Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Is the Water Supply for 8 Million People in New York City at Risk?

By Chris Hedges, Truthdig. Posted May 26, 2009.


A massive natural gas project could pollute fresh water supplies for New York, Philadelphia, Camden and Trenton, and other areas.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Atheists, It's Time to Stand Up to Jesus
Russell Blackford, Udo Schuklenk

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
As Foreclosure Nightmares Increase, Will More Homeowners Pay Off Their Bankers in Violence?
Scott Thill

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why We Need Bees and More People Becoming Organic Beekeepers
Makenna Goodman

Food:
Despite Censorship By Beef Magnate, Michael Pollan Spreads Message About the Real Price of Cheap Food

Health and Wellness:
New York May Stop Heartless Health Insurers from Dropping Coverage When It Stops Being Profitable
William Ehart

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
Focusing on Fort Hood Killer's Beliefs Is an Easy Out to Avoid the Deeper Reasons for the Massacre
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Michelle and Barack's Marriage Has in Common with 56 Million Other Ones
Annabelle Gurwitch

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Fetus-Shaped Potatoes? Going Undercover Inside the Weird World of Right-Wing Abortion Foes
Ann Neumann

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
Instant Sex: Has the Digital Age Destroyed Relationships or Made Them Better?
Vanessa Richmond

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
With Unemployment at 40 Percent, Afghan Teens Enlist in Army, Police
Lal Aqa Sherin

More stories by Chris Hedges

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

In the musical “Urinetown,” a severe drought leaves the dwindling supplies of clean water in the hands of a corporation called Urine Good Company.  Urine Good Company makes a fortune selling the precious commodity and running public toilets. It pays off politicians to ward off regulation and inspection. It uses the mechanisms of state control to repress an increasingly desperate and impoverished population.

The musical satire may turn out to be a prescient vision of the future. Corporations in Colorado, Texas, Louisiana, Pennsylvania and upstate New York have launched a massive program to extract natural gas through a process that could, if it goes wrong, degrade the Delaware River watershed and the fresh water supplies that feed upstate communities, the metropolitan cities of New York, Philadelphia, Camden and Trenton, and many others on its way to the Chesapeake Bay.

“The potential environmental consequences are extreme,” says Fritz Mayer, editor of The River Reporter in Narrowsburg, N.Y. His paper has been following the drilling in the Upper Delaware River Valley and he told me, “It could ruin the drinking supply for 8 million people in New York City.”

Trillions of cubic feet of natural gas are locked under the Marcellus Shale that runs from West Virginia, through Ohio, across most of Pennsylvania and into the Southern Tier of New York state. There are other, small plates of shale, in the south and west of the United States. It takes an estimated 3 million to 5 million gallons of water per well to drill down to the natural gas in a process called hydraulic fracturing, or fracking. The water is mixed with resin-coated sand and a cocktail of hazardous chemicals, including hydrochloric acid, nitrogen, biocides, surfactants, friction reducers and benzene to facilitate the fracturing of the shale to extract the gas.

The toxic brew is injected with extreme force deep within the earth. The drilling is vertical for about 5,000 to 7,000 feet. The technology, developed by Halliburton, allows drills to abruptly turn sideways when they reach these depths. The lubricant and biocides propel the sand on a horizontal axis for as far as half a mile. The fissures created are held open by the sand, and the natural gas flows to the surface through steel casings. Feeder lines run from the grid of wells to regional pipelines.

About 60 percent of the toxic water used to extract the natural gas—touted in mendacious commercials by the natural gas industry as “clean” energy—is left underground. The rest is stored in huge, open pits that dot the landscapes at drilling sites, before it is loaded into hundreds of large vehicles and trucked to regional filtration facilities. Such drilling has already poisoned wells in western Pennsylvania, Colorado, Alabama, Arkansas, New Mexico, Kansas, Montana, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia and Wyoming. Those whose water becomes contaminated, including people living in towns such as Dimock, Pa., must have water trucked in to provide for their needs. Farm animals that have drunk the toxic mixture that has leeched from gas drilling sites have died. Cattle ranchers in Colorado, where drilling is occurring in close proximity, have reported that their livestock birthrates have gone down and animals are bearing deformed offspring.

“The single biggest concern is the release of poisons into the environment and its impact on all that live in proximity to the drilling activity,” the River Reporter’s editorial this week read following a visit to local drilling sites. “Large pits, lined with sagging black plastic, did not instill confidence that it couldn’t escape into the environment. And we wondered how migrating birds would know the difference between this body of fluid and an area pond. Ironically, the effect on animals became very real that afternoon when, upon our return, we received the news that in Caddo Parish, LA, 17 cows died after apparently ingesting fluids that escaped from a nearby gas pad.”

The New York City watershed lies within the Marcellus Shale. This watershed provides unfiltered water to more than 14 million people in New York City, upstate New York, Philadelphia and northern New Jersey. It is the largest unfiltered drinking water supply in the United States. And if the federal government does not intervene swiftly, it could become contaminated. The nonprofit group NYH2O has begun organizing in New York City, calling for a statewide ban on natural gas drilling to protect not only the city’s fresh water drinking supply, but everyone else’s. But New York’s notoriously corrupt state Legislature and feeble governor seem set to permit the drilling. 


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: health, environment, economy, water, new jersey, law, natural gas, epa, government, hedges, new york, pennsylvania, delaware river

Chris Hedges, a Pulitzer prize-winning reporter, is a Senior Fellow at the Nation Institute. His latest book is Collateral Damage: America's War Against Iraqi Civilians.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Couldn’t happen to a nicer group of people.
Posted by: Honky the Nihilist VI on May 26, 2009 4:03 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now if California would just burn down…

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Amen Brother Posted by: Daito
Frank The Eagle
Posted by: The Eagle on May 26, 2009 4:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Horizontal drilling well below surface - Isn't this the technique that the Noble Kuwaiti's were using to steal oil from Iraq to sell to His Majesty Bush I when he declared war on Iraq the first time? Perhaps in the process of determining the cost of drilling for natural gas you should add the cost in lives in the wars you've started to strengthen Haliburton's bottom line.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Frank The Eagle
Posted by: The Eagle on May 26, 2009 4:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Horizontal drilling well below surface - Isn't this the technique that the Noble Kuwaiti's were using to steal oil from Iraq to sell to His Majesty Bush I when he declared war on Iraq the first time? Perhaps in the process of determining the cost of drilling for natural gas you should add the cost in lives in the wars you've started to strengthen Haliburton's bottom line.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Vote Green to protect safe drinking water
Posted by: greenferret on May 26, 2009 5:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Reverend Billy Talen, Green candidate for mayor of NYC, has made safe drinking water a central issue of his campaign. If there's one candidate you can trust to put people ahead of profits, it's him. Check out his website at
http://voterevbilly.org/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There's a precedent for this -- LIBYA!
Posted by: xvictor on May 26, 2009 5:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Libya under Khaddafi had hurled complaints at the private oil companies operating in the desert that their drilling methods had fouled the aquifers in the region, giving it a waxy taste. After prolonged delays, numerous promises, and threats from Khaddafi, the water quality improved somewhat.

I hope NYC's quality water supply doesn't degrade to the level of a third world state.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

John O'Connor
Posted by: johntoconnor on May 26, 2009 7:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Local pride is nice, but New York City's water is hardly the "best in the world".

I have independently examined tap waters from many American cities and the particulate matter to be found in New York's distributed water far exceeds that found in most filtered water supplies.

John O'Connor

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» "..particulate matter.." Posted by: xvictor
Rachel
Posted by: Raquella on May 26, 2009 7:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The article is stupid.

1. The New York City water supply is entirely surface water. Water goes FROM the surface TO the shale where the natural gas is, more than a mile below.

2. The contamination is already IN the shale where the natural gas is.

3. Not much drilling can be expected in the NYC watershed area specifically. It is reserved land, and it is at the northern rim of the natural gas zone.

The concern is that after the natural gas (and some contaminated water) is brought to the surface, the water will run into places it shouldn't. True. But the region already has a lot of industries that use/create contaminated water. This adds water that in general is LESS contaminated to the mix. Will there be spills? Sure. There are six gasoline-truck spills a DAY in New Jersey due to auto accidents! Will it threaten the NYC water supply? Don't be silly.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» uninformed Posted by: chrysalis124812
» RE: achel Posted by: osd
Consistent Water Quality Regulations
Posted by: Elmo409 on May 26, 2009 9:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our little town serves fewer than 200 people in less than 40 houses. Our community owned water system is subject to more regulations than all of New York City.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If it burns
Posted by: willymack on May 26, 2009 12:53 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It isn't a solution; it's part of the problem. Our climate change is due to the massive infusion of carbon dioxide into our atmosphere. This is something that simply cannot be ignored, but somehow is. The evil nature of profiteers is also ignored. Continuation of burning and allowing criminals to own us will lead to our demise. The sooner we realize these facts, the better off we'll be.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

gasp
Posted by: tazdelaney on May 27, 2009 9:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
bechtel and halliburton lend the confidence factor... it was 70 years ago that bucky fuller predicted the freshwater shortage worldwide would be happening right now, which it is. he suggested a program to put water-recycling in every structure, turning toilet water back into toilet water, factory water back into factory water, etc. refresh from time to time and save the fresh water for cooking and drinking and nature. but nooooo, who would listen to a nut like bucky? our leaders?

the oxygen-depletion wars will be starting in a decade or so, too. another big growth industry. for a while, gasp.

think this author was a bit over the top calling governor paterson feeble, though. hasn't struck me that way, pretty decent so far, really. rightly call him feeble if he lets this go through.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Geography
Posted by: UP58 on May 28, 2009 8:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a very disturbing story, especially since I have lived in NY, NJ, and PA. However, my comment concerns geography. As I know from personal observation, maps, and written text, Delaware River flows into the DELAWARE Bay, NOT the Chesapeake!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Geography
Posted by: UP58 on May 28, 2009 8:42 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a very disturbing story, especially since I have lived in NY, NJ, and PA. However, my comment concerns geography. As I know from personal observation, maps, and written text, the Delaware River flows into the DELAWARE Bay, NOT the Chesapeake!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement