Greed: The Ugly American Pastime

By Marty Jezer, AlterNet. Posted August 1, 2002.

Professional sports often reflect, and sometimes shape, important currents in American life. Race, for example: The daily indignities of racial discrimination were too easily ignored by white Americans until Jackie Robinson broke baseball's color barrier. Only when racial segregation was dramatized by the national pastime did the demand for racial justice become a visible national issue.

And so it is with major league baseball and corporate economics. The greed that fueled the stock-market bubble and crash was mirrored in major league baseball. And now greed threatens to cause a walkout (one dare not dignify it by calling it a "strike") by baseball players that would abort the baseball season just when the pennant races are heating up. The dynamics of the baseball dispute shed light on the current corporate scandals. As Yogi Berra once said, "You can observe a lot just by watching."

The issues that may lead to a September walkout include revenue sharing to minimize the financial advantage (and hence competitive edge) that big-market teams have over their small-market opponents and a "luxury tax" that, like revenue sharing, would distribute money from high-salary teams to those that can't now afford high-salaried star players.

Both the National Football League and the National Basketball Association have variations of sporting socialism. Both leagues encourage competition by divvying up media revenues and capping the total amount of money a team can pay for player salaries. Baseball, however, insists on free market economics (except of course when owners demand taxpayer money to build their private stadiums).

Mirroring the corporate world, money determines all. Big markets and rich owners determine team competitiveness. Those teams without either rarely become part of a pennant race.

Baseball players are more concerned with their salaries than they are about the competitiveness of the sport. It's the same in the corporate world where top executives expect and get more money even if their leadership stinks and their companies fail. The average salary for a major league ball player is $2.4 million. The elite get over $10 million per year; the scrubs who rarely play are guaranteed $200,000.

The corporate world has an even more inequitable disparity. According to the AFL-CIO (http://www.aflcio.org/paywatch) the average CEO for a major corporation received (in 2001) $15.5 million in total compensation, more money than the salary of all but the four highest-paid ballplayers. Just as player salaries increased even as big league revenues declined, median CEO pay grew 7% despite a 35% decline in corporate profits. In other words, merit had nothing to do with pay. Failure is financially remunerative -- more so in the corporate world than in the major leagues, though that's hard to believe.

Where does it end? What is the salary cap for greed? According to Business Week, the average CEO earns 531 times more than the average hourly paid worker. (In 1980 the ratio was 42:1, in 1990, 85:1). By contrast, Alex Rodriguez, who gets $25 million as the Texas Rangers shortstop, earns "only" 125 times the amount of the lowest-paid major league benchwarmer.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »