Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

DPA ADVISORY: "RAVE" BILL

By Tony Newman, Drug Policy Alliance. Posted July 12, 2002.


Broad language in a rapidly moving Senate bill could mean up to 20 years in prison for concert throwers and private property owners and a move away from health and safety regulations if the law passes.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Atheism and Diversity: Is It Wrong For Atheists To Convert Believers?
Greta Christina

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Don't Fear the Deficit Bogeyman
John Miller

DrugReporter:
The War on Weed: Marijuana Is Basically Harmless -- The Monumentally Stupid Drug War Is Not
Jim Hightower

Environment:
White House Garden Won't Make Up for Obama's Nomination of Pesticide Lobbyist for US Chief Agriculture Negotiator
Jill Richardson

Food:
Don't Be Scared of Food: Are We Being Needlessly Hysterical About Food Safety?
David E. Gumpert

Health and Wellness:
47,000 Women Could Die As a Result of the New Mammogram Guidelines
George Lakoff

Immigration:
Republican Playbook on Immigration Debate Long on Emotions, Short on Facts
Mary Giovagnoli

Media and Technology:
The Memory Scrub About Why Ft. Hood Happened Is Almost Complete ... If It Weren't for Archives
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
Disney Apocalypse: Why 2012 Sucks
Alexander Zaitchik

Politics:
White House's Ties to Health Care Industry Deeper Than Visitor Records Show
Daniela Perdomo

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Why Can't We Look Away From Sarah Palin?
Vanessa Richmond

Rights and Liberties:
Whatever Happened to the CIA Black Sites?
David Corn

Sex and Relationships:
Hot Mormon Muffins and Models for Jesus: What's With All the Sexy Christians?
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Poseidon's Financial Shell Game: Why Is a Private Desalination Plant Asking for Public Money?
Peter Gleick

World:
Is Obama Following in the Footsteps of Bill Clinton?
Jeff Cohen

More stories by Tony Newman

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The Senate is poised to pass legislation that would give federal prosecutors new powers to shut down raves, concerts, and other events. If enacted, business owners could face severe fines and long prison sentences if they failed to prevent customers from using or selling drugs on their premises or at their concert or other events. The proposed law also potentially subjects homeowners to enormous fines and sentences if some of their guests use drugs at their party or barbecue. The bill, known as the Reducing American's Vulnerability to Ecstasy Act (RAVE Act), was introduced in the Senate on June 18th and has already passed the Senate Judiciary Committee. It is moving very rapidly and could be passed by the Senate by the end of next week. (A similar bill is pending in the House.)

"The proposed RAVE Act is a serious threat to property rights, free speech, and even the right to dance," said Bill McColl, Director of National Affairs for the Drug Policy Alliance. "If this bill passes almost any bar owner, concert promoter, or landlord could potentially face costly civil suits and jail time."

Health advocates warn that the bill will endanger our nation's youth. If enacted, licensed and law-abiding business owners may stop hosting raves or other events that federal authorities don't like, out of fear of massive fines and prison sentences. Thus, the law would drive raves and other musical events further underground and away from public health and safety regulations. It would also discourage business owners from enacting smart harm-reduction measures to protect their customers. By insinuating that selling bottled water and offering "cool off" rooms is proof that owners and promoters know drug use is occurring at their events, the bill may make business owners too afraid to implement such harm-reduction measures, and the safety of our kids will suffer.

"By scaring business owners with lawsuits and criminal sanctions this bill is endangering the safety of young people, " said Daniel Abrahamsom, Director of Legal Affairs for the Drug Policy Alliance. "Even widely-accepted, common sense safety steps, such as ensuring an adequate supply of water at a dance club or having ambulances available at large concert venues could be used as evidence against innocent businessmen."

Opponents of the bill note that it has many concerning implications:

* It is too broadly written and could subject innocent business owners to enormous fines or prison sentences.

* As currently written, the proposed law would make it a federal crime to temporarily use a place for the purpose of using any illegal drug. Anyone who used drugs in the privacy of their own home or threw a party or barbecue in which one or more guests used drugs could potentially face $500,000 in fines and up to 20-years in jail.

* It endangers our nation's youth by discouraging business owners from enacting harm-reduction measures and by driving raves and other musical events into underground markets.

Drug Policy Alliance is the nation's leading organization working to end the war on drugs and promote new drug policies based on common sense, science, public health and human rights. The Alliance, headquartered in New York City, has offices in Sacramento, Oakland, San Francisco, Washington, DC and Santa Fe, New Mexico.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Republican Playbook on Immigration Debate Long on Emotions, Short on Facts
Immigration: Senate Republicans have “thoughtfully’ provided immigration advocates with their strategy for opposing immigration reform in 2010.
By Mary Giovagnoli, Immigration Impact. November 27, 2009.
Lou Dobbs, Eyeing Public Office, Endorses Policy He's Long Spun as "Amnesty for Illegals"
Politics: His fans must be thinking, 'Et Tu, Lou?'
By Joshua Holland, AlterNet. November 26, 2009.
Whatever Happened to the CIA Black Sites?
Rights and Liberties: The CIA ordered its secret prisons closed, but lawyers for terrorism suspects want them preserved as possible evidence -- and the CIA won't say what's going on.
By David Corn, Mother Jones. November 26, 2009.
Advertisement
Advertisement

 

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement