Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Sarah Palin Suffers Massive Political Fallout from Her Latest Nutcase Nominee

By Max Blumenthal, The Daily Beast. Posted April 14, 2009.


The governor is reeling after nominating for attorney general a man who allegedly defended the right of men to rape their wives.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
What Can the Morass of the 1970s Tell Us About the Current Economic Crisis?
Alejandro Reuss

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Does the House Bill's Public Option Kill Off the Senate's?
Booman

Immigration:
Recent Democratic Victories May Grease the Wheels for Immigration Reform in Congress
Marcelo Balive

Media and Technology:
Focusing on Fort Hood Killer's Beliefs Is an Easy Out to Avoid the Deeper Reasons for the Massacre
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Obama Is Up Against in His Own Branch of Government
Russ Baker

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
"Precious" Star Claims the Spotlight
Emily Wilson

Rights and Liberties:
"Women Are Being Killed All Over the World": One Reporter's Fight Against So-Called "Honor Killings"
Robert S. Eshelman

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Radioactive Wastewater in New York Raises More Concerns About Oil Drilling
Abrahm Lustgarten

World:
Egyptian Marine: Soldiers Often 'Racialize' the Enemy to Cope With Stress
Aaron Glantz

More stories by Max Blumenthal

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

While priming her political machine for a likely 2012 presidential primary run, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin has fomented a scandal that threatens to further erode her reputation in the Last Frontier.

In March, Palin nominated Wayne Anthony Ross for attorney general. Ross, a colorful far-right lawyer and longtime Palin ally who sports his initials, W.A.R., on his Hummer’s vanity plates, was once considered a shoo-in for confirmation. However, his nomination was thrown into grave peril when his opponents presented evidence that he called homosexuals “degenerates,” hailed the “courage” of a student who lionized the Ku Klux Klan, vowed to undermine the sovereignty of Native American tribes, and allegedly defended men who rape their wives. According to two sources close to the confirmation hearings, Palin may ask Ross to withdraw before his appointment comes to a vote.

Palin’s hopes for a swift confirmation process were dashed April 10 when Leah Burton, a veteran lobbyist on children’s issues and domestic violence, submitted a letter to the Alaska State Judiciary Committee claiming that Ross publicly defended spousal rape. According to Burton, who detailed the allegations for me, Ross allegedly declared during a speech before a 1991 gathering of the “father’s rights” group Dads Against Discrimination, “If a guy can’t rape his wife, who’s he gonna rape?” (In a subsequent letter, Ross denied the remark and claimed, “I don’t talk like that!”)

Burton said Ross’s statement was consistent with his overarching attitude toward women’s issues. She claimed that he once said during a debate on the Equal Rights Amendment, “If a woman would keep her mouth shut, there wouldn’t be an issue with domestic violence.” Burton also maintained she has been in touch with “a number” of domestic-violence victims who witnessed Ross make “horrible” statements, but are too intimidated to speak out. “Alaska is a very small state and it’s terrifying for these victims to come forward because they’re afraid of retribution,” Burton told me.

Since Burton’s testimony, her father, former Alaska Public Safety Commissioner Richard Burton, wrote a letter of his own demanding to Ross that he withdraw his nomination. “You sir, speak and act like the kind of bully I met many times when responding to domestic-violence calls, some of the most dangerous situations police officers are often in,” Burton wrote. Ross reacted with characteristic fury to the Burtons’ broadsides, barking to reporters that if “anybody said that to me, we'd have a little confrontation because that's a bunch of crap.” At the same time, a grassroots group raising support for Palin’s presidential bid called Conservatives4Palin  attacked Leah Burton as an anti-Christian “fringe nutcase.”

But as pro-Palin forces attempted to push back against Ross’s critics, dozens of op-eds Ross authored during the 1980s and 1990s surfaced as key exhibits in the case against his confirmation. Among them is a 1993 piece entitled, “KKK ‘art’ project gets ‘A’ for courage,” in which Ross cheered on a local college student who had offended an African-American classmate by creating a statue of a Klansman with a cross in one hand and a flag in the other. “It might have been fun to see [the African-American student] try to remove the display,” Ross wrote. “Then she could have been arrested and her future as a student of the university could have been resolved through the university disciplinary proceedings.”


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: politics, native americans, alaska, sarah palin, max blumenthal, palin 2012, richard burton, alaska politics, palin controversy, wayne anthony ross, alaska attorney general, palin appointment, rape his wife, leah burton, palin presidential candid

Max Blumenthal is a senior writer for The Daily Beast and writing fellow at The Nation Institute, whose book, Republican Gomorrah (Basic/Nation Books), is forthcoming in Spring 2009. Contact him at maxblumenthal3000@yahoo.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Greener Pastures
Posted by: DrBrian on Apr 14, 2009 12:17 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If he doesn't get the job in Alaska, I'm sure he'd be welcome in Iran or Saudi Arabia.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Greener Pastures Posted by: salamah
» RE: Greener Pastures Posted by: orwellturns
» RE: Greener Pastures Posted by: luzmejor
» RE: Greener Pastures Posted by: Dr. P. Mooney
So many things not to like Appalling Palin over
Posted by: orwellturns on Apr 14, 2009 1:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I cannot believe the nerve of this woman and that Wayne Anthony Ross douche bag. To me those lilly white, bigoted people are the intruders of Alaska and all respect and help should be given to the American Indian population that truly belongs there. When Palin was running for VP, even though she didn't know what her job would be, she never talked about the indigenous people in her state, who have a very rich history and are among the finest artisans of pre-white America. Ross wants everybody to forget the oil spills!! The coast and the villagers have been devastated by it and have still to receive compensations from Exxon for having lost their livelihood by fishing.

Palin and her whole party is a disgrace to humanity. God forbid her ever winning a national election and I hope Alaskans don't re-elect her as governor.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Libs do what they do Posted by: reelman
» RE: Libs do what they do Posted by: blitzmesser
» WAR is over. Posted by: 113121
Palin bumper sticker
Posted by: geometeer on Apr 14, 2009 2:41 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would like to see bumpers with Sarah Palin ate Bambi's mother.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Palin bumper sticker Posted by: CosmoViking
» RE: Palin bumper sticker Posted by: blitzmesser
Bush-Palin 2012
Posted by: Perry Logan on Apr 14, 2009 2:45 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It doesn't matter how crazy she acts. We used to laugh at Ronald Reagan, too.

Sarah Palin will be Vice President in 2012. Jeb Bush will be the next President.

This prediction is based on the inevitable implosion of Obama's Presidency, with generous help from Republican vote suppression and vote-flipping.

Also spracht Perry.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bush-Palin 2012 Posted by: weathered
» RE: Bush-Palin 2012 Posted by: robchapman
» RE: Bush-Palin 2012 Posted by: mikeblack
» RE: Bush-Palin 2012 blajblahbalh Posted by: blitzmesser
» RE: Bush-Palin 2012 Posted by: mr. joshua
What do you expect?
Posted by: davescott on Apr 14, 2009 3:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sarah Palin is a dumb little sicko, and I'd guess she's kept some of her whackiest views to herself. I have zero concern about her ever being President or Veep, but it's a shame she's been able to hurt Alaska, and she could pose a threat to Mark Begich one day.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What do you expect? Posted by: mikeblack
don't under estimate the (w)itch
Posted by: jrmart on Apr 14, 2009 4:05 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I doubt there are many who dislike this woman more than I, but this article has so many "alleged" and As told to me's that it loses its impact. Taking a stupid joke and elevating it to the realm of "policy" just weakens the authors credibility. The "who can you rape" quote is obviously intended as a joke. Even that is not corroberated. Sarah, tall and true, is going to be a force in 2012. If she is to be stopped it will have to be with valid opposition, not rants. Wouldn't it be cool to see a new reality tv series entitled "Sarah being Sarah"? or just "The Palins"?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» a force in 2012 Posted by: foreverhope
This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
It's just a far rightwinger nominating a far rightwinger.
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield on Apr 14, 2009 4:49 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't see any scandal in that. AK generally votes for such looney tunes. Besides, that state hasn't gone Democrat since 1964 and LBJ was winning just about every state back then. Am I supposed to believe that AK is on its way to turning blue or something?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» LOL ! Good one ! :) Posted by: JenniferBedingfield
» She sounds like one of the Posted by: outsideagitator
» PUMA ? Nope. I proudly voted thrice for Nader. Posted by: JenniferBedingfield
» Massachuteses , New Jersey, Illinois Posted by: SeattlePackedSnowandCollidedCars
WAR
Posted by: robchapman on Apr 14, 2009 5:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Should Governor Palin proceed with her nomination battle for W.A.R., she certainly will lose standing among the people whose support she needs.

The Governor is human and like all of us is prone to errors, although this one is a lulu, it is not fatal.

The challenge that Governor Palin now faces, is how to name an Attorney General who shares WAR's legal views, but who lacks his baggage.

I predict that Governor Palin will succeed with this and that she will come out of this entire affair, stronger and more polished.

Nevertheless, even without the egregious remarks that make WAR easy to stereotype and dismiss, Governor Palin's views on the environment, on the direction of the American economy and a broad range of social issues are retrograde and destructive.

In governing Alaska, Sarah Palin is administering the government of an economy that depends entirely upon the extraction of minerals.

Alaska's mineral resources are important to the rest of the US and to the world, but governance outside Alaska is much more complicated.

It is abundantly clear that the policies that Governor Palin favors for the maximization of oil profits are not compatible with the sound governance of an economy based on production and selling of goods rather than the extraction of oil.

It is even more clear that Sarah Palin's cultural background in the defiantly rural atmosphere of Alaska is unsuited for the urban conditions of the rest of America.

It is still important to pay attention and to engage Governor Palin's plans on their merits. Although she may have the political muscle to dominate Alaska, the weakness of her policies will derail her as they become publicized among the wider electorate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Yup... welfare. Posted by: Smackback
» RE: Nope... Not welfare. Posted by: kogwonton
New Jersey: The Soprano State
Posted by: SeattlePackedSnowandCollidedCars on Apr 14, 2009 5:21 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wish you media types cared this much about the state of New Jersey then y'all do about the state of Alaska's affairs.

Its like Illinois East

p.s. months after the election this has move beyond the point of negative press and its just flat out press for Sarah Palin, I'll become worried when you guys "stop" talking about her becuase that when she'll be irrelevant.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Buffalo, NY aka Michigan jr Posted by: SeattlePackedSnowandCollidedCars
» What is relevant about Sarah? Posted by: foreverhope
» Palin Ad Infinitum Posted by: Jest2007
Self-destructive
Posted by: sawdust on Apr 14, 2009 5:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gov. Palin seems determined to blow herself up. The worse she gets, the worse she gets. Her capacity for implosion and self immolation increases geometrically.

At least she is not the VEEP and negotiating with Israel.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

STOP THE INSANITY
Posted by: argiom on Apr 14, 2009 5:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
STOP GIVING THIS HATE MONGERER ANY AIRTIME, PRINT OR ANY KIND OF COVERAGE. I BET SHE THINKS ALL THIS ATTENTION IS PROVING THAT SHE CAN TAKE THE WHITE HOUSE, PLEASE STOP FUELING THIS MAD WOMAN IN A STATE I USED TO WANT TO GO TO BUT I AM GAY AND I DONT TAKE CRAP

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bigotry Against Bigotry
Posted by: TimV on Apr 14, 2009 5:49 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ross is clearly a retro-bigot. Now lets turn to Blumenthal (after all, bigots can be opposed by other bigots): He indulges in bias against the mentally ill in his attacks on Ross and Palin, (going beyond a reasonable debating point that the opposing position is "crazy".) However, I'm open to the possibility that Blumenthal's bigotry here is not enough to justify the claim that HE is a bigot. (Hey, don't waste your time arguing that his use of 'nutcase' etc, is not really a side-swipe at "the truly mentally ill" - You'd be arguing against the existence of something that is staring you in the face.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

SA-RAH! SA-RAH!
Posted by: Tom Degan on Apr 14, 2009 6:42 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I pray every day that the GOP gives her the nod as nominee three years from now.

Isn't it fun? Watching the implosion of the so-called "party of Lincoln" is the gift that just keeps giving and giving (and giving and giving and giving!)

The utter moral bankruptcy of that party is now on display and even the most foolish among us can no longer deny it with a straight face. To say that Obama's will be a two year term is no longer a bold prediction - it is a fait accompli!

It doesn't get any better than this. It really doesn't

April 9, 1939

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: SA-RAH! SA-RAH! Posted by: Ratskii
» RE: SA-RAH! SA-RAH! Posted by: babs
» RE: SA-RAH! SA-RAH! Posted by: VZEQICVA
» I really does get better! Posted by: 2thepoint
» 2 the pointyhead... Posted by: zipper696
» RE: 2 the pointyhead... Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: 2 the pointyhead... Posted by: 2thepoint
» RE: 2 the pointyhead... Posted by: 2thepoint
Can we just leave Sarah Palin alone already and move on?
Posted by: Benn_Miller on Apr 14, 2009 8:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All this negative rant on Palin is only making her stronger.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Whats the big deal...
Posted by: 2thepoint on Apr 14, 2009 8:54 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
after looking at Blogo, Burris or many of Obama's appointments, this is no big deal.

But with enough leftwing smear media behind it it can be a very big deal.

What I'd really like to know is how misleading these statements presented are - what is the real story!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» 2the pointyhead Posted by: zipper696
» Hey Zippy, Posted by: 2thepoint
hearings
Posted by: jareilly on Apr 14, 2009 9:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It would be better to put this clown through nomination hearings and give the AK leg a chance to ask him under oath if he actually said any of this. Then ask what he meant. Not that I think they are too far apart on a lot of this. If there were hearings, though, there would be a public record and maybe some good video. These might be useful for cudgeling Palin, Ross and other cranks in the next election season.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Too much, already
Posted by: willymack on Apr 14, 2009 11:42 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All this craziness is getting under my skin. Let's just segue to a bizaro "1984" type world, get over it, and move on.
War is Peace
Freedom is Slavery
Ignorance is Power

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sources?
Posted by: Wendiego on Apr 14, 2009 11:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would LOVE to post a link to this article to many people.. I find the comment about spousal rape completely shocking yet entirely plausible. However, it isn't backed up very well... which people who read my post would probably point out. Alternet writers, please link to original source when writing about statements so inflammatory?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How bout another Catie Couric Interview now?
Posted by: Dixie Dawg on Apr 14, 2009 12:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Shara, with W.A.R as your lead dog, what do you see out your picture window now?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

LET'S DO SOME HOMEWORK
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Apr 14, 2009 12:32 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I checked out "TeamSarah.Org", and got the impression that her people are adopting the Obama Plan. You know, the one that got him elected. For $5 you're in. This crazy chick is serious. She has followers and volunteers, mostly young and all strongly pro-life. Not in great numbers, yet. I keep thinking that one day she'll go home and care for her special needs child and be the Governor of AK, but that's not her plan. She has to be watched. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» If it worked for Obama.. Posted by: 2thepoint
This is a surprise to you...
Posted by: mark_proulx on Apr 14, 2009 12:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...only if you've been living in a cave for the past year.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Historical Nonentity
Posted by: Revolutionary (Direct) Democracy on Apr 14, 2009 4:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sarah Palin is still reeling from the consequences of being Sarah Palin.

She'll flounder around until the big broom of history sweeps her into oblivion.


FREE AMERICA

REVOLUTIONARY (DIRECT) DEMOCRACY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Palin needs to be GUNGED !
Posted by: FLYING DOOFUS on Apr 14, 2009 9:14 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now there's a woman who deserves to be gunged while she's sexily dressed. LOL !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush-Palin 2012
Posted by: Dboy on Apr 14, 2009 10:00 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is in response to the Bush-Palin ticket theory posted above...

The Republicans have a LOT of work to do if they want to make a serious challenge for the White House in 2012. Right now, they have no ideas, no vision, no focus. In addition, the Republicans are so arrogant that I think they will have a problem running a "come-back" campaign. It's WAY to early to start picking their candidates for them, and in my opinion, a Palin+Bush offering would be a GIFT for the Democratic Party. They have a huge taint to undo, and running a "dumb and dumber" ticket isn't going to fly. They will probably discuss pairing Palin and Bush, but I'm willing to bet that the idea would get axed fairly quickly. The Bobby Jindal fiasco is a great illustration of just how shallow their talent pool has become; and let's face it--nobody with any integrity can MAKE IT in the Republican party, so all they are left with are a few goofy governors. The American people are really tired with the criminality coming out of the Republicans, but I don't think that the Republicans themselves realize this. I think they lack both introspection as well as intelligence, and therefore I believe they will EPIC FAIL in 2012.

On a side note, I would like to offer a a few talking points to be used anytime the topic of 2012 elections come up:

1) the current economic disaster should be referred to any of these:

"The Republican Depression"
"The Bush Slump"
"The Bush economic setback"

(make sure THEY are seen as the breakers, and we are the fixers)

2) Obama's spending plans (not the bank bailouts) should be referred to as:

"Homeland Investment"
"Relief for America"
"Rebuilding America"

(all of these highlight that Obama is working to address the various disasters that Bush created)


3) nicknames/put-downs to be tied to the "Republican" brand...don't just f*** over their candidates, attack the BRAND as well!:

"the know-nothing party"
"the got-nothing party"
"the no-ideas party"
"the war party"
"the Katrina party"


4) make sure that people never forget about Dick Cheney. While Bush seems to be (I hate to say it) not completely unpleasant, Cheney is a walking, talking nightmare. Let's hope they continue to let him do interviews. The Republicans have no sense of tone. They don't understand America. We can use that. The fear game isn't working anymore. We are all-feared-out! That's why Obama's mantra of Hope/Change worked so well. Obama sensed the tone. The other side missed it. Stepping into the fear zone puts the ball back on the Republican's side. They know how to push the fear buttons. Don't give them the chance to do it.

5) I LOVE the moves that Obama is making on Cuba. It speaks volumes about Obama, his people, and their ideas. Damn good moves. Many Americans, including myself, would LOVE to visit Cuba legally. This is an easy win for Obama. Even if he only gets part-way there with Cuba, it serves as a great reminder what a REAL President can do...if only you pick a good one. Plenty of material here to attack Republicans/Bush on. What WAS Bush DOING the last 2 years of his presidency?


dboy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I Hope Palin Runs in 2012!
Posted by: JewelsJ on Apr 14, 2009 10:54 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It would be a beautiful thing to see her debate Obama. She'd wink so much she'd likely implode. :D

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I Hope Palin Runs in 2012! Posted by: blitzmesser
Retired USN
Posted by: R.W. on Apr 15, 2009 11:13 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Comedienne Tina Fey must be drooling! :-))

Sarah Palin's a true 'shovel-ready' project that is 'the gift that just keeps giv'in" ... ya know?!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bat
Posted by: frank69 on Apr 18, 2009 6:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ignore Palin.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Transient Me
Posted by: Truelass on Apr 18, 2009 10:33 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Allegedley Sarah in her high school days would make out with any one with a rubber in his pocket so when did she change to Missy Goodshoes? To even consider that she has Presidential or even Vee Pee ambitions is ludicrous since she is still Miss Hicks from Hicksville USA condemning everything except her promiscuous daughter's living room antics.
Her support for W.A.R is for endorsment of her own wacky policies. God HELP America if people start taking her seriously.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Transient Me Posted by: willegge
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement