Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Filling the Skies with Robot Assassins: The Drone Wars Have Begun

By Tom Engelhardt, Tomdispatch.com. Posted April 8, 2009.


Hunter-killer drones armed with Hellfire missiles are patrolling the Pentagon's expanding global battlefields: It's a scene right out of Terminator.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Rachel Maddow Goes After the "Child Labor-Endorsing, Pro-Slavery Freak" Corporations

DrugReporter:
Why Are We Locking Up Traumatized Veterans for Their Addictions Instead of Offering Them Treatment?
Penny Coleman

Environment:
Whistleblowers Say Oil Reserve Numbers Deliberately Inflated to Avoid Panic, Appease the US
Matthew McDermott

Food:
Quitting Meat Is a Process -- Almost Impossible to Do All at Once
Jonathan Safran Foer

Health and Wellness:
Does the House Bill's Public Option Kill Off the Senate's?
Booman

Immigration:
Immigrants and Health-Care: What Part of LEGAL Doesn't Washington Understand?
Marielena HincapiƩ

Media and Technology:
Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh Stoking GOP Civil War
Eric Boehlert

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Obama Is Up Against in His Own Branch of Government
Russ Baker

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
"Precious" Star Claims the Spotlight
Emily Wilson

Rights and Liberties:
Ugly Truth: Most U.S. Kids Sentenced to Die In Prison Are Black
Liliana Segura

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Radioactive Wastewater in New York Raises More Concerns About Oil Drilling
Abrahm Lustgarten

World:
Why the Ft. Hood Massacre Is George Bush's Fault
Thom Hartmann

More stories by Tom Engelhardt

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

In 1984, Skynet, the supercomputer that rules a future Earth, sent a cyborg assassin, a "terminator," back to our time. His job was to liquidate the woman who would give birth to John Connor, the leader of the underground human resistance of Skynet's time. You with me so far? That, of course, was the plot of the first Terminator movie and for the multi-millions who saw it, the images of future machine war -- of hunter-killer drones flying above a wasted landscape -- are unforgettable.

Since then, as Hollywood's special effects took off, there were two sequels during which the original terminator somehow morphed into a friendlier figure on screen, and even more miraculously, off-screen, into the humanoid governor of California. Now, the fourth film in the series, Terminator Salvation, is about to descend on us. It will hit our multiplexes this May.

Oh, sorry, I don't mean hit hit. I mean, arrive in.

Meanwhile, hunter-killer drones haven't waited for Hollywood. As you sit in that movie theater in May, actual unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), pilotless surveillance and assassination drones armed with Hellfire missiles, will be patrolling our expanding global battlefields, hunting down human beings. And in the Pentagon and the labs of defense contractors, UAV supporters are already talking about and working on next-generation machines. Post-2020, according to these dreamers, drones will be able to fly and fight, discern enemies and incinerate them without human decision-making. They're even wondering about just how to program human ethics, maybe even American ethics, into them.

Okay, it may never happen, but it should still make you blink that out there in America are people eager to bring the fifth iteration of Terminator not to local multiplexes, but to the skies of our perfectly real world -- and that the Pentagon is already funding them to do so.

An Arms Race of One

Now, keep our present drones, those MQ-1 Predators and more advanced MQ-9 Reapers, in mind for a moment. Remember that, as you read, they're cruising Iraqi, Afghan, and Pakistani skies looking for potential "targets," and in Pakistan's tribal borderlands, are employing what Centcom commander General David Petraeus calls "the right of last resort" to take out "threats" (as well as tribespeople who just happen to be in the vicinity). And bear with me while I offer you a little potted history of the modern arms race.

Think of it as starting in the early years of the twentieth century when Imperial Britain, industrial juggernaut and colonial upstart Germany, and Imperial Japan all began to plan and build new generations of massive battleships or dreadnoughts (followed by "super-dreadnoughts") and so joined in a fierce naval arms race. That race took a leap onto land and into the skies in World War I when scientists and war planners began churning out techno-marvels of death and destruction meant to break the stalemate of trench warfare on the Western front.

Each year, starting in 1915, new or improved weaponry -- poison gas, upgrades of the airplane, the tank and then the improved tank -- appeared on or above the battlefield. Even as those marvels arrived, the next generation of weapons was already on the drawing boards. (In a sense, American auto makers took up the same battle plan in peacetime, unveiling new, ramped up car models each year.) As a result, when World War I ended in 1918, the war machinery of 1919 and 1920 was already being mapped out and developed. The next war, that is, and the weapons that would go with it were already in the mind's eye of war planners.

From the first years of the twentieth century on, an obvious prerequisite for what would prove a never-ending arms race was two to four great powers in potential collision, each of which had the ability to mobilize scientists, engineers, universities, and manufacturing power on a massive scale. World War II was, in these terms, a bonanza for invention as well as destruction. It ended, of course, with the Manhattan Project, that ne plus ultra of industrial-sized invention for destruction, which produced the first atomic bomb, and so the Cold War nuclear arms race that followed.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: drones, drone wars, terminator, mq-9 reaper, mq-1 predator

Tom Engelhardt, co-founder of the American Empire Project, runs the Nation Institute's TomDispatch.com. He is the author of The End of Victory Culture, a history of the Cold War and beyond, as well as of a novel, The Last Days of Publishing. He also edited The World According to TomDispatch: America in the New Age of Empire (Verso, 2008), an alternative history of the mad Bush years. To catch an audio interview in which he discusses our airborne assassins, click here.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Robots killing is unethical and dangerous.
Posted by: zola77 on Apr 8, 2009 12:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cognitive scientist Jonah Lehrer recently wrote a book called "how we decide" (i think) that contained some compelling information about the balance needed to make healthy decisions. He draws on a series of studies that show that a person who thinks and reacts with complete logic (i.e incapable of emotional thought or feeling, often due to brain damage) are EQUALLY as bad at making decisions as those who think and react only with emotions (absent of rational thought).

The healthiest and best decisions are made by people who can effectively combine the two "types" of thought. Most 'heroic' actions (like those of Sullenberger, or firefighters, Air traffic controllers etc.) make their decisions based on a combination of abstract emotional and rational thought. They are able to take calculated risks because they are most able to judge a situation's reality + ethics and weigh up its pro's, con's and probable outcomes as well as imagine a series of possible tactics that could provide the best outcome for the situation.

ROBOTS are INCAPABLE of the abstract and combined emotional/logical thinking that humans have and use to make good decisions. Robots are totally LITERAL, therefore they can't effectively judge what actions or tactics are more or less appropriate in any given situation.

Incidentally, this is why the (modern) psychological aspect of military training is also a problem - because soldiers are trained to desensitise themselves and ignore their emotions...the article on rape in the military the other day had a lot of comments along these lines.

Robots and desensitised soldiers are MORE effective killing machines, but they are LESS effective at making useful, accurate judgments in difficult situations.

Until robots can be programmed to think abstractly and with the same combination of emotion and logic as humans, they should NOT be used in combat. It is unethical to do so. Many scientists have pointed this out.

If you want to see what scientists have written about the ethical dilemmas here, do a search at www.newscientist.com and you should find some stuff.

Incidentally it is electrolux and Dyson that are producing some of these robots.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: True... Posted by: Cybershaman
» dustdevil Posted by: zola77
» I do not want robots . . . Posted by: dustdevil
Opportunity Cost
Posted by: DrBrian on Apr 8, 2009 1:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's amazing that we're so willing to spend fortunes to develop and build more and more sophisticated ways to kill people, but downright miserly in developing green technologies? Had we listened to Carter and worked to reduce our dependence on foreign oil, we and the planet would have been in much better shape. Cheney's energy task force wouldn't have been poring over maps of Iraq and we wouldn't have invaded, the glaciers wouldn't be melting, and the Saudis would be poorer and we'd be richer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

we can go back at least to the Battle of Hastings in 1066 and the introduction of the stirrup
Posted by: Suzon on Apr 8, 2009 1:55 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The stirrup had been known elsewhere in Europe perhaps 300 years before William of Normandy used it in his invasion of England. Military historians debate to this day whether the stirrup was the decisive factor in making William into the Conquerer. The stirrup allowed the Norman on horseback to be more effective in using lance or sword because it stabilized his position.

Whether or not the stirrup (instead of the exhaustion of the English troops who had been fighting in the north) was the decisive factor, it is certainly possible that the Normans would have seen the stirrup as an invention that brought them a great prize, one they have managed to keep--and add to--to this day.

If technology works for you (or even if you only think it does), then you will want to be on the lookout for more and better ideas. The Norman-English Empire (which includes its outposts in the US, Australia and elsewhere) has been a (mostly secret) success due to its emphasis on military technology as well as having standing armies and/or mercenary troops at the ready.

Together with the corporation (William granted his first charter to the Corporation of the City of London in 1067) and the use of law for criminal purposes (still popular today), the development and use of advanced weaponry continues to have a baleful influence on our exhausted planet.

Little wonder that (some) white men find it convenient to demonize people of color.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's nothing like the Terminator
Posted by: brunowe on Apr 8, 2009 1:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is still human beings who are designing, flying and pulling the trigger on/with armed UAVs. It seems that the policy decisions on their deployment are a greater issue than the unmanned nature of the flying weapons.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

keel keel keel
Posted by: J4761 on Apr 8, 2009 2:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The use of drones to attack people is an abomination and an affront to civilised sensibilities. The use of remote controlled, unmanned aircraft to fire high explosive, armour piercing missiles at people in homes, or travelling in cars, is vicious and obscene, yet this is what the pentagon does, on a routine basis, in Afghanistan and the tribal border region of Pakistan. The consequence of such actions is clearly horrendous! What does it say about our culture, that this abhorent practice is not just countenanced, but actually condoned?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: keel keel keel Posted by: masthead
» RE: keel keel keel Posted by: richholland
» You don't make sence. Posted by: HLbuchanan
» RE: keel keel keel Posted by: Basenjis
Yes, THAT American "dream" is coming true.
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield on Apr 8, 2009 4:24 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What I'm referring to is that I'm sure every time people watch these sci-fi movies where all these good-for-nothing hi-tech weaponry are used, there's always dreams of using it in real life. Well, Big Military sure knows how to make THAT dream come true. Too bad the American dream of a peaceful society can't come even close thanks to people's urges to vote for warmongering pols even when those pols pretend to be "anti-war". It's truly sad that a minority of us ended up voting for peace while the rest voting against a peaceful America by voting for Barry or McSame. And the same thing goes for voting for members of Congress. Even San Francisco had the nerve to vote for pro-war Pelosi over Sheehan. These kinds of votes are what empower the military industrial complex in the wrong way. Even now, despite Barry's promise to scale back on nuclear weapons, he's silently allowing them to go on. It's like labelling a dictatorship a "democracy".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There has to be a way
Posted by: colinmeister on Apr 8, 2009 5:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To make the drones uncontrollable. These 'planes are radio controlled, right? I wonder how controllable they are if subjected to very strong wide frequency RF transmission? There has to be a lucrative market out there for equipment to make them uncontrollable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: There has to be a way Posted by: J4761
Mullah Radio Trumps US Technology in Pakistan
Posted by: jbpazz on Apr 8, 2009 6:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In some regions of Pakistan, including the Swat Valley and the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA), militant Islamists have been particularly effective in spreading their message via FM radio. One key figure is a guy named Maulana Fazlullah.

Fazlullah spent $200 on his FM broadcasting rig. His signal did not carry beyond the rim of the Swat Valley, but his message reached the hearts and minds of the locals. While the cowardly Yanks bombed civilians, Fazlullah beheaded four cops up close and personal.
Consequently, he has a power base 100 miles from Islamabad and 44 Pakistani nuclear warheads. The American faith in her war toys is touching but fatal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Autonomous weapons systems already deployed
Posted by: DignityForAll on Apr 8, 2009 6:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"South Korea and Israel were among countries already deploying armed robot border guards."
NYT, Nov 24, 2008

The US military has been using "self-guiding" missiles and bomb-dropping unmanned airplanes for decades.

Just like "bots" in video games, current drone planes are controlled by sophisticated software, they do not technically need human input to fly around and attack.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

IMPEACH THE WHITE HOUSE AND CONGRESS !
Posted by: WYGunston on Apr 8, 2009 6:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Then we'll have a better chance at cutting down on those shit drones.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Drone Proliferation
Posted by: worksg1 on Apr 8, 2009 6:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Generals and politicians around the world are watching the success of the drones with interest. Unlike nukes, drones are pretty easy to manufacture and the US has no monopoly on the key technologies. I expect to see these things popping up everywhere patrolling borders, doing surveillance and law enforcement, catching smugglers and maybe even sending out traffic citations. It's a good time to be old.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Very realistic, this is now technically possible
Posted by: DignityForAll on Apr 8, 2009 6:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Robots will likely never be able to think like human beings, but it is now possible to have robots with intelligence at least like spiders. In the future, maybe like the velociraptors in Jurassic Park.

Short videos:
Boston Dynamics "Big Dog", impressive military robot, must see.

Jan 29, 2009, Daily Show interview with P.W. Singer, Brookings Inst, author of "Wired for War"

Feb 10, 2009, Future Shock - Roombas of Doom, amusing but seriously creepy interviews.

Documentary, one hour:
Adam Curtis, BBC 1995, The Living Dead, part 2/3, on the history of "cognitive science", and how scientists are manipulated into working on military projects, thinking that they are going to discover some deep truths about "the mind" or "nature". - Excellent for all science and engineering students.

The six-part series by Adam Curtis on technocrats "Pandora's Box" (BBC 1992) is also extremely recommended for students of science.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Since when...
Posted by: robert.noll on Apr 8, 2009 7:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since when is it permissible to execute suspects? I was taught that you had to try and convict someone before you execute them. What the government does in our name is murder.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where this all leads
Posted by: PaulK on Apr 8, 2009 7:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The past is prologue. Britain invented the tank. Germany made a copy. Every African tinhorn now builds a few armored "technicals" out of pickup trucks. Coming full circle, the U.S. invented "hillbilly armor" for its vehicles.

If the U.S. can build drones, Russia and China will gladly sell drones to tiny countries. Drones mean that Brownsville and San Diego are completely vulnerable to Heckfire designer knock-off missiles. Farmers in West Texas who don't cooperate with the cartel can be hunted from the sky. If little tiny drones can be smuggled across the border inside bales of marijuana, then most of the U.S. becomes a free-fire zone for every drug gang, wingnut militia and psycho teenager with a problem to solve. Our nuclear reactors don't stand a chance. Thanks for nothing, United States military!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Third world assassins
Posted by: kungfoofighterx on Apr 8, 2009 11:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These types of weapon systems are effective against the weak and defenseless. I think of them as a cowards weapon against the militarily feeble. They do save USA soldiers and airmen from exposure to death by combat, but in their current iterations can only be effect against enemies without radar and missiles. You can harass enemies on the cheap. The ultimate robotic death machines are cruise missiles. Especially the supersonic naval vessel killing kind. Slap a nuke on the end and thats a lot power for a computer program to wield.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

supersoldier etcetera
Posted by: tazdelaney on Apr 8, 2009 12:49 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
a few years ago, read a list of over 60 USG weapons projects in R&D, but the article quoted a DoD spokesman as saying that the list didn't include the really secret ones...

considering that clusterbombs are a warcrime weapon according to most of the world (except to the barbarians in the usg/israel/russia/england/saudis and such...), as they are a 'child-targeting weapon,' what with those cute toylike fragbombs of which 33milion now dot the globe... the demonic weapons developers will obviously stop at nothing to mass murder even kids for profit.

but that's old tech. as i've long said, the HUGO human genome experiment' is set to enable the creation from scratch of bizarre new organisms; just as other technologies including remote thought-reading and thought-sending, new mK Ultra dev, psych-pharma, high-tech implants and on and on begin to converge into the future 'supersoldier', an entirely remote-controlled vehicle, whether a drone-bomber or on the ground troop.

imagine a critter that is 8'8" and weighs in at 500lbs; a mixture of flying cockroach, hyena and man. when it breaks wind, ebola is unleashed. it sees telescopically and microscopically; doesn't need food or oxygen. when it screams, out pours hypersonics able to take out a tank miles away. it is a walking taser that eats grandmothers for kicks.

think i'm kidding? not at all, and these technologies are much closer than generally thought, as a few issues of MIT's tech review will demonstrate... somewhere deep in the stinking bowels of the pentagon and CIA 'rendition' torture chambers obama has vowed to continue... there are men rubbing their hands and waiting gleefully for these new tools to come into their vile hands as we speak.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How were the 911 planes controlled
Posted by: tim_s_eb@yahoo.com on Apr 8, 2009 2:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The technology has been in existence since the 1980's, the air force has demonstrated this ability by flying an unmanned jet to Adelaide Australia in 2001 way before 911 and now we are witnessing the technology used to fly the drones over Pashtunistan. See Space Daily, April 24, 2001 article: http://www.spacedaily.com/news/uav-01d.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Drones Tell the World "Your Lives Are Worth Nothing"
Posted by: Blueprelude on Apr 8, 2009 2:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The drones reflect our lack of respect for the lives of human beings in general. What do we care that we killed all of the Pakistani wedding party. We got the one terrorist who lived next door, right? To us, that is a good tradeoff. No wonder we have so few friends.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I think Predator drones are SO cool!
Posted by: AJR Journal on Apr 8, 2009 7:48 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is Yankee ingenuity at its finest. Taking dreadful tasks and make a machine that does it better. These things stay in the air forever, are lighter (therefore more fuel efficient and quieter), the operator is out of harm's way, and it can cover vast areas (in this case, Afghani mountains).
There is nothing not to admire about this revolutionary tool.
I can only dream about the improvements that will be coming in the near future.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bring Back the Duel!
Posted by: DrBrian on Apr 8, 2009 10:01 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think there is a much better, cheaper way for nations to resolve their differences than war and military forces. Let's bring back the old-fashioned duel. The presidents, prime ministers, kings or grand poobahs can face off with pistols and settle things. The maximum death toll would be 2, and had Bush and Saddam dueled the world would have been better off regardless of the outcome, unless they had both missed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bring Back the Duel! Posted by: VZEQICVA
Jerky Lebouf of the dailydirt posted his fears...
Posted by: Bearzerker on Apr 9, 2009 11:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... about meat eating robots!

where are you Jerky... come back!
the fascists have left the capitol and you can come outta your bomb shelter now!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WE'VE COME A LONG WAY, BABY
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Apr 9, 2009 1:50 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So we can launch attacks from a comfortable chair. Someone can retaliate from another part of the world while eating lunch. This is a military and technological victory no doubt about it. But someone tell me how civilians are supposed to defend ourselves while the 'big guys' play their video games. War has become so remote that there appear to be no consequences. Well none that they can see. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

remote control or automatic killing machines
Posted by: mwildfire on Apr 9, 2009 8:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
refined, concentrated, distilled evil. And yet this piece says that the military regularly brags about them. Yet another sign that we're overdue for the Bug that wipes out most humans. Something is very wrong when people can hear about this sort of thing and not recoil in horror.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Anthony D'Auria Medical Microbiologist
Posted by: Tony D on Apr 13, 2009 9:37 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you have a good scientific historical background it shouldn't be a surprise to imagine the evolution of scientific advancement. I say advancement because in the end the good overwhelms the evil. When man discovered fire I am sure there were those who suggested that we would set the world on fire. But we have been able to control and use fire reasonably. In a terrorist battle where the enemy doesn't have uniforms to distinguish them from civilians you can be sure there is going to be collateral damage. Most dislike killing but how else can we deter this kind of invasion of our security. I am happy that the government is using these weapons, for one thing we are certainly saving the lives of a lot of US pilots. They count.... don't they?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ba
Posted by: mnstra on Apr 19, 2009 9:57 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When is Alternet going to realize that all the weapons systems, spying programs are intended to control American citizens and 9/11 was the perfect excuse. Dont think for a minute that we have become a more thoughtful and compassionate a country since Sherman s march to the sea.When American slaughtered Americans. The drone will be used to attack gorilla bands in the US in event of social collapse brought about by the huge transfer of wealth to the ruling Elite.We are next after the Afgans...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

syed salamah ali mahdi
Posted by: salamah on Apr 20, 2009 12:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Every action has an equal and opposite reaction". These drones are not so costly to manufacture. Arabs & specially Pakistanis do not lack the brains required to match the 'electronics' and other SPOOKY gadgets in such drones. Locally manufactured ready-to- mount missiles are available . Satellites for 'guidance', control and command can be be hired if and when required. CIA, the government within the government should be aware of all this AND should not be 'chuckling' and pointing their middle finger at Aaarabs, Pakkis and 'camel hajjis', Dubya_Cheney-Rumsfeld style. After all, these predators are not dropping 'manna' from the skies. Wait for the 'back lash', CIA!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement