Noone will trust these banks until they have been put through a tough audit, NOT a prebaked "Stress Test".

Then tough action need ensue. Obama needs to show the bankers and indeed the country that justice will be done for the financial system AND the tax payer.

Hundreds of billions if not trillions of dollars have been wasted already. There is NO appetite for hemming and hawing while hundreds of thousands of houses are being foreclosed and millions upon millions become unemployed and desperate ....

Yet Obama shouts out his support for the perpetrators of this malignant situation, Geithner and Summers. Obama had better smell the coffee or be a one term President.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Kuttner is intoxicated on Obama's Koolaid. Progressive president? Whether it's his slow-motion pseudo-withdrawal from Iraq, his hawkishness on Afghanistan and Pakistan, his support for Bush's secretiveness, his attempts to deny rights to Bagram detainees, his obstruction of justice in preventing investigations and prosecutions of war criminals, his lavish military spending,or his multitrillion dollar largesse to his campaign contributors from Wall Street at the expense of future generations, Obama doesn't look very progressive to me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The devotees of Wall Street and their ilk should be removed from having any further access to the political process. Not as individual citizens, of course, but the financial industry / corporate influences on policy that have de-railed the economic health of the U.S. over the last 30 years must be stopped. No PACs , no lobbyists, no more political money. Zero.

Change you can believe in can be incremental, but it has to be based on a fundamental belief that what has gotten us to THIS POINT will not be sufficient ( and is not desirable) to rescue us from the ledge we are on now. We should not rebuild a financial system that has, for the mass of Americans, resulted in the financial terrorism and ruin that we have just experienced.

Rebuild the American capacity to produce THINGS / PRODUCTS in America by slashing taxes to record low levels on that activity. Create economic manufacturing zones in urban areas like Detroit, Cleveland, Buffalo, Indianpolis, and similar towns across the nation, and tax income from short term financial manipulations so that long term investment replaces speculation as the activity on Wall Street.

We were once smarter than this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

While these A**holes are hiding their piles of plunder,the rest of us are being screwed.

Complete and Total Financial Transparency NOW!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

(and his bosses, too).

Yes, brothers and sisters, that's what it's going to take and it's way past time that we began organizing one and forming a consensus on our demands. Here are a few suggestions:

1) Immediate repeal of the Patriot Act and a full restoration of all our civil rights.

2) An immediate halt to all foreclosures until they can be properly reviewed and adjusted to reflect current market value.

3) A complete and transparent investigation of the financial system before any more taxpayer money is used to bailout people who gambled on totally non-productive "financial instruments" followed by a thorough re-regulation of the industry, as needed.

4) A phased transition to a single-payer national health care system with universal coverage.

5) A complete and transparent investigation into the election irregularities of the last 10 years.

6) A complete and transparent investigation into the events of 9/11/01.

7) An end to the war on drugs and a complete review of national drug policy.

8) A phased reduction in the military budget and downsizing of the armed forces to no more than 30% of present levels.

9) Good faith negotiations with the Afghani and Iraqi people as to the future of U.S. forces in their countries. Similar negotiations regarding the status of all military bases on foreign soil, beginning with Guantanamo Bay in Cuba.

(That should be more than enough to start a lively debate!)

It's our country and it's time we started taking control of it back.

Love is a verb, brothers and sisters, let's get busy!

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Whatever his shortcomings, Obama accomplished a great deal by just getting elected because a solid majority of Americans chose the positive message. (Had McCain/Palin won, hatred would have triumphed.)

The banksters have a criminal history and an MO, but (thanks largely to the corporate media) the president isn't strong enough at this point to expose them for what they are.

Fraud, however, unravels everything. I suggest that we can help Obama by letting him and our congresscritters know that we know the score and that it would be wise for them to prepare themselves for the exposure of blackmail and fraud.

Corporations are anti-democratic and anti-American, run by elites to benefit themselves. Together we can take back our constitution and our country!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's dismaying that Kuttner calls Obama a "progressive" with a straight face.

There is nothing progressive about stealing the nomination.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It is interesting that Alternet still is in denial and avoid speaking the truth in regards to leadership of the western world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The comment by ardoin61 above, which scapegoats Zionism for the world's economic malaise, is sick, dangerous, and all too analogous to the dynamics of the 1930's that took the whole world into war. If Alternet consents to becoming a sounding board for such horseshit, I'm done with it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm sorry but Obama made himself and his intentions crystal clear last year on the campaign trail and even when he did vote in the Senate. The problem with the progressive movement for the last 50 years is no matter what, we have to shut up and vote Democrat or there will be no progressive policies in place. For anyone to tell me that progressives are now having concerns about Obama's handling on the economy or foreign policy is like rubbing salt on our wounds. We 3rd party voters tried to warn the public about Obama being a conservative Trojan horse but nooooooooooooooooooooo, we were "Cassandras" and "closet rightwingers" for telling the truth ! Even as Obama flip-flopped to the rightwing issue after issue all through the campaign trail and even joined McSame in bailing out Wall $treet, I could not stand it that people would still vote for one of these two weasels and not give 3rd parties a chance ! 2008 was supposed to be the year of the INDEPENDENTS even more than 1968, 1980, or 1992 and yet I had to put up with even a few potential Nader/Mckinney supporters suddenly switching to Obama simply because they feared Palin ! I was utterly fed up on Election Night as I helplessly watched our nation once again voted for more status quo even when it was sick and tired of it. But what pisses me off even more is when Obama and his Obamabots want to preach "personal responsibility blah-blah-blah" and tell us "well, make him do it" ! What ?!?!? When a regular citizen gets hired to do a job, he or she does it or gets fired. Why should we treat leaders any differently? In fact, why should we give them our tax dollars if they want us to do their dirty work ?!? Obama isn't a leader. He's just a weasel and a puppet for the corporate and military criminals. I wished he would improve but the worse things get and the more Obama betrays us, the more I can't stand that man just like I couldn't stand Dubya !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

In an early paragraph Mr. Kuttner describes the essence of life in the United States -- "taxpayers bear most of the downside risk while the speculators get most of the upside gain" -- but nullifies the accuracy of his summation of capitalist government and governance by immediately falling prey to a common dementia: the increasingly clinical fantasy that ANY president of such a definitively oppressive nation might somehow offer the "promise" of progressive reforms.

Obviously Mr. Kuttner has forgotten the three basic facts about the U.S. -- facts that explain all the Democratic betrayals he decries. These are (1) that for the past 46 years the U.S. has been and remains a one-party state, with charade elections structured in advance to ensure the ruling class retains power; (2) that no true progressive can possibly pass the ruling-class screening that ensures the election charade will always have the same outcome regardless of which party wins; and (3) that the one true purpose of government and governance at all levels of the U.S. is the propagation of capitalism -- that is, the absolute protection of the ruling class and the total subjugation of all the rest of us, by any available means and precisely as was accomplished by the bailout: endless rewards for the banksters achieved by looting the public treasury; the de facto imprisonment of taxpayers in the slave-pens of the resultant debt -- all this while a growing number of us lose our jobs in a nation that due to terminal climate change and the exhaustion of fossil fuels will never see anything approaching full employment ever again.

Meanwhile any analysis of our present circumstances that doesn’t start with acknowledgment of these bitter truths is at best nothing more then mental masturbation and at worst a particularly glib and devious form of capitalist enablement: criticism that conceals or obfuscates the core problem and thus furthers the necessarily theocratic and fascistic expressions of national purpose even as it fosters euphemistic variants of capitalism’s credo of infinite greed elevated to maximum virtue.

This is what we are up against and what we are witnessing in the new administration: not a savior come to resurrect our long-dead liberty but rather a master manipulator whose ultimate purpose is -- just as the so-called bailout proves beyond any doubt -- to facilitate the unprecedented looting by which the ruling class is preparing itself (at our maximum expense) to survive the forthcoming environmental apocalypse. All of which would be logically obvious were we ever to awaken from our Moron Nation stupor, acknowledge the historical truth of class-struggle, and begin examining its very specific manifestations in the post-New Deal, post-Kennedy United States.

Until such an awakening occurs -- and I am ever more strongly persuaded it will never happen -- we will continue drowning in a sea of words that increasingly signify nothing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

But a failure to revive the banking system would be Obama's Vietnam.

I also worry that Afghanistan and maybe even Iraq could be Obama's Vietnam.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

in his first 100 days our change candidate has decided to stand by the two most problematic issues for our country: banksters and Iraq. Passing a few toy issues to his progressive wing that helped elect him is not going to cut it. I refuse to make excuses for this guy by claiming he's somehow being held hostage by interests. He's made the decision. it's now every citizen for himself when the hyperinflation kicks in.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Too late, suckers ! LOL !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I may have forgotten the most important thing.

But, noooooooooooo!

However, LOL sums it all up nicely.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dont be a mole just be an American.

tomorrow April 15 its going down accost the nation.

You know you don't like it when the Dems cozy up to Wall Street.

You know you don't like the bailouts

You know you are not a fan of the IMF, G-20 or whatever new world Oligarchy is next

so...

Drop that smugness, hop in your Toyota Pruis and joPrius. We can argue the merits of UHC later however right now Washington is robbing you blind and is ready to send your kids the bill.

The future is now!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Right off the bat this article shows it's willingness to follow mainstream thought, "Progressives now find themselves in an awkward position of simultaneously wishing Barack Obama well, but feeling dismayed by his policies on some key issues, most notably the banking bailout."

Real progressives have left the Democratic/Republican party behind. Yes, the reference to one party is deliberate. The so called 2 party system is owned by the Financial, Insurance and Real Estate industries. Anyone who doesn't see this, keep trying, it will come to you eventually. As long as we debate the tired old Liberal vs. Conservative argument that is just helping buy time for the Financial industry to bankrupt us for enerations to come, no real change will occur. The planned theft of the countries wealth that was initiated under the umbrella term "The Reagan Revolution" is reaching its logical conclusion now and when they finally steal Social Security.
Pirates in Somalia? We have 2 of the biggest pirates our country has ever seen running the theft, Geithner and his partner Larry Summers.

Please consider a political party that actually cares about this country, our communities, and future generations; the Green Party, which takes NO corporate money.
www.gp.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Before you can push Obama in the right direction, you need to realize who he is and where you're pushing him from.
He is a big bank, lobbyist-ridden imperialist with a nice face, warm smile and smooth talk.
If you try to frame him as some sort of "misguided progressive", you will be lied to and used. He talked his way out of accountability for his "sicko style" tort reform, gutting nuclear regulation for his backers and voting for unwarranted spying on citizens, and even declared prerogative for the president to be above the constitution at will. He's doubling the troops to Afghanistan that Bush had, and added 50,000 troops long term plus a corporate mercenary base to the Iraq plan, and soothed his "progressive" base by calling it a withdraw. He pushed the biggest single billionaire giveaways (as well as voting for the Bush one he decried), by saying he was doing for "main street", not "wall street". So he paints an image of a bi-partisan, semi-socialist for the ignorant and softhearted, while pushing an elite, imperialist agenda.

So how would you push a smarter, charismatic Bush, who reads and do his homework, in the right direction?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

He is just persuing unprogressive policies. He won't last more than one term, so he doesn't have to be impeached.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The banks have been robbed and AIG provided the insurance. Insurance firms are the only way to replace the money. Everybody has to chip in. The only way to get some of the money back into the public pocket is to tax it away from those who robbed the banks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

As long as so called progressives keep blaming others than Obama for the pillage of our treaury,it's going to continue.Americans have a beggar mentality when it comes to their political leaders.Instead of demamding that the governement delivers services they need,they rather beg and give thanks for any little crumb they can pick up off the floor.Damn it,Obama is responsible for geithner and Summers and he is responsible for everythin they do...Whatever they do,they do under his leadership....I do not understand the basis for this fear to criticize Obama.Could it be that white people are afraid to be called racist if they do?Hell,you are a racist anyway...Might as well face up to it and start worrying about defending the future of your children.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This figure of speech is used incorrectly by many. It is not a carrot for a reward and a stick for punishment. It is a carrot dangling from a stick by a string, held always just in front of a beast of burden's face but just out of reach, compelling the animal forward. This is the "carrot and stick" approach.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm not seeing very much progressive movement in the Obama Presidency, unless it's by comparison to the thugs who just left, and that's not saying a lot.

This President has not earned my progressive loyalty. He talks a good game - he's a terrific public speaker. But he is not on my side.

The progressive agenda includes (not an exhaustive list):

* Single-payer health care. You want to reduce health care costs? Get the 35% surcharge imposed by insurance companies out of the equation.

* An end to deprivation of rights in the name of national security.

* An end to spying on Americans.

* An end to the revolving door between large corporations and government.

* An end to pointless wars that damage our national security. War against a non-nation is an oxymoron. Terrorism is a criminal matter.

* Fair trade, not Free Trade.

* Reconstruction of the financial system, not reverse socialism.

* A simplified, progressive tax code with no loopholes for the wealthy to wiggle through.

* An end to subsidies for wealthy corporations in agriculture and energy and elsewhere.

* Trust busting, especially in media empires, energy, and finance.

* Taxes on carbon emissions; you emit, you pay. (Cap-and-trade is a Wall Street give-away, complicated, and might not work.)

* Elimination of corporate "personhood."

* An end to the drug war and a reduction in our prison population.

I could go on, but why bother? Obama is on the wrong side of most the issues I care about.

Loyal opposition, hell. Progressives are in the opposition, period. Again. And we'll stay in the opposition until we stop supporting politicians who oppose us and elect one of our own.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The memories of Bill Clinton are sufficiently recent that we need little reminder of the needless tilt to the right on economic issues from NAFTA to welfare reform to financial deregulation...

...and most of the left responded to Clinton's back stabbing by going out and campaigning for him and voting for him in '96. They'll do the same thing again with Obama in 2012.

a new administration that progressives must wish well

This drivel from Kuttner is the heart of the problem with the Cult of Obama . What deterrent is there to Obama doing what ever he wants to do for his real constituency, Wall Street, when his liberal supporters will go out and campaign and vote for him again, regardless of what he does?

By 2012 Kuttner and other liberals will be saying we "must" vote for the "attractive progressive president", no matter how bad his policies are. I don't wish Obama well. Why should I? He's a Wall Street tool, and I'm tired of liberals pretending this represents some kind of "betrayal". Obama has always made it clear that he is a pro-Wall Street centrist democrat. Why "must" we support him, as his cult following insists?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

IWW labor organizer Joe Hill's exhortation is as true today as it was one hundred years ago in his day. President Obama understands the process of community organizing, and it is through community organizing that we have any chance of influencing him.

Change is always accomplished by social movements, not by presidents who act on behalf of the people from the top. Power, after all, still corrupts. In Obama's case, it seems to have corrupted him in record time!

The President has told us repeatedly that this is the path to change that we want. It's time we took him up on it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You progressives need to ask yourselves this question. Am I a globalist or am I a nationalist? What Obama et al is doing makes perfect sense if you are a globalist. It makes no sense if you are a nationalist. The cost of a nationalist agenda at this time is very high, and I doubt that most Americans are ready to pay the price. The US is an economic toxic asset for the world; our debt is worth nothing. Obama is trying to prevent the world from writing off that toxic asset with a song and dance, to buy time. I am not sure Obama knows what he would do if he were successful, he better be careful not to sell his soul at the company store. We nationalists would just as soon go to zero and start over, the shortest distance between two points is a straight line. Is the goal of America, to maintain a high standard of living for we the people or to create wealth for the few, chasing cheap global labor? As Greenspan keeps saying, the lost of the American standard of living is more than justified by moving people from starvation to subsistence globally. We nationalists believe that we can do better as long as the people of other lands are nationalists also. All we have to do is let the people of other lands define what is in their best interest and help them achieve that. Are you progressives’ nationalists or globalists?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama was a fighting progressive when he was a pol in IL and yet he became different when he entered the US Senate in 2005. How can we help bring back the old Obama pre 2005 and I'm gonna need a hell of a lot of help since I'm not sure I can do this alone?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Looks like I'm not alone so maybe I'm not a doofus after all. LOL !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Now there's a bailout for the American people, LOL !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why Not Send My Tax Check Directly to Wall Street Execs?
by Sarah Anderson

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/04/14-1

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"His commitment to restore constitutional government is no small achievement."

Doesn't read Glenn Greenwald, does he? This isn't even funny.

That "awkward position" he says progressives who support Obama are in? Let me describe it:

Bend over, grab your ankles, and say "thank you for using lube."

Given Kuttner's list of betrayals by Democratic presidents, I can only say that some of us never learn.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I too am thoroughly disgusted with the present direction of this so-called rescue plan for the economy. We need to Nationalize the big Banks and forget those Toxic Assets. If the Banks don't want them, what makes Giethner and Summers think I would want them? Those two guys are the problem now, not the solution. The money spent on saving the Banks should have gone to contractors buiding new infrastructure, and repairing the old, to provide jobs and green energy. We have to get the Country back to work so folks can pay their mortgages and grocery bills. Then those Toxic assets may not be quite so toxic.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There are two major factors that have really hurt our economy and they are linked together, making the devastating concoction that is the economy. Firstly banks and lenders have unfairly taken advantage of average citizens. Writing bad loans or mortgages has created a lack of cash flow because people are unable to pay. Banks need this money for capital and now it is scarce. Investors made these loans knowing that they were unfair, hoping that the customer would take the bait and they did. Secondly those receiving the loans should have been more aware of finance. Look at it this way, would you want someone to fly an airplane who hasn't been to pilot school? No. It's the same thing in this case, if people had actually took the time to learn about finance, just briefly this might have been avoided. Business is always going to take advantage of ill informed clients, thats how it works. If they know more than you it's easy to manipulate a desirable outcome. Americans need to stop being so apathetic, otherwise we are going to continue to get what we deserve, a valuable lesson in finance at the expense of our economy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I enjoy seeing everyone who wants instant gratification on the economy and throw stones because they would rather rant and rave instead of being proactive in working to help solve these issues. It is way too early to judge the outcome of Obama's economic plans. I have every confidence we now have a leader who is engaging, does his homework, and presents a multi-prong approach to address this issue which took years to get America to this point.
I would rather see positive efforts to ensure Americans can afford health care, that our troops get 21 century defense systems, that our kids get affordable education, and dependence on foreign oil is reduced.
Dogging a 3 month old Presidency is not my way of supporting America. I leave the flag burning and anti-American rhetoric to Colter, Hannity, Limbaugh and Palin.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The link in the article to the Stiglitz/Johnson/Hoenig hearing on April 21st is not accurate and goes nowhere.

Here is the correct link (combine the three sections to make it work):

http://jec.senate.gov/index.cfm?

FuseAction=Hearings.HearingsCalendar&ContentRecord_id=

90aa4fb4-5056-8059-763a-a45c5849b73b

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

One of the few times the former chump-in-charge told the truth was when he mentioned his enthusiastic support for what he called an "ownership society". What he neglected to mention was that rather than owning our lives and destines, we would be OWNED by Wall Street crooks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The first part of your article basically goes "we had hoped x president wouldn't fuck everything up and actually help the people, but he didn't"

"We then hoped again that the new president wouldn't fuck everything up and actually help the people, but he didn't"

and it continues

So....why are we *hoping* he doesn't fuck us when we know from history that well.. He will.
All presidents,black,white,democrat,republican fuck the people it's in their genes.. That's why big businesses back them that's why they are nothing more than a business party..Not a Democrat or Republican party but the party of Citibank,Chase,Pfizer,AIG etc..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What's next for the banks?

This is an article written by Simon Johnson, now an MIT economist and formerly the chief economist at the IMF. His blog, BaselineScenario is a really good resource. He also recently wrote an article for The Atlantic, which includes this pithy soundbite:

"The challenges the United States faces are familiar territory to the people at the IMF. If you hid the name of the country and just showed them the numbers, there is no doubt what old IMF hands would say: nationalize troubled banks and break them up as necessary."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It is quite clear that the media is full of doom and gloom. The plan is working, and maybe too well. I bet we have crazy inflation coem late 2010.

Roy
Swoopo site

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There's nothing at all awkward about disagreeing with Obama's policies while simultaneously hoping that he does the right thing.

I don't get the author's assertion that somehow we on the left are in some kind of tight or contradictory position.

No President is going to do exactly what I want, so obviously I'm going to disagree. His bank bailout plan is more smarmy capitulation and gross coffer-filling for rich people.

But I support his presidency and hope he does well.

Okay, great. How hard was that?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Find :"Facts About Goldman Sachs" on the web. most informative site.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I don't think Obama is a hard-core corporatist conservative, but he is an opportunist. He's pulling for Wall Street and the war industry now because they're the ones buttering his bread. If he's persuaded that the labor movement or some other social force will keep him in power, I bet he'll switch sides pretty quickly. Unlike Bush -- a true ideologue -- Obama can be swayed, but only by a massive, no-mistaking-the-message uprising from the grassroots.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How to turn an owning classer against himself? I dunno, tap his greed and promise him the moon if he'll only go against everything he holds dear to be divine, unalterable truth?

Sounds like a total political-fail if you ask me.

'Merkins are stoopid. Owning class 'Merkaaners are six ways from beyond batshit stoopid. But you want a dog to fly pigs over the moon.... mmkay... drugs are bad.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

President Obama alone does not have the answers. We as a nation are in denial over the real state of our nation. The economic system we live in has a momentum of its own, driven by questionable ethic, callous greed and consumerism gone haywire. This sytem will not fix itself nor will Bank bailouts deliver the real change that is needed. The inevitable collapse of the Banking System as we know it will occur with or without bailouts. For long-term economic survival we as a nation must change.

Unfortunately, the extraordinarily complex gambit of self-serving religious, social and politically driven motives and self-righteous rationalization clouds the picture. The, for many people probably, uncomfortable approach to the solution is in a space that lies between us and a new ‘cosmology’.

To begin to re-connect with that space, we need to perfect three very personal disciplines. The solution is akin to having to acquire a clean, blank, white canvas to paint on. The perfection of these disciplines is an essential prerequisite; it will prepare us for the more tangible commercial and business related tasks ahead. However, one need not wait for the clean canvas. The canvas gets cleaned as one progresses. The three disciplines are: Charity, Morality and Mind Development.

Charity encompasses both the materialistic and the psychological aspects of giving. Materialistic charity is not giving to accrue some benefit or satisfaction by the act of giving. It is an unconditioned act which leads to increasingly balanced human behaviour.

Morality demands a strict ethical code that avoids antisocial activity. Compassion should be the only key note. Truthfulness is essential.

Mind development demands practice and starts with simple attention to the present `as is'. It is a practice of passionless observation. The mind is held steady on the object of attention. The ability to achieve the focus and attention required for rational, unconditioned thought develops with practice.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The constitution that THE PEOPLE HAVE THE POWER OF RECALL? I think the time for indecision is past, the corporations have tightened the screws on THE PEOPLE, and our representatives hide! Re-enact Glass - Stegall, stop funding this debacle, and hold the violators of our financial system accountable!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You refer to Obama as an "attractive progressive President," but where is the evidence that he's progressive? He leaves Bush's defense secretary in place, plans to ratchet up the war on Afhghanistan, expresses support for Bush's "faith-based" programs, and makes clear that he will give Wall Street all the money it demands to keep those bankers in private jets until unemployment hits 50% or more. Meanwhile, closing Gitmo and pulling out of Iraq remain nothing more than promises.

I knew when I voted for him that Obama was not a progressive, but I had no idea that he was as far to the right as he is turning out to be. If no one can make him listen to reason instead of Geithner, there will be no economic recovery, and the Republicans will have their foot in the door for 2012, to come in and finish the destruction the Bush/Cheney crime syndicate started.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

He IS Being Pushed in the RIGHT Direction...but not the CORRECT direction.


you think you're going to start now? hahahaha.....Obama's "CHANGE" is nothing more than cowardice and has already set the wheels of economic destruction in motion and it's too late to push now.

better hang on....this isn't going to be pretty.


KUCINICH 2012

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Vote of Confidence Amendment will give American voters the power to dismiss any elected official at any time.


VOCA, NOW


FREE AMERICA


REVOLUTIONARY (DIRECT) DEMOCRACY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

As stated, Obama is a likable guy, but he made very bad choices in selecting his advisors. And the fact is that defending the ex-President crimes against humanity and Crimes of War, and carrying forward the Patriot Act and other so called national security BS when the attacks of 9-11 were so obviously a demolition job, and an inside covert operation is not restoring our Constitution. The US criminal invasionary wars on the Middle East that were in fact based on lies are still being pushed forward by Obama. God Bless him, but, if Obama can't do the job to the satisfaction of our Constitutional law he should move on to a job he can handle.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

JFK was the last President who was willing to take on the banksters, Federal Reserve (New World Order). This powerful group will stop at nothing to achieve their goal of total world domination. After the dust settles after the destruction of the world economy, maybe, just maybe another Ron Paul, Jesse Ventura, or some other brave soul will emerge to lead us back. In the meantime, over the next few years, my only advise to my fellow Americans is: stay close to your family, friends and neighbors; help each other as best you can. Pray and resist this dark evil.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama has no practical experience and knowledge.

He was a COMMUNITY ORGANIZER. He ordered coffee, donuts, saw horses, and buses.

He is a BIG MISTAKE. Trillions in debt will be his LEGACY (he is a FOOL).

OBAMA is CARTERS second term.

Someone please give OBAMA a CUP OF TEA!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

OBAMA hardly has a "Promising Presidency".

The author must be snorting COCAINE like OBAMA did to have that type of opinion.

YOU NEED A CUP OF TEA!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama doesnt give a fuck about change.

"His commitment to restore constitutional government is no small achievement."

Uhmm do you have something to back up that claim? From everything Ive seen Obama cares nothing about the constitution, and everything about his corporate handlers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I stopped reading here.

The country is now being run as a parliamentary monarchy, where the Executive tells the Congress what to do and it is done. Vide the bailout.

That's not a constitutional government. It's a benign dictatorship.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]