COMMENTS: 12
A Solar Revolution May Be Coming to Your Town
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.
This winter, as Congress was scrambling to pass the stimulus package, the bottom fell out of the renewable energy sector -- the very industry that lawmakers have held out as our best hope of salvaging the economy. Trade groups like the American Wind Energy Association, which as recently as December was forecasting "another record-shattering year of growth," began predicting that new installations would plunge by 30 to 50 percent. Solar panel manufacturers that had been blazing a trail of growth announced a wave of layoffs. Some have since cut their workforces in half, as stock prices tumble and plans for new green energy projects stall.
But there is one place where capital is still flowing: Gainesville, Florida. Even as solar panels are stacking up in warehouses around the country, this city of 120,000 is gearing up for a solar power boom, fueled by homegrown businesses and scrappy investors who have descended on the community and are hiring local contractors to install photovoltaic panels on rooftops around town.
One of those investors is Tim Morgan, a tall fiftysomething man with slicked-back hair and ostrich-skin boots who owns a chain of electrical contracting companies. His industry has been hit hard by the downturn, but he has a plan to salvage his business, which he explained over a drink at the Ballyhoo Grill, a gritty Gainesville bar with rusty license plates nailed to the wall and Jimmy Buffett blaring on the jukebox. Morgan intends to rent roof space from eighty Gainesville businesses and install twenty-five-kilowatt solar generating systems on each of them, for a total of two megawatts -- a project that would nearly double Florida’s solar-generating capacity. He estimates the venture will cost between $16 million and $20 million and bring in $1.4 million a year. Already, he has lined up financing, found local contractors to do the installation, and staked claims to the rooftops of at least fifty businesses. "And we’re just one tiny player," he told me. "Look around. You can see how fast this thing is going to move."
Indeed, around Gainesville similar projects abound. Paradigm Properties, a residential real estate company, plans to install photovoltaic arrays on fifty local apartment buildings and its downtown headquarters. Achira Wood, a custom carpentry outlet, is plastering the roof of its workshop -- roughly 50,000 square feet of galvanized steel -- with solar panels. Interstate Mini Storage is doing the same with its sprawling flat-roofed compound. Tom Lane, who owns ECS Solar Energy Systems, a local solar contractor, told me he’s planning to expand his staff from eleven to at least fifty. "The activity we’ve seen is just explosive," he said. "I’ve been in the business thirty years and I’ve never seen anything like it."
Why is the renewable energy market in Gainesville booming while it’s collapsing elsewhere in the country? The answer boils down to policy. In early February, the city became the first in the nation to adopt a "feed-in tariff" -- a clunky and un-descriptive name for a bold incentive to foster renewable energy. Under this system, the local power company is required to buy renewable energy from independent producers, no matter how small, at rates slightly higher than the average cost of production. This means anyone with a cluster of solar cells on their roof can sell the power they produce at a profit. The costs of the program are passed on to ratepayers, who see a small rise in their electric bills (in Gainesville the annual increase is capped at 1 percent). While rate hikes are seldom popular, the community has rallied behind this policy, because unlike big power plant construction -- the costs of which are also passed on to the public -- everyone has the opportunity to profit, either by investing themselves or by tapping into the groundswell of economic activity the incentive creates.
Though Gainesville is the first to take the leap, other U.S. cities are also moving toward adopting feed-in tariffs. Hawaii plans to enact one this summer, and at least ten other states are considering following suit. Among them is hard-hit Michigan, where Governor Jennifer Granholm has promised that the policy will help salvage the state’s economy and create thousands of jobs by allowing "every homeowner, every business" to become "a renewable energy entrepreneur." There is also a bill for a federal feed-in tariff before Congress.
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DrBrian on Apr 13, 2009 1:11 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: pfgetty on Apr 13, 2009 4:39 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When are we going to get off this nonsense of spending our money and energy and our policies all on militarism?
I guess one day we will have to awaken to the fact that Americans, through the press, have been conned into spending their national treasury for the enrichment of the military complex.
One way to reverse all this? Show the world the big con game that continues: the fight against terrorism..........and to do this, show the lies of 9/11.
Our present day militarism and costs for war are continuing because the American people still accept all of it because they are petrified of terrorism. And this is because of the lies of 9/11.
Expose those lies, and the American people will demand a complete overhaul of where we spend our money. And maybe we can again get in the game of working for the future, for the betterment of all.
But it will take the media to expose 9/11. The msm won't do it. It is left up to alternative media, like Alternet, to do it. But Alternet and the rest have all decided they will not present the truth of 9/11. Seven and a half years, and no coverage of all of the evidence and analyses done by pariotic brave Americans showing 9/11 was an inside job.
Alternet needs to change course and begin exposing 9/11, and pushing for a new way to use our money and power, before we don't have any left.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on Apr 13, 2009 10:58 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: What's holding up alternative energy?
Posted by: adp3d
Comments are closed-
Posted by: fred_53_99 on Apr 13, 2009 11:20 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: superfeduphoosier on Apr 13, 2009 11:44 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: hsr0601 on Apr 13, 2009 1:06 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In my mind, it might bring back the much-anticipated economic growth as a cornerstone.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: AngryGranny on Apr 14, 2009 8:57 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: reelectnoone on Apr 14, 2009 9:28 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I met with him recently and the systems are far better than in the past.
Florida still needs to change one aspect of the law. Currently if you are not an individual and you sell power you must be a utility company subject to regulations. What's the rub?
Most cannot afford to pay the up-front costs for solar despite nice rebates. Contractors cannot lease you a system under the present law because that makes them a utility company under present definition.
Florida needs to amend that law to permit private solar contractors to install and lease systems to people who don't have deep pockets yet who would benefit from solar's savings.
When the law was enacted this was not an issue and was never considered. At that time only utility companies sold electrical power.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cactus on Apr 14, 2009 4:16 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Nogginthink on Apr 21, 2009 9:02 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DrBrian on Apr 13, 2009 1:11 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: pfgetty on Apr 13, 2009 4:39 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When are we going to get off this nonsense of spending our money and energy and our policies all on militarism?
I guess one day we will have to awaken to the fact that Americans, through the press, have been conned into spending their national treasury for the enrichment of the military complex.
One way to reverse all this? Show the world the big con game that continues: the fight against terrorism..........and to do this, show the lies of 9/11.
Our present day militarism and costs for war are continuing because the American people still accept all of it because they are petrified of terrorism. And this is because of the lies of 9/11.
Expose those lies, and the American people will demand a complete overhaul of where we spend our money. And maybe we can again get in the game of working for the future, for the betterment of all.
But it will take the media to expose 9/11. The msm won't do it. It is left up to alternative media, like Alternet, to do it. But Alternet and the rest have all decided they will not present the truth of 9/11. Seven and a half years, and no coverage of all of the evidence and analyses done by pariotic brave Americans showing 9/11 was an inside job.
Alternet needs to change course and begin exposing 9/11, and pushing for a new way to use our money and power, before we don't have any left.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on Apr 13, 2009 10:58 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: What's holding up alternative energy?
Posted by: adp3d
Comments are closed-
Posted by: fred_53_99 on Apr 13, 2009 11:20 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: superfeduphoosier on Apr 13, 2009 11:44 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: hsr0601 on Apr 13, 2009 1:06 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In my mind, it might bring back the much-anticipated economic growth as a cornerstone.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: AngryGranny on Apr 14, 2009 8:57 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: reelectnoone on Apr 14, 2009 9:28 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I met with him recently and the systems are far better than in the past.
Florida still needs to change one aspect of the law. Currently if you are not an individual and you sell power you must be a utility company subject to regulations. What's the rub?
Most cannot afford to pay the up-front costs for solar despite nice rebates. Contractors cannot lease you a system under the present law because that makes them a utility company under present definition.
Florida needs to amend that law to permit private solar contractors to install and lease systems to people who don't have deep pockets yet who would benefit from solar's savings.
When the law was enacted this was not an issue and was never considered. At that time only utility companies sold electrical power.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cactus on Apr 14, 2009 4:16 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Nogginthink on Apr 21, 2009 9:02 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Vancouver's Games Will Be the Gayest Olympics Ever
Trial Begins for Activist Who Fought to Protect Federal Lands from Drilling -- Join the Protest
Starbucks' Cop-Out to Gun Nuts: Customers Served Coffee While Strapped




