Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Obama's Cuba Moves Do Little to End the Economic War on Havana

By Jeremy Scahill, Rebel Reports. Posted April 7, 2009.


While a step in the right direction, easing travel restrictions to Cuba doesn't end the economic blockade of Cuba. That change is long overdue.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Atheists, It's Time to Stand Up to Jesus
Russell Blackford, Udo Schuklenk

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
As Foreclosure Nightmares Increase, Will More Homeowners Pay Off Their Bankers in Violence?
Scott Thill

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why the End May Be Coming for Coal
Christine MacDonald

Food:
Despite Censorship By Beef Magnate, Michael Pollan Spreads Message About the Real Price of Cheap Food

Health and Wellness:
New York May Stop Heartless Health Insurers from Dropping Coverage When It Stops Being Profitable
William Ehart

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
Focusing on Fort Hood Killer's Beliefs Is an Easy Out to Avoid the Deeper Reasons for the Massacre
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Michelle and Barack's Marriage Has in Common with 56 Million Other Ones
Annabelle Gurwitch

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Fetus-Shaped Potatoes? Going Undercover Inside the Weird World of Right-Wing Abortion Foes
Ann Neumann

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
Instant Sex: Has the Digital Age Destroyed Relationships or Made Them Better?
Vanessa Richmond

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
With Unemployment at 40 Percent, Afghan Teens Enlist in Army, Police
Lal Aqa Sherin

More stories by Jeremy Scahill

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

A group of U.S. lawmakers visiting Cuba has called on the Obama administration to join every other country in the Western hemisphere in normalizing relations with Cuba. “Most of the members of our delegation believe we need to actually normalize relations and then the details of what that means would follow,” said Representative Barbara Lee, chair of the Congressional Black Caucus, which is leading the Congressional delegation. Most recently, El Salvador’s new president, Mauricio Funes, broke with the U.S. position, saying he would reopen ties in June when he officially takes over. Costa Rica has pledged the same, leaving Washington alone in its half-century-long policy.

Meanwhile, Republican Sen. Richard Lugar, the ranking member on the Foreign Relations Committee, recently “called on President Obama to appoint a special envoy to initiate direct talks with the island’s communist government and to end U.S. opposition to Cuba’s membership in the Organization of American States.” While his letter was filled with the language of empire and U.S. “interests,” Lugar called on Obama “to recast a policy that has not only failed to promote human rights and democracy, but that also undermines our broader security and political interests in the Western Hemisphere.” Lugar stopped short of calling for a total lifting of the blockade, but his appeal for an envoy could be seen as a step in that direction.

Despite calls from some of Obama’s closest Congressional allies, his administration is unlikely to end the blockade against Cuba. A recent report in the Wall Street Journal cites a senior U.S. official, revealing, “President Obama doesn’t intend to call for lifting of the trade embargo against Cuba, which would require congressional action, nor is any specific diplomatic outreach contemplated.” This point was also made clear by Vice President Joe Biden last month on a visit to Latin America when asked if Obama would lift the blockade. Biden responded bluntly, “No,”

There was a point in Barack Obama’s political career when he advocated for a dramatically different approach to U.S.-Cuba policy than most politicians with a decent shot at winning the White House. In January 2004, Obama said it was time “to end the embargo with Cuba,” and said, “It’s time for us to acknowledge that that particular policy has failed.” After it became clear that Obama might well be within arm’s reach of the presidency, he began to use harder line rhetoric and, as most politicians do, he pandered to the right-wing Cuban-American mafia in Florida (which, by the way, decreasingly represents the views of most Cuban-Americans). “I will maintain the embargo,” he declared on the campaign trail last year in front of the ultra-right-wing Cuban American National Foundation. “It provides us with the leverage to present the regime with a clear choice: if you take significant steps toward democracy, beginning with the freeing of all political prisoners, we will take steps to begin normalizing relations. That’s the way to bring about real change in Cuba -- through strong, smart and principled diplomacy.” While Obama has said he supports “eventual normalization” of U.S.-Cuba relations, his bottom line is this: “Make no mistake – the embargo must remain, and I strongly oppose any aid to the Castro regime.”


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: barack obama, barbara lee, cuba, wall street journal, joe biden, el salvador, richard lugar, mauricio funes, cuba embargo, foreign relations committ, cuban american national f

Jeremy Scahill, an independent journalist who reports frequently for the national radio and TV program Democracy Now!, has spent extensive time reporting from Iraq and Yugoslavia. He is currently a Puffin Writing Fellow at The Nation Institute. Scahill is the author of Blackwater: The Rise of the World's Most Powerful Mercenary Army. His writing and reporting is available at RebelReports.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Lipstick on a pig
Posted by: DrBrian on Apr 7, 2009 2:45 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Are we getting the pattern here? Small, cosmetic changes in policy that don't make much difference but get headlines and allow him to claim that he's keeping his promises while in fact perpetuating the status quo is Obama's modus operandi.

Talk about putting lipstick on a pig!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Lipstick on a pig Posted by: richholland
» Paradise lost! Posted by: 2thepoint
» RE: Paradise lost! Posted by: richholland
» RE: Paradise lost! Posted by: 2thepoint
Washington retains its blockade on Cuba
Posted by: walterlx on Apr 7, 2009 3:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Allowing Cuban-Americans to visit and send money, while good for them and their relatives as individuals, is very well explained by Jeremy Scahill as yet another way Washington continues intervening in Cuban affairs.

Today's Wall Street Journal has a major story on how Washington allows people who were never born in Cuba and who may have never set foot there permission to enter and live in the United States which people from no other country on earth are granted.

Here's the Wall Street Journal article:

linked text


Thanks to Jeremy Scahill for his report!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The way I see it..
Posted by: daniel1982 on Apr 7, 2009 4:38 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
..the price for the lifting of the 'economic blockade' on Cuba has always been its implementation of democracy.

So ask yourselves this, is democracy really that hard for Cuban leaders to swallow? Is democracy really that horrible that Cuban leader (who are ultimately responsible for the welfare of Cubans) would choose to go continue alienating its biggest neighbor just to not hold free and fair elections?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The way I see it.. Posted by: ProgressiveManiac
» So what's the excuse in 2009? Posted by: daniel1982
» RE: So what's the excuse in 2009? Posted by: ProgressiveManiac
» RE: The way I see it.. Posted by: Basenjis
» RE: The way I see it.. Posted by: sunlakedude
» So tell me... Posted by: daniel1982
» Democracy my a$$ Posted by: chaoslegs
» RE:Democracy, Schlemocracy! Posted by: Basenjis
Cuba's doing just fine. Besides, when it comes to Cuban immigrants,
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield on Apr 7, 2009 7:30 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
they are given blanket "legal" status even if they came here illegally. Just look at the mess in FL and to jog your memory, remember when the conservatives blew up when the father wanted his child back and he was in Cuba? Besides, Barry wants to win FL again so he's going to pander to the wingnuts just like the FL GOP has been doing since 1984.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Wal-Mart, Target, McD's Posted by: SeattlePackedSnowandCollidedCars
» We gave Cubans everything . . . Posted by: countingdaisies
what crap would we export
Posted by: leemiller38 on Apr 7, 2009 1:50 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's remember what we used to send to Cuba; mobsters, sex tourists, and gamblers. I am sure we would do better now as per previous commments give them Walmarts,SUVS,fast food and pesticides to replace their new found dependance on organic farms and gardens. Yes, let the yankee empire roll them again and set up near slave plantations like in the good old Bautista days.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: what crap would we export Posted by: Basenjis
There is just no doubt the the US is trying to subvert democracy in Cuba
Posted by: krock on Apr 7, 2009 4:48 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even our own Statist Department says freely, unequivocally, and with a heavy heart, that were 'free elections' (by Statist Standards) held tomorrow, the Castros would undoubtedly win. Why doesn't that end the argument? This picture that has been painted of a 'people held hostage' is only true if you include the US in the picture - Cuba has long stopped trying to keep people from leaving, and even its enemy, the most powerful autocracy in the history of the world, is lamenting that the government there is the favored one by the people. We can't move forward, we can't come up a vital rung in our evolution, if we don't stop the nonsense and hypocrisy. There is no need to be at war with the world. It is alright to allow people to manage their own affairs.

The only reason Cubans aren't free is because of the United States. That's what 'blockade' means. While the US was running rampant throughout South America, decimating populations, Cuba has managed to hold it together and maintain a level of dignity. Look, we can continue pointing out the indignity and criminality of the US' actions in this and almost every other case - but why bother? We'd be adding to an already outstanding list. The fact is - there are better ways - right now. We could start by respecting democracy, truly, here and abroad. We could throw off what even members of the IMF (for dog's sake) are calling our 'predatory elite'. We could represent ourselves, once and for all, for real - we could throw off management and market-ideology. We could truly start working towards a better tomorrow for once. This could actually happen in most of our lifetimes. Anyone who can read a GAO report or a balance sheet can see that the outsized intervention of the USA around the world means there's a good chance that if the US stopped this practice of using war to solve the problems of an ancient 'marketplace' mentality, well... war might actually come close to going away. Let's just give a thought to all the things we could do that might be better and more productive than encircling island nations that have only committed the crime of protecting themselves from US market-sickness.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The big question . . . Posted by: countingdaisies
Foreign Policy Duplicity
Posted by: chomsky on Apr 7, 2009 5:16 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is one of the many instances where US foreign policy rears its ugly hypocritical head.

Remind me again why backing Saddam's regime, Saudi Arabia's repressive monarchy, Egypt's oppressive autocracy, Israel's Zionist oppressive apartheid and military occupation, Pinochet, Hernandez Martinez, Manuel Noriega and Roberto Cordova was jim dandy, but Castro's regime is singled out like a bad apple?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» No hypocrisy... Posted by: daniel1982
Cuba Libre
Posted by: shawn828 on Apr 8, 2009 1:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The reasons given for continuing the embargo are false on their face. Why should Cuba be subjected to more force than China to get it to change government? Why are we trading and conversing with nations like Saudi Arabia (which also does not have democracy), among others?

Ever watch the various protests and interviews with Miami Cubans that want the embargo to remain until Castro is gone? Virtually always it's Cubans of the very fair complexioned, who would normaly be called white. They are the same ones who were normally on top back in the Batista days, while the more brown colored folks were subjegated to doing the dirty work and pretty much locked out of education. Castro set that dynamic on its ass, hence the current high levels of literacy and education.

Is he a dictator? Yes. But so are many others we've related to in the past and currently. So why should he be treated differently? Just to appease a bunch of folks in Miami that apparently could give a rat's ass about what happens to the people on the island so long as the "right" people are not in charge there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement