Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Compañero Obama? Obama Mends Fences with Latin America

By Benjamin Dangl, AlterNet. Posted May 6, 2009.


The last time George W. Bush went to Latin America, protesters flooded the streets. Things have changed quite a bit since then.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Who's Paying for the Recession Most of All? Young Workers
Lizzy Ratner

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Do We Really Want to Enshrine Insurance Monopoly into Law? This and 5 Other Complaints About the Health Bill
John Nichols

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
How Biased Media Can Brainwash You
Melinda Burns

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
4 Ways the Stupak Amendment Deprives Women of Access to Abortion
Jessica Arons

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
How the Stupak Amendment Radically Undermines Abortion Rights
Rachel Morris

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
10 Suicides a Month at Ft. Hood -- War Stress Is Taking Soldiers to the Brink
Dahr Jamail

More stories by Benjamin Dangl

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

When George W. Bush went to Latin America, Argentine soccer star Diego Maradona called him "human trash," and protesters flooded the streets.

Now, when Barack Obama visited, leftist Venezuela President Hugo Chavez wanted to shake his hand, the right-wing president of Colombia, Alvaro Uribe, asked for his autograph and the anti-imperialist book Open Veins of Latin America made an unlikely journey to the White House.

What does the April Summit of the Americas say about the past and future of U.S.-Latin American relations?

"While the United States has done much to promote peace and prosperity in the hemisphere, we have at times been disengaged, and at times we sought to dictate our terms," Obama told 34 of the hemisphere's presidents at the summit. "But I pledge to you that we seek an equal partnership … There is no senior partner and junior partner in our relations; there is simply engagement based on mutual respect and common interests and shared values."

Such intentions were perhaps most clearly represented in the now-famous handshake between Obama and Chavez. At the start of the summit, Obama strode across the room to initiate a warm greeting with Chavez -- much to the chagrin of right-wing pundits and politicians in Washington.

Dick Cheney found the handshake "disturbing," and Sen. John Ensign, R-Nev., said, "I think it was irresponsible for the president to be seen kind of laughing and joking with Hugo Chavez."

Obama responded to critics by explaining, "Venezuela is a country whose defense budget is probably 1/600th of the United States'. They own Citgo. It's unlikely that as a consequence of me shaking hands or having a polite conversation with Mr. Chavez that we are endangering the strategic interests of the United States."

The encounters between Obama and Chavez were followed up with concrete plans to improve relations. Both countries agreed to restore the ambassadors in each nation; the diplomats had been pulled last September when oppression of supporters of Bolivian President Evo Morales was linked to U.S. funding and support.

Obama later said at the summit, "We recognize that our military power is just one arm of our power, and that we have to use our diplomatic and development aid in more intelligent ways."

Such rhetoric comes at a time when the region is clearly breaking free of Washington's grasp. Across Latin America, leftist leaders have been elected on anti-imperialist and anti-neoliberal platforms. On April 26, left-leaning Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa was re-elected with 51.7 percent of the votes, showing that the leader is one of the most popular in Ecuador's recent history; it was the first election since 1979 that did not necessitate a run-off vote.

Statistics also show that many Latin American leaders' socialistic policies -- and independence from Washington -- are improving the lives of their citizens.

Inés Bustillo, director of the Washington office of the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, a United Nations agency, recently told the Christian Science Monitor that in Latin America, "Between 2003 and 2008, we had average annual growth of 4.5 percent -- growth we had not seen since the late 1960s … That growth, and some really sound fiscal policies and expanded social initiatives, led to a 9 percent drop in the poverty rate -- 40 million people moving above the poverty line."

Obama Has a Fan in Colombia

Obama has previously criticized the Free Trade Agreement with Colombia, citing the assassination of labor leaders and violations of human rights as reasons for not supporting the deal. Yet Obama has since made an about-face on the topic. The day after the summit, the Obama administration announced that it will not renegotiate any part of the North American Free Trade Agreement and will continue pushing for the application of FTAs with Panama and Colombia.

Colombia's Uribe was in on Obama's plan at the summit, hence his giddiness when he approached the U.S. president to ask for his autograph. Obama complied, writing, "To President Uribe, with admiration."

Uribe joked of the note to reporters: "Barack Obama signed this little letter for me ... I'm going to send this to get framed."

But is Uribe really the kind of fan Obama needs? The Colombian leader has been regularly linked to violent right-wing paramilitary groups, implicated in gross human rights violations. Just recently, Diego Murillo, a former paramilitary and drug lord in Colombia, said in a U.S. court that he helped fund Uribe's 2002 election campaign.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: bush, chavez, obama, latin america, uribe, summit of the americas

Benjamin Dangl is the author of The Price of Fire: Resource Wars and Social Movements in Bolivia (AK Press, 2007). He is also the editor of Toward Freedom, a progressive perspective on world events, and Upside Down World, a news Web site uncovering activism and politics in Latin America. Email BenDangl@gmail.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Reawakening the "good neighbor policy"
Posted by: xvictor on May 6, 2009 6:03 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While the Repugs were in power here, they did a pretty good job in alienating our Latin American neighbors and helping to increase the numbers of left-wing governments to a substantial majority.

Colombia, a demonstrated U.S. subservient, is the only remaining major rightwing type government still around, and with an atrocious human rights record against their own people. Hopefully, the Colombian people can vote in their brand of government without the fear of intimidation from the U.S.

And good relations with Cuba is more likely now than ever before. Even the "gusanos" in Florida has finally grown tired of the anti-castro rhetoric.

.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Hardly, Victor Posted by: logansafi
Quite a difference, huh?
Posted by: willymack on May 6, 2009 9:50 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Instead of a boorish oaf impersonating our President, we now have a duly-elected man of grace, charm, and genuine good will in the White House. The difference couldn't be more welcome. Just look at the way President Obama is greeted everywhere he goes as he walks among the people rather than having an army protecting him. One thing I learned as a career Navy man is that if you're going to lead others, you'd do well leading by EXAMPLE. President Obama is doing just that in my opinion, and is setting a positive example for his successors to emulate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No to Bush's Panama FTA!
Posted by: orftc on May 6, 2009 11:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The fact that a Democratic president who promised to renegotiate NAFTA while on the campaign trail is now considering moving forward with a Bush-negotiated, NAFTA expansion is very disheartening.

Hopefully, President Obama will get his new USTR in check and abandon plans to champion the stalled Panama Free Trade Agreement. Bush's pact would be bad for Panama, bad for the United States and bad for Mr. Obama's wider political agenda.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» agenda?? Posted by: gellero1
Alvaro Uribe asked for his autograph?
Posted by: logansafi on May 6, 2009 11:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yeah? Whose companero es este pendejo Barack?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Great
Posted by: Dyolfknip on May 6, 2009 11:55 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now how about ceasing the half century of murderous economic blockade and state sponsored terrorism against the Cuban people? Oh, and if you really want to display your intention to be "engaged based on mutual respect" do it without making them prostitute themselves to American ideology just for the "privilege" of not being under constant embargo.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement