Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Limbaugh's $400 Million Contract Is an Even Match for Clear Channel's Layoffs

By Eric Boehlert, Media Matters for America. Posted May 7, 2009.


What does Limbaugh think when he reads about the collapse of his radio employer while lounging in his 24,000-square-foot Florida estate?

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Are the "New Atheists" As Bad as Christian Fundamentalists?
Frank Schaeffer

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
How a Public Jobs Program Could Put America Back on Track
Julianne Malveaux

DrugReporter:
Pot Is More Mainstream Than Ever, So Why Is Legalization Still Taboo?
Steven Wishnia

Environment:
Why We Need Bees and More People Becoming Organic Beekeepers
Makenna Goodman

Food:
The Raw Milk Revolution: Behind America's Emerging Battle Over Food Rights
Makenna Goodman

Health and Wellness:
New York May Stop Heartless Health Insurers from Dropping Coverage When It Stops Being Profitable
William Ehart

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
Focusing on Fort Hood Killer's Beliefs Is an Easy Out to Avoid the Deeper Reasons for the Massacre
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Michelle and Barack's Marriage Has in Common with 56 Million Other Ones
Annabelle Gurwitch

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Fetus-Shaped Potatoes? Going Undercover Inside the Weird World of Right-Wing Abortion Foes
Ann Neumann

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
Instant Sex: Has the Digital Age Destroyed Relationships or Made Them Better?
Vanessa Richmond

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
With Unemployment at 40 Percent, Afghan Teens Enlist in Army, Police
Lal Aqa Sherin

More stories by Eric Boehlert

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Even for a pancaked industry like radio broadcasting, which has become somewhat numb to years' worth of mass layoffs triggered by hyper, corporate consolidation, and more recently by an over-the-cliff advertising recession, last week's HR wave of mutilation unleashed by industry giant Clear Channel Communications must have felt like a pile-on.

Drowning under massive debt and desperate to cut more costs, Clear Channel took an ax to its payroll -- again -- and hacked hundreds of radio pros out the door. Program directors, morning show hosts, production pros, news anchors -- all of them tossed over the side. A "bloodbath," one newspaper called it. (In Albany, New York, the entire on-air staff at a Clear Channel music station was sacked; same with a radio outpost in Exeter, New Hampshire)

The most recent blizzard of pink slips (one industry report pegged it at "nearly 1,000") came in the wake of a January purge, in which 1,850 Clear Channel employees were let go. So already this year the company has shed nearly 3,000 employees, or 12 percent of its workforce. Also, last week, Clear Channel's parent company announced it was suspending its matching contributions to employee 401(k) retirement programs.

Clear Channel, the conservative-friendly media behemoth with a soft spot for right-wing radio -- and which emerged earlier this decade as the poster child for everything that's wrong with runaway media consolidation (aka "The Evil Empire") -- is now hanging on for dear life. "It's a house of cards," radio watcher and Clear Channel expert Alec Foege recently told me, noting the company's crippling debt payments, which are due at a time when advertising revenues are vanishing. (Foege is author of 2008's Right of the Dial: The Rise of Clear Channel and the Fall of Commercial Radio.)

As The New York Times noted last week, "It is too soon to say who will be the biggest loser among media companies in this recession. But Clear Channel Communications is vying for the title."

Clear Channel's fall from business grace remains epic in its proportions. In 10 years time the company has gone from dominating a flourishing radio industry to a corporation that now teeters on the brink. (Clear Channel stock traded for $90 a share in 2000. When the radio company went private last year, pre-crash, the stock was already down in the $30s.) Lots of over-extended, debt-ridden media conglomerates are struggling through today's deep economic recession, but few face a future quite as perilous as the one staring back at the San Antonio radio giant.

And yet Clear Channel's most famous employee, Rush Limbaugh, remains oblivious to it all. I sometimes wonder what Limbaugh thinks when he reads about the not-so-slow-motion collapse of his radio employer while lounging in his 24,000-square-foot Florida estate or motoring in his $450,000 car to the airport to ride in his $54 million jet. Does Limbaugh feel bad? Does he feel a little guilty? And does he ever think about giving some of his riches back so that thousands of radio colleagues wouldn't have to be bounced to the curb?

And I wonder what those pink-slipped Clear Channel employees -- some of whom spent decades working for the company -- think about Limbaugh as they're ordered out the station door and onto "the beach." (That's radio-speak for unemployment.)

I wonder about Limbaugh and the thousands of his laid-off Clear Channel colleagues, because the dichotomy is striking: Last July, just months before the radio economy went into free-fall, Limbaugh's bosses at Clear Channel, who enjoy deep ties to Texas Republicans and who have been at the forefront of promoting right-wing radio, rewarded the turbo-talker with the biggest contract in terrestrial radio history. The contract included an eye-popping 40 percent raise over his already gargantuan pay, despite the fact it's doubtful any other radio competitors could have even matched Limbaugh's old pay scale.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: rush limbaugh, layoffs, clear channel

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
It's Sing Along Time!
Posted by: Crazy H on May 7, 2009 1:26 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
(to the tune of "Barack The Magic Negro"

Rush the rightwing blowhard
Lived by his tongue
Spouting lies and talking points
and other dittohead dung.

Little Rupert Murdoch
Loved old Rush's stuff
and bought him pills and Viagra
And underage offshore muff.

Evil Robber Barons
Would bow whene'er he'd pass
They'd assume that position
to kiss his hairy ... foot

One great day it happened
The dittoheads came no more
And Rush that mighty big gasbag
Ceased his endless roar.

Without his life-long fans
Rush could not be brave,
So Rush that fat wingnut
sadly slipped into his grave.

Rush the rightwing blowhard
Lived by his tongue
Spouting lies and talking points
and other dittohead dung.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» see: the LA Times Posted by: SeattlePackedSnowandCollidedCars
» RE: see: the LA Times Posted by: kabac
» RE: It's Sing Along Time! Posted by: nonaste
» ROTFLMAO! Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: It's Sing Along Time! Posted by: parrotuya
» RE: It's Sing Along Time! Posted by: kelly.nickell
On The Other Hand, They Just Signed Randi Rhodes
Posted by: Ishmael1 on May 8, 2009 1:44 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yep, Clear Channel will syndicate MIA Liberal Talker Randi Rhodes from Washington DC starting Monday, May 11. Perhaps CC is hedging their bets. I'm sure SHE didn't get 400 mil.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Its all business Posted by: Illiteratilumen
envy much?
Posted by: SeattlePackedSnowandCollidedCars on May 8, 2009 4:14 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
fyi Rush was fired before, many times. Running a radio station an't cheep but when George Sours is paying the bills then I don't see much of an issue on Media Matters part. Oh did I just spark a nerve? You don't get into radio because its going to get you the big bucks unless you can really entertain. I mean there is only 24 hours in a day and only a hand full of people have some sort of syndication. For the rest of you whom say "lets go after Rush's Sponsors" so you are going to take on GM, Life Lock, Zicam, Allen Brothers just to name a few? The UAW/The Government just took over GM and I know you can't wait for your Obamamoble that runs off of E85 corn like Doc's Delorean in Back to the Future II with that fusion thingy that Robber Gibbs won in a dice game at the Pentagon so really... yes really. Someday I just wanna pull back the bark off of the Media Matters slime tree just to see the Men behind your curtain.

p.s. it is immoral to use food for fuel

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» uh what? Posted by: Cory.Goodman
» Corn should be for eatting only Posted by: SeattlePackedSnowandCollidedCars
» RE: envy much? Posted by: mainspark
» RE: read much? Posted by: jewellthief
» Randi Rhodes aka the Crazy Lady Posted by: SeattlePackedSnowandCollidedCars
» RE: envy much? Posted by: kelly.nickell
» RE: envy much? Posted by: luzmejor
rewards
Posted by: DrXyzzy on May 8, 2009 4:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Does the radio superstar deserve a big, fat contract? No doubt.

Oh, come on. Let's not get into what he deserves.

This article was too long.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How is Clear Channel getting their money?
Posted by: xvictor on May 8, 2009 6:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
from the few times i listened to that fat clown and his sister-in-crime Sean Hannity, the radio ads they ran are herbal prostate remedies, gold bullion purchases, and horoscope nonsense. not much else. Ironically, their opposite "leftwing" radio station airs the same commercials.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» obviously Posted by: Cory.Goodman
The question is...
Posted by: daniel1982 on May 8, 2009 7:22 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is he making them money?

If 'Yes' then he probably saved jobs since his show (at least partially) offset losses in other areas. So is his show profitable or not?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» actually Posted by: Cory.Goodman
» RE: actually Posted by: daniel1982
» RE: actually Posted by: mizani
» Sure.. Posted by: daniel1982
» RE: Sure.. Posted by: kelly.nickell
» RE: The question is... Posted by: kelly.nickell
From a strictly business perspective...
Posted by: Illiteratilumen on May 8, 2009 7:30 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't think you can say they are overpaying him unless you also know how much revenue his show generates for Clear Channel. Putting politics aside for a moment one must ponder things like how many jobs would be lost if Limbaugh died of a stroke? Would the sound man even have a job if Limbaugh was not on the air? Does the sound man who works for Limbaugh command a higher salary than the sound man who works for the Jesus and Friends radio hour broadcasting out of Cornfieldsville, IN? He probably does.

Its a similar argument with professional sports. Many people complain that NBA players are overpaid. Well that may be the case to an average Joe who busts his ass and sees a guy who gets paid $10 million a year to put a ball through an iron ring. But the simple fact of the matter is that these players are the ones providing the product that their industry is selling. Without the Rush Limbaughs and Lebron Jameses there would be no entertainment value. No product. No revenue. No industry. No jobs necessary to support an industry that isn't there.

No matter what you think of Limbaugh (and if you think, you probably don't like him very much) you cannot deny that he IS the product. If he wasn't being compensated to the degree he is who do you think would be pocketing the difference? The soundman? The janitor? The station manager? I don't think so. The same questions must be asked of professional atheletes. If they get a smaller share of the pie they help generate who gets the difference?

Compensation for Limbaugh and other entertainers is best examined from a business perspective and not, as the author is doing, an emotional one.

That doesn't mean you can't be pissed that the blowhard is making that kind of bank. It just means you can't really say he's overpaid unless you look at the complete business picture.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Clear Channel conservative radio
Posted by: mcyclemama on May 8, 2009 7:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Going bust, laying off people, needs money?
What's the matter, the right wing rich assholes feeling a little of the pinch of the economy and not giving as much to that syndicate? Or is it that some of their listeners are starting to come to their senses and analyse the crap that comes from Clear Channel. If only that were the case. In addition, die FAUX NEWS die!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No such thing as 'Overpaid'
Posted by: gellero1 on May 8, 2009 8:03 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's strictly a cost/benefit ratio. Why begrudge the man his success.

The money circulates. And if he doesn't spend it all, remember Economics 101....... Savings = Investment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: No such thing as 'Overpaid' Posted by: daniel1982
» RE: No such thing as 'Overpaid' Posted by: kelly.nickell
» RE: No such thing as 'Overpaid' Posted by: daniel1982
» RE: No such thing as 'Overpaid' Posted by: kelly.nickell
The spoils of unfettered capitalism. A rightwing trash talker gets you $400 million, eh?
Posted by: maxpayne on May 8, 2009 8:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And yet honest workers never get anything close to it. Money talks, bullshit walks ! Or perhaps bullshit talks, money walks !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Point no one raises
Posted by: BlueTigress on May 8, 2009 10:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Clear Channel gives away Limbutt's program to a lot of stations.

No charge. Free. Here ya go!

How is that making them money? Other than it might make the ratings better for the ad revenue.

Clear Channel was stupid to boost his pay that much.

Oh, who am I kidding? Clear Channel is a stupid company that should be broken up because it is not serving the American people very well.

BREAK THE RADIO MONOPOLIES!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rush think?
Posted by: BlueTigress on May 8, 2009 10:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He also has no empathy for the laid-off employees.

He waddles around his house wondering which nerve endings to pleasure.

I doubt he reads anything other than his own press.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Tax rates need to change - compensation over $10M should be taxed at 90%
Posted by: MeyravLevine on May 8, 2009 11:16 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
over $5M at 80%...

The fact that Limbaugh's tax bracket is same or not much higher than the tax rate of hard working middle class is the problem.

No need to have salary caps. Just raise the tax rate for those making over $1M and up from 60% to 90%, and there will be no need to worry about how much fat hate-preachers get paid.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How do we hate Thy, let US count the Groups
Posted by: Purple Girl on May 8, 2009 4:41 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course Rush has alienated any minority listeners, liberals, openminded, thinkers and those with the ability to use deductive reasoning...Bu tnow he has headed into territory which may actually render him extinct. Not just the 99.00% of Americans not in his Wealth bracket, but also Military families and any and all which still hold our service men & women in uniform in high regard.
going after the Seals for 'gunning down minority teenagers' does not bode well when those 'Teenagers' were the ones who attemtped to committ an armed hostage attack. Besides the Reality is that in their country, there is no such thing as the 'teenage' years that is merely a Western luxury our kids are afforded- they have a rite of passage into adulthood once they hit puberty. So in a way, Rush not only insulted the Seals, but also the Pirates.
Then Rush decided to once again go after Colin Powell, who as a Lefty I Know was used by the Bushies to sell their illegal invasion- Powell was the only one left with any real creditability- so they Duped him. If they didn't give Congress all the Intell, I'm betting they didn't give it to Powell either.
so now Rush has not only gone after the enlisted ranks (like the ones unjustly called 'rouge 'at Abu Ghraib), but our expert marksmen and rescuers of the Ship Captain,And four Star General- hellova job supporting the Troops, Rush. Please TELL US once again what a 'Patriot' you are, how you support the Troops. Apparently only when they can be used to increase your Ratings and your pocket book.
Frankly,Rush even an 'Against the Wars' Liberal must disavow you for your shameless disrespect for those in Service to this country. Disgusting and Pathetic, as usual.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Radio, Rush and the dead Republican party line
Posted by: socrates2 on May 8, 2009 5:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To comment on what another writer wrote. I have worked in and for radio (and television and college newspapers). Allow me to tell you radio's dirty little secret: an FCC license is a license to pick the public's pocket. I did not invent that phrase, but it is a truism, nonetheless.
When all governments back in the 1930's nationalized the broadcasting band of the electro-magnetic spectrum, ours decided to grant _monopolies_, defended and policed by government, to whomever solicited a license to operate a particular frequency in a geographical area.
Originally anyone who "promised to serve" the public airwaves and not broadcast obscene material got a license for a couple of bucks. The big cost and initial investment was the transmitter and antenna. After that it was gravy all the way. And the gravy only increases exponentially depending on the market size and the wattage (reach of signal).
You _sell_ sponsors "air time" by the second to raise listener awareness of their product. The more listeners the more you can charge per second. As an example, next time check out what a Superbowl 30 second commmercial costs. By the way, radio technology is so primitive and _cheap_ compared to television. That means, other than the low-maintenance transmitter, low overhead at the station's end. All that money is pure, monopolistic profit! Programming has its costs (ASCAP/BMI royalties for music), but the station gets its money back _many times_ over.
And, as these monopolies are so lucrative (especially in larger markets), at one time a rule limited the number stations one corporation or individual could own.
Those limiting rules were done away with, as was the Fairness Doctrine--whose un(?)intended result has been the ubiquitous, on-air presence of over-rated right-wing windbags the masses either love or hate.
That said, Rush may or may not be worth the price to his Goebbel-esque ringmasters, but at one time they believed so. My question is, where were the _anticipated monies_ supposed to come from that were destined for Rush? And why is this money suddenly and mysteriously unavailable under the Obama administration and when the GOP is on the run, thanks to the past 8 years of misrule?
There is more to this _gambling on future revenues for Rush_ than meets the eye. Perhaps Rush's sponsors are indeed going broke and are cutting back on ad dollars.
On the other hand, Rush unashamedly waved, cajoled, and sold the GOP party-line and its hawkish views. The official view has changed and Rush is a liability, a 400 mill liability. Like Father Coughlin, perhaps Rush is starting to believe his own oral fantasies. And as someone once commented, Rush needed the embrace of a lot of Oxycontin before he could sleep at night...
I have to pity Rush at some level. Despite his obvious ability to absorb, regurgitate, and glibly sell _cherry-picked_ facts, Rush will always remain a _shallow_ human being. I find it difficult to believe than an individual with authentic self-insight, empathy, and understanding into the human condition could actually believe what Rush preaches.
Rush is fundamentally a comedian, but a one-trick pony, good for a week or two of laughs before his message recycles itself. And recycles itself and recycles itself and ...
"My condolences, Mr. Limbaugh; the reactionaries lost _this round_."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Nice. Posted by: LeaderofMen
konawriter
Posted by: konawriter on May 8, 2009 9:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The faster they go down the faster the fat bastard goes with them...Nazi assholes

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

observer
Posted by: davy on May 8, 2009 11:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who cares

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I've got mine, so SCREW YOU!
Posted by: willymack on May 9, 2009 10:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maybe HIS should be a cattle prod up his ever-expanding ass. That may just shock him into reality, but I doubt it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

mikedog
Posted by: tgroarke on May 9, 2009 1:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The fact that Limbaugh is the quasi official spokeman for the neo-con Republicans, Wall Street, the military-industrial- government-MSM complex; could it be that these entities are funnelling funds secretly to Clear Channel to support his gross earnings? These entities benefit more from his bloviations than he does. Just wondering.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I smell a rat
Posted by: Grandma Crabby on May 10, 2009 4:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is absolutely NO WAY, even with all his popularity, that Rush is worth that much money, essentially replacing thousands of technician types.

Many of you seem to be coming from the premise that the ONLY motivation for clear channel is they make that much off him, so Rush should get it. Since when do businesses like clear channel, with a political agenda, make decisions based on logical business practices? Their motivation is always something else.

Radio does not live on hosts alone. You gotta have the people who punch the buttons and get the tub of lard onto the air. Only if Rush got a raise while all jobs were kept could anyone argue that Rush brings it in and therefore deserves it. He ain't bringing it in or they wouldn't lay everybody else off!

Giving one person everything while neglecting everybody else is not a sustainable business model. Good! Let the bastards sink. I think America would be better off if right wing radio went bust.

Lub,
Granny
Granny's crazy videos Go get a chuckle!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rush has a special deal with Clear Channel,
Posted by: Ellie1 on May 10, 2009 10:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
he gets a percentage of the take from the commercials and supplies his "show" at no expense to the network. It is pure profit for the networks, no labor costs. I just can't figure out why any company would want to sponsor this retard!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Quit Listening to the Idiot
Posted by: 1rufus1 on May 10, 2009 11:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are three types of people that listen to Limbaugh: the ones who agree to almost everything he says, the curious, and the ones who hate him but listen to him to criticize his ideas. If the last group would simply quit listening to Limbaugh, his ratings would drop significantly. The curious usually give up listening anyway, but unfortunately there is a steady stream of curiousity. The "choir" Limbaugh preaches to is dwindling but a good portion will stick by him no matter what. Ratings is everything, so now is the time to turn the station when Limbaugh comes on and let him fade away.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

SYKES AND AIR AMERICA
Posted by: reelman on May 11, 2009 5:26 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yet another example of the angry tacky liberal approach to political life. At a spoof-fest that had not a thing to do with any talk show host a black female (Wanda Sykes) just had to “hope that Limbaugh’s kidneys fail”. Are political policies and kidneys anything alike?
Think about the angry viciousness and inappropriateness of that comment. Bush had eight years to have equal comments made about the kook hosts of hateful lefty Air America. None were made. Repeat, none were made, ever.

You see, there are no taste or ethical boundaries for the secular socialists. They get a pass to do this sort of tacky stuff week after week. The Dufus actually laughed. You can bet he will not smooth it over either. What does that tell you about the true nature of the man?

Its a tradition of national democrats to have others throw the spears or to just say anything they like…knowing the biased media will change their diapers as needed. Dumbing down the culture is democrat domain.

http://conservablogs.com/theconservativecrawfish

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement