Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Why Spain Can Actually Prosecute Bush and Co. for Their Crimes

By Marjorie Cohn, San Francisco Chronicle. Posted April 10, 2009.


They can use "universal jurisdiction," often used to prosecute foreign nationals for crimes that shock the conscience of the global community.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
What Can the Morass of the 1970s Tell Us About the Current Economic Crisis?
Alejandro Reuss

DrugReporter:
Why Are We Locking Up Traumatized Veterans for Their Addictions Instead of Offering Them Treatment?
Penny Coleman

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Does the House Bill's Public Option Kill Off the Senate's?
Booman

Immigration:
Recent Democratic Victories May Grease the Wheels for Immigration Reform in Congress
Marcelo Balive

Media and Technology:
Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh Stoking GOP Civil War
Eric Boehlert

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Obama Is Up Against in His Own Branch of Government
Russ Baker

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
"Precious" Star Claims the Spotlight
Emily Wilson

Rights and Liberties:
Ugly Truth: Most U.S. Kids Sentenced to Die In Prison Are Black
Liliana Segura

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Radioactive Wastewater in New York Raises More Concerns About Oil Drilling
Abrahm Lustgarten

World:
Afghanistan Is Worse Off Than Ever, Thanks to the Sham Army We're Propping Up
Chris Hedges

More stories by Marjorie Cohn

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

A Spanish court has initiated criminal proceedings against six former officials of the Bush administration. John Yoo, Jay Bybee, David Addington, Alberto Gonzales, William Haynes and Douglas Feith may face charges in Spain for authorizing torture at Guantánamo Bay.

 

If arrest warrants are issued, Spain and any of the other 24 countries that are parties to European extradition conventions could arrest these six men when they travel abroad.

 

Does Spain have the authority to prosecute Americans for crimes that didn't take place on Spanish soil?

 

The answer is yes. It's called "universal jurisdiction." Universal jurisdiction is a well-established theory that countries, including the United States, have used for many years to investigate and prosecute foreign nationals for crimes that shock the conscience of the global community. It provides a critical legal tool to hold accountable those who commit crimes against the law of nations, including war crimes and crimes against humanity. Without universal jurisdiction, many of the most notorious criminals would go free. Countries that have used this as a basis to prosecute the most serious of crimes should be commended for their courage. They help to create a just world in which we all seek to live.

 

Israel used universal jurisdiction to prosecute, convict and execute Adolph Eichmann for his crimes during the Holocaust, even they had no direct relationship with Israel.

 

A federal court in Miami recently convicted Chuckie Taylor, son of the former Liberian president, of torture that occurred in Liberia. A U.S. court sentenced Taylor to 97 years in prison in January.

 

Universal jurisdiction complements, but doesn't supersede, national prosecutions. So if the United States were investigating the Bush officials, other countries would refrain from doing so.

 

When the United States ratified the Convention Against Torture, it promised to extradite or prosecute those who commit, or are complicit in, the commission of torture.

 

President Obama, when asked whether he favored criminal investigations of Bush officials, replied, "My view is also that nobody's above the law and, if there are clear instances of wrongdoing, that people should be prosecuted just like any ordinary citizen."


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: torture, war crimes, guantanamo, barack obama, george w. bush, alberto gonzales, spain, waterboarding, charles taylor, william haynes, john yoo, david addington, jay bybee, alberto mora, bush prosecutions, convention against tortur, chuckie taylor, adolph eichmann, douglas feith

Marjorie Cohn is a professor at Thomas Jefferson School of Law, president of the National Lawyers Guild, and the US representative to the executive committee of the American Association of Jurists.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
SPAIN?? We could prosecute here, for 9/11. But our press couldn't care less.
Posted by: pfgetty on Apr 10, 2009 5:10 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why are we even talking about Spain? Because they actually care about human rights and the truth? Because we in the US, especially the press, is so controlled that we can't get anything going here against our political criminals?
Yes. Our press, Alternet included, is controlled by powerful forces, and may take on SOME issues, but has been manipulated to ensure that it NEVER takes on the lies and crimes of 9/11.
Alternet has decided to self censor itself about 9/11. After seven and a half years, not a word about the volumous evidence proving that the official story is a lie.
Alternet doesn't want you to know about it.
Instead, it will tell you that maybe SPAIN should look into crimes of torture. SPAIN? and what evidence will Spain have access to? Maybe Spain, or Venezuela, will prosecute for 9/11. But without the evidence, which Bush covered up, Bush doesn't have to worry.
Until the American people want to begin prosecuting and convicting political criminals like Bush/Cheyney, nothing will happen. And nothing will happen until Alternet decides it wants to do its job: look into the crimes and lies of 9/11 and expose the truth.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» +100 xp for surfreality Posted by: EinMD
» RE: Where's the evidence? Posted by: Reader in Japan
» Bentham is a vanity press Posted by: brunowe
» No link...irrelevant anyway Posted by: surfreality
» Too bad. Posted by: pfgetty
Send Calcium Tablets to Washington
Posted by: DrBrian on Apr 10, 2009 5:45 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama and the congressional majority can currently argue that they have more important things to do--furhter enriching and indemnifying against the consequences of greed their Wall Street friends and ramping up the war in Afghanistan--than seeking justice for war crimes victims and establishing deterrence. Panetta has advanced a novel, fatuous but widely accepted legal theory that the opinions of Yoo, Bybee et al. trump US statutes and international law, thereby providing an excuse for doing nothing in the face of serious crimes.

But the test will come if the intrepid Spanish court issues arrest warrants for Americans. Will they thumb their noses at the Nuremburg precedents and well settled law and become accessories after the fact to war crimes by conspiring to obstruct justice, or will they relent knowing that it will anger their ever-supportive Republican colleagues and render their heretofore brilliant experiments in bipartisanship obsolete?

Maybe we should all send calcium tablets to Washington and hope they develop spines.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pretty ironic when you think of it.
Posted by: Lurker on Apr 10, 2009 6:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The country most often associated with torture (eg Spanish Inquisition) has indicted high US law and justice officials for suborning torture.

Maybe (some) people can learn from past mistakes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

JT Barrie
Posted by: rimchamp77 on Apr 10, 2009 7:45 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We can't even prosecute beloved leader in North Korea for criminal misconduct. Why would we have delusions that a heavily guarded leader of a country that spends as much as everyone else on military power be accountable?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Spain...?
Posted by: alive on Apr 10, 2009 7:54 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Really spain will prosecute them...who cares, it won't make any difference, plus spain isn't even relevant to the modern world stage anyway. Wow, the only thing I care about in this article is how little I care about it!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Spain...? Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Spain...? Posted by: alive
Afoul Of The Law
Posted by: QQOblivion on Apr 10, 2009 8:54 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I posted this to another article, but I should post it here too.

CIA Director Leon Panetta has said that NOBODY should be investigated or prosecuted for abusing (and sometimes killing) US-held prisoners during the Bush administration.

Why not? Because the torturers all were told what they did was "legal".

My question is: Does it take a law professor to know that CUTTING INTO SOMEONE'S GENITALS with a knife is indeed probably against the law???

At the very least, those who ordered the torture or advised that it is legal should be prosecuted! (and at the very least, not made law professors, as Yoo has been!) But we will NOT have prosecutions or even investigations [in America] under Obama, will we? No, of course not.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Afoul Of The Law Posted by: surfreality
» RE: Afoul Of The Law Posted by: Basenjis
» RE: Afoul Of The Law Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Afoul Of The Law Posted by: davewuxi
The torturers were all told what they did was legal
Posted by: yolanda on Apr 10, 2009 9:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No-one has the right to be obedient.

Hanna Arendt

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sign up for updates from IndictBushNow.org
Posted by: Defenestrator on Apr 10, 2009 9:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article is completely lame. The US can do it. It just won't do it.
Posted by: Benn_Miller on Apr 10, 2009 9:49 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If we'd replace our cowards and rubberstamps in Washington with better versions and quit inventing unfounded conspiracy theories, our justice system in the US wouldn't be in spectacle land by now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not in Spain's authority, nor responsibility.
Posted by: rickiey on Apr 10, 2009 5:34 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The only entity that has either the authority, or the responsibility, to prosecute the Bush administration, is the US Judicial system. If the judiciary wishes to absolve themselves of trial, they must still hold an extradition hearing, to determine that Spain has legitimate cause to extradite. This, of course, would be equivalent to a trial by the US judiciary anyway.

Put them on trial by courts (courts mind you, not Congress), and if found guilty, apply the applicable US sentence.

Our other branches of government (Executive that had other countries do our torturing, and legislative who supported and gave the authorization for war powers) have already had other countries do enough of our dirty work.

Try Bushco HERE, or not at all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Trial for Bush/Cheney and their goons
Posted by: Pop on Apr 10, 2009 9:13 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is a rotten shame, that belongs to Obama/Holder that Spain has to do the trials instead. Apparently Obama doesn't care of his oath to defend our Constitution against domestic tyranny.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

BulldogRedemer
Posted by: BulldogRedeemer on Apr 10, 2009 9:35 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the Spanish fruitcakes try to get Bush, or any other American for that matter, on trumped up war crime charges, you will see such an uprising you won’t believe from the true Americans in this country. Who the Hell do you think are buying all those guns and ammo? Best everyone drop this matter and look to a future where we can try to unite to save this country. Senator Leahy and Congressman Conyers are so partisan that they border on the insane. Pursuing "War Crimes" could be just the final straw to divide us to the point that it will plant the seeds for a new civil war. STOP IT!!! The majority in this country are really getting fed up with all this nonsense!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: BulldogRedemer Posted by: Quannah
Wall Street Journal's stance on Spain and "universal jurisdiction"
Posted by: Woodpecker on Apr 11, 2009 1:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Wall Street Journal's editorial page( April 9-13, 2009) has been getting increasingly hot under the collar under Spain's charges against former Bush Administration officials. In the above editorial, it not only assailed Judge Baltazar Garzon but broadly hinted that the Obama Administration should pressure Spain into dropping the charges as they infringed on "American sovereignty"(a favorite hobby horse of the WSJ, as if American sovereignty was more important than any other society's_. It might be argued that Spain should mind its own business, but as Jimmy Carter noted to Leonid Brezhnev over 30 years ago- "human rights violations are ultimately everybody's business!")
Personally I think it's a severe indictment of Attorney General Eric Holder(and ultimately his boss Barack Obama's) political timidity that Spain has to step up to the plate on this issue!

Terry

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It all boils down to having a spine or having the cojones to do it.
Posted by: Dr. P. Mooney on Apr 11, 2009 8:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obviously, Spain still has their cojones intact, unlike the eunuchs in our own country impeding us in bringing Bush/Cheney et al to justice.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Torture by design.
Posted by: folkie on Apr 11, 2009 1:52 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The torture was supposed to elicit information about the terrorists, the people who were responsible for 9/11.

The torture methods adopted were explicitly designed by the Chinese to extract false confessions from people they knew were innocent.

How could our government have known that the people they were torturing were innocent of terrorism, and that unless torture was used to extract false confessions, no confessions at all could be obtained, unless our government knew who REALLY was responsible for 9/11?

And our government did know for sure. If there had been the slightest, remotest possibility of extracting genuine confessions, the government would not have adopted torture techniques that were designed specifically for the purpose of extracting false confessions from innocent people.

But out government knew full well that there was no such possibility, and that's something that only insiders, the people actually responsible for 9/11, could have known for sure.

In other words, 9/11 was an inside job.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

SPAIN?? We could prosecute here, for 9/11. But our press couldn't care less.
Posted by: CrawDaddySammy on Apr 15, 2009 5:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why stop with six...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

why stop with six...
Posted by: CrawDaddySammy on Apr 15, 2009 5:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
why not all...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Statue of Liberty must be hiding her eyes in shame.
Posted by: monkeywrench on Apr 15, 2009 8:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How ironic it will be if "The Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave" will not live up to that slogan, so that a foreign country, Spain in this case, will have to step up, show that bravery, and do for humanity what our bastion of freedom and the Rule of Law will not.

How utterly embarrassing.

But if that's what it takes for the criminals of the Bush administration, including Bush and Cheney themselves, to answer for their crimes for the good of humanity, then so be it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement