So? What now? Posted by: blogfrog
» It's just the beginning Posted by: james108
Rider3
Posted by: rider3 on May 29, 2009 11:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He probably will take kickbacks...and then some. I don't trust this guy at all and was very disappointed when Obama chose him. Being from Boston, I've read a lot about Summers. It will take some time, but this guy will show you just how low he can go. Believe me on this. He's no good and is only out for himself and the all mighty dollar.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another monster with ties to the President
Posted by: Jaffe on May 29, 2009 12:30 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At least as puzzling as retaining Bush's man Gates as Secretary of Defense (and we see the damage he's done already), was Obama's choice of Summers to make the big money decisions in a period of financial meltdown.

Summers has been an ogre wherever he's been, including his ill-fated tenure as president of Harvard.

He's conservative, corrupt, and oppressively ugly. One hopes that Obama has the good sense to deep-six him soon. Very soon.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I JUST EMAILED THIS TO SEN PAT LEAHY HEAD OF THE JUDICIAL COMMITTEE
Posted by: cori on May 29, 2009 1:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And you should too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama good, everyone who points out he is a larcenous thief, bad.
Posted by: johnwinthrop on May 29, 2009 3:08 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He has nice teeth. He is smart, or at least he went to Harvard and Columbia. He hangs with smart folks like Larry Summers and not yokels from Texas.

Lay off Obama. If you criticize him, you must be a, hrumph, hrumph, a racist. Because smart black guys are good. And we owe black people big. What's that? Obama isn't black? He's culturally white and biologically half white? And went to all private schools that are mostly white. Racist! /Racist!

And Larry Summers is a Jew who ran Harvard. And Harvard is Good. Because most of the professor are for good things. Like spending lots of money for people who have no money. And will have no money after all the Harvard programs are finished. Funny. They used to have a prof at Harvard. Daniel Patrick Moynihan. He said giving lots of federal money wouldn't solve blacks' problems. He thought blacks should behave more like whites. Moynihan was called a racist by people like Obama Bad Boy. Moynihan was originally a poor irish kid. poor irish kids don't know what poverty is like poor black kids. Because they fight their way through poverty and don't whine about "racism". Thank god we have larry summers and barack obama. Our jewish and black rulers will tell us what to do,which is pay up whitey and shut up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» shoot the idea, not the speaker Posted by: johnwinthrop
'by their deeds you will know them'
Posted by: weathered on May 29, 2009 3:41 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Denial is very cruel, it interupts the association between cause and effect.

Larry takes a piss all over conflict of interest.
Any honorable, class-act in puplic service would firewall themselves from a 'stress-test' process.

Nice scholarship Lawrence, you'd steal a hot stove and then write a paper on it, how not to burn yourself.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

BlogFrog
Posted by: blogfrog on May 29, 2009 4:22 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is a reason why the Russian people did away with the czars. Czars are autocrats that care only about what is good for them and their cronies...those willing to stand in front of them and take the hit.

Is it any surprise that a wall (emphasis on the small "w") street / beltway insider muckity muck won't change his behavior...even on the biggest stage under the brightest lights possible?

Greed and power are as addictive as crack cocaine. Mr Summers may be hooked on a speedball diet of both and damn the torpedos...all that matters is getting a steady dose.

I'm sure, if this is the case, that he sees / rationalizes it as a public service fee that he deserves for his selfless actions on the part of all us little people.

Arrogance beyond belief...can you feel the disease?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: BlogFrog Posted by: weathered
» RE: BlogFrog Posted by: dArKeR
Monster
Posted by: dumdumboy on May 29, 2009 6:51 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The key point is in the last paragraph: now it's up to us to force this guy outta there.

He was a terrible choice to begin with, just the same as Shrub's industry insiders in charge of regulating the self-same industries. There ought to be a law against such.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bonkers Is Number One In The UK Music Charts This Week
Posted by: tony_opmoc on May 29, 2009 8:55 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bonkers

Just thought I'd share it with you

Tony

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Of course Larry Summers is taking kick backs.
Posted by: rafaeltoral on May 30, 2009 8:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Tim Geihtners chief of staff was a lobbyist for Goldman Sachs. And the list goes on and on of total blatant conflicts of interest.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

OF COURSE!
Posted by: exoevolution on May 30, 2009 2:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is Larry Summers taking kick backs from the the banks he is bailing out?

OF COURSE!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Recall Milo Minderbender and the Piece of the Action
Posted by: lorenzodimedici1 on May 30, 2009 5:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
'...and we all get a piece of the action!'

That is the key to how Wall Street works. You clip off your piece and pass on the risk to others.

The policy changes in the 1990s under Bill Clinton set the stage for the unraveling of the US financial system. There were two critical steps:

First - undo the benefit of Glass-Steagall by allowing underregulated organizations to play with public money by shifting risk without accountability. That played out in the great CDO fiasco last fall.

Second - push social engineering without accountability onto the GSEs. That was a great vehicle for those CDO peddlers to partner up with and kill equity all over the world.

They set up an unstable system that was far more prone to unpriced downside risk. Think of that as the current sick echo of how the prior bout of deregulation screwed the country in the 1980s - allow assets and liabilities to move apart in unequal ways with significantly different reactions to any perturbation and you get disintermediation and the S&L problem.

Who is to blame for the current mess? - Start with Alan Greenspan (in thrall to Ayn Rand), then toss in Bob Rubin and Larry Summers.

Also add Hank Greenberg and his AIG kleptocrats for good measure.

Then ask why nobody has called the rating agency drones on the carpet to answer for their role in juicing non-existent returns. They were part of a modern variant of a Ponzi scheme but nobody seems to want to call them out on that.

By the way, Barney Frank and his fellow two-faced politicians rolled over for ACORN and every other 'activist' group to force the Community Reinvestment Act onto the country. That was a giant mistake waiting to happen.

Their seemingly noble goals ignored the execution of the plan - people have to be able to pay for the mortgage payment, and should have some skin in the game. Otherwise, they are playing with the house's money - read Your Money and My Money because we taxpayers end up footing the bill for that folly.

There is a tendency to think that anyone that went to Harvard and/or worked at Goldman can walk on water. They watch out for their own, as you can see when looking at who was shielded from the most egregious impacts of the losses and counter-party risks.

Why should they get a pass when others don't? The answer is that they set up that Catch-22 so they get to influence how the endgame works.

How Summers got rehabilitated in the public eye to return to power is nauseating. Compound that with having to listen to that speech-challenged Frank and his outright lies.

Is there really nobody else capable of providing policy recommendations to our President? He is bringing change, so perhaps he can get away from that Bos-Wash axis of arrogance, hubris and incompetence that has caused such lasting damage over the past 20+ years.

God Help Us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Poisoning the water hole
Posted by: GregH on May 31, 2009 9:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We elect the crooks and the elected appoint fellow crooks. Senator Feinstein’s husband has collected millions directly from her bills. Congressman Murtha’s brother and nephew have collected millions from his bills. Those are just two recent names. They continue to get elected by large majorities.

The conclusion I reach is we are a sleazy crooked people who only get angry when the crook is the other guy’s crook. I am confident that if Summers had not made the “anti women” comments while at Harvard, Alternet would not now care about his financial arrangements.

No political reform is possible until we stop electing crooks. People can hold opposing political views and still be honest. I’d rather have someone who is honest but opposed to my views then a crook who merely mouths my views. The Clinton’s come to mind when I think of that.

The thing about corruption is it is wasteful It bleeds a country dry. If we elected honest people, we would all benefit financially. And that may be the problem. We don’t want the other side to benefit. We would rather poison the water hole then give them a drop.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

http://www.PrettyReplica.com for sale all kinds of famous watches! Fashion Watches! Luxry Watches!
Posted by: prettyreplica on May 31, 2009 8:33 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.PrettyReplica.com for sale all kinds of famous watches! Fashion Watches! Luxry Watches!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

http://www.PrettyReplica.com for sale all kinds of famous watches! Fashion Watches! Luxry Watches!
Posted by: prettyreplica on May 31, 2009 8:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.PrettyReplica.com for sale all kinds of famous watches! Fashion Watches! Luxry Watches!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

some good reading on this harvard clique
Posted by: realtruther on Jun 1, 2009 12:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Further squeezing Harvard was a transaction Summers had pushed it into in 2004, when he successfully argued that the university should engage in a multibillion-dollar interest rate swap with Goldman Sachs and other large banks. Under the terms of the deal, Harvard would pay Goldman a long-term fixed rate while Goldman paid Harvard the Federal Reserve rate. The main goal was to lock in a low rate for future debt, and if the Fed had raised rates, Harvard would have made hundreds of millions. But when the Fed slashed rates to historic lows to try to goose stalled credit markets, the deal turned equally sour for Harvard: By last November, the value of the swaps had fallen to negative $570 million. The university found itself needing to post more collateral to guarantee those swaps, and would ultimately buy its way out of them at an undisclosed cost."


"Not surprisingly, Lawrence Summers is convinced that he deserved every penny of the $8 million that Wall Street firms paid him last year. And why shouldn’t he be cut in on the loot from the loopholes in the toxic derivatives market that he pushed into law when he was President Bill Clinton’s treasury secretary? No one has been more persistently effective in paving the way for the financial swindles that enriched the titans of finance while impoverishing the rest of the world than the man who is now the top economic adviser to President Obama. "


In 18,000 words, the spellbinding narrative detailed the University’s effort to reform the Russian economy in the 1990s—and the fraud scandal that resulted. The U.S. Department of Justice alleged that University employees who steered the project violated their federal contracts by making personal investments in the Russian economy, and Harvard paid $26.5 million to settle a government lawsuit.


A cover of Time magazine in 1999 displayed Rubin, Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan, and Larry Summers (number two at Treasury, later replacing Rubin) as "The Committee to Save the World." But more recently he has been caught peddling his influence for the financial giant Citigroup, where he left public office to become a top executive. As Enron's accounting irregularities were being discovered and its fortunes rapidly sinking, Bob Rubin placed a call on November 8 to Peter R. Fisher, current undersecretary of the Treasury for domestic finance.According to Treasury, Rubin wanted to know if the Bush administration was going to intervene with the big credit rating agencies, who were about to lower their rating of Enron's debt. Since Rubin's Citigroup was holding hundreds of millions of dollars worth of Enron's debt, it had quite a large stake in the outcome of any such decision.



Economics Professor Martin S. Feldstein ’61 will step down after 22 years on the board of directors at American International Group, an embattled international insurance company that has received billions in government bailout funding. Feldstein declined to comment on why he will not stand for re-election at the company’s annual general meeting on June 30. “I never discuss AIG,” Feldstein wrote in an email. The insurance giant, which has received $182.5 billion in government funding since September, has been under pressure to overhaul its board, according to media reports.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

restrict li deimh
Posted by: ruruben on Jun 15, 2009 7:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ddf VHS to DVD Converter||VHS Converter

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement