Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Confirmed: Rep. Jane Harman Tried to Kill NSA Wiretapping Story -- May Have Swayed 2004 Election

By John Byrne, Raw Story. Posted April 21, 2009.


The New York Times has confirmed Harman tried to keep the paper from publishing an article exposing warrantless wiretapping.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Are the "New Atheists" As Bad as Christian Fundamentalists?
Frank Schaeffer

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
How a Public Jobs Program Could Put America Back on Track
Julianne Malveaux

DrugReporter:
Pot Is More Mainstream Than Ever, So Why Is Legalization Still Taboo?
Steven Wishnia

Environment:
Why We Need Bees and More People Becoming Organic Beekeepers
Makenna Goodman

Food:
The Raw Milk Revolution: Behind America's Emerging Battle Over Food Rights
Makenna Goodman

Health and Wellness:
New York May Stop Heartless Health Insurers from Dropping Coverage When It Stops Being Profitable
William Ehart

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
Focusing on Fort Hood Killer's Beliefs Is an Easy Out to Avoid the Deeper Reasons for the Massacre
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Michelle and Barack's Marriage Has in Common with 56 Million Other Ones
Annabelle Gurwitch

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Fetus-Shaped Potatoes? Going Undercover Inside the Weird World of Right-Wing Abortion Foes
Ann Neumann

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
Instant Sex: Has the Digital Age Destroyed Relationships or Made Them Better?
Vanessa Richmond

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
With Unemployment at 40 Percent, Afghan Teens Enlist in Army, Police
Lal Aqa Sherin

More stories by John Byrne

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The New York Times confirmed late Monday that a top Democratic congresswoman called the paper in 2004 and tried to keep it from publishing an article exposing the Bush Administration’s warrantless wiretapping program -- possibly helping to sway the balance in the 2004 presidential election.

The New York Times exposed the warrantless wiretapping program in 2005, revealing that the National Security Agency had engaged in the interception of thousands of American and foreign calls without a warrant as part of a program intended to disrupt terrorist plots. Upon running the story, they also admitted that they had withheld the article for a year at the urging of Bush Administration officials.

But buried in a Times article published Tuesday is the revelation that the top Democratic congresswoman on the House Intelligence Committee, Jane Harman (D-CA), called the paper’s Washington, D.C. editor in “October or November” of 2004 in an effort to quash the story.

“Bill Keller, the executive editor of The Times, said in a statement Monday that Ms. Harman called Philip Taubman, then the Washington bureau chief of The Times, in October or November of 2004,” the Times writes. “Mr. Keller said she spoke to Mr. Taubman -- apparently at the request of Gen. Michael V. Hayden, then the N.S.A. director -- and urged that The Times not publish the article.”

“She did not speak to me,” Keller said in a statement, “and I don't remember her being a significant factor in my decision.”

In addition, “Shortly before the article was published more than a year later, in December 2005, Mr. Taubman met with a group of Congressional leaders familiar with the eavesdropping program, including Ms. Harman. They all argued that The Times should not publish,” they Times reporters added.

At the time of her calls in 2004, Harman was part of the Gang of 8 — one of eight powerful members of Congress who are briefed on heavily classified intelligence matters. She was the most senior Democrat in the House dealing with intelligence affairs, and was sidelined after the 2006 congressional elections.

“October or November” 2004 would have been the month before, or the month of, respectively, of the election that Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) lost to then-incumbent President George W. Bush.

The paper did not give the exact date of Harman’s call.

Harman’s role in the wiretapping scandal emerged after a story Sunday in Congressional Quarterly, which disclosed that the California Democrat had been caught on an NSA wiretap promising an Israeli agent that she’d lobby to get the charges for two Israeli lobbyists accused of espionage reduced. The Times expanded on the story today.

An “official with access to the transcripts said someone seeking help for the employees of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, a prominent pro-Israel lobbying group, was recorded asking Ms. Harman, a longtime supporter of its efforts, to intervene with the Justice Department,” the paper wrote. “She responded, the official recounted, by saying she would have more influence with a White House official she did not identify.

“In return, the caller promised her that a wealthy California donor -- the media mogul Haim Saban -- would threaten to withhold campaign contributions to Representative Nancy Pelosi, the California Democrat who was expected to become House speaker after the 2006 election, if she did not select Ms. Harman for the intelligence post,” the paper added.

The full Times story is available here.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: bush, democrats, republicans, nancy pelosi, warrantless wiretapping, jane harman, jane harman

John Byrne is editor of Raw Story.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Harmon
Posted by: rideyourbike11 on Apr 21, 2009 9:55 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
She's caused the deaths of so many young Americans, not to mention all the others she's hurt as well.

Some Democrat she's turned out to be.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» LIEberman laughs in our face Posted by: weathered
» RE: Harmon-not only that Posted by: viewsights
» Ohhhhh you are so right and Posted by: outsideagitator
» Nice agenda in your post Posted by: channing
Not surprising
Posted by: Llama11 on Apr 21, 2009 10:05 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Corruption knows no partisanship, don't be surprised by this information. The Democrats are a bunch of cowards and pussies and shills for the corporations.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Never surprising Posted by: greenPuker
» RE: Never surprising Posted by: Llama11
Wow.....
Posted by: kaelieh on Apr 21, 2009 10:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm guessing that she pissed someone off that ended up getting this story leaked.

The scary thing is, even though America has a clue now, since stuff like this and the torture memos are actually showing up on TV, I bet nothing changes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Wowless..... Posted by: greenPuker
This is nothing but Antisemitic witch hunt
Posted by: MeyravLevine on Apr 21, 2009 10:40 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Any minute now Abe Foxman will release a statement calling NSA officials Antisemitic fools who should be torturing underage towel-heads instead of framing patriots like Harman and AIPAC officials.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Yeah, and have them drop their pants Posted by: outsideagitator
Don't think so...
Posted by: CatDad on Apr 21, 2009 11:17 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In America circa 2004 the electorate was too afraid and distracted to have been "swayed" by a story like this. In 2004 the terrorists were coming to get us...

The media prior to Steve Colbert's 2006 Gridiron Dinner speech treated Bush in the same way that Pravda treated Brezhnev. They would not have offended our "leader" back then.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Don't think so... Posted by: Jdog
This is espionage.
Posted by: channing on Apr 21, 2009 11:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"“In return, the caller promised her that a wealthy California donor -- the media mogul Haim Saban -- would threaten to withhold campaign contributions to Representative Nancy Pelosi,..."

From this excerpt Haim Saban is guilty of espionage and/or bribery of elected officials and/or racketeering (RICO), while Jane Harman is guilty of Treason.

Is this a nation of laws or not?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» No, it isn't Posted by: Schnookums
Well, who cares anyway, right?
Posted by: Bliss Doubt on Apr 21, 2009 12:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama doesn't care about warrantless spying, torture, wars waged on false pretenses, investment fraud. Why should we? Why not be happy little bots and eat our burgers and drink our sodas, watch tv and buy what the advertisers want us to?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: "Counting Bodies Like Sheep" Posted by: Bliss Doubt
They're both guilty
Posted by: bluebama II on Apr 21, 2009 1:15 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a real print journalist let me begin saying the Times has no business making editorial decisions determined by generals, ESPECIALLY, after Judy what's her face was caught peddling the 9-11 lies to privatize Iraq's oil. Harman wanted the Domestic Terrorism Act crap. I can't remember the correct name but it is a rebirthing of regional courts outside the legal system trying people for "domestic terrorism activities," sedition, persons "suspected" of wanting to possibly harm the government. Now she's on tape and the New York Times is saying she and a general got them to kill a story about the NSA data mining on innocents, which they have now admitted included print journalists. Obviously, they spy on American senators in their own offices.
Way toooooo much powerade in their Dixie cups.
I used to trust the Times. No more. The paper of record records what it wishes when it deems it beneficial to record it and if you need to sell an Oil War to make hundreds of billions in oil contracts well call up the Times and order a sychophant. Shine the light on all of it. Perkins, 2004, Confessions of an Economic Hit Man about the CIA/World Bank is an enlightening experience. Let's clean it all up at once, spring cleaning and let the oil rigs fall where they may!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What "lie" EncinoM? Posted by: channing
» RE: What "lie" EncinoM? Posted by: EncinoM
» Great Job, Channing! Posted by: LeftWright
» RE: Great to see you too Posted by: channing
Great Comments!
Posted by: PaulC on Apr 21, 2009 1:46 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
BlueBama II and CatDad's comments particularly caught my eye.

I would add that legislators such as Harmon are supposedly public figures. Why can we not really clamp down on these monsters outside of political/legal channels?

Why are these traitors allowed to go about their monstrous, dirty lives without constant expressions of outrage from everyone they meet?

Are they so isolated that they can get away with murder within their social framework, never mind the legal and political corruption?

peace,
Paul

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Harman's guilt is greater than any Republican's
Posted by: Jdog on Apr 21, 2009 3:17 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I know the Democrats are not perfect. I am registered with them primarily so that I can vote for Kucinich or some other occassional progressive that slips into the primary process.

Having said that, I do usually end up voting for the Democratic candidate in most general elections because Democrats are, at the end of the day, the adults in the room. As such, when they act like the Republican children we're trying to keep in line, the act is much worse.

I'd like to see someone organize a serious push for her removal from office or, at the very least, her resounding defeat in the next election.

Democratic leaders need to understand that we care. Otherwise, they'll turn into the same anti-American gang that runs the GOP.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Johnnyn Mack
Posted by: JTMixer5 on Apr 21, 2009 3:42 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wow, I think you may well be onto something here!

RT
Privacy Center

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Johnnyn Mack Posted by: Ross Wolf
bblinky
Posted by: h2oman on Apr 22, 2009 7:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good Points, but this thing has raised several other questions:
1. How many other members of Congress and political activists have been tapped for potential extortion insurance? And under Obama’s FISA version, what is to really prevent continued tapping?
2. Did the press withhold an expose about wiretapping by the Bush administration prior to the 2004 election at Harman’s request?
3. Was Harman made aware of torture when it was being started?
4. Did her AIPAC contact have any power to influence selection of congressional committees or sub-committees and, if so, who could be so influenced?
5. Will Holder's Justice drop the spy charges against the AIPAC operatives and thus rug-sweep the whole episode?
6. How much influence does AIPAC have on Congress AND Obama’s administration?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Great questions and we need answers Posted by: outsideagitator
No surprise in Washington
Posted by: luzmejor on Apr 22, 2009 6:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
History shows it is always feeding time in the congressional Zoo. There are the many early examples from the founding of the Republic.

Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Over and over again!

The only thing we citizens can do is mandate strict term limits. We might also consider going back to taping everything that goes on in the Oval Office. Of course, that might lead to their doing their shady business in dark alleys instead.

Maybe if we just forbid lobbyists from doing any of their business in the halls of Congress? They could call their representatives' district office staff and have their messages relayed instead, just like the rest of us do.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Treason to the Democratic Party ...
Posted by: chorton on Apr 22, 2009 9:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and to the people. The Democratic Party needs to develop the will and the way to expel these people!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Lesson Here?
Posted by: jaguarxjs on Apr 23, 2009 7:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Democrat or Republican you CANNOT trust politicians, they are just people and will do whatever is in their own best interests.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

(&(&(_(&_
Posted by: itouch backup on May 7, 2009 10:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
_________________________
Video Converter OS X

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement