Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

No One's Falling for Big Health's Bogus Promise to "Reform"

By Joshua Holland, AlterNet. Posted May 13, 2009.


Corporate Dems are fawning over the industry's "promise" to hold down costs. A broad progressive coalition is pushing for a real solution.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Atheists, It's Time to Stand Up to Jesus
Russell Blackford, Udo Schuklenk

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
As Foreclosure Nightmares Increase, Will More Homeowners Pay Off Their Bankers in Violence?
Scott Thill

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why We Need Bees and More People Becoming Organic Beekeepers
Makenna Goodman

Food:
Despite Censorship By Beef Magnate, Michael Pollan Spreads Message About the Real Price of Cheap Food

Health and Wellness:
New York May Stop Heartless Health Insurers from Dropping Coverage When It Stops Being Profitable
William Ehart

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
Focusing on Fort Hood Killer's Beliefs Is an Easy Out to Avoid the Deeper Reasons for the Massacre
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Michelle and Barack's Marriage Has in Common with 56 Million Other Ones
Annabelle Gurwitch

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Fetus-Shaped Potatoes? Going Undercover Inside the Weird World of Right-Wing Abortion Foes
Ann Neumann

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
Instant Sex: Has the Digital Age Destroyed Relationships or Made Them Better?
Vanessa Richmond

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
With Unemployment at 40 Percent, Afghan Teens Enlist in Army, Police
Lal Aqa Sherin

More stories by Joshua Holland

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

This week, the health care lobby scored a cunning propaganda victory by feigning interest in fixing the perennial rip-off we call a health care system.

With much fanfare, Big Health trotted out a six-month old "promise" -- a toothless, non-binding pledge lacking any specifics -- to make various nips and tucks that would slow the rate at which health costs grow to "only" 4.7 percent annually. It was hailed by the Obama administration and many observers as a breakthrough in the battle for reform.

Until recently, the health care industry has been dead-set on preserving a disastrous but profitable status quo (The U.S. spends close to twice as much per person on care than other wealthy countries, and gets consistently poorer results; among residents of 30 rich countries polled by Gallup, Americans came in 18th in terms of satisfaction with their care). But now the "disease care" industry is portraying itself as an agent of change. Fearful of a growing movement towards real, substantive reform, it's trying to co-opt the process under the guise of "getting a seat at the table." That they've given up, for now, their oppositional stance is what has so many tongues wagging about the significance of the proposal.

But it's nothing new -- "voluntary" codes  of conduct, self-regulation and industry-driven initiatives for the private sector to address complex policy issues have long been a standard tactic for heading off real regulation and deeper systemic reforms. The Brookings' Institution's Henry Aaron, a former official in the Carter administration told the New York Times that when he heard of the proposal, "I had a Rip van Winkle moment, as if I had fallen asleep in 1977 and woke up again this morning.” According to the Times, Carter's pledge to do something about out-of-control health care costs "prompted the industry to undertake a short-lived 'voluntary effort.'” The growth of health care costs also slowed briefly after Bill Clinton's failed attempt to fix the system.

But while the industry's proposal is light on substance, it is a game-changer to some degree. Instead of simply opposing reform, which is a more dangerous proposition today -- with 47 million uninsured and health care eating up 17 percent of the country's economic output -- than it was when Clinton mounted his fight, Big Health is trying to kill the most important and progressive elements of Obama's promised reforms from the inside -- from its "seat at the table."

But while health lobbyists are trying to maintain the industry's grip on trillions of dollars of business, Health Care for America Now, a broad coalition of groups including ACORN, the AFL-CIO, Campaign for America's Future and MoveOn.org, is fighting for the inclusion of a public-insurance option that would add to the current mix of employer-based insurance and government programs for the needy -- one of the centerpieces of Obama's health care proposals during the campaign. According to The Hill, "Organizers believe their efforts will pressure centrist Democrats and Republicans to line up behind Obama's health care proposal, which calls for all Americans to have the choice of a public insurance plan."  This week, the group launched a series of ads targeting wishy-washy Dems by name.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: health, hcan, health care industry

Joshua Holland is an editor and senior writer at AlterNet.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Great Post ... But don't forget the MSM ...
Posted by: mmckinl on May 13, 2009 12:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Main Stream Media makes hundreds of millions of dollars every year from the ads the health care companies place in media ... They are large beneficiaries of health care waste ... and they will be potent adversaries along with the health care companies and the Republicans.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

deja vu
Posted by: redstatemama on May 13, 2009 1:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The recent priority given to Wall Street over Main Street, proves the real intent of corporate dems and the administration regarding average citizens & Health Care Reform.

http://www.pnhp.org
Physicians for a National Health Program

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

IF THE PUBLIC OPTION PLAN CONCEPT FAILS THIS TIME....
Posted by: drricklippin on May 13, 2009 2:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...it will be a disaster for American public policy as you say Josh.

... it will also be a disaster for Barack Obama who will alienate a huge consituency who depended on him to do something meaninful about the unmitigated disaster and immorality of the current US Health Care system

You are also correct about the grassroots taking to the streets, to their their telephones and to their keyboards asap

The progressive media(like AlterNet,etc) also must help because the mainstream media is hopelessly in bed with the status quo (with a few notable exceptions)

We have reached a defining moment in America on this issues. The battle is fully engaged."Big Health" is trying to dupe us.

The stakes of losing are far too great for this once great nation to endure in my opinion.

Dr. Rick Lippin
Southampton,Pa

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

But guys...Obama is more corporate than the whole damn DLC.
Posted by: Perry Logan on May 13, 2009 2:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The article gives the false impression that the Obama Administration is fighting for public health care against the "corporate Dems" and conservative forces.

Whoa there. If Obama isn't a corporate Dem, there is no such creature.

Judging from his campaign contributions and his actions so far, Barack Obama is more corporate than the whole DLC put together.

From the get-go, Obama and company have opposed the voters' health-care choice--a single-payer system. His health-care proposals are famously worse (i.e., more corporate!) than Hillary's far superior plan.

So the dichotomy between Obama and the "corporate Dems" is a bit goofy. This has been obvious from the start--raising the question of why progressives supported such a corporate tool in the first place.


Xe Technology: To Purify America

which raises the question of why these progressive groups supported him in the first place.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Tighty righties need to stop the hypocrisy
Posted by: Chaimirija on May 13, 2009 3:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hillary's plan was THE corporate plan---a total gift to the Insurers...look at Mass right now, a total mess, no one ever defined 'affordable', you can get away with not insuring your employees for 295/year, they had to lower the min benefits because it is too expensive, and, cherry ala mode, turns out not enough PCP's...BO's choice should be of no concern to the tighty righties---after all, it is about introducing competition...thought they love that?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Nor would I..... Posted by: mjabele
There are problems in Massachusetts, but almost everyone has coverage - and that's an improvement...
Posted by: mjabele on May 13, 2009 5:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After all, I used to be a PCP at a community health center there and remember what it was like when people DIDN'T have coverage.

The lack of PCP's is a totally separate issue, and not something ANY single-payer plan can necessarily solve - after all, you can't just create PCP's by waving a wand. The problem, essentially, is that being a PCP is a shitty job that gives less and less satisfaction and eats away at the quality of one's life as time goes on - which is why people leave it to do something else, and young medical graduates, sensing trouble, steer themselves toward something else right from the start.

I'm for universal coverage first, single payer second. As a provider, the most important thing to me is that all my patients be covered, so that they can see me, see specialists, and get their tests, meds, and whatever else they need paid for. No more running to the sample closet to look for antibiotics or insulin, no more sending patients to Boston to see specialists at "charity" clinics or hospitals, in other words.

Single payer strikes me as the best way to finance this, and I think it's pretty much inevitable that we'll eventually turn to that alternative when nothing else proves to be fiscally viable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Public Option
Posted by: ProgressiveManiac on May 13, 2009 5:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you for your great article. It makes the important point that the inclusion of a public insurance option is a step towards a single-payer system; this is a point that seems lost on many on the progressive side who feel that nothing less than a full-fledged single payer system is acceptable. This is a case of the perfect being the enemy of the good.

The political difficulties of achieving reform should not be underestimated. Just because we now have a Democratic President and Congress, there is no guarantee that we can overcome the substantial opposition by the insurance and pharmaceutical industries and the Republican Party to any attempt to meet the health needs of American citizen. Obama appears to agree with many other Democratic leaders that a single-payer system is too big a bite to attempt and that it would be doomed to defeat. Personally, I am willing to bow to their political judgment on this matter.

Since 1946 the Democratic party has made numerous attempts to institute a national health care system for the people of the United States and most of these attempts have failed completely due to Republican and Corporate opposition. Medicare and Medicaid have been notable exceptions even though they were less than complete solutions.

A public insurance option that is available to all would be another big step, not only toward a national health care system but toward a single payer system. It would be a sad thing if insistence by liberals on nothing short of a single payer system doomed this opportunity for important progress toward a health care system as good as other industrialized countries enjoy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Opposing universal healthcare is unpatriotic
Posted by: Uncle John on May 13, 2009 6:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If genius is distributed randomly through a nation's people . . .

and if a nation neglects the health of 20% of it's best and brightest while another nation doesn't. . .

. . . that first nation will end up being second-rate.

Opposing universal care is un-American. We neglect genius kids. We bind innovators and entrepreneurs to jobs for fear of losing healthcare.

What could possibly go wrong . . . ?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Madoff would have been proud,
Posted by: linecrosser on May 13, 2009 6:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The health care insurance industry is as useless and unnecessary as the FEDERAL RESERVE. Would our, auto industry(or any industry) be closing( I know health care isn't its only problem) or any other employer and employee be in the situation we find ourselves in today if America went with a single payer system where all were covered. Our Leaders are working against the public(on all fronts) because in their eyes globalization means one thing. Two distinct classes the ultra rich(them) and the surviving masses(us) of deeply impoverished to tend to their mundane tasks while begging for a slice of bread.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sorry Joshy but as long as we can continue to enjoy our kool food, who cares?
Posted by: FLYING DOOFUS on May 13, 2009 7:08 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There will never be universal or single payer type health care passed. Besides, as long as we can keep enjoying what we eat, who cares what passes? I may have been a doofus to vote for Nader but I'm having fun looking at Obama playing screwy pants and I'm sure Mccain would have done the same. Tell you what, let's just impeach Congress. It'll make great entertainment and I can enjoy scarfing down my dinner and a bucket of fries every night and chug a bottle of beer. And while at it, another pie to scarf down as well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

NOW THEY ARE GOING AFTR SOCIAL SECURITY, MEDICARE AND MEDICADE
Posted by: cori on May 13, 2009 8:29 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While they are funding 12 billion per week for Iraq, 680 billion for the wars, + the 700 bases and tillions for Wall Street that they are using to bribe congress, much of it our tax dollars, while also paying $40,000 per yr per inmate for the biggest prison system on the planet, they are telling us that they can't pay for our only safety nets. Well now is the time for everyone to call their senators and congressman and tell them that if they can find away to fund all of the above they better make sure, we the people, who voted for them to represent us, preserve our most impotant safety nets. They have the money and they can do it! My congressman told me they just plan not to increase the cost of living for Social Security, yet they have no trouble comng up with the extra billions for the wars! We pay for these social safety nets and they have no right to take them away or not provide the necessary increases when they can come up with all of the above. SO CALL AND BE OUTRAGED AND DON'T VOTE FOR YOUR REP IF THEY AREN'T WORKING FOR YOU! 202 224 3121 ASK FOR YOUR REP WHEN YOU CALL.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lies, Lies, and More Lies
Posted by: Gravitas on May 13, 2009 9:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is tangentially related. It has come out that the drug company Merck created a phony medical journal to showcase its products:
http://tinyurl.com/cp8q8x
But it is related in a broader way because the entire point of the medical system exists today to maximize the profits of corporations. Our "science" is laughable. We have totally lost sight of what causes disease and how to treat it. It needs to be torn down from the ground up and rebuild, paradigms and all. If not, national health care will be just another opportunity for kleptocrats to use the government to rake in the bucks at our expense. Just like the war in Iraq!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And so it begins
Posted by: willymack on May 13, 2009 9:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is but the opening salvo in what promises to be a battle royal between the public and corporate interests. The corporatists are armed to the teeth, and experienced, as they've travelled down this road before. Their pathological greed knows no limits; they'll bribe, scandalize, or simply crush anyone attempting t steal their golden goose. In my letter to the President, I stated that the drug and insurance racketeers are NOT good people, and would eat him alive or make him crawl, given half a chance. My guess is that single-payer universal health care will be another generation in coming, if at all. I hope I'm wrong.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Profiteers will continue to rape this country
Posted by: Sushi on May 13, 2009 10:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Profiteers will continue to rape this country until it crashes and burns, and they will profit on that too. They will just move on to another country. These corporations are INTERNATIONALISTS, loyal to no one. They will make what they can as fast as they can, then move on to a new host.

The people will never win because they have been kept ignorant/ill/frightened and deceived by slick news.o.mercials and corporate-shill talk show hosts who are paid to mis-inform.

Sushi
"The secret of joy is the mastery of pain."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

wolf callers
Posted by: BPomeroy on May 13, 2009 10:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As described in the comment, the "voluntary" "cost-cutting" "promises" of the health care industry are meaningless. Their parade of horrors on TV are misrepresentations, and they clearly DO NOT have the public interest at heart. While I support Obama's efforts, I don't think he's going far enough and prefer Conyer's plan, it's at least a step in the right direction. The short answer is "take the profit out of health care, it should be treated as a fundamental right", but not for boutique procedures or to create octuplets. We also should have neighborhood clinics for routine matters like innoculations, childhood injuries, and other matters not really requiring an MD

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No one's falling for it EXCEPT Congress and the President
Posted by: DCostello2 on May 13, 2009 11:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We The People aren't falling for it but the President and Congress are. Obama is turning out to be exactly what some of us kept warning about - yet another corporate shill. He's probably going to be a one termer but he'll do LOTS of damage before he's done. Expect the raping of Social Security next, especially given the latest 'news'.

Maybe it's time the We The People took a lesson from the original We The People and beat our plow shears into swords and TAKE BACK our Country!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The We In President Obama's Change We Can Believe In Turns Out To Be Them, Not Us
Posted by: booboo on May 13, 2009 1:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Based on?"

"Almost everything he's done since his inaugeration."

"What about his green-lighting stem cell research."

"Even there he's caved to right wing pressure, denying cloning for purposes of developing replacement organs such as insulin secreting cells to cure diabete and kidneys for those with end stage renal disease."

"What about his forbidding torture?"

"He's been back-pedalling on that since day one."

"And his promise to stop warrantless surveillance of us?"

"Unkept."

"Ending the Iraq War?"

"Not."

"So whose side is he on?"

"Obviously the powers that be."

"Ok, we've been had, but if we persevere, find trustworthy candidates for the next election, won't we still get change we can believe in."

"Except time's running out, what with perpetual war + global warming + economic collapse = doomsday."

"What are our options?"

"Only one that's viable."

"Which is?"

"To rise up en masse."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

My Dears,
Posted by: beijaflor on May 13, 2009 1:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
if you have the time to sit here and respond to Mr Holland's excellent article, you surely can write a letter to the editor of your local area newspapers!!!
And then, follow up with a phone call, letter or email to your congress critters.
Get to work! for Pete's sake!
Hope and change are but mere platforms from which to take action.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I've been duped??
Posted by: Will Miller on May 13, 2009 8:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ahhgh, after hearing the great news that the OHPU [Organization of Health Profiteers United] was scaling back on the amount they were planning on taking from my pocket I rushed right out [Not to be confused with the Conservative Whiner] and committed myself to a brand new 2004 Ford, knowing how great things were trending. Aghast, I can see that the increase in my payments for my meds will be a trifle higher than the recent increase in fuel prices [percentagewize (is that a word?)], oh whoa is I.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

HERE'S WHAT DEMS DON'T WANT PUBLIC TO KNOW ABOUT SOC HEALTHCARE...
Posted by: SassyFrassy on May 13, 2009 8:30 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
how many people don't know that an EAR INFECTON LEFT UNTREATED will result in PERMANENT PHYSICAL handicapping of your child/person.

How many people DON'T know THAT allergies and asthma LEFT untreated will result in PERMANENT HANDICAPPING and/or death and even more so in children?

YOU CAN bet the DEMS knew and are still willing to sell down the river the PUBLIC BY insisting on dragging it's feet on kicking out the soc healthcare and bailout.

HOW MANY people don't know that the longer the DEMS drag their feet on KICKING out the bailout the HIGHER TAXES will have to go to offset the spending spree these WASH DC SLUGS are on.

Geightners so-called fix?? it's creating a re-inflation bubble scheduled to burst worse than the one we are in and it will occur in 7 years.

why is that relevant??? in 2018 the bill for the bailout becomes due and payable and if the USA CANNOT PAY?? we will be owned by foreigners whom subscribe to sharia law.
To the present it's only one of the 1 % group of people attempting to destroy our Nation's economic systems.

WHY??? It was said to a WASH DC VIP---that the reason the Socialists think they will win this time and are doing this is because ACLU and their DEMS SLUGS -- they don't think American's are " smart enough" to care to let their fingers do the walking to protect their lands, their CONSTITUTION or their freedoms. The DEMS and ACLU don't think the 99% of American's will be 'smart enough" to CARE about their country, their homes, their small business enough to kick the WASH DC SLUGS out and send them packing by way of Balagovich for NOT doing what is right to protect PUBLIC freedoms and the free enterprise system (ie meaning small business/med business) and rights.

Therefore, they want to make sure they take all freedoms away from the public and they want to make it impossible for FREE ENTERPRISE to exist for the small business and mid business and sole proprietorship thru gravytraining BIG BUSINESS bankrupting our Nation and MUSCLING OUT the small/med sole proprietorships, and creating a welfare state. A move straight out of the marxist handbook. and by attempting to eradicate free speech.

Then, we will be SOCIALIST/GLOBALIST/MARX/FACIST/COMM COUNTRY and the marketplace will be MONOPOLIZED AND DOMINATED by the ENGORGED 1 or 2 or several big businesses in sector. Gone will be the hope for any American whom would wish to start a business and earn profit to live on

Seek legislative and LEGAL agencies to DISMANTLE the bailout and kick out the SOCIALIST stimulus.

see American center for law and justice

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CHILDREN MOST HARSHLY AFFECTED BY SOC HEALTHCARE
Posted by: SassyFrassy on May 13, 2009 8:35 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
AND SENIORS...

Here we have the DEMS always needing a bigger shovel for the level of UTOPIAN propaganda they want to throw at the UNSUSPECTING PUBLIC.

wanna? know the latest??? Michael moore made a progpaganda film where they attempt to bamboozle the PUBLIC by claiming CUBA'S healthcare is better than the USA ....and that the USA should go to the CUBAN model for healthcare.

WANNA KNOW??? what the reality is and whaaat they are really HIDING... the reality is in CUBA people have to BEG FROM TOURISTS for allergy inhalers and aspirin. You can bet if Americans are allowed to be bamboozled into Socialist healthcare DEMS will make SURE USA is WORSE OFF than CUBA.

According to the new stimulus if your child needs antibiotics and the GOV only wants to give them Asprin or NOTHING guess whaaat they will get ASPIRIN or NOTHING.

Whats worse.. if your/adult/child are X percent sick they ARE LEFT TO DIE.

tHIS ISN'T just about the money people, with these WASH DC SLUGS it's about control.
WASH DC SLUGS think American's are too stupid to care about their RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS if DEMS LIE enough to claim it's cheaper and better.

Soc healthcare is MORE expensive AND gives NO HEALTHCARE. We are no scholar, but you don't need to be a scholar to SEE whaaat is wrong with the DEMS scenario.

DEMS LIED to claim our healthcare system is broken. SOCIALIST HEALTHCARE is MORE EXPENSIVE and gives NO HEALTHCARE.

PEOPLE, OUR MARKET BASED HEALTHCARE SYSTEM IS ONE OF THE BEST IN THE WORLD. Why, sure it's not perfect. BUT THE SHORTCOMINGS it faces such as high cost of drugs and insurance---are in part THE results of the inroads the SOCIALISTS AND LIBERALS have already made into our market based health care system.

THE REAL SOLUTION TO fixing HEALTHCARE ISN'T to make UNCLE SAME/DEMS your doctor ....BUT to GIVE YOU THE PUBLIC MORE CHOICE.

ALLOWING the DEMS socialize healthcare not only would prove expensive but DEADLY. Think about it?? DEMS WANT TO SPEND MORE MONEY BUT DENY PUBLIC the meds and services it needs while GOV POCKETS THE CASH TO SPEND ON PORK.

DEMS think that they can do what they want ABOVE THE LAW & WITHOUT IMPUNITY while the public can only act by permission.

don't ALLOW yourselves to be put off seek LEGISLATIVE and LEGAL ACTION TO KICK STIMULUS OUT AND BAILOUT. go see --American center for law and justice

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

DEMS HIDING HIDDEN COSTS OF SOC HEALTHCARE THAT MAKE IT MORE EXPENSIVE THAN PRESENT SYSTEM-PART A
Posted by: SassyFrassy on May 13, 2009 8:37 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
IN SCOTLAND-462,000 PEOPLE DIED AS A RESULT OF HEALTHCARE FAILINGS

ENGLAND---the NATIONAL HEALTHCARE JUST UP AND DECIDED TO HALT KNEE AND HIP REPLACEMENTS FOR OVERWEIGHT PEOPLE.

in SOUTH AFRICA- PATIENTS DIED after his life saving surgery was RE-CLASSIFIED as 'elective' and CANCELED seven YES THAT'S RIGHT SEVEN times until it was simply to late.

in AUSTRALIA man has been on a 90 day waiting PERIOD---for over 2 years.

in Canada -cancer patients have been DENIED life saving medicines that are standard treatment in USA and covered by USA INSURANCE.

ENGLAND AGAIN---- Alheimer's patients denied $5 a day drug that provides crucial relief because it's considered TOO EXPENSIVE.

CUBA---they are FORCED to BEG tourists for common medicines like allergy and asthma inhalers and even aspirin.

EVERYWHERE SOCIALIZED MEDICINE HAS BEEN TRIED IT HAS FAILED.

The DEMS BRAND of getting around using the term SOCIALIZED MEDICINE is to dress up their BIG GOVERNMENT schemes to bamboozle public by calling it UNIVERSAL HEALTHCARE OR HEALTH CARE FOR ALL to 'diguise' the fact it should be labeled as HEALTHCARE FOR NONE so the BIG GOV can pocket the funds.

NO matter how these DEMS CALL soc med it always has the same RESULTS---RATIONED HEALTHCARE, DENIAL OF ESSENTIAL MEDICAL SERVICE, WAITING LISTS, MEDIOCRE MEDICINE, AND UNNECESSARY SUFFERING AND DEATH. and for whaaat?? so gov can pocket the funds. always the bottom line.

MEANWHILE WASH DC SLUGS end up with final say over your most intimate medical decisions NOT YOU AND NOT YOUR DOCTOR.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

DEMS HIDING HIDDEN COSTS OF HEALTHCARE THAT MAKE IT MORE EXPENSEIVE THAN OUR PRESENT SYSTEM--PART B
Posted by: SassyFrassy on May 13, 2009 8:39 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here we have the DEMS always needing a bigger shovel for the level of UTOPIAN propaganda they want to throw at the UNSUSPECTING PUBLIC.

wanna? know the latest??? Michael moore made a progpaganda film where they attempt to bamboozle the PUBLIC by claiming CUBA'S healthcare is better than the USA ....and that the USA should go to the CUBAN model for healthcare.

WANNA KNOW??? what the reality is and whaaat they are really HIDING... the reality is in CUBA people have to BEG FROM TOURISTS for allergy inhalers and aspirin. You can bet if Americans are allowed to be bamboozled into Socialist healthcare DEMS will make SURE USA is WORSE OFF than CUBA.

According to the new stimulus if your child needs antibiotics and the GOV only wants to give them Asprin or NOTHING guess whaaat they will get ASPIRIN or nothing. Soc healthcare is MORE expensive AND gives NO HEALTHCARE. We are no scholar, but you don't need to be a scholar to SEE whaaat is wrong with the DEMS scenario.

PEOPLE OUR MARKET BASED HEALTHCARE SYSTEM IS ONE OF THE BEST IN THE WORLD. Why, sure it's not perfect. BUT THE SHORTCOMINGS it faces such as high cost of drugs and insurance---are in part THE results of the inroads the SOCIALISTS AND LIBERALS have already made into our market based health care system.

THE REAL SOLUTION TO fixing HEALTHCARE ISN'T to make UNCLE SAME/DEMS your doctor ....BUT to GIVE YOU THE PUBLIC MORE CHOICE.

ALLOWING the DEMS socialize healthcare not only would prove expensive but DEADLY. Think about it?? DEMS WANT TO SPEND MORE MONEY BUT DENY PUBLIC the meds and services it needs while GOV POCKETS THE CASH TO SPEND ON PORK.

TAKE A LOOK .. 50% OF BRITISH AND NEW ZEALANDS WOMEN diagnosed with breast cancer DIE. however, HERE IN USA only 1/5th breast cancer sufferers DIE FROM IT. did you know hair dye are directly linked to breast cancer??

25 % CANADIA men and 50% of british men diagnosed with prostrate cancer die from it. HERE, IN USA less than 1/5th men die from it.

BRITISH-ER'S with serious illnesses are 7 times more likely to die from them than AMERICANS with such conditions.
BRITISH-ERS are also 4 times MORE likely to DIE during major surgery than Americans.

IN most countries if you are OVER A CERTAIN AGE like 75 they will let you die.

this is what awaits America if public doesn't do what it takes NOW to seek LEGAL ACTION to kick out SOC healthcare stimulus AND BAILOUT.

SEE AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Health Care Reform is Simple!
Posted by: jpinsatx on May 14, 2009 10:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hmmm... Health Care for All Uninsured Americans is Simple!

1) Merge Medicare with Medicade into a single "Income Based" system.

2) Allow insurance companies to offer "Medigap" coverage to all participants.

As for Funding...

1) Changing from an "Emergency Treatment" to a "Preventative Care"
system will save local communities billions, maybe even trillions of
taypayer dollars!

2) Small business will be able to compete globally and hire additional
taxpaying employees!

3) Wealthy seniors will pay their fair share!

4) The tremendous burden on future generations will be greatly reduced!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement