COMMENTS: 55
9 Weight Loss Secrets the Diet Industry Doesn't Want You to Know
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.
Even if you're not trying to lose weight, chances are you've seen some ideas on how to do so:
"Eat what you want and lose weight!"
"Lose thirty pounds in thirty days!"
"Finally, a diet that really works!"
"Lose one jean size every seven days!"
"Top three fat burners revealed"
"Ten minutes to a tighter tummy!"
But these claims are readily rebuked by anyone who's tried to lose five, ten, or one hundred pounds. Losing weight ain't that easy. It's not in a pill, it doesn't (usually) happen in thirty days, and judging from the myriad plans out there, there is no one diet that works for everyone.
Looking past the outrageous claims, there are a few hard truths the diet/food industry isn't going to tell you, but might just help you take a more realistic approach to sustained weight loss.
1. You have to exercise more than you think.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends getting at least thirty minutes of moderate exercise most days of the week; this includes things like shoveling snow and gardening. And while this is great for improving heart health and staying active, research indicates that those looking to lose weight or maintain weight loss have to do more -- about twice as much.
For instance, members of the National Weight Control Registry (NWCR) -- a group of over 5,000 individuals who have lost an average of sixty-six pounds and kept it off for five and a half years -- exercise for about an hour, every day.
A study published in the July 28, 2008 issue of Archives of Internal Medicine supports this observational finding. The researchers enrolled 200 overweight and obese women on a diet and exercise regimen and followed them for two years. Compared with those that gained some of their weight back, the women who were able to sustain a weight loss of 10 percent of their initial weight for two years exercised consistently and regularly -- about 275 minutes a week, or fifty-five minutes of exercise at least five days a week.
In other words, things like taking the stairs, walking to the store, and gardening are great ways to boost activity level, but losing serious weight means exercising regularly for an hour or so. However, this doesn't mean you have to start running or kickboxing -- the most frequently reported form of activity in the NWCR group is walking.
2. A half-hour walk doesn't equal a brownie.
I remember going out to eat with some friends after a bike ride. Someone commented on how we deserved dessert because we had just spent the day exercising; in fact, we had taken a leisurely twenty-minute ride through the park. This probably burned the calories in a slice of our French bread, but definitely not those in the caramel fudge brownie dessert. Bummer.
And while it's easy to underestimate how many calories something has, it's also easy to overestimate how many calories we burn while exercising. Double bummer.
Even if you exercise a fair amount, it's not carte blanche to eat whatever you want. (Unless you exercise a ton, have the metabolism of a sixteen-year-old boy, and really can eat whatever you want). A report investigating the commonly-held beliefs about exercising, published in the Journal of the American Dietetic Association, concludes that although exercise does burn calories during and after exercise, for overweight persons, "excessive caloric expenditure has limited implications for substantially reducing body weight independent of nutritional modifications." In other words, to lose weight, you have to cut calories and increase exercise.
3. You have time to exercise.
If you have time to check email, watch a sitcom or two, surf the internet, have drinks/coffee/dinner with friends, go clothes shopping, and on and on, then you have time to exercise. Yes, sometimes you have to sacrifice sleep, TV, or leisure time to fit it in. Yes, sometimes you have to prioritize your exercise time over other things. But your health and the feeling you get after having worked out is well worth it.
4. Eating more of something won't help you lose weight.
The food industry is keen to latch onto weight loss research and spin it for their sales purposes. A prime example is the widespread claim that eating more dairy products will help you lose weight. However, a recent review of forty-nine clinical trials from 1966 to 2007 showed that "neither dairy nor calcium supplements helped people lose weight."
This idea -- that eating more of a certain type of product will help you lose weight -- is constantly regurgitated on supermarket shelves (think low-fat cake, low-carb crackers, high in whole grain cookies, and trans fat-free chips), but is in direct opposition to the basic idea behind weight loss -- that we have to eat less, not more.
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: indradawn on May 11, 2009 3:09 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Big Fat Lies with Gary Taubes, Stevens Institute of Technology
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Gary Taubes - the debunked, unqualified, nobody expert?
Posted by: jparsons
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bobcoejr on May 11, 2009 4:45 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: diet+exercise=weight loss
Posted by: willymack
Comments are closed-
Posted by: strahlungsamt on May 11, 2009 5:03 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yet, no matter how many times I tell her, she is still always trying to diet as if not being a swimsuit model is a social handicap. Honestly, it drives me crazy sometimes.
Ladies, 2 things:
1. Lots of men like slightly plump girls. It's natural.
2. Looks are overrated anyway. Personality is more important. If I don't get on with a woman, or if she is just plain stupid or annoying, I don't care how great a body she has. Besides, if I really love someone, I love her for her faults too.
Try asking your menfolk what they like before asking what a corporate magazine wants you to think they like. It's a lot cheaper and less painful than most diet plans.
Just my $0.02.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Good For You
Posted by: Gravitas
» RE: 10. Skinny women are overrated.
Posted by: EinMD
» RE: 10. 2 - 10.3 Chronic dieters are just not that sexy.
Posted by: stellabloo
» RE: 10. 2 - 10.3 Chronic dieters are just not that sexy.
Posted by: pelican beak
» RE: 10. 2 - 10.3 Chronic dieters are just not that sexy.
Posted by: stellabloo
» RE: 10. 2 - 10.3 Chronic dieters are just not that sexy.
Posted by: pelican beak
» RE: 10. 2 - 10.3 Chronic dieters are just not that sexy.
Posted by: jw32181
» It's not just about looks, it's about organs squooshed
Posted by: harpy
» Getting Desperate
Posted by: Gravitas
Comments are closed-
Posted by: paulmagillsmith on May 11, 2009 5:09 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At age 20 I began to really consider nutrition, primarily because of an illness I went through while living as a hippie in Haight-Asbury. I got conflicting diet recommendations from local doctors, but finally was set straight by a guy known as Blind Jerry who owned a health food store a block from Haight Street, and a couple blocks from the entrance to Golden Gate Park.
I've modified his information a bit in the intervening years, but here is my/his basic formula:
1) Protein is the essential friendly ingredient, while fat content in a food the enemy. Read labels and compare with alternatives. Don't just grab something off the shelf based on mass marketing. Do your homework while shopping in the grocery.
2) Pay attention to vitamin contents also. C & E are very important, but labels can be very deceptive. If you see a food having less than 5% of a couple or three vitamins it is most likely junk. Vitamin supplements are good, since eating commonly found foods off the shelf won't provide enough, but they aren't a panacea for everything.
3) The old 'three square meals a day', and 7 basic food group recipe is outdated info. The human body needs nutrition when it needs it, NOT according to an artificial clock. If you tune in to your body it will signal you when it's time to eat. I usually only eat when hungry, then eat as much of what my body tells me it's hungry for.
4) Stay away from aspartame, a neuro-toxic poisonous food additive, possibly the #1 cause of obesity in the US, and which causes a craving for carbs. READ LABELS! Almost everything sweet on the shelf with a no-fat, non-fat, lo-cal advertisement on it contains aspartame. What good does it do you if you drink a diet soda then gorge yourself on several doughnuts? It's also linked to 92 illnesses, and you're better off with regular soda, plain sugar, and especially honey or brown sugar.
5) Pay attention to your teeth. Many of the foods that are better for you are those requiring proper chewing. Don't gulp down your food & chew it thoroughly. The stomach sends a signal to the brain when full (based mainly on fat content), but the signal doesn't travel at light speed, so if there's excess food in there (or still on the way) you've eaten too much.
BTW, I just had my first routine exam by a doctor in over 10 years, including blood work. All vitimins excellent, organs healthy, cholesterol levels (good & bad) in good ranges, blood pressure excellent for someone even half my age. I went because I cracked a couple ribs in a fall, and the x-ray said lungs clear & heart normal. I'm 5'11" and 156 pounds. Like I said, though, genetics play an important role, but doesn't it make sense that if my forebearers were able to adapt & give me good genes I can pass the same on to my offspring or even theirs through nutritional predisposition? Fat America is a recent phenomena; just look at pictures from past generations.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Fat is NOT the enemy, you absolutely have to
Posted by: harpy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: chrysalis124812 on May 11, 2009 5:26 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Detroit will just have to start building a better bicycle.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ellie on May 11, 2009 5:39 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
add in the rule that food is for the hungry signal, like tummy growls and remember that your brain begins to signal your pancreas to unleash insulin beginning with smell, so make it worth it... a bit of a heavenly cookie split between 2 or 3 friends takes care of the craving...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» You're not gaining muscle at first
Posted by: harpy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Gravitas on May 11, 2009 6:32 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"If you have time to check email, watch a sitcom or two, surf the internet, have drinks/coffee/dinner with friends, go clothes shopping, and on and on, then you have time to exercise."
Ummm, NO!!! Because you must GIVE UP all those things and exercise instead. Give up e-mailing and socializing with friends??? Is living a more socially isolated life really a valid trade off? Not for me it isn't! And there are studies that show social networks are good for health. So the dubious benefits from weight loss may be overshadowed anyway.
I feel the same way about surfing the internet. NOTHING will make me give it up. It is the most convenient way to access what is really happening and not what we are spoon feed by MSM. I am not going to trade intellectual diminishment for physical diminishment.
I do agree with the author in that weight loss is a full time job for genetically fat people. Almost all naturally fat people I know who lost weight permanently(non surgically) are obsessed. They exercise for several hours a day and eat very little. Since most of us have very little free time, they don't have lives beyond the scale. I would never want that for myself. I don't have an extreme desire to conform to my society or the disease to please others. Arbitrary social trends do not define my worth!!! Spending my time in pursuit of my own interests, doing what is important to me, even my own pleasure once in a while in moderation are my priorities. It is the difference between being true to yourself vs going along with the crowd. And the problem is if you choose the later, you will always be at their mercy. No thanks!
http://www.myspace.com/vortexresister113
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» lol
Posted by: EinMD
» What You Are Saying is You Lack Reading Comprehension
Posted by: Gravitas
» RE: Unbelievable
Posted by: cryptique
» Yawn! Sounds Like You are in a Bit of Denial
Posted by: Gravitas
» RE: Yawn! Sounds Like You are in a Bit of Denial
Posted by: bizeeb
» RE: Unbelievable
Posted by: vioibi
» Maybe combine socializing with exercise?
Posted by: Gabba_Gabba_Hey
Comments are closed-
Posted by: FLYING DOOFUS on May 11, 2009 7:08 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: TarryFaster on May 11, 2009 7:21 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not only that, but they are now finding that HFCS contains MERCURY!
I started reading labels and excluding it from my diet and the excess weight started melting away.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» crystalline fructose...is another synonym for hfcs...
Posted by: undrgrndgirl
» YES! - Especially, find a bread without it
Posted by: Gabba_Gabba_Hey
» RE: YES! - Especially, find a bread without it **BRAND NAME OF GOOD BREAD PLEASE**
Posted by: maribelle
Comments are closed-
Posted by: stellabloo on May 11, 2009 8:56 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
12. Monsodium glutamate - MSG - is found in everything from chips to soups to gravy to FAST FOOD. It crosses the brain-blood barrier and randomly excites the neurons *the excitement of biting into DORITOS!*. As with any drug, you immediately want more. And more.
Also, the poster above is spot on with regards to aspartame, which breaks down to methanol in your system.
13. The reason europeans stay so slender is because they drink MINERAL WATER, which contains magnesium. It is little recognized that magnesium is really an electrolyte that works in conjunction with calcium to contract muscle. All muscle - including heart and gut muscle. Europeans LAUGH at your national obsession with eating bran. Imported water is impractical but you can take a calcium/magnesium (look for a soluble citrate form or such) supplement instead.
14. Get your beauty rest. The latest study I heard claims that people who don't get enough sleep tend to eat more to compensate. About 500 calories a day more. Makes sense ... Since 8 hours every night is unrealistic at present, I am big fan of the occasional NAP.
15. Stop thinking of it as EXERCISE! This is the same puritan hangover that tells us that things like dancing or sex *anything involving our sinful flesh* are BAD BAD BAD. Some activities, like golf or skiing, are so much fun that people will PAY big bucks to do them! Think of little kids who will gladly run around the neighborhood for hours (back in the old days at least).
For all its imperfections, the body is still a marvel of biochemistry - we can clone DNA or replicate it but we can't create a DNA sequence * or a critter * from scratch and the body you're sitting in is the only one you've got. New research suggests that we can actually alter our genes through lifestyle changes.
Explore your neighborhood by walking. Adopt a pound puppy - they love walking more than food. Consider working up to hiking, biking, self-defense, ballroom dancing or anything else that sparks your interest. Work the mind/body connection with yoga - you don't need an expensive class, it could be as simple as laying flat on the floor and letting yourself just breathe - good if you've been hunched over your computer for hours (yogajournal.com is an excellent free resource).
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» #16 Fill up on veggies & fruits 1st
Posted by: mcubed
» RE: veggies & fruits are also often more expensive "per carb"
Posted by: stellabloo
» You're right
Posted by: mcubed
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bob Bliss on May 11, 2009 8:59 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I would love to add her to my collection
Posted by: Gravitas
Comments are closed-
Posted by: TagsNOLA on May 11, 2009 9:23 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I started in May 2007 at 216 lbs with a 40" waist. Now in May 2009 I weigh 177 with a 32" waist. While I DO exercise, (I lift 4 days & do core training 1 day/wk.), there is now way I could have lost this weight without changing my dietary habits. I now eat zero junk food. Not ever! I avoid a lot of TV because, as the article says, the food ads are a stumbling block. Most personal trainers will tell you, to lose 1 pound a week on average, make sure you establish a 500 calorie per day calorie intake deficit. (ie burn 500 calories a day than you eat). You could do this by eating cake, but you'd burn up the cake really fast and feel hungry all the time. If you eat a balanced diet of protein, fat and carbohydrates (COMPLEX carbohydrates) you will fell fuller because it will take longer to digest you food so your stomach stays full longer. I eat 5 small meals a day but that's not really necessary. You can eat a three normal meals a day if you eat a balanced diet and maintain that 500 calorie per day deficit. This was one of the better articles I've seen in Alternet! Good on you guys for this one! Cheers! TagsNOLA
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: pierrot on May 11, 2009 10:05 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can anybody explain? Thanks
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Point 5? - It's about 'nutrient density', satiety and glycemic values.
Posted by: blurider
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Charlow on May 11, 2009 10:26 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A friend finally took me aside and told me about the gastric bypass surgery she had had 6 months previously and said that she thought it was actually working and that I should look into it. I did and discovered that because I was so heavy and that my insurance company would pay for the surgery because of the likelihood that I would get seriously ill with something that would be even more costly to them, I had it done.
In the process of being evaluated for the surgery, I discovered that gastric bypass is the only "cure" for morbid obesity that the NIH has discovered. Now, eight years later, my weight is stable, I can walk, and even be seen in public with a bathing suit on. I weight about 180 and wear size 12 jeans. I have a new chance at life and am taking it.
I firmly believe that the greatest component of my obesity was genetic. My father was obese as was his mother, and are all of my female cousins on that side of the family. It was probably a survival mechanism back when we all went through periods of famine. Those of us who could genetically pack in and hold onto our calories where the skinny high metabolism people didn't.
In any case, diets don't work and even exercising to keep it off is in my opinion, dubious. Once one is obese, the only solution is some form of surgical intervention. Nothing else worked for me. Now, I do not get hungry to the point that I ever eat in excess. The surgery prevents that. I lost 140 pounds after the surgery and have no regrets of any kind of having done this.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Formerly Morbidly Obese
Posted by: cryptique
» Yes, I permanently changed my diet as per Dr John McDougall's recommendations
Posted by: jparsons
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JTotino on May 11, 2009 10:42 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: harpy on May 11, 2009 11:21 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you have hypothyroidism or a condition called Wilson's Low Temperature Syndrome, which causes hypothyroidism and other problems, you can gain weight on 700 calories a day (this has been done in a hospital setting). You can and will gain weight when you exercise. Your body goes into preservation mode because your temperature is already too low, and anything that will cause your body to lose that protective fat, will cause your metabolism to slow down further. Anything that causes your blood sugar to rise too fast will make you gain weight via overproduction of insulin. Therefore, a low-glycemic diet of higher protein, and lower carbs will work best. High glycemic diets (high carbs and sugar) will overload your system and cause your metabolism to go haywire.
There is NO sure-fire way to regulate your weight, no matter what anybody says. It's individual.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: marid on May 11, 2009 4:27 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But seriously take a peek at Michael Pollans' "In Defense of Food" some very interesting points to say the least. Much of it deals with what and how we eat and its impact on us.
One I found very interesting is that since our food supply started being produced by factory farms the quality has gone down. The farms are intended to maximize profits (surprise there) and in so doing the food they produce has gone down in nutritional value, nutrients, and micro-nutrients. A hypothesis is that you eat until full of the new better foods we produce, but since it lacks nutrients and especially micor-nutrients, your body turns the hunger switch back on looking for more nutrient content. Possible?
Many years ago I worked in the seed corn industry and I still occasionally see people still in the business. More than a few of them have made the comment that the soil we grow our food in has changed for the worse, it even looks bad. A plant scientist friend has said that what they have produced is a root anchoring medium meant to maximize the absorbtion of petrochemicals. All natural things be damned.
We used to spend a substantially higher portion of our budget on food. We have lowered this dramaticly but it has been offset by soaring health costs. A connection? Nah they wouldn't do that to us just to make money.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ladyoracle on May 11, 2009 6:35 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That is completely me! I was obese and lost a tremendous amount of weight 1997-200 and have stayed within my BMI range ever since then. Every time the pounds creep back on, it's because I am exercising less and eating the same or more food. By less I don't mean that I stop exercising, but maybe I'd be down to three times a week for less than an hour instead of 4-5 days a week 1-2 hours, which is what I need to do to keep my weight where it is. I also eat probably 1800-2200 calories, so I do not starve myself, but lifetime weight control has meant that I am always, constantly aware of what I am eating and how many calories (roughly) it has. I mostly cook my own meals whenever possible. I have missed and shortened social engagements in order to exercise or to avoid food situations. Is that sad? Pathetic? Well maybe it is to some people, but after having been obese once, I will never go back there again. It is harder for me than for women who are my same size that have never been heavier. I can tell you that counting the effort I make to get proper food, plus exercising, educating myself on recipes and substitutions etc, the time I put into my weight control equals a 10-15 hrs/week part time job.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: vikrez on May 12, 2009 6:49 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Perhaps even more importantly, we're treated as consumers to be poisoned or fattened for profit, not human beings to be kept healthy as a basic human right. Add a deep-seated cultural revulsion against fat, and we have a wonderfully deadly recipe for widespread diseases along the spectrum from anorexia to metabolic syndrome.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Francetheperson on May 14, 2009 2:28 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: My Sure-fire Method
Posted by: ellie
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Gabba_Gabba_Hey on May 17, 2009 5:46 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think some Tolkien fans have named their daughters Bree, after the mixed-species town of humans and hobbits (progressive model of diversity?) where Frodo first met Aragorn - but what would inspire parents to name their daughter after a fine cheese?
She will have a hard time if she ever becomes a vegan.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: weilert on May 21, 2009 7:52 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
My Experience with a Psychedelic Plant That Thousands Have Used for Release from Severe Addictions
Is Using a Checklist the Answer to All Your Problems?
On Anniversary of Iraq Invasion, Time to Rethink Anti-War Activism




