Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

The Soaring Rate of Abandoned Animals Is the Latest Sign of a Deep Economic Crisis

By Liliana Segura, AlterNet. Posted April 28, 2009.


Abandoned animals and "foreclosure pets" are the innocent victims of our financial downward spiral.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Nobel Laureate Slams the Bible, Calls It "A Catalogue of Cruelties"
Mario de Queiroz

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
As Foreclosure Nightmares Increase, Will More Homeowners Pay Off Their Bankers in Violence?
Scott Thill

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why the End May Be Coming for Coal
Christine MacDonald

Food:
Despite Censorship By Beef Magnate, Michael Pollan Spreads Message About the Real Price of Cheap Food

Health and Wellness:
New York May Stop Heartless Health Insurers from Dropping Coverage When It Stops Being Profitable
William Ehart

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
Study Claims Even the Most Sophisticated Readers Can Be Manipulated
Melinda Burns

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Michelle and Barack's Marriage Has in Common with 56 Million Other Ones
Annabelle Gurwitch

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Fetus-Shaped Potatoes? Going Undercover Inside the Weird World of Right-Wing Abortion Foes
Ann Neumann

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
Instant Sex: Has the Digital Age Destroyed Relationships or Made Them Better?
Vanessa Richmond

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
With Unemployment at 40 Percent, Afghan Teens Enlist in Army, Police
Lal Aqa Sherin

More stories by Liliana Segura

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Beginning last year and well into 2009, a disturbing media trend emerged, as local news outlets across the country began reporting different versions of the same sad tale: Dogs, cats and other animals were being found abandoned inside and outside of shuttered homes, the "silent victims," apparently, of the foreclosure crisis.

There were the three dogs found dead in Arkansas that had been locked inside pet carriers without food or water; the "emaciated" German shepherd left chained to a tree in the backyard of an abandoned home in Arizona (he was later euthanized); the starving pit bull in Stockton, Calif., discovered in the wreckage of a ruined house, whose owners had "trashed their home before a bank foreclosed on it." (One Animal Protective League officer in Cleveland calls this "part of the revenge process: They leave these animals to defecate in the house to destroy the furniture and to urinate on everything to make it difficult for the mortgage company to clean up.")

As more and more Americans have lost their homes to the wave of foreclosures that has swept the nation, a shocking portion of them, whether due to an inability or an unwillingess to find homes for their animals after being rendered homeless themselves, have simply left their pets behind.

"This has really become an epidemic," Allie Phillips, director of Public Policy at the American Humane Association told the Detroit News earlier this month. According to her estimates, with some 8,000 houses going into foreclosure every day, from 15,000 to 26,000 more animals are in danger of losing their homes daily.

Not all pets have been left to fend for themselves, of course. After all, most states consider it a crime abandon animals (although such anti-cruelty laws are not strictly enforced). But an untold number have been given up because the owners had no other choice.

The Detroit News tells the story of a woman who came in with her son to give up a 9-year-old purebred Yorkshire terrier after losing their home. "They were just bawling, but they had no place to live," said Kayla Allen, director of the Michigan Animal Rescue League in Pontiac.

And the New Haven Register recently told of a Connecticut woman who was forced to move in with her parents after losing her home, and in the process had to give up her two cats (sisters) as well.

"She had gotten them from a shelter when they were really, really tiny," said Mary Mellows, who runs a local cat rescue and picked up the cats in a gas station parking lot. "This woman had bottle fed them, and she had had them for 11 years, and she and her husband were being foreclosed on. She was devastated." The obviously well-cared-for cats "came equipped with everything -- cat trees and litter boxes and photo albums. They were definitely a part of the family."

In the news and on animal-rescue listservs, stories like this one are ubiquitous. They are also not going away. This past February, the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals estimated that the number of cats and dogs at risk of becoming homeless due to the economic crisis stands between 500,000 and 1 million.

'When times are hard for people, they're hard for their pets'

"What we've always known is that when times are hard for people, they're hard for their pets," Stephen Zawistowski, vice president at the ASPCA told the Associated Press last January. But with the unprecedented foreclosure crisis now compounded by a broader economic catastrophe, the landscape is looking particularly bleak. "According to national financial estimates, approximately 1 in 171 homes in the United States is in danger of foreclosure due to the subprime mortgage crisis," Zawistowski said in a statement released by the ASPCA in February. "And considering that approximately 63 percent of U.S. households have at least one pet-plus, hundreds of thousands of pets are in danger of being abandoned or relinquished to animal shelters across the country."


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: pets, recession, economic crisis, humane society, dogs, cats, foreclosure pets, animal shelters, no paws left behind, sean casey animal rescue, aspca, stephen zawistowski, american society for the , betsy saul, petfinder.com, viviane arzoumanian, subprime mortage crisis, jacki lugg

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Growing up in a poor family, I went through a lot of evictions and we abandoned
Posted by: and_abottleofrum on Apr 28, 2009 12:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
a lot of pets. There is probably nothing that still bothers me so much about my childhood as abandoning animals I was so close to - emotionally closer to them than to other people, even my family.

I can read about massacres, famine, children dying in large numbers and in squalor from what in wealthy countries are considered simple diseases - I've even lived around starving and crippled children in East African countries - and these things don't produce that reaction I see so often in other people to avoid and withdraw from overwhelmingly disturbing facts, like when someone just refuses to believe that our way of life is unsustainable or doesn't care to hear about suicide bombings in the Middle East, and the reason is clearly a visceral unease at the prospect of facing an ugly reality.

I've recently noticed the only stories and realities that produce this kind of reaction in me are about animal cruelty, like infant seal kills, poaching, pets abandoned upon eviction. Maybe this is because animals are innocent in that they don't possess a moral sense which they then choose to ignore, and they are loyal because the artificial social-competition games that humans engage in have no meaning in their worlds. Their only concerns are for food, shelter, security, and affection - which ideally would be the only significant focal points of human activity. So I tend to see "animals" as better than human beings (we are animals). Humans are a disappointment because, on the whole, they could be more than they turn out to be.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Since the economic downturn has not affected me...
Posted by: Honky The Antichrist on Apr 28, 2009 12:52 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been donating more than I normally do to the Humane Society.

As always, people can fuck themselves and die of swine flu.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Swine Flu? Posted by: Honky The Antichrist
I Agree, Humans Have Issues
Posted by: bryangalt on Apr 28, 2009 2:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think one of the problems people have with their animal care is the idea that we are somehow more important than our family friends are. Just look to the Bible for confirmation: doesn't it state rather clearly that Man shall have dominion over the beasts of the land and the sea? Of course, the person that put that verse in the Bible was probably the largest sheep hearders in Sumeria at the time.

If you are a believer in God, then I must ask you what will say when your God asks "how could you let my creation, my gift to you, die like that?"

Are humans a disappointment? Yes. We could have been and should have been so much more than just the sum of our greed and indifference.

Oh, and by the way, I think it should be a felony with a minimum 5 year sentence for leaving any animal chained up inside a foreclosed home, no exceptions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Neuter and spay your animals...
Posted by: adp3d on Apr 28, 2009 3:27 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First of all let me say that pets that are victims of "seasonal dumping" are not family members. Second of all, these economic "surrenders" are a matter of choice. I wonder how many of these people choose to keep their cable TV service while giving up their four legged "family members".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» [add] Posted by: Gabba_Gabba_Hey
For anybody who has divorced and left an animal companion with your ex
Posted by: ZPaul on Apr 28, 2009 3:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Am I being silly to say that there should be visiting rights with your animal companion? Because of circumstances beyond my control, I could not keep our cat in my new residence. My ex has her, and although I'm glad that our cat is in a good home, I miss Luna (that's the cat's name)....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Legislation to require Licensing for Breeders
Posted by: Purple Girl on Apr 28, 2009 4:05 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This issue is of course more wide spread fr cats & dogs- but horses have an even tougher plight. Housing requirements and food & care costs are leaving amny to starve. While visiting FL last year I heard that horses were being led into the swamps as a means of disposing of them- gator food.
This wide spread tragedy may be the time to push for real solutions to our overpopualtion of pets.
Saving animals is admirable, but does not solve the porblem. There are far too many people haphazardly breeding animals.Not just 'puppy mill' profiteers, but novices who just want Fluffy to have a litter, Or Bess the Old Grey mare -so the kids can witness a birth. Then they are stuck with the litter or the foal with no means or comprehension of what to do next.
It is time that we institute stricter breeding standards and laws. Not only must the people obtain a license to be a breeder, but each animal the intend to breed must be evaluated,certified and licensed. Of course food production animals would be exempt.
We need vets to not only assure these animals are fit/worthy to breed, but the owners have the knowledge and ability to manage the offspring.
Make both Licneses Expensive- Thus dissauding the Whimsical breeder and buyer.This will eliminate the emotional breeder, and push buyers towards less expsensive shelter pets (which would be reducing in numbers through fewer reckless breeding).
As an owner of both a broodmare and a stallion colt- I would be appreciate the process and certification by a trained Vet attesting to their 'soundness' and approriateness. This would be the equivalant of a 'gold medal Standard', adding value to my sales horse. If my is certified, and another is not- mine is more valueable. Most notably if they are also qualified for a breeding prosepect. Additionally this would also assure me these horse would be purchased by knowledgeable and licnesed breeders (prelicensed to Buy breeding stock).
Having worked in the Horse industry for 15 yrs I have seen not only back yard breeders do a grave disservice to broodmares, stallions and offspring- but also large breeders who breed mares and stallions of low quality- bad conformation, temperment or abilities. The guiding adage for any breeding program should always be 'Breed the Best to the Best and hope for the Best'. If you breed low quality to low quality, that is guaranteed exactly what you will get.
Additionally any one caught breeding with out a license, or breeding an animal without a license should face Heavy Fines. Ending abandoned, abused or neglected animals is quite similar to ending abortion- stop the unwanted pregancies to begin with.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

just because you are homo sapien...
Posted by: ellie on Apr 28, 2009 4:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
doesn't give you the right to abandon pets... we are not higher on the evolution scale... would your pet abandon you???

when you adopt a pet, it's till death do us part... realize this before adopting...

would live under a bridge with the human and animal kids dumpster diving before walking away from the pet kids...

the spark of human cruelty runs deep and is getting deeper...

back to coffee...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Homeless and Helpless
Posted by: rfgtile on Apr 28, 2009 4:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am saventy-eght, my wife is seventy-three years old. Our small business is about to go under due to the ecomomy. We live in rural North Carolina. We have found three abandoned starving dogs in the last three months discarded on the highway. One of them was pregnant and had nine puppies in our spare bedroom. We have adopted out all of the puppies to good homes except the three we are keeping along with the mother and our other dogs. We can ill afford it financially...but we can ill afford not to...morally.

We have faith that God will find a way....and gratitude that he has given us this wonderful oportunity and these loving and beautiful friends. We are blessed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Homeless and Helpless Posted by: patsy6
» You are the "True" Angels! Posted by: zooeyhall
» If we lived in a civilized nation Posted by: NYmediator
» RE: Homeless and Helpless Posted by: jbitch
no surprises
Posted by: SekhmetsatRa on Apr 28, 2009 5:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
it doesn't surprise me people abandon their pets. to certain humans, pets are trophies, just one more aspect of the status-showing. i started a trend in my suburb by actually walking my dogs. they aren't lawn ornaments. they are family. if anything were to happen, and i'd lose my house, i have relatives who will take ALL of us. i disagree on the cost of dog vs cat care, however. dogs are much more expensive to keep legally than cats(licensing, leashing, training). to keep a dog healthy is even more expensive. and bigger dogs cost more, both because of food and meds, but also because bigger dogs are seen as more dangerous. we had to switch insurance three times because one of my dogs is a german shepherd/border collie/whippet mix and the other is a dane/rottweiler mix. i had to get cgcs for both before finding a home policy. it isn't easy, and the price of dog food has gone up 50%. the vet bills are still about what they were, but i have relatively young dogs. people don't consider what all goes into CARING for a pet as opposed to OWNING a pet. two completely different worldviews.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What's next, abandoning kids? Even Ace Ventura needed a pet to help him when he was in debt.
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield on Apr 28, 2009 5:30 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pets and kids have feelings too. Unfortunately, society has become way too materialist to be able to take feelings into consideration. Lose everything but please do not give up your humane self by abandoning your pets or kids or for that matter your spouse. Besides, if you had seen the movie Ace Ventura Pet Detective, you would have seen the ending where Ace finally gets the mystery solved when one of his pets accidently helps him. If he had abandoned his pets, he wouldn't have been able to keep his rented apartment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

coachappho
Posted by: coachsappho on Apr 28, 2009 5:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you for the information. Obviously, these are uncommon times economically(as compared to most times in our recorded US history). But no matter what the times are like, it is always okay to surrender an animal to a rescue agency if you are unable or unwilling to give your pet adequate care. This is much more responsible than just abandoning your pet. The beautiful cats in the story - yes, it's sad the owner had to surrender them - but, they will be the first to be adopted into a home where the owners ARE prepared to give the cats a good home.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nothing Personal It's Just the Free Market
Posted by: Triton on Apr 28, 2009 6:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First they sell houses that people cannot afford, then they make loans which people can't pay, then they forclose and people lose their jobs and are on the streets. If they are lucky, they get to live in tent cities.food is in short supply and they are forced to eat pet food. The pets are no longer affordable so they must be abandoned. The families have no medical insurance and the cost of perscription drugs is beyond their means. These are the unneeded people which the oligarchs have decided we can do without.

The bankers who bare the responsibility for this horror whine about the decrease in ther salaries because they are worth every penny of their bonuses. The insolvent banks which should fail recieve massive handouts from the Treasury because it is their right. The economic advisers of the President are all members of the Bankers Club and if they can find more money it will also be given to the banks at the cost of future generations.

The House and Senate represent Big Everybody and as a result the environment is dying, innocent people are dying, the planet is dying.
The oligarchs live like princes did during the Middle Ages and the people are no more than serfs.

Interestingly, almost half of the serfs support the party of the oligarchs. What has that party every done for them and why do they support it? For that matter, what has the other party ever done which is fundamently different from the party of oppression?

The American Dream is more an illusion or a nightmare than reality. As a nation, we no longer lead in manufacture, education, science or infant survival.

We are on the down side of greatness and the slide to mediocraty is steep. To be an older citizen, with all the limitations of age, may be a blessing at this point in our history.

That we tolerated eight years of Bush and Chaney is a measure of our moral decay. That the current President is not really interested in identifying those who initiated the program of torture is another example of how morality no longer plays a role in guiding the course of our nation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» VERY well said. Posted by: NYmediator
Glad to see this getting its own article
Posted by: Tereska on Apr 28, 2009 6:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a volunteer in feline rescue I have seen the numbers of animals in need rise and rise. It used to be people would come in and say oh this cat is scratching my furniture, my new boyfriend is allergic, and all other selfish excuses that made me so mad, but now more and more its truely sad people coming in that obviously love their cat, but they got evicted and are either in the street, or going somewhere they cant take their cats and the pain is so deep. I can't imagine what I would do or how I would feel if I had to give away my family. Let alone the amount of strays running around my neighborhood after dark. Spay & neuter is the best soltion we have right now please do it!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thanks for an insightful story!
Posted by: ladyoracle on Apr 28, 2009 7:03 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As I write this, my adopted 14-lb rescued manx mix cat is sniffing my feet. I love my 2 cats, and my husband and I have decided not to get anymore animals because we live abroad, and bringing pets from country to country is very expensive, but we paid 4K to have them with us. I would have to be truly destitute to surrender my cats, but if I couldn't feed them, I would give them up. I think people who make unethical decisions about their pets and leave them in foreclosed homes should be prosecuted for animal abuse.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Isn't there a relationship between folks who will abuse animals and sociopathic...
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Apr 28, 2009 7:14 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...behavior?

Perhaps then, there is also a link between financially self-destructive behavior and a disregard for animal welfare?

Or perhaps the willingness to walk away from ones commitments is just simply that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I dunno, maybe: Posted by: NYmediator
» You give folks no credit. Posted by: ABetterFuture
» You have a valid comparison. Posted by: countingdaisies
I can't imagine...
Posted by: Gisele on Apr 28, 2009 7:37 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
giving up any one of my 4 cats, no matter how bad it gets.

Three of them came to me via "last chance gulch." The next step for them was euthanasia, and one was an abandoned animal who almost ate me out of house and home for 3 weeks. His eating style is still that of a starving animal 10 months after rescue.

My vacation paid for their neutering/spaying, their vaccines and sundries that happy cats have. I'm at my limit, yet there is one who still comes to my door daily for food and water. It took me a short while to realize that he was "brought" to my door by the last cat to adopt me! And they say animals don't think?

The economic downturn has begun its effects here too...I'm looking to buy an old van to live in if need be. One that holds all five of us. I can't imagine not having them with me...just can't do it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I can't imagine... Posted by: jackyD
So sad
Posted by: Jacko95 on Apr 28, 2009 7:55 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
OMgosh this is so sad. These poor animals have done nothing to hurt anyone and they are being discarded like trash. So sad indeed!

RT
Is your ISP watching?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Thanks, GuitarBill! Posted by: zooeyhall
» RE: So sad Posted by: helenahanbasquet
Adoption is easier than ever before
Posted by: stellabloo on Apr 28, 2009 7:56 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... with sites like Petfinder and Furever Pets in Canada, you can search through shelters and adoption agencies online to find exactly the breed you're looking for. Furever Pets will even search through high kill shelters in the US and fly your new pet to Canada.

In return you get a pet who has already been examined by a vet and checked out by volunteers, is already spayed or neutered and HOUSEBROKEN. Now if I could just get used to my dog following me everywhere around the house, including the bathroom ...

The other thing is that $1200 a year maintenance is an excessive quote, canned pet food is crap anyway - your pound puppy will not keel over because you accidentally fed it a raisin. In fact a pound puppy is better than a garberator when it comes to reducing household waste - you certainly can't pour bacon fat down the drain.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Adoption is easier than ever before Posted by: countingdaisies
My favorite t-shirt:
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on Apr 28, 2009 7:57 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you love animals called pets, why do you eat animals called dinner?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: My favorite t-shirt: Posted by: jaguarxjs
» RE: My favorite t-shirt: Posted by: Eddie Van Helsing
» RE: My favorite t-shirt: Posted by: NYmediator
» RE: My favorite t-shirt: Posted by: Reader in Japan
» That's a cute slogan, but... Posted by: morticia
» RE: My favorite t-shirt: Posted by: Reader in Japan
They're just animals
Posted by: jaguarxjs on Apr 28, 2009 8:05 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm glad we aren't wasting time talking about the human cost of the economic crises.

Interesting about how Americans don't care that autoworkers and millions of others are losing their jobs, bank executives are sucking them dry, they just care about the poor cute animals.

Give me a break, this article isn't journalism, it's just fluff.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: They're just animals Posted by: Liliana Segura
» RE: They're just animals Posted by: WyrdSister
» RE: I'm with you on this. Posted by: Cybershaman
» How people treat animals... Posted by: zooeyhall
» RE: They're just animals Posted by: mooresart
» RE: They're just animals Posted by: Reader in Japan
» RE: They're just animals Posted by: Liliana Segura
this is so sad
Posted by: zooeyhall on Apr 28, 2009 8:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It just breaks my heart to read stories like this.

I have a little Chihuahua who is the light of my life. Not only is it a terrible thing for the pets, but I can sympathize with the owners also.

There is so much evil in American society.

There is always an answer for a pet in this situation. PLEASE...if you are a pet owner, please think of your poor animal who cannot take care of himself. Take it to the Humane Society, advertise and/or ask friends to help. They can at least take your pet temporarily until you get back on your feet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dems are generally more supportive of animal issues
Posted by: vasumurti on Apr 28, 2009 8:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Kathleen Marquardt founded Putting People First, an anti-animal rights group. In her 1993 book, Animal Scam: The Beastly Abuse of Human Rights, she says:

"The real agenda of this movement is not to give rights to animals, but to take rights from people—to dictate our food, clothing, work, recreation, and whether we will discover new medications or die." Identical assertions could have been made about the abolition of human slavery, the crusade to end child labor, the liberation of concentration camp prisoners from Nazi physicians or an end to the experimentation upon black humans by white humans.

Marquardt writes that the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA) "now encourages vegetarianism, the banning of fur, and the eventual end to all animal research, not just ‘cruel’ animal research." Marquardt writes that the Humane Society now supports vegetarianism.

According to Marquardt, "The typical animal rights activist is a white woman making about $30,000 a year. She is most likely a schoolteacher, nurse, or government worker. She usually has a college degree or even an advanced degree, is in her thirties or forties, and lives in a city."

Marquardt cites studies indicating that animal rights activists tend to identify with liberal causes such as feminism and environmentalism. "Every year," writes the Reverend Andrew Linzey, "I receive hundreds of anguished letters from Christians who are so distressed by the insensitivity to animals shown by mainstream churches that they have left them or are on the verge of doing so." It is not surprising, therefore, that Marquardt reports that "Most activists share a bias against Western civilization and its Judeo-Christian foundations."

According to Marquardt, the "political clout" of the animal rights movement "is surprisingly bipartisan. But most of the leading politicians working with the animal rights movement are liberal Democrats." Marquardt makes mention of Senator Barbara Boxer of California, Nevada Congressman Jim Bilbray, Charlie Rose of North Carolina, Tom Lantos and Gerry Studds.

Marquardt admits, however, that "some Republicans are animal rightists, too. Senate Minority Leader Bob Dole of Kansas often supports animal rights causes—except, of course, those pertaining to cattle, a major business in Kansas. Senator Robert Smith of New Hampshire was a founder of the Congressional Friends of Animals. Bob Dornan of California, one of the most conservative House members, is an animal rights advocate—he cosponsored legislation banning the use of animals in testing cosmetics and received a PETA award. And Manhattan Congressman Bill Green promoted legislation that would have shut down over 90 million acres of federal land to hunting, fishing, and trapping."

Marquardt states further that "Although he’s not an elected official, a conservative political figure who, surprisingly, is on the other side is G. Gordon Liddy, author Will and a key figure in the 1972 Watergate uproar. When I went on Liddy’s radio show, he and PETA’s Ingrid Newkirk greeted each other with hugs and kisses and lots of warm words.

"With allies in both political parties and across the ideological spectrum," concludes Marquardt, "the animal rights movement has been able to score some great successes, regardless of which party controls the White House or Capitol Hill."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» People like Marquardt and her ilk Posted by: NYmediator
Forclosure kitty
Posted by: Sunfell on Apr 28, 2009 8:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Last year, I adopted a cat from a local charity, because our shelters do not have a 'no-kill' policy. He was a foreclosure kitten- his family had 7 cats, and had to give up 5 when they were foreclosed upon and forced to move. I took him in, and he gets along with my other shelter kitty just fine.

I wish I could adopt another cat or two, but I know my limits, have a budget, and have a backup plan for them should something happen to me. They may be 'just cats' to some, but they are my responsibility- and my family.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Except for the flagrant abandonment, this is a good step
Posted by: HLbuchanan on Apr 28, 2009 9:25 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Look, these people having pets in the first place are irresponsible. Ok. If they have a good job and bills are not a problem then fine have a pet. But for struggling people to waste public resources on pets is irrisponsible. The same as the Cable/TV argument. Yesterdays story about the strugling Iraqis displayed one picture of a big TV in the house. Here is a strugling refugee family, with a TV larger than mine (35" CRT thank you).

I agree, abandoning pets to either starve or wreck havoc on a foreclosed or otherwise vacated residance is spiteful and lame. But in general if you can't take care of the pets, you need to either find a home for them, eat them or euthenize them. (and for those that don't want to eat their pets, thats fine with me if you don't want to eat meat, I am not advocating it - but you have that option, we live in a omniverous society and many familys pets are not illegal to eat in this country)

My wife was just complaining to me the other day about someone in line with her at the Store buying dog food with her food stamps. I am fine with the government handing out food stamps. Until the laws change and stops providing food stamps to people - no issue. but unless those folks are buying kibbles and bits for human consumption, public welfare feeding peoples luxuries (pets) is really a travesty of the intent of the welfare system.

So I say get rid of those pets.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: food stamps Posted by: WyrdSister
» Here comes the judge! Posted by: morticia
Abandonment of an animal is never justified
Posted by: Old Skeptic on Apr 28, 2009 1:56 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm not referring to those who surrender their pets to a legitimate shelter when they can no longer care for them, but to the slime who leave them to starve in abandoned houses or yards. It can be weeks or months before anyone actually comes to inventory these properties; by then, the pet or pets would probably have died. What a way to reward their trust and loyalty! Surely people who do these things will be sent to the hottest part of hell.

At least if the pet is signed over to the local shelter, it will be euthanized humanely and will not suffer. It might even get lucky and be adopted. Who knows? Better a slim chance than none at all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dont Ever Buy From A Breeder
Posted by: macdon1 on Apr 28, 2009 3:17 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you want to help animals adopt from a shelter and never buy from a breeder. My neighbor who always adopted abandoned animals finally got the Maine Coon kitten of her dreams. Today, a few months later he had to be put down because he had an incurable fatal disease called Feline Infectious Peritonitis. The vet said his mother was a carrier and should have never been used for breeding. Now my neighbor's heart is broken. Never buy from a breeder, adopt an orphan instead.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pet food pantries
Posted by: Honky The Antichrist on Apr 28, 2009 4:31 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some of you folks with Cosco or Sam's Club memberships can get bulk rate dog and cat food.

Check with your local shelter. Many shelters are providing pet food for people that would otherwise have to abandon their pets.

It burns my ass that I may be contributing to the quality of life to people but I think of it like this: people are not adopting pets because of hard times and these pets are in loving homes. The best option is helping people maintain their animals.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

My thoughts are mixed on this issue...
Posted by: djnoll on Apr 28, 2009 4:39 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
mostly because I find it appalling what people do to their pets in general. I am saddened that shelters have to make decisions about putting down perfectly healthy animals because there is no room for them or the rescue groups who must try to find homes for these animals.

As for the people though - their behavior is inexcusable. Most people facing foreclosure have up to three months or more before they are going to be evicted by the bank. That is ample time to find new homes for their pets, and if they say they cannot, then they are lying.

I found homes for over 8 dogs in the last year, and not once did I advertise in a paper or online or in any manner other than word of mouth. And I never had a puppy or a dog for more than 30 days beyond the time they could go to a new home! I have lived in small towns, so you would think that finding homes would be harder, but it wasn't. I have lived in large cities and never had a problem either. People who abandon their pets are probably not thinking clearly due to panic at the loss of their jobs or their homes, but that is not an excuse for these kinds of actions.

PEOPLE, IF YOU ARE GOING TO LOSE YOUR HOME FOR WHATEVER REASON - MOVING, JOB LOSS, FORECLOSURE, WHATEVER - YOU HAVE PLENTY OF TIME TO FIND THE APPROPRIATE NEW HOME FOR YOUR FAMILY PET!!! MAKE IT YOUR FIRST PRIORITY BECAUSE IF YOU MAKE IT YOUR LAST THEN THE ANIMAL WILL SURELY DIE!

There are worse things in this life than being homeless, and living with the knowledge that you have abandoned an innocent living being to die from neglect or lack of shelter is most definitely one of them. And if you have children, pray they never fully realize what a monstrous thing you are doing to their friend and companion. You will pay dearly for that, I can assure you.

PLEASE PLAN YOUR HOMELESSNESS SO THAT BOTH YOU AND YOUR PETS SURVIVE - HEALTHY AND WHOLE, PHYSICALLY AND MENTALLY!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pets Shouldn't Have To be Given Up!
Posted by: marusasma on Apr 28, 2009 4:51 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've been a long time dog breeder/owner/trainer of German Shepherds. Two years ago, I was looking squarely at a foreclosure. Fortunately, the house sold before the bank got it. I would have killed myself before being homeless again. I'm serious about that because I had already lost my house once to a catastrophic fire that killed most of my show chickens and one of my beloved shepherds. Several others died a couple of years later from cancer because of the toxins released by the fire.

However,as difficult as it was, I found a place where I could live and still have my dogs (8 shepherds, 1 pug, 4 cats) and the chickens and turkeys. Although it was not ideal, the point is, I was able to keep my "family" together. Last fall, the owner of the place where we were renting sold the place and we had very little time to get out and find another place. Again, I went into panic mode and put it out everywhere that we needed a place that allowed pets. I'm now living in another spot, so it can be done with some creativity.

I'm still hoping to own my own home again as renting is just not my thing, but at least it is a roof over my head and the animals seem happy enough.

There is no excuse in the world to leave a pet behind, whatever the reason. It is cruel and inhumane (and there is enough of that in this world today). All of my cats are rescues. I have one that is almost 20 that was rescued from one of my patients when she was going into a nursing home. The cat was 16 at the time and in excellent health and I couldn't stand seeing her put down for this stupid a reason.

I have taken dogs that I've bred back when the owner's situations have changed. Most reputable breeders will if you ask them nicely. I'm really at a loss how anybody can give up something that has become part of the family.

Landlords have to give their renters some slack here. Renters generally have to have renter's insurance which covers any damages that may have been incurred.

I realize that there is a financial crisis and God knows I'm a victim of it, but I made a commitment when I took on the responsibility for these guys and I intend to honor it. Anybody who really cares would do the same thing. No, I'm not a PETA person or even an advocate of theirs. They are not animal lovers. They are nothing more than animal terrorists.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the slippery slope (part 1)
Posted by: vasumurti on Apr 28, 2009 5:13 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Russell Weston Jr., tortured and killed 12 cats: burned and cut off their tails, paws, ears; poured toxic chemicals in their eyes to blind them; forced them to ingest poison, hung them from trees (the noose loose enough to create a slow and painful death.) Later killed 2 officers at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, DC.

Jeffery Dahmer staked cats to trees and decapitated dogs. Later he dissected boys, and kept their body parts in the refrigerator. Murdered 17 men.

Kip Kinkle shot 25 classmates and killed several in Springfield, Oregon. He killed his father and mother. Said he blew up a cow once. Set a live cat on fire and dragged the innocent creature through the main street of town. Classmates rated him as "Most Likely to Start WWIII."

As a boy, Albert De Salvo, the "Boston Strangler," placed a dog and cat in a crate with a partition between them. After starving the animals for days, he removed the partition to watch them kill each other. He raped and killed 13 women by strangulation. He often posed bodies in a shocking manner after their murders.

Richard Allen Davis set numerous cats on fire. He killed all of Polly Klaus'
animals before abducting and murdering Polly Klaas, aged 12, from her bedroom.

11-year-old Andrew Golden and 13-year-old Mitchell Johnson tortured and killed dogs. On March 24, 1998, in Jonesboro, Arkansas, Golden and Johnson shot and killed 4 students and 1 teacher during a fire drill at their school.

After 16-year-old Luke Woodham mortally stabbed his mother, killed 2 classmates and shot 7 others, he confessed to bludgeoning his dog Sparkle with baseball bats and pouring liquid fuel down her throat and to set fire to her neck. "I made my first kill today," he wrote in his court-subpoenaed journal. "It was a loved one...I'll never forget the howl she made. It sounded almost human." In June 1998, Woodham was found guilty of 3 murders and 7 counts of aggravated assault. He was sentenced to 3 life sentences and an additional 20 years for each assault.

Theodore Robert Bundy, executed in 1989 for at least 50 murders, was forced to witness a grandfather who tortured animals. Bundy later heaped graves with animal bones.

At 4-years-old, Michael Cartier dislocated the legs of rabbits and hurled a
kitten through a closed window. He later shot Kristin Lardner 3 times in the head, before shooting himself.

Henry Lee Lucas killed numerous animals and had sex with their corpses. He killed his mother, common law wife, and an unknown number of people.

Edward Kemperer cut up 2 cats. He later killed his grandparents, mother and 7 other women.

Richard Speck threw a bird into a ventilator fan. Killed 8 women.

Randy Roth taped a cat to a car's engine and used an industrial sander on a frog. Killed 2 of his wives and attempted to kill a third.

David Richard Davis shot and killed 2 healthy ponies, threw a wine bottle at a pair of kittens and hunted with illegal methods. Murdered his wife, Shannon Mohr Davis, for insurance money.

Peter Kurten, the Dusseldorf Monster, tortured dogs, and practiced bestiality while killing animals. Murdered or attempted to murder over 50 men, women and children.

Richard Trenton Chase, "The Vampire Killer of Sacramento," bit the heads off birds, drained animals for their blood, killed animals for their organs, and later killed 6 people in random attacks. One police officer present at the scene of the first murder, confessed to having nightmares about the crime for months afterwards.

"The Kobe Killer," an as yet unnamed 15-year-old boy in Japan, beheaded a cat and strangled several pigeons. Decapitated 11-year-old Jun Hase, and battered to death a 10-year-old girl with a hammer, and assaulted 3 other children in separate attacks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the slippery slope (part 2)
Posted by: vasumurti on Apr 28, 2009 5:14 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Richard William Leonard's grandmother forced him to kill and mutilate cats and kittens when he was a child. He later killed Stephen Dempsey with a bow and arrow. He also killed Ezzedine Bahmad by slashing his throat.

Tom Dillion murdered people's pets. He shot and killed Jamie Paxton, aged 21; Claude Hawkins, aged 49; Donald Welling, aged 35; Kevin Loring, aged 30; and Gary Bradely, aged 44.

At 9-years-old, Eric Smith strangled a neighbor's cat. At 13, he bludgeoned 4-year-old Derrick Robie to death. Smith lured the little boy into the woods, choked him, sodomized him with a stick, then beat him to death with a rock.

David Berkowitz, "Son of Sam," poisoned his mother's parakeet out of jealousy. He later shot 13 young men and women. 6 people died and at least 2 suffered permanent disabilities.

Arthur Shawcross repeatedly threw a kitten into a lake until the kitten drowned from exhaustion. Killed a young girl. After serving 15-1/2 years in prison, he killed 11 more women.

Michael Perry decapitated a neighbor's dog. Later killed his parents, infant nephew and 2 neighbors.

Jason Massey's killing resume began with cats and dogs; at 20 he decapitated and disemboweled a 13-year-old girl and fatally shot a 14-year old boy. He claims to have killed 37 cats, 29 dogs and 6 cows.

Patrick Sherrill stole neighborhood pets, tethered them with baling wire and encouraged his dog to mutilate them. He killed 14 co-workers and himself in 1986.

Keith Hunter Jesperson, "Happy Face Killer," bashed gopher heads and beat, strangled and shot stray cats and dogs. He is known to have strangled 8 women. He said: "You're actually squeezing the life out of these animals...Choking a human being or a cat--it's the same feeling...I'm the very end result of what happens when somebody kills an animal at an early age."

Carroll Edward Cole, executed in 1985 for an alleged 35 murders and reputed to be one of the most prolific serial killers in U.S. history, confessed that his first act of violence was to strangle a puppy under the porch of his house.

Robert Alton Harris murdered two 16-year-old boys, doused a neighbor with lighter fluid and tossed matches at him. His initial run-in with police was for killing neighborhood cats.

Rachel Carson wrote: "Until we have the courage to recognize cruelty for what it is whether its victim is human or animal we cannot expect things to be much better in this world. We cannot have peace among men whose hearts delight in killing any living creature. By every act that glorifies or even tolerates such moronic delight in killing we set back the progress of humanity."

In a 1990 letter to Eric Mills of Action For Animals, vegetarian labor leader Cesar Chavez similarly observed:

"Kindness and compassion towards all living things is a mark of a civilized society. Conversely, cruelty, whether it is directed against human beings or against animals, is not the exclusive province of any one culture or community of people. Racism, economic deprival, dog fighting and cockfighting, bullfighting and rodeos are cut from the same fabric: violence. Only when we have become nonviolent towards all life will we have learned to live well ourselves."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Think of the fish! Those poor, suffering little babies!
Posted by: AJR Journal on Apr 28, 2009 6:32 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nobody ever mentions the fish!
All people do is just flush them down the toilet.
Where is the outrage!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» So long, and thanks for all the fish! Posted by: DR. LARRY MITCHELL
A Familiar Ache
Posted by: kurmudjin on Apr 28, 2009 6:39 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Today I was exiting my favorite local Co-op, after having purchased a $4.00 blueberry muffin for an afternoon snack, and I saw a dirty, homeless man lying on the parking lot asphalt with two dogs, a mature collie and a small adorable puppy, which was contentedly curled up at his side. A man in a pickup truck was talking with him. There was an air of friendliness in the encounter and I suspect that the man in the truck was making sure that the guy with the two dogs was all right; just being a kind human being.

I had the same familiar thought that I always have, "He can have a dog but I can't" Let me explain. I have a good, secure job that is weathering this economic crisis quite well. I have a nice home in a semi-rural area with a fenced-in piece of property that is against a beautiful green belt. Yet, because of my intense work schedule, I am unable to adequately care for and have a dog, a pet that would be my friend and companion and that I would love and cherish dearly. I grew up with animals and miss them terribly.

I have begun to wonder if our priorities are so screwed up that the job which affords a $4.00 muffin can compare to the gentleman who has little but love to lavish on a canine companion? Just thinking a little and a lot here...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A Familiar Ache Posted by: morticia
» RE: A Familiar Ache Posted by: bookie
» RE: A Familiar Ache Posted by: doodledoo
adoption/rescue
Posted by: sureshot45 on Apr 29, 2009 8:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
my husband is picking up our rescued aussie shepherd/retriever mix today from a shelter. i was somewhat surprised at the extensive adoption process..but figure these rescues want to see that people will put in the effort to ensure a good home for the animal.

the people that leave their animals to fend for themselves and destroy homes to prove a point obviously never cared for the 'pet' anyways.

i do realize that many people are suffering across the country due to lost jobs, foreclosures etc. but not too many years ago..when these people had jobs, money, homes..i sometimes wonder were they saving any? the trend (at least in the u.s.) seems to be living beyond ones means..and has been for some time.

i was taught growing up to spend conservatively, and save as much as possible..you never know what could happen.

of course there are true victims of the ecomony right now..and i do not mean to downplay the seriousness of the situation..but i do wonder about if the irresponsible consuming has come back to bite people in the ass. and their poor pets and kids are the real victims.

read an aritcle the other day about a doctor with a $4,000 mortgage payment saying how he and his family live month to month and cannot afford the 'luxuries' in life due to the economy. give. me. a. break. i think a house with a payment like that must be quite a luxury.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sad
Posted by: Gravitas on Apr 29, 2009 9:02 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that readers have no compassion for humans. One of my biggest beefs with animal rights people. No doubt some people were irresponsible. And there is NO excuse for leaving a dog tied to a tree or locked inside a home. But I am sure there is genuine heart break too for those who really did lose their homes. I know I recently sent my cat to live with my mother because I may lose my job. My mom's cat of 18 years passed away and I don't regret my decision. It is a great mutual fit. Lily (kitty) will receive excellent care. It has only been 1 month and she already has my mother trained to her satisfaction. No the same thing as taking her to a shelter but I do feel sorry for those who have no other choice. The last thing they need is judgement from the self-righteous. Don't be so absolutely sure it will never happen to you!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sad Posted by: Old Skeptic
» RE: Sad Posted by: doodledoo
» RE: Sad Posted by: sureshot45
What does animal welfare tell us?
Posted by: ReallyBearish on Apr 29, 2009 11:03 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A line from the poet William Blake:

"A dog starved at his master's gate
Predicts the ruin of the state."

There is a bigger picture here, and it ain't pretty.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement