Blame Prohibition, Not Pot Smokers for Violence in Mexico
Stay up to date with the latest headlines via email.
"Just Say No" advocates have hatched a campaign scheme to blame people who smoke marijuana for the horrifying violence in Mexico.
An article in the Wall Street Journal reported that anti-drug groups plan to use this message when talking to high school students and plan to ask the Partnership for Drug Free America ("this is your brain on drugs") and the Obama administration to make this argument.
Proponents of the campaign hope young people will stop smoking marijuana if they associate the activity with the murder of people in Mexico. This theme is similar to one that former drug czar John Walters used after 9/11. Walters ran TV spots during the Super Bowl and print ads in hundreds of newspapers across the country attempting to link drug use with international terrorism.
These ads were roundly criticized across the political spectrum. They were eventually canceled as a result.
This latest campaign, like the "drug use supports terrorism" deception, is destined to backfire.
It will surely be ridiculed and will further discredit the "Drug Free America" crew's credibility with the young people they proclaim to care so much about.
The research backs my hypothesis. In 2006, a federally funded study conducted by the research firm Westat and the University of Pennsylvania's Annenberg School for Communication found that anti-drug ads linking drug use to terrorism by the Office of National Drug Control Policy had no effect on the kids who had seen them, and in some cases actually made them more interested in marijuana.
There are a few problems with these campaigns: They are inaccurate in some cases, and downright dishonest in others.Office of National Drug Control Policy It is disingenuous to connect the average American's marijuana consumption to the horrific violence of Mexico's drug war. The average pot smoker's growing and purchasing of marijuana has no relationship to the violence along the border that is the result of large-scale drug trafficking.
For the people who do smoke marijuana that comes from Mexico, it's not too hard to figure out that it's not the marijuana plant or use of it that causes the violence. The violence is a byproduct of drug prohibition that makes the plant as valuable as gold and creates a profit motive that people are willing to kill for.
The drug-free-society crowd had their counterparts during alcohol prohibition, who similarly blamed the beer drinker for Al Capone and the violence.
People continued to drink during alcohol prohibition, just like people use drugs during drug prohibition. When alcohol was illegal in this country, organized crime ruled the streets and violent turf wars resulted in shootouts in the streets. Sound familiar?
Today no one dies over the sale of Budweiser. People eventually figured out that alcohol prohibition did not prevent people from drinking. But it did lead to out-of-control violence and a black market that benefited bootleggers who controlled the trade.
Drug prohibition today is no different. Tens of millions of people still use marijuana and other drugs. But instead of regulation and control, we have more than 7,500 deaths in Mexico over the last year-and-a-half from drug-prohibition violence.
The violence in Mexico has led to an unprecedented debate about the failures of drug prohibition and possible exit strategies from the unwinnable war. More and more people are calling for all options to be considered -- including the option of legalization.
In February, the Latin American drug policy commission co-chaired by three ex-presidents, Fernando Henrique Cardoso of Brazil, Carlos Gaviria Diaz of Colombia and Ernesto Zedillo of Mexico, broke new ground with a report calling for decriminalization of marijuana and the need to "break the taboo" on open and honest debate.